A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Intraoperative Anesthetic Therapies for Analgesic Efficacy and Morphine Consumption Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative anesthetic therapies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) regarding postoperative analgesic efficacy and morphine consumption by conducting a systematic literature search. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of TKA using various anesthetic therapies were identified from various databases from conception through December 31, 2021. A network meta-analysis of relevant literature was performed to investigate which treatment showed better outcomes. In total, 40 trials were included in this study. RESULTS: Surface under the cumulative ranking curve showed local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) with saphenous nerve block (SNB) to produce the best pain relief on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 2 and the best reduction of morphine consumption on PODs 1 and 3. However, femoral nerve block showed the largest effect on pain relief on POD 3, and liposomal bupivacaine showed the largest effect on reduction of morphine consumption on POD 2. CONCLUSIONS: According to this network meta-analysis, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that LIA with SNB provided the best analgesic effect after TKA. Furthermore, patients receiving LIA with SNB had the lowest consumption of morphine. Although femoral nerve block resulted in better pain relief on POD 3, LIA with SNB could be selected first when trying to reduce morphine consumption or increase early ambulation.

Risk of revision in UKA versus HTO: a nationwide propensity score-matched study.

INTRODUCTION: Our study aims to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors for subsequent revision in patients treated with UKA compared with those treated with HTO. METHODS: In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2017. We compared patients who had undergone UKA or HTO as the primary surgical procedure longer than two years prior. We used multivariable logistic regression models to compare risk of revision between the groups after propensity matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Revision was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after primary UKA or HTO. RESULTS: In this study, 73,902 patients with UKA and 72,215 patients with HTO were identified after applying IPTW. The risk of revision during the entire study period was higher for patients with HTO than for patients with UKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42). Kaplan-Meier 8-years survival was 96.8% in the UKA group and 95.1% in the HTO group. Patients with HTO who were at higher risk of revision had advanced age (60-69 years [HR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.76-2.67] and 70-79 years [HR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.81-4.62]), female sex (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.66), CHF (HR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.25-7.78), COPD (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.34-2.10), PVD (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-2.78), and CVA or TIA (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.13-3.08) compared with those with UKA. CONCLUSION: Risk of revision was higher for patients with HTO than for patients with UKA. Risk factors for subsequent revision in patients with HTO were advanced age (60-69, 70-79), female sex, and comorbidities such as CHF, COPD, PVD, CVA, or TIA. However, orthopedic surgeons should also consider that TKA conversion from UKA has higher risk of revision than TKA conversion from HTO before choosing between UKA and HTO.

