GJ Express: an improvement initiative to decrease sedation and anesthesia for gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges.

BACKGROUND: Overuse of sedation and anesthesia causes delays in gastrojejunostomy tube (GJ) exchanges, increased risk of complications, unnecessary use of resources, preventable hospital admissions, and an adverse impact on patient and family experience. Our hospital was over-utilizing sedation and anesthesia, and we aimed to decrease this use from 78% to 20% within two years. METHODS: An interdisciplinary quality improvement team comprehensively evaluated current processes for GJ tube exchanges through a retrospective chart review for baseline data with prospective time series analysis after improvement implementation. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of pediatric patients that utilized sedation or anesthesia for routine GJ tube exchanges. RESULTS: A statistical process control p-chart was used to calculate and show changes over time for patients (n = 45 patients average). The median percent of pediatric GJ tube exchanges performed with sedation or anesthesia decreased from 77.8% to 11.3%. Most patients (76%) were covered by Medicaid programs; with low reimbursement rates, decreased anesthesiologist billing revenue does not have a negative financial impact. CONCLUSIONS: An interprofessional improvement initiative that engaged patients and families, incorporated pediatric-specific staff services, and developed systematic weaning was associated with a significant decrease in the overuse of sedation and anesthesia for GJ tube exchanges. IMPACT: We believe that this work is highly relevant and impactful for medical centers caring for children who require gastrojejunostomy tubes, an increasingly common approach to management of children with feeding issues. There is very little literature available on the use of sedation or anesthesia for changing these tubes. While large children's medical centers in the USA usually do not utilize sedation or anesthesia, there are likely many serious outliers, especially when children receive care outside of a pediatric specific institution. This paper brings awareness to this serious issue and provides information about how we changed care to achieve higher patient safety and lower medical costs.

Acetaminophen for analgesia following pyloromyotomy: does the route of administration make a difference?

BACKGROUND: During the perioperative care of infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, an opioid-sparing technique is often advocated due to concerns such as postoperative hypoventilation and apnea. Although the rectal administration of acetaminophen is commonly employed, an intravenous (IV) preparation is also currently available, but only limited data are available regarding IV acetaminophen use for infants undergoing pyloromyotomy. The objective of the current study was to compare the efficacy of IV and rectal acetaminophen for postoperative analgesia in infants undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of the use of IV and rectal acetaminophen in infants undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy was performed. The efficacy was assessed by evaluating the perioperative need for supplemental analgesic agents, postoperative pain scores, tracheal extubation time, time in the postanesthesia care unit, time to oral feeding, and time to hospital discharge. RESULTS: The study cohort included 68 patients, of whom 34 patients received IV acetaminophen and 34 received rectal acetaminophen. All patients also received local infiltration of the surgical site with 0.25% bupivacaine. No intraoperative opioids were administered. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to postoperative pain scores, need for supplemental analgesic agents, time in the postanesthesia care unit, or time in the hospital. There was no difference in the number of children who tolerated oral feeds on the day of surgery or in postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that there is no clinical difference or advantage with the use of IV versus rectal acetaminophen in infants undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.