Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Pathology: The Extinction of a Medical Profession or the Key to a Bright Future?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become of increasing interest over the past decade. While digital image analysis (DIA) is already being used in radiology, it is still in its infancy in pathology. One of the reasons is that large-scale digitization of glass slides has only recently become available. With the advent of digital slide scanners, that digitize glass slides into whole slide images, many labs are now in a transition phase towards digital pathology. However, only few departments worldwide are currently fully digital. Digital pathology provides the ability to annotate large datasets and train computers to develop and validate robust algorithms, similar to radiology. In this opinionated overview, we will give a brief introduction into AI in pathology, discuss the potential positive and negative implications and speculate about the future role of AI in the field of pediatric pathology.

Interobserver variability between experienced and inexperienced observers in the histopathological analysis of Wilms tumors: a pilot study for future algorithmic approach.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological classification of Wilms tumors determines treatment regimen. Machine learning has been shown to contribute to histopathological classification in various malignancies but requires large numbers of manually annotated images and thus specific pathological knowledge. This study aimed to assess whether trained, inexperienced observers could contribute to reliable annotation of Wilms tumor components for classification performed by machine learning. METHODS: Four inexperienced observers (medical students) were trained in histopathology of normal kidneys and Wilms tumors by an experienced observer (pediatric pathologist). Twenty randomly selected scanned Wilms tumor-slides (from n = 1472 slides) were annotated, and annotations were independently classified by both the inexperienced observers and two experienced pediatric pathologists. Agreement between the six observers and for each tissue element was measured using kappa statistics (κ). RESULTS: Pairwise interobserver agreement between all inexperienced and experienced observers was high (range: 0.845-0.950). The interobserver variability for the different histological elements, including all vital tumor components and therapy-related effects, showed high values for all κ-coefficients (> 0.827). CONCLUSIONS: Inexperienced observers can be trained to recognize specific histopathological tumor and tissue elements with high interobserver agreement with experienced observers. Nevertheless, supervision by experienced pathologists remains necessary. Results of this study can be used to facilitate more rapid progress for supervised machine learning-based algorithm development in pediatric pathology and beyond.