Bone healing on serial plain radiographs occurs slowly but adequately after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone graft.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate osteotomy gap filling rates on serial plain radiographs, and to evaluate whether alignment correction is maintained after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) using a locking plate without bone graft. METHODS: Between March 2014 and June 2017, MOWHTO was performed without bone graft regardless of gap size. Radiographs were taken preoperatively, postoperatively, at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Radiographic examinations included a weight bearing long-standing anteroposterior (AP) view of the whole lower extremity, as well as, the AP, lateral, and both oblique views of the knee. Bone healing was measured on the medial oblique view of the knee. The postoperative alignment correction and its maintenance were assessed using the three radiologic parameters of the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) on the weight-bearing long-standing AP view of the lower extremity. RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients underwent MOWHTO, but three patients failed to follow-up for more than 24 months. A total of 49 patients were assessed in this study. The median opening gap height was 10.0 mm (IQR, 8.0-12.0; range, 7-20). On immediate post-operative radiographs, the mean gap filling was 31.4 ± 3.6%. After 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, the mean gap filling rates increased to 38.7 ± 4.4%, 51.4 ± 6.6%, 66.5 ± 5.1%, 84.8 ± 7.0%, 92.4 ± 5.6%, and 97.8 ± 2.3%, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between all the follow-up evaluations (P < 0.001). Statistical differences in the WBL ratio, HKAA, and MPTA were observed between preoperatively and 1 month after surgery (P < 0.001). The mean PTSA increased significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively (P < 0.001). However, no statistical differences were found between the post-operative follow-up radiographs performed for these four values. CONCLUSION: MOWHTO using a locking plate without bone graft achieved at least 90% bone healing and had no loss in correction at 2 years postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Risk of stroke after unilateral or bilateral TKA (simultaneous and staged without discharge) in 327,438 matched patients using data from the National Health Insurance Claims for South Korea.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors of stroke in patients treated with bilateral TKA compared with patients with unilateral TKA. METHODS: In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we compared patients undergoing unilateral TKA or bilateral TKA using data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2017 and included patients older than 40 years of age who underwent primary TKA by the index date as documented primary diagnosis and first additional diagnosis without a history of stroke during the preceding 1 year. We used matched Cox regression models to compare the incidence rate and risk factors of newly acquired stroke among patients treated with unilateral TKA or bilateral TKA after propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: In the present study, 163,719 patients who received unilateral TKA were matched to 163,719 patients with bilateral TKA based on PS. The risk of stroke during the study period was lower in patients treated with bilateral TKA than in patients with unilateral TKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.79). Patients who received bilateral TKA were at decreased risk of stroke when the following variables were present: advanced age (70-79 years, HR 0.76), female sex (HR 0.75), rural area (HR 0.77), small- or medium-sized hospital (HR 0.75), health insurance (HR 0.77), history of hypertension drug use (HR 0.75), congestive heart failure (HR 0.70), connective tissue disease (HR 0.71), diabetes (HR 0.77), and diabetes with complication (HR 0.76). CONCLUSION: The risk of stroke was lower in patients treated with bilateral TKA than in patients with unilateral TKA. Patients treated with bilateral TKA were at decreased risk of stroke when the following variables were present: age (70-79 years), female sex, health insurance, history of hypertension drug use, and comorbidities, such as congestive heart failure, connective tissue disease, and diabetes.

Intra-Articular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid or Steroids Associated With Better Outcomes Than Platelet-Rich Plasma, Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, or Placebo in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical effects of hyaluronic acid (HA), steroids, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or adipose mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials with OA of the knee that compared HA, steroids, PRP, adipose MSC, or their combination with placebo or in head-to-head combination were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases up to June 30, 2019. We performed a network meta-analysis of the relevant literature to determine whether there was benefit from HA, steroids, PRP, or adipose MSC treatment as compared with placebo. RESULTS: A total of 43 trials covering 5554 patients were included. Steroids were ranked most likely to be effective for the management of pain or function, with adipose MSC and multiple PRP appearing least likely to be effective. Although no significant difference was observed among the 6 interventions, except for single PRP with respect to adverse effects, steroids and HA exhibited a lower rate of AEs compared with the placebo. In view of severe adverse effects, only single PRP was superior to placebo. Direct pairwise meta-analysis for pain relief showed that HA was superior to placebo or single PRP, but steroids had a significantly worse effect than single PRP. In addition, direct pairwise meta-analysis for adverse effects favored steroids in comparison to HA. CONCLUSIONS: The ranking statistics like surface under the cumulative ranking curve values of our network meta-analysis support the use of steroids and HA for appropriate patients with knee OA. For pain relief and AEs, steroids are most likely the best treatment, followed by HA. Single PRP, multiple PRP, and adipose MSC interventions do not result in a relevant reduction of joint pain nor improvement of joint function compared with placebo. However, treatment effect differences were small and potentially not clinically meaningful, indicating that other factors, such as cost and patient preferences, may be more important in patients with knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: meta-analysis of non-homogenous randomized controlled trials, Level II.

Risk of a complete exchange or failure in total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a nationwide population-based cohort study from South Korea.

PURPOSE: Few large-scale studies using adjusted data from national registries have explored the risk factors of subsequent revision in patients with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to those with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We investigated the incidence rate and risk factors of subsequent revision in patients with UKA and TKA. METHODS: We enrolled all patients who had undergone TKA or UKA as the primary surgical procedure without histories of having undergone either procedure during the preceding 2 years. Matched Cox regression models were used to compare the risks of revision between groups after propensity score matching. Revision was defined as conversion to revision TKA after primary TKA and conversion to TKA after UKA. RESULTS: The study enrolled 418,806 TKA patients and 446,009 UKA patients. The risk of revision during the entire study period was higher for patients with UKA than for patients with TKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.10-1.36). The Kaplan-Meier 8-year survival was 98.7% in the TKA group and 96.7% in the UKA group. Patients with UKA were at an increased risk of revision in cases of advanced age (70-79 years, HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.15-1.71), female sex (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16-1.49), the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.54), the presence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (HR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11-1.61) compared to patients with TKA. In patients with hemiplegia, however, UKA were associated with a lower risk of subsequent revision (HR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.94). CONCLUSION: The risk of a complete exchange or failure was higher for patients with UKA than for patients with TKA. The most significant independent risk factors for subsequent a complete exchange or failure in patients with UKA were advanced age (70-79 years), female sex, and the presence of comorbidities such as COPD and PUD.

