RESUMEN
Data on post-coronavirus disease (COVID) in healthcare workers (HCWs) are scarce. We aimed to assess prevalence, determinants, and consequences of post-COVID in HCWs. In fall 2022, we performed a cross-sectional survey in a tertiary care hospital with a web-based questionnaire sent to HCWs. Post-COVID was defined as persistent/new symptoms 3 months after acute COVID. Propensity score weighting was performed to assess the impact of post-COVID on return-to-work. 1062 HCWs completed the questionnaire, 713 (68%) reported at least one COVID, and 109 (10%) met the definition for post-COVID, with workplace contamination reported in 51 (47%). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for post-COVID were female gender (p = 0.047), ≥50 years (p = 0.007), immunosuppression (p = 0.004), ≥2 COVID episodes (p = 0.003), and ≥5 symptoms during acute COVID (p = 0.005). Initial sick leave was prescribed for 94 HCWs (86% post-COVID), for a median duration of 7 [7-9] days, and extended for 23. On return-to-work, 91 (84%) had residual symptoms, primarily asthenia/fatigue (72%) and cognitive impairment (25%). Cognitive impairment at return-to-work was associated with post-COVID. Ten HCWs (9%) received a medical diagnosis of post-COVID, 8 consulted the occupational physician, and four required work adaptation. Post-COVID affected 10% of HCWs. Long-term consequences included repeated sick leaves and residual symptoms on return-to-work.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Riesgo , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to confirm the relationship between several parameters of exposure to asbestos and pleural plaques (PP) using data from a large cohort of retired workers occupationally exposed to asbestos in France. METHOD: A large screening programme, including high-resolution CT (HRCT) examinations at inclusion and two other HRCT campaigns, was organised from 2003 to 2016 in four regions of France for voluntary, formerly asbestos-exposed workers. Exposure to asbestos has been evaluated by industrial hygienists based on the complete work history. The time since first exposure, the time since last exposure, Cumulative Exposure Index and maximum level of exposure to asbestos, were used in logistic regression using fractional polynomials to model the relationship with PP. RESULTS: The study included 5392 subjects with at least one HRCT available. There was a significant non-linear effect of time since first exposure, time since last exposure and Cumulative Exposure Index to asbestos on the presence of PP. The risk of PP increased with increasing Cumulative Exposure Index to asbestos adjusted for time since first exposure, age and smoking status. Models also show that PP odds rise with increasing time since first exposure adjusted for cumulative index exposure, age and smoking status. PP odds decrease when time since last exposure increases. CONCLUSION: The study provides new data on the link between asbestos exposure and the presence of PP using fractional polynomials with non-linear relationships for time exposure parameters and asbestos exposure parameters.
Asunto(s)
Amianto , Exposición Profesional , Enfermedades Pleurales , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Masculino , Francia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Enfermedades Pleurales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pleurales/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Asbestosis/etiología , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Asbestos causes cancer and non-cancerous lung and pleural diseases and can also have a negative psychological impact but little is known about its effect on health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of retired men with a history of occupational exposure to asbestos and examine factors linked with low HRQoL. METHODS: Retired male workers of the French Asbestos-Related Disease Cohort (ARDCO) completed self-questionnaires that included SF-36v2 and HAD scales, questions about their perception of asbestos (perceived dangers and level of exposure, expectations to fall ill, or knowing someone who is) and their respiratory symptoms. Asbestos exposure was assessed by industrial hygienists. A perceived risk score was created using factorial analysis. Multivariable regressions were performed for all SF-36 subscales. RESULTS: A total of 1266 of 2075 questionnaires (61%) were returned complete and included in analysis. After adjustment for potential confounders, an increase in perceived risk score resulted in a decrease in physical component summary score (PCS), up to 10.7 points (p = 0.048) and in mental component summary score (MCS) (p = 0.044). Presence of respiratory symptoms was also associated with significantly decreased PCS and MCS (p < 0.001). Poor HRQoL was linked to higher perceived risk score with p ≤ 0.01 for all SF-36 dimensions. Asbestos exposure assessed by an expert was not associated with any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: All dimensions of HRQoL appear to be affected by the perceived risk of incurring asbestos-related disease and respiratory symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Amianto , Exposición Profesional , Calidad de Vida , Jubilación , Humanos , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Jubilación/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Francia/epidemiología , Asbestosis/psicología , Asbestosis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In developed countries, about 15% of women are occupationally exposed to solvents. Associations between this maternal occupational exposure and intrauterine fetal growth are inconsistent, but almost no existing study has investigated this relation by solvent family (oxygenated, petroleum, and chlorinated), although they may affect fetal growth differently. