Aortic dissection associated with penetration of a spinal pedicle screw: a case report and review of the literature.

A 30-year-old male underwent a corrective posterior instrumented spinal fusion for scoliosis. Six years later, he was found to have an aortic dissection after aortic penetration of a spinal pedicle screw. We review the literature, including diagnostic modalities, and treatment decision-making for this unusual complication.

An Emergent Nexus between Striae and Thoracic Aortic Dissection.

Current approaches to stratify the risk for disease progression in thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) lack precision, which hinders clinical decision making. Connective tissue phenotyping of children with TAA previously identified the association between skin striae and increased rate of aortic dilation. The objective of this study was to analyze associations between connective tissue abnormalities and clinical endpoints in adults with aortopathy. Participants with TAA or aortic dissection (TAD) and trileaflet aortic valve were enrolled from 2016 to 2019 in the setting of cardiothoracic surgical care. Data were ascertained by structured interviews with participants. The mean age among 241 cases was 61 ± 13 years. Eighty (33%) had history of TAD. While most participants lacked a formal syndromic diagnosis clinically, connective tissue abnormalities were identified in 113 (47%). This included 20% with abdominal hernia and 13% with skin striae in atypical location. In multivariate analysis, striae and hypertension were significantly associated with TAD. Striae were associated with younger age of TAD or prophylactic aortic surgery. Striae were more frequent in TAD cases than age- and sex-matched controls. Thus, systemic features of connective tissue dysfunction were prevalent in adults with aortopathy. The emerging nexus between striae and aortopathy severity creates opportunities for clinical stratification and basic research.

Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Mycotic Aneurysms and Infected Aortic Grafts Using Allograft.

BACKGROUND: Mycotic aneurysm of the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta and infection of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic grafts are challenging problems with high mortality. In situ reconstruction with cryopreserved allograft (CPA) avoids placement of prosthetic material in an infected field and avoids suppressive antibiotics or autologous tissue coverage. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with infection of a thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic graft or mycotic aneurysm underwent resection and replacement with CPA from 2006 to 2016. Intravenous antibiotics were continued postoperatively for 6 weeks. Long-term suppressive antibiotics were uncommonly used (8 patients). Follow-up imaging occurred at 6, 18, and 42 months postoperatively. Initial follow-up was 93% complete. RESULTS: Men comprised 64% of the cohort. The mean age was 63 ± 14 years. The procedures performed included reoperations in 37 patients; replacement of the aortic root, ascending aorta, or transverse arch in 19; replacement of the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta in 27; and extensive replacement of the ascending, arch, and descending or thoracoabdominal aorta in 4. Intraoperative cultures revealed most commonly Staphylococcus (24%), Enterococcus (12%), Candida (6%), and gram-negative rods (14%). Operative mortality was 8%, stroke was 4%, paralysis was 2%, hemodialysis was 6%, and respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy was 6%. Early reoperation for pseudoaneurysm of the CPA was necessary in 4 patients. One-, 2-, and 5-year survival was 84%, 76%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection and in situ reconstruction with CPA avoids placing prosthetic material in an infected field and provides good early and midterm outcomes. However, early postoperative imaging is necessary given the risk of pseudoaneurysm formation.

Long-term survival, valve durability, and reoperation for 4 aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term results of aortic root procedures combined with ascending aorta replacement for aneurysms, using 4 surgical strategies. METHODS: From January 1995 to January 2011, 957 patients underwent 1 of 4 aortic root procedures: valve preservation (remodeling or modified reimplantation, n = 261); composite biologic graft (n = 297); composite mechanical graft (n = 156); or allograft root (n = 243). RESULTS: Seven deaths occurred (0.73%), none after valve-preserving procedures, and 13 strokes (1.4%). Composite grafts exhibited higher gradients than allografts or valve preservation, but the latter 2 exhibited more aortic regurgitation (2.7% biologic and 0% mechanical composite grafts vs 24% valve-preserving and 19% allografts at 10 years). Within 2 to 5 years, valve preservation exhibited the least left ventricular hypertrophy, allograft replacement the greatest; however, valve preservation had the highest early risk of reoperation, allograft replacement the lowest. Patients receiving allografts had the highest risk of late reoperation (P < .05), and those receiving composite mechanical grafts and valve preservation had the lowest. Composite bioprosthesis patients had the highest risk of late death (57% at 15 years vs 14%-26% for the remaining procedures, P < .0001), because they were substantially older and had more comorbidities (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: These 4 aortic root procedures, combined with ascending aorta replacement, provide excellent survival and good durability. Valve-preserving and allograft procedures have the lowest gradients and best ventricular remodeling, but they have more late regurgitation, and likely, less risk of valve-related complications, such as bleeding, hemorrhage, and endocarditis. Despite the early risk of reoperation, we recommend valve-preserving procedures for young patients when possible. Composite bioprostheses are preferable for the elderly.

"Supercharged" isoperistaltic colon interposition for long-segment esophageal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: When the stomach is not available, long-segment esophageal reconstruction remains a surgical challenge. Since 2005, we have used a "supercharged" isoperistaltic colon interposition conduit for long-segment esophageal reconstruction that reestablishes a dual blood supply. METHODS: An institutional database search of 449 patients who underwent esophagectomy from 2005 to 2012 identified 11 consecutive patients who underwent long-segment esophageal reconstruction using an isoperistaltic supercharged right (n=9) or left (n=2) colon conduit. All conduits were routed through the anterior mediastinum, maintaining the middle colic (right) or ascending left colic vessels (left) in situ, with reimplantation of the ileocolic vessels (right) or middle colic vessels (left) into the left internal thoracic artery and brachiocephalic vein to improve distal conduit blood flow. RESULTS: Patients were a mean age of 64 years (range, 47 to 76 years). Seven patients had a history of malignancy and 4 had a benign process. The stomach was unavailable for reconstruction due to prior gastric operations (n=9) or neoplastic involvement (n=2). All reimplanted vessels demonstrated excellent flow by Doppler evaluation. Esophagocolonic healing was successful in all patients; however, 1 patient required a temporary stent. CONCLUSIONS: Supercharged isoperistaltic colon interposition appears to be an excellent option for the challenging situation where long-segment esophageal reconstruction is needed and the stomach is not available. The additional effort required to reestablish a dual blood supply appears justified to minimize ischemic-related morbidity. Unlike long-segment small bowel "supercharged" techniques, adequate blood supply to the distal conduit may still be present in case thrombosis of the reimplanted vessels occurs.