Incidence and Predictors of Lateral Hinge Fractures Following Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Locking Plate System: Better Performance of Computed Tomography Scans.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the rates of plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) for detecting lateral hinge fractures and to evaluate factors affecting lateral hinge fractures in patients following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). METHODS: This prospective study included 59 patients (65 knees) undergoing MOWHTO for primary medial compartment osteoarthritis with a 2-year follow-up between 2013 and 2016. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed using Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and we calculated the hip-knee-ankle angle, weight-bearing line ratio, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, posterior tibial slope, osteotomy gap height, and osteotomy gap filling rate. Immediate plain radiographs and CT were used to detect lateral hinge fractures according to Takeuchi's method. RESULTS: Among 65 knees, the incidence of lateral hinge fractures was 13.8% (Type I: 7, Type II: 2). Only 6 knee fractures (9.2%) were detected on postoperative plain radiographs, including 5 Type I fractures and 1 Type II fracture. An additional 3 knees (4.6%) were detected on postoperative CT scans, including 2 Type I fractures and 1 Type II fracture. Furthermore, osteotomy gap height (adjusted odds ratio = 1.831, P = .016) was the only predictor of lateral hinge fractures. CONCLUSION: The incidence of lateral hinge fractures after MOWHTO was 13.8%. CT (13.8%) afforded higher detection rates for lateral hinge fractures than did plain radiographs (9.2%) despite a marginal difference with uncertain significance. Osteotomy gap height was the only predictor of lateral hinge fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study (Level II).

Correction to: Use of autogenous onlay bone graft for uncontained tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty.

After the publication of this article [1] it came to the attention of the authors that there were 2 errors in the results section: 0.0.856 should be 0.856 and "this this difference" should have been "this difference".

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty fails to completely restore normal gait patterns during level walking.

PURPOSE: Gait analysis is a valuable instrument for measuring function objectively after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, most gait analysis studies have reported conflicting results for functional assessment after UKA. This meta-analysis compared the gait patterns of UKA patients and healthy controls during level walking. METHODS: Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they recorded vertical ground reaction force (GRF), flexion at initial contact, flexion at loading response, extension at mid-stance, flexion at swing, walking speed, cadence, and stride length in UKA patients or healthy controls. RESULTS: Seven studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The UKA patients and healthy controls were similar in terms of vertical GRF (95% CI - 0.54 to 0.23; ns), flexion at initial contact (95% CI - 0.47 to 4.96; ns), flexion at loading response (95% CI - 1.29 to 3.69; ns), and flexion at swing (95% CI - 8.85 to 0.40; ns). In contrast, extension at mid-stance (95% CI 0.53 to 4.88; P = 0.01), walking speed (95% CI - 2.13 to - 0.15; P = 0.02), cadence (95% CI - 1.02 to - 0.25; P = 0.001), and stride length (95% CI - 2.02 to - 0.22; P = 0.01) differed significantly between groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that the pooled data were similar between groups: 1st maximum (heel strike), - 0.43 BW (ns); 1st minimum (mid-stance), 0.61 BW (ns); and 2nd maximum (toe off), - 0.46 BW (ns). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in vertical GRF or overall kinematics in the sagittal plane between UKA patients and healthy controls during level walking. However, the UKA group had a significantly slower walking speed and cadence and a shorter stride length than healthy controls. The current findings suggest that, clinically, UKA fails to completely restore normal gait patterns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability.