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relations between maternal occupational solvent exposure, by solvent family, and the risk of neonates born small for gestational age (SGA), or with low birthweight, or with small head circumference (HC). METHODS: Among the 18,040 women enrolled in the Elfe rather than included in the Elfe birth cohort, we included 13,026 women who worked during pregnancy (72% of the cohort). Information about maternal occupations and industrial activities during pregnancy was collected by questionnaire at the maternity ward, and completed at 2-month when necessary. Using Matgéné job-exposure matrices, we assessed maternal occupational exposure to solvents. Logistic and multiple linear regressions were used to assess the association between maternal occupational solvent exposure and SGA status, birth weight, and HC. Analyses were conducted for exposure during pregnancy and also stratified by the trimester that pregnancy leave began. RESULTS: We observed a higher risk of SGA newborns among mothers occupationally exposed during pregnancy to petroleum solvents (ORadjusted = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.01 to 1.57). Among women working until the third trimester of pregnancy, we observed a higher risk of SGA newborns to those occupationally exposed to oxygenated solvents (ORadjusted = 1.75; 95%CI: 1.11 to 2.75), a significantly lower birthweight for infants of mothers exposed to petroleum solvents (ßadjusted = -47.37 g; -89.33 to -5.42), and a lower HC among newborns of those occupationally exposed to oxygenated solvents (ßadjusted = -0.28; -0.49 to -0.07) and to chlorinated solvents (ßadjusted = -0.29; -0.53 to -0.05). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that maternal occupational solvent exposure may influence fetal growth, especially exposure into the third trimester of pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Materna , Exposición Profesional , Compuestos Orgánicos , Solventes , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Solventes/toxicidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: 3-9% of low-grade preinvasive bronchial lesions progress to cancer. This study assessed the usefulness of an intensive bronchoscopy surveillance strategy in patients with bronchial lesions up to moderate squamous dysplasia. METHODS: SELEPREBB (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00213603) was a randomised study conducted in 17 French centres. After baseline lung computed tomography (CT) and autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) to exclude lung cancer and bronchial severe squamous dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (CIS), patients were assigned to standard surveillance (arm A) with CT and AFB at 36â months or to intensive surveillance (arm B) with AFB every 6â months. Further long-term data were obtained with a median follow-up of 4.7â years. RESULTS: 364 patients were randomised (A: 180, B: 184). 27 patients developed invasive lung cancer and two developed persistent CIS during the study, with no difference between arms (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.20-1.96, p=0.42). Mild or moderate dysplasia at baseline bronchoscopy was a significant lung cancer risk factor both at 3â years (8 of 74 patients, OR 6.9, 95% CI 2.5-18.9, p<0.001) and at maximum follow-up (16 of 74 patients, OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.9-12.0, p<0.001). Smoking cessation was significantly associated with clearance of bronchial dysplasia on follow-up (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.66, p=0.005) and with a reduced risk of lung cancer at 5â years (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.003-0.99, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with mild or moderate dysplasia are at very high risk for lung cancer at 5â years, with smoking cessation significantly reducing the risk. Whereas intensive bronchoscopy surveillance does not improve patient outcomes, the identification of bronchial dysplasia using initial bronchoscopy maybe useful for risk stratification strategies in lung cancer screening programmes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Lesiones Precancerosas , Broncoscopía/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse, within a French cohort of workers previously occupationally exposed to asbestos, incidence and mortality from various sites of head and neck cancers (larynx excluded) and to examine the potential link of these cancers with pleural plaques. METHODS: A 10-year follow-up study was conducted in the 13 481 male subjects included in the cohort between October 2003 and December 2005. Asbestos exposure was assessed by industrial hygienist analysis of a standardised questionnaire. The final cumulative exposure index (CEI; in equivalent fibres.years/mL) for each subject was calculated as the sum of each employment period's four-level CEI. The number of head and neck cancers recorded by the National Health Insurance fund was collected in order to conduct an incidence study. Complementary analysis was restricted to men who had performed at least one chest CT scan (N=4804). A mortality study was also conducted. We used a Cox model with age as the time axis variable adjusted for smoking, time since first exposure, CEI of exposure to asbestos and pleural plaques on CT scans. RESULTS: We reported a significant dose-response relationship between CEI of exposure to asbestos and head and neck cancers after exclusion of laryngeal cancers, in the mortality study (HR 1.03, 95% CI (1.01 to 1.06) for an increase of 10 f.years/mL) and a close to significant dose-response relationship in the incidence study (HR 1.02, 95% CI (1.00 to 1.04) for an increase of 10 f.years/mL). No statistically significant association between pleural plaques and head and neck cancer incidence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study suggests a relationship between asbestos exposure and head and neck cancers, after exclusion of laryngeal cancers, regardless of whether associated pleural plaques were present.
Asunto(s)
Amianto , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Laríngeas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Exposición Profesional , Enfermedades Pleurales , Amianto/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/etiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/etiología , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pleurales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Occupational asbestos exposure is associated with pleural plaques (PP), a benign disease often seen as a marker of past exposure to asbestos and lung cancer. The association between these two diseases has not been formally proved, the aim of this study was to evaluate this association in the asbestos-related disease cohort (ARDCO) cohort. METHODS: ARDCO is a French multicentric cohort including workers formerly occupationally exposed to asbestos from 2003 to 2005. CT scan was performed to diagnose PP with double reading and lung cancer (incidence and mortality) was followed through health insurance data and death certificates. Cox models were used to estimate the association between PP and lung cancer adjusting for occupational asbestos exposure (represented by cumulative exposure index, time since first exposure and time since last exposure) and smoking status. RESULTS: A total of 176 cases (of 5050 subjects) and 88 deaths (of 4938 subjects) of lung cancer were recorded. Smoking status was identified as an effect modifier. Lung cancer incidence and mortality were significantly associated with PP only in non-smokers, respectively, HR=3.13 (95% CI 1.04 to 9.35) and HR=16.83 (95% CI 1.87 to 151.24) after adjustment for age, occupational asbestos exposure and smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: ARDCO study was the first to study this association considering equal asbestos exposure, and more specifically, our study is the first to test smoking as an effect modifier, so comparison with scientific literature is difficult. Our results seem to consolidate the hypothesis that PP may be an independent risk factor for lung cancer but they must be interpreted with caution.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term predictors of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) decline. METHODS: A longitudinal study in 110 bakers in 4 industrial bakeries and 38 non-exposed workers was conducted at the workplace with a mean of 3.3 visits per subject over a period of 13 years and a mean duration of follow-up of 6 years in bakers and 8 years in non-exposed subjects. A respiratory health questionnaire was administered; occupational allergen skin prick tests, spirometry and a methacholine bronchial challenge test were performed at each visit. In each bakery, full-shift dust samples of the inhalable fraction were obtained in order to assess the exposure of each job assignment. The repeated measurements of BHR and FEV1 were analyzed using mixed effects logistic and linear regression models in subjects seen at least twice. RESULTS: BHR, respiratory symptoms and their simultaneous occurrence depended on the duration of exposure. FEV1 significantly decreased with duration of exposure and BHR at a preceding visit. This result persisted when adjusting for the effect of BHR at the current visit. The measured exposure levels were not a significant predictor for any outcome. Occupational sensitization was only a predictor of a decline in FEV1 when duration of exposure was not included. CONCLUSION: In flour-exposed industrial bakers, length of exposure and smoking are long-term determinants of BHR and of the decrease in FEV1. BHR at a preceding visit predicted lower FEV1 even when accounting for the effect of BHR at the current visit.