PURPOSE: It is unknown whether the conforming superiority of ultracongruent (UC) inserts over posterior stabilized (PS) inserts, due to an increased anterior lip for prevention of anterior displacement of the condyles during knee flexion, leads to better knee scores or greater knee stability in arthroplasty patients. This meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes, intraoperative kinematics, sagittal stability, and range of motion (ROM) between groups with either UC or PS inserts in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies that recorded clinical outcomes, intraoperative kinematics, sagittal stability, and ROM in patients who underwent primary TKA with UC or PS inserts were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on differences in flexion angles were performed for intraoperative kinematics. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The UC and PS insert groups reported similar pain scores (95% CI - 0.15 to 0.16; n.s.) and function scores (95% CI - 0.30 to 0.14; n.s.). In contrast, femoral rotation during flexion (95% CI - 0.06 to 6.35; p = 0.05), posterior femoral translation during flexion (95% CI - 2.74 to - 0.15; p = 0.03), tibial sagittal laxity at 90° (95% CI 2.91 to 7.72; p < 0.0001), and ROM (95% CI - 4.84 to - 1.53; p = 0.0002) differed significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that the pooled data for femoral rotation were significantly different between groups: 60°, 4.09 (p < 0.00001); 90°, 7.94 (p < 0.00001); and 120°, 8.16 (p < 0.00001). Furthermore, pooled data for posterior femoral translation were significantly different between groups: 90°, - 3.70 (p < 0.00001); and 120°, - 3.96 (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups with UC and PS inserts. However, the UC insert group showed significantly greater external femoral rotation, less posterior femoral translation, greater tibial laxity in the sagittal plane, and less ROM than the PS insert group. Based on the results of the current meta-analysis, in substituting the PCL, PS inserts are preferable to UC inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability, even though both inserts have equivalent clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Polyurethane meniscal scaffolds lead to better clinical outcomes but worse articular cartilage status and greater absolute meniscal extrusion.

PURPOSE: Implantation of polyurethane (PU) meniscal scaffolds has become a popular procedure to provide a scaffold for vessel ingrowth and meniscal tissue regeneration in patients with partial meniscal defects. However, it is unclear whether PU meniscal scaffolds lead to better clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes post-operatively. This meta-analysis compared the clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with partial meniscal defects treated with PU meniscal scaffolds. METHODS: This meta-analysis reviewed all studies that assessed Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), articular cartilage (AC), absolute meniscal extrusion (AME), morphology and size (MS), signal intensity (SI) of meniscal implant, and interface of the implant-residual meniscus complex (IIRMC) in patients with partial meniscal defects treated with PU meniscal scaffolds. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients who evaluated MS (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38-1.33; n.s.), SI (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53-2.18; n.s.), and IIRMC (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.33-3.06; n.s.) did not differ significantly between baseline and final follow-up. However, AC (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.84; P = 0.02) and AME (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.18; P < 0.00001) worsened between baseline and final follow-up. Conversely, Lysholm score (95% CI -1.87 to -1.07; P < 0.00001), IKDC score (95% CI -2.19 to -1.08; P < 0.00001), VAS for pain (95% CI -2.29 to -1.07; P < 0.00001), Tegner score (95% CI -0.76 to -0.15; P = 0.003), and overall KOOS (95% CI -29.48 to -23.17; P < 0.00001) were significantly greater at final follow-up when compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found no significant differences in the tested MRI parameters, including MS, SI, and IIRMC. However, AC and AME worsened between baseline and final follow-up. Conversely, patients treated with PU meniscal scaffolds showed significant functional improvement and pain relief when compared with baseline scores. Thus, PU meniscal scaffolds appear to be a viable alternative for patients with partial meniscal defects, although further studies are needed to determine whether worsened AC and AME are clinically relevant. In particular, precise measurement of PU meniscal scaffolds in combination with thorough investigation of the baseline articular cartilage status and meniscal defect size may be effective for pain relief or functional improvement in patients with PU meniscal scaffold implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Many studies have found associations between laboratory biomarkers and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but it remains unclear whether these biomarkers are clinically useful in ruling out PJI. This meta-analysis compared the performance of interleukin-6 (IL-6) versus procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated IL-6 or/and PCT as a diagnostic biomarker for PJI and provided sufficient data to permit sensitivity and specificity analyses for each test. The major databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for appropriate studies from the earliest available date of indexing through February 28, 2017. No restrictions were placed on language of publication. RESULTS: We identified 18 studies encompassing a total of 1,835 subjects; 16 studies reported on IL-6 and 6 studies reported on PCT. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95) for IL-6 and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86) for PCT. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.89) for IL-6 and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.31-0.81) for PCT. The pooled specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95) for IL-6 and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.63-1.00) for PCT. Both the IL-6 and PCT tests had a high positive likelihood ratio (LR); 9.3 (95% CI, 5.3-16.2) and 12.4 (95% CI, 1.7-89.8), respectively, making them excellent rule-in tests for the diagnosis of PJI. The pooled negative LR for IL-6 was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12-0.29), making it suitable as a rule-out test, whereas the pooled negative LR for PCT was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25-0.78), making it unsuitable as a rule-out diagnostic tool. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the present meta-analysis, IL-6 has higher diagnostic value than PCT for the diagnosis of PJI. Moreover, the specificity of the IL-6 test is higher than its sensitivity. Conversely, PCT is not recommended for use as a rule-out diagnostic tool.