Asunto(s)
Hiperreactividad Bronquial/epidemiología , Hiperreactividad Bronquial/fisiopatología , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Polvo , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight chemicals constitute one of the major causes of occupational allergies. European legislation on chemicals recommends limiting the use of in vivo models for assessing the sensitizing potential of chemicals, and encourages the development of integrated alternative methods. An in vitro mouse model of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) that showed good accuracy (75%) and sensitivity (69%) has previously been developed to assess the sensitizing potential of chemicals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of BMDCs to activate T cells (TCs) in vitro. METHODS: BMDCs pre-exposed to the reference sensitizer ammonium hexachloroplatinate (AHCP) were co-cultured with different subpopulations of TCs. TC activation was assessed by surface marker expression, proliferation, and cytokine release. RESULTS: The results showed significant activation of TCs co-cultured with dendritic cells pre-exposed to AHCP as evaluated by CD124 expression, proliferation, and cytokine secretion. Moreover, the response of TCs appeared to be Th2-oriented. Naive TCs were shown to be involved in this response, and the removal of regulatory TCs did not improve the cell response. CONCLUSIONS: The BMDCs used in this previously developed model appear to have the ability to activate TCs, confirming that the BMDC model represents a reliable assay for assessing the sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Cloruros/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Activación de Linfocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos de Platino/inmunología , Alérgenos/farmacología , Animales , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Cloruros/farmacología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Compuestos de Platino/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the prevalence of occupational exposure to asbestos and crystalline silica according to histological types of lung cancer and age at diagnosis. METHODS: CaProMat study is a pooled case-only study conducted between 1996 and 2011. The current study consisted of 6521 lung cancer cases. Occupational exposure to asbestos and crystalline silica was assessed by two Job-Exposure Matrices. A weighted prevalence of exposure was derived and compared according to histological types and age at diagnosis. RESULTS: There was no difference of weighted prevalence of exposure to asbestos and crystalline silica according to histological types of lung cancer. There was a statistically significant difference of weighted prevalence of exposure to asbestos and crystalline silica according to age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the limited clinical importance of the difference, neither the histological type, nor the age at diagnosis can be used as an indicator for the occupational exposure to asbestos or crystalline silica.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/análisis , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenotipo , Dióxido de Silicio/análisis , Amianto/toxicidad , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Quebec/epidemiología , Dióxido de Silicio/toxicidadRESUMEN
Occupational exposure constitutes a common risk factor for lung cancer. We observed molecular alterations in 73% of never-smokers, 35% of men and 8% of women were exposed to at least one occupational carcinogen. We report herein associations between molecular patterns and occupational exposure.BioCAST was a cohort study of lung cancer in never-smokers that reported risk factor exposure and molecular patterns. Occupational exposure was assessed via a validated 71-item questionnaire. Patients were categorised into groups that were unexposed and exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), asbestos, silica, diesel exhaust fumes (DEF), chrome and paints. Test results were recorded for EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF and PIK3 mutations, and ALK alterations.Overall, 313 out of 384 patients included in BioCAST were analysed. Asbestos-exposed patients displayed a significantly lower rate of EGFR mutations (20% versus 44%, p=0.033), and a higher rate of HER2 mutations (18% versus 4%, p=0.084). ALK alterations were not associated with any occupational carcinogens. The DEF-exposed patients were diagnosed with a BRAF mutation in 25% of all cases. Chrome-exposed patients exhibited enhanced HER2 and PIK3 mutation frequency.Given its minimal effects in the subgroups, we conclude that occupational exposure slightly affects the molecular pattern of lung cancers in never-smokers. In particular, asbestos-exposed patients have a lower chance of EGFR mutations.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amianto/efectos adversos , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Francia , Gasolina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To detect new hazards ("signals"), occupational health monitoring systems mostly rest on the description of exposures in the jobs held and on reports by medical doctors; these are subject to declarative bias. Our study aims to assess whether job-exposure matrices (JEMs) could be useful tools for signal detection by improving exposure reporting. METHODS: Using the French national occupational disease surveillance and prevention network (RNV3P) data from 2001 to 2011, we explored the associations between disease and exposure prevalence for 3 well-known pathology/exposure couples and for one debatable couple. We compared the associations measured when using physicians' reports or applying the JEMs, respectively, for these selected diseases