No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the biomechanical superiority of the inlay technique over the transtibial technique, arising from avoidance of the killer turn at the graft-tunnel margin of the proximal tibia during posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, leads to better knee scores or greater knee stability. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This systematic review was designed to compare Tegner and Lysholm scores, and posterior residual laxity of the knee, between single-bundle PCL reconstruction using transtibial and inlay techniques. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing Tegner and/or Lysholm scores and posterior residual laxity, in patients who underwent PCL single-bundle reconstruction with the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. There were no restrictions on language or year of publication. Studies were included if they compared clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PCL single-bundle reconstruction with the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques; they simultaneously reported direct comparisons of transtibial and tibial inlay PCL single-bundle reconstruction; and their primary outcomes included comparisons of postoperative scores on knee outcome scales and posterior residual laxity. A total of seven studies (including 149 patients having surgery using a transtibial approach, and 148 with the tibial inlay approach) met the prespecified inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: Our systematic review suggested that there are no clinically important differences between the transtibial and the tibial inlay single-bundle PCL reconstruction in terms of Tegner or Lysholm scores. Of the five studies that assessed Lysholm scores, one favored the transtibial approach and four concluded no difference on this endpoint; however, the observed differences in all studies where differences were observed were quite small (< 7 of 100 points on the Lysholm scale), and likely not clinically important. Of the four studies that compared postoperative Tegner scores, three identified no differences between the approaches, while one favored the tibial inlay approach by a small margin (0.5 of 11 points) suggesting that there likely is no clinically important difference between the approaches in Tegner scores, either. Finally, we identified no difference between the approaches in terms of residual laxity, either among the seven studies that presented data using Telos radiographs, or the five that reported on patients with residual laxity greater than Grade 2 on a four-grade scale of posterior drawer testing (28/107 for transtibial and 26/97 for tibial inlay). CONCLUSION: We found no clinically important differences between the transtibial and tibial inlay approach for PCL reconstruction. Based on the best evidence now available, it appears that surgeons may select between these approaches based on clinical experience and the specific elements of each patient's presentation, since there do not appear to be important or obvious differences between the approaches with respect to knee scores or joint stability. Future randomized trials are needed to answer this question more definitively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Use of autogenous onlay bone graft for uncontained tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The use of autogenous bone graft is a well-known technique for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In cases where the size of the bone graft is inappropriate, the stability of bone graft fixation and subsequent bone graft to host bone incorporation may be compromised. We describe a simple and reliable technique of reconstruction in a proximal tibia bone defect at the time of primary TKA by using autogenous onlay bone graft (AOBG). METHODS: Records were reviewed of 19 patients (mean age, 72 years) who underwent primary TKA using AOBG without the additional allogenous bone or metal augments, between August 2013 and August 2014. RESULTS: Mean Knee Society score (KSS) in the 22 knees was significantly higher postoperatively than preoperatively (92 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 7, P < 0.001). The mean range of motion (ROM) in the 22 knees, which was 106 ± 12° preoperatively, improved to 112 ± 10° at last follow-up, but this difference was not significant (P = 0.32). No migration of implants and presence of radiolucent lines at the bone cement-prosthesis interface were observed. Furthermore, the serial radiographs of 19 patients had a mean time of 3.2 months (range, 2.7-4.4 months) for solid union with cross trabeculation between the proximal tibial bone and graft. CONCLUSIONS: This simple AOBG supplement technique may biologically promote graft to host bone healing by enhancing fixation stability without the additional fixatives and assist the surgeon in managing the varying nature of uncontained bone defects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: KCT0002328 , May 15, 2017.

Similar outcomes of locking compression plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis was designed to compare clinical outcomes, including knee scale score and nonunion rate, of patients with periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who were treated using locking compression plates and retrograde intramedullary nails. METHODS: Studies were included in this meta-analysis if they compared clinical outcomes, including operation time, Knee Society Score (KSS), time to union, nonunion rate, and revision rate due to nonunion, in patients who underwent locking compression plate or retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic distal femur fractures following TKA. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Mean operation time was 11 min shorter (95 % CI -9.56 to 31.33 min; n.s.) and KSS one point higher (95 % CI -8.88 to 11.10; n.s.) with retrograde intramedullary nail than with locking compression plate, but these differences were not statistically significant. The two groups were also similar in mean time to union (0.46 weeks 95 % CI -1.17 to 2.08 weeks; n.s.), the proportion of subjects with nonunion (OR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.26-2.60; n.s.) and the proportion that underwent revision surgery (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.32-2.40; n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes, including nonunion and revision rates, were similar in patients who underwent locking compression plate and retrograde intramedullary nail fixation for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fracture following TKA. Orthopaedic surgeons must train to master both the retrograde intramedullary nail and locking compression plate techniques because both approaches can be considered for periprosthetic distal femur fracture after TKA as they have similar clinicoradiologic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid administration in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) versus topical administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by evaluating the need for allogenic blood transfusion, incidence of postoperative complications, volume of postoperative blood loss, and change in haemoglobin levels. METHODS: Studies were included in this meta-analysis to check whether they assessed the allogenic blood transfusion rate, postoperative complications including pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), volume of postoperative blood loss via drainage, estimated blood loss, total blood loss, and change in haemoglobin levels before and after surgery in primary TKA with TXA administered through both the IV and topical routes. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis. The proportion of patients requiring allogenic blood transfusion (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 0.63-2.81; n.s.) and the proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications including PTE or DVT (OR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.41 to 1.77; n.s.) did not significantly differ between the two groups. There was 52.3 mL less blood loss via drainage (95 % CI -50.74 to 185.66 mL; n.s.), 52.1 mL greater estimated blood loss (95 % CI -155.27 to 51.03 mL; n.s.), and 51.4 mL greater total blood loss (95 % CI -208.16 to 105.31 mL; n.s.) in the topical TXA group as compared to the IV TXA group. The two groups were also similar in terms of the change in haemoglobin levels (0.02 g/dL, 95 % CI -0.36 to 0.39 g/dL; n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: In primary TKA, there are no significant differences in the transfusion requirement, postoperative complications, blood loss, and change in haemoglobin levels between the IV and topical administration of TXA. In addition, results from subgroup analysis evaluating the effect of the times of TXA administration through the IV route suggested that double IV dose of TXA is more effective than single dose in terms of the transfusion requirements and blood loss via drainage. The current meta-analysis indicates that IV administration of 10 mg/kg of TXA 20 min before inflation of the tourniquet followed by 10 mg/kg of TXA 15 min before deflation of the tourniquet is effective and safe. The topical administration of 2 g of TXA mixed with 100 mL of normal saline after wound closure could be an alternative option in patients at greater risk of thromboembolic complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis, Level III.

Periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral stem treated with locking plate osteosynthesis: distal femoral locking plate alone versus with cerclage cable.