and across non-selected RNV3P population or for cases with musculoskeletal disorders, used as two reference groups; the ratio of exposure prevalences according to the two sources of information were computed for each disease category. RESULTS: Our population contained 58,188 subjects referred with pathologies related to work. Mean age at diagnosis was 45.8 years (95% CI 45.7; 45.9), and 57.2% were men. For experts, exposure ratios increase with knowledge on exposure causality. As expected, JEMs retrieved more exposed cases than experts (exposure ratios between 12 and 194), except for the couple silica/silicosis, but not for the MSD control group (ratio between 0.2 and 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: JEMs enhanced the number of exposures possibly linked with some conditions, compared to experts' assessment, relative to the whole database or to a reference group; they are less likely to suffer from declarative bias than reports by occupational health professionals.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Guardia , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Hematológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Salud Laboral , Ocupaciones , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Sistémica , SilicosisRESUMEN
Background: Asbestos is known to be an independent risk factor for lung and pleural cancers. However, to date, little attention has been paid to the psychological effects of asbestos exposure among exposed subjects. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of anxious and depressive symptoms among >2000 French participants of the Asbestos-Related Diseases Cohort (ARDCO), 6 years after their inclusion, to identify the risk factors associated with those anxious and depressive symptoms and to evaluate the impact of the asbestos-risk perception. Methods: The ARDCO was constituted in four regions of France between October 2003 and December 2005, by including former asbestos workers. Between 2011 and 2012, participants of the ARDCO program were invited to undergo another chest CT scan 6 years after the previous scan. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires including asbestos exposure assessment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), asbestos-risk perception and self-perception of asbestos-related diseases. Results: Among the 2225 participants, 2210 fully completed questionnaires were collected and analyzed. The prevalence of symptoms of probable anxiety and probable depression was 19.7% and 9.9%, respectively. The risk of anxious and depressive symptoms was independently associated with self-perception of the intensity of asbestos exposure, asbestos-risk perception and self-perception of asbestos-related diseases. Conclusion: The results obtained in this large study confirm that previously asbestos-exposed subjects are likely to develop anxious and depressive symptoms. Finally, implications related to the prevention of anxiety and depression among asbestos-exposed workers is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Asbestosis/epidemiología , Asbestosis/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Autoimagen , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Causalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Our study aimed at analyzing incidence and mortality from esophageal cancer within a cohort of workers with previous occupational asbestos exposure (ARDCo Program). METHODS: A 10-year follow-up study was conducted in the 14 515 male subjects included in this program between October 2003 and December 2005. Follow-up began when exposure stopped. Asbestos exposure was analyzed by industrial hygienists using data from a standardized questionnaire. The Cox model was used, with age as the time axis variable adjusted for smoking, time since first exposure (TSFE) and cumulative exposure index (CEI) of exposure to asbestos. RESULTS: We reported a significant dose-response relationship between CEI of exposure to asbestos and esophageal cancer, in both incidence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.58), and mortality (HR 1.40, [95%CI 1.12-1.75]). CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study suggests the existence of a relationship between asbestos exposure and cancer of the esophagus.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/toxicidad , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are still uncertainties regarding the respective prevalence, diagnosis and management of occupational asthma (OA) and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). There is as yet no standardized methodology to differentiate their diagnosis. A proper management of both OA and WEA requires tools for a good phenotyping in terms of control, severity and quality of life in order to propose case-specific therapeutical and preventive measures. Moreover, there is a lack of knowledge concerning their actual costs. METHODS: This project aims at comparing 3 groups of asthmatic subjects at work: subjects with OA, with WEA, and with non-work-related asthma (NWRA) in terms of control, severity and quality of life on the one hand, and estimating the prevalence of OA, WEA and NWRA in active workers and the economic costs of OA and WEA, on the other hand. Control will be assessed using the Asthma Control Test questionnaire and the daily Peak Exploratory Flow variability, severity from the treatment level, and quality of life using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. A first step will be to apply a standardized diagnosis procedure of WEA and OA. This study includes an epidemiological part in occupational health services by volunteering occupational physicians, and a clinical case-study based on potentially asthmatic subjects referred to ten participating University Hospital Occupational Diseases Departments (UHODD) because of a suspected WRA. The subjects' characterization with respect to OA and WEA is organized in three steps. In Step 1 (epidemiological part), occupational physicians screen for potentially actively asthmatics through a questionnaire given to workers seen in mandatory medical visit. In step 2 (both parts), the subjects with a suspicion of work-related respiratory symptoms answer a detailed questionnaire and perform a two-week OASYS protocol enabling us, using a specifically developed algorithm, to classify them into probably NWRA, suspected OA, suspected WEA. The two latter groups are referred to UHODD for a final harmonized diagnosis (step 3). Finally, direct and indirect disease-related costs during the year preceding the diagnosis will be explored among WRA cases, as well as these costs and the intangible costs, during the year following the diagnosis. DISCUSSION: This project is an attempt to obtain a global picture of occupational asthma in France thanks to a multidisciplinary approach.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Asma/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Asma/economía , Asma/etiología , Asma Ocupacional/economía , Protocolos Clínicos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several countries have built databases of occupational hygiene measurements. In France, COLCHIC and SCOLA co-exist, started in 1987 and 2007, respectively. METHODS: A descriptive comparison of the content of the two databases was carried out during the period 1987-2012, including variables, workplaces and agents, as well as exposure levels. RESULTS: COLCHIC and SCOLA contain, respectively, 841,682 (670 chemicals) and 152,486 records (70). They cover similar industries and occupations, and contain the same ancillary information. Across 17 common agents with >500 samples, the ratio of the median concentration in COLCHIC to the median concentration in SCOLA was 3.45 [1.03-14.3] during 2007-2012. This pattern remained when stratified by industry, task, and occupation, but was attenuated when restricted to similar sampling duration. CONCLUSIONS: COLCHIC and SCOLA represent a considerable source of information, but result from different purposes (prevention, regulatory). Potential differences due to strategies should evaluated when interpreting data from these databases.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Bases de Datos Factuales , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Polvo/análisis , Francia , Humanos , Industrias , Plomo/análisis , Ocupaciones , Compuestos Orgánicos/análisis , Cuarzo , MaderaRESUMEN
Lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) (fewer than 100 cigarettes in lifetime) is considered as a distinct entity and harbours an original molecular profile. However, the epidemiological and molecular features of LCINS in Europe remain poorly understood. All consecutive newly diagnosed LCINS patients were included in this prospective observational study by 75 participating centres during a 14-month period. Each patient completed a detailed questionnaire about risk factor exposure. Biomarker and pathological analyses were also collected. We report the main descriptive overall results with a focus on sex differences. 384 patients were included: 65 men and 319 women. 66% had been exposed to passive smoking (significantly higher among women). Definite exposure to main occupational carcinogens was significantly higher in men (35% versus 8% in women). A targetable molecular alteration was found in 73% of patients (without any significant sex difference): EGFR in 51%, ALK in 8%, KRAS in 6%, HER2 in 3%, BRAF in 3%, PI3KCA in less than 1%, and multiple in 2%. We present the largest and most comprehensive LCINS analysis in a European population. Physicians should track occupational exposure in men (35%), and a somatic molecular alteration in both sexes (73%).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Anciano , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Carcinógenos , Estudios de Cohortes , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Francia , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/genética , Exposición Profesional , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco , Factores de Transcripción/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to estimate the incidence of digestive cancers within a cohort of asbestos-exposed workers. METHODS: Our study was based on a cohort of 2024 participants occupationally exposed to asbestos. The incidence of digestive cancers was calculated from 1 January 1978 to 31 December 2009 and compared with levels among the local general population using Standardised Incidence Ratios (SIRs). Asbestos exposure was assessed using the company's job-exposure matrix. RESULTS: 119 cases of digestive cancer were observed within our cohort, for an expected number of 77 (SIR=1.54 (1.28 to 1.85)). A significantly elevated incidence was observed for peritoneal mesothelioma, particularly in women. Significantly elevated incidences were also observed among men for: all digestive cancers, even when excluding peritoneal mesothelioma (SIR=1.50 (1.23 to 1.82)), oesophageal cancer (SIR=1.67 (1.08 to 2.47)) and liver cancer (SIR=1.85 (1.09 to 2.92)). Concerning colorectal cancer, a significant excess of risk was observed for men with exposure duration above 25â years (SIR=1.75 (1.05 to 2.73)). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in favour of a link between long-duration asbestos exposure and colorectal cancer in men. They also suggest a relationship between asbestos exposure and cancer of the oesophagus in men. Finally, our results suggest a possible association with small intestine and liver cancers in men.