To promote rapid bone healing, an adequate stable fixation implant with a percutaneous reduction instrument should be used for Vancouver type B1 or C fractures. The objective of this study was to describe radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with periprosthetic fracture (PPF) around a stable femoral stem, treated with a distal femoral locking plate alone or with a cerclage cable. A total of 21 patients with PPF amenable to either a reverse distal femoral locking plate (LCP DF®) alone or with a cerclage cable, with a mean age of 75.7 years, were included. In these patients, ten fractures were treated with a reverse LCP DF® alone and were classified as group I, and 11 additionally received a cerclage cable and were classified as group II. Group II had a significantly longer operation time (P = 0.019) than group I and included one patient with nonunion at the final 24-month follow-up visit after the initial fracture reduction. However, this difference in nonunion rate for the two groups is more likely to inappropriate indications than surgical techniques. When comparing the stability of the fractures in both groups, there was no statistically significant difference, which might be attributed to the stable fixed-angle implant.

Tibial nerve neuropathy following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy-case report of a rare technical complication.

A 63-year-old woman developed tibial nerve injury caused by an overlong K wire and 4.5-mm cortical lag screw through the first distal hole below the osteotomy during medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), leading to a lack of sensation on the sole of the foot with no disturbances in motor functions. The temporary lag screw in the first distal hole below the osteotomy is often inserted by an excessive length in order to compress the potentially fractured opposite cortex. By doing so, posterior neurovascular structures including the tibial nerve and the popliteal vessels can be injured. To avoid this type of injury during medial opening-wedge HTO, proper knee position and appropriate Hohmann retractor position in combination with meticulous insertion of the K wire or screw under fluoroscopic control are essential. In addition, our study reinforces the fact that different presentations of injury to the tibial nerve should be carefully considered in the absence of common diagnostic features, including weakness of the toe flexors and posterior tibial muscle of the leg with intractable pain.

Minimally invasive navigation-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether the minimally invasive navigation-assisted (MINA) or conventional (CONv) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to better clinical and radiographic outcomes. This meta-analysis compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the MINA and CONv approaches after primary TKA. It was hypothesized that there was no difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches for primary TKA. METHODS: This meta-analysis reviewed all studies that compared surgical time, incision length, flexion range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score ( KSS), coronal mechanical axis (CMA), and coronal femoral component angle (CFCA) with various measurement tools, from direct interview to plain radiography, between the MINA and CONv approaches. RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The findings of this study suggest that surgical time (95 % CI -18.51 to 39.09; n.s.), KSS (95 % CI -8.55 to 30.84; n.s.), CMA (95 % CI -1.01 to 0.54; n.s.), and CFCA (95 % CI -0.91 to 2.97; n.s.) were similar between the two surgical approaches, whereas incision length (95 % CI -5.18 to -3.69; P < 0.001) was significantly shorter in the MINA approach and flexion ROM (95 % CI 14.26-19.01; P < 0.001) was significantly greater in the MINA approach. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes, including surgical time, KSS, CMA, and CFCA, in patients who underwent MINA and CONv approach for primary TKA, but the MINA approach resulted in a slightly shorter incision length and increased flexion ROM than the CONv approach. Therefore, if particular attention has to be paid to patient's selection with appropriate counselling and surgeon's experience, MINA approach can provide early clinical benefit when compared with CONv approach. Besides, orthopaedic surgeons need to master the MINA and CONv approaches because both approaches have similar clinical and radiographic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Comparison between two angular stable locking plates for medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: Decisive wedge locking plate versus TomoFix™.

BACKGROUND: An adequate stable fixation implant should be used for medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) to promote rapid bone healing without complications. This study compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes as well as plate-specific complications between two angular stable locking plates in patients following MOWHTO. METHOD: This prospective study involved 97 patients (50 with DWL®, group I; 47 with TomoFix™, group II) undergoing MOWHTO for primary medial compartment osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2013. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed by using the HSS and WOMAC scores, and calculating mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) on radiographs both preoperatively and after 3 years. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was observed for the MPTA at the last follow-up between the two groups (P = 0.033). Additionally, the last follow-up MPTA of group I was associated with the osteotomy technique (P = 0.004) and preoperative JLCA (P = 0.034) whereas the last follow-up MPTA of group II was associated with gender (P = 0.001) and BMI (P = 0.008). Furthermore, the results showed that group I had a higher rate of non-union (4%) compared to that in group II (0%). CONCLUSION: Both locking plates are useful tools in the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity in young, active patients. However, under special consideration of the complication we found in present study, the TomoFix™ seems to be a better alternative in using the MOWHTO for highly demanding patients.