Effect of body mass index on 30-day complication rate and implant survival rate after simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicentre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The practice of simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (SBUKA) remains a topic of debate, particularly in patients with obesity. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the 30-day complication rate and the survival rate of the implant following SBUKA. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical records of 245 patients (490 knees) who underwent SBUKA at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University and the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2010 and December 2020. Patients were categorised based on their BMI at the time of surgery into four groups: normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 22.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 23.0 to 24.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2), and severely obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Variables such as length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, and costs of hospitalisation were compared across all groups. Additionally, we recorded the 30-day postoperative complication rate and the time from surgery to any required revision. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate and compare the implant survival rates. RESULTS: The follow-up period for the 245 patients ranged from 39 to 114 months, with an average of 77.05±18.71 months. The incidence of complications within 30 days post-surgery did not significantly differ across the groups (χ2 = 1.102, p = 0.777). The implant survival rates from the lowest to the highest BMI groups were 97.14%, 93.9%, 94.44%, and 96.43%, respectively. Both the rate of implant revision (χ2 =1.612, p = 0.657) and the survival curves of the implants (p = 0.639) showed no statistically significant differences among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMI did not influence the 30-day complication rate nor the survival rate of implants following SBUKA, suggesting that SBUKA should not be contraindicated based on BMI alone.

Survivorship of the fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mean 14-year follow-up in a single medical center.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to report the long-term survival of fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a mean of 14-year follow-up, and to determine possible risk factors of failure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 337 fixed-bearing medial UKAs implanted between 2003 and 2014. Demographic and radiographic parameters were measured, including pre-operative and post-operative anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and anatomical medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to figure out risk factors. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 14.0 years. There were 32 failures categorized into implant loosening (n = 11), osteoarthritis progression (n = 7), insert wear (n = 7), infection (n = 4), and periprosthetic fracture (n = 3). Cumulative survival was 91.6% at 10 years and 90.0% at 15 years. No statistically significant parameters were found between the overall survival and failure groups. Age and hypertension were significant factors of implant loosening with odds ratio (OR) 0.909 (p = 0.02) and 0.179 (p = 0.04) respectively. In the insert wear group, post-operative aFTA and correction of PTS showed significance with OR 0.363 (p = 0.02) and 0.415 (p = 0.03) respectively. Post-operative aMPTA was a significant factor of periprosthetic fracture with OR 0.680 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The fixed-bearing medial UKA provides successful long-term survivorship. Tibial component loosening is the major cause of failure. Older age and hypertension were factors with decreased risk of implant loosening.

Effect of lower limb alignment on outcome after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between lower limb alignment and patient outcomes after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (LUKA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, the information of 51 patients who underwent lateral UKA was collected after an average of 27months of follow-up (13 to 60 months). Evaluation indicators include the AKS and WOMAC score. The Kellgren-Lawrence grade is used to evaluate the severity of osteoarthritis, while the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle is utilized to measure the valgus angle of lower limb alignment. RESULT: Patients with postoperative valgus (≥ 3°) alignment had the best outcomes, while those with varus (≤-3°) alignment had the worst outcomes (p < 0.001). Furthermore, it was noted that patients with preoperative mild valgus (≤ 4°) alignment had worse postoperative outcomes than those with severe valgus (≥ 7°) alignment (p < 0.05). The study also revealed a positive correlation between postoperative valgus and WOMAC scores (p < 0.001), whereas a negative correlation was observed between the change in valgus angle and WOMAC scores (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: During follow-ups, we found that lower limb alignment seems to be an independent predictor of postoperative outcomes. It is recommended that more than 3° of valgus alignment should be maintained after LUKA. Surgeons performing lateral UKA should be cautious of overcorrecting alignment, particularly in patients with preoperative mild valgus alignment.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we present the unique case of a patient with knee osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial compartment and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency who underwent simultaneous medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and PCL reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old male patient presented with a 1-year history of pain and instability in the left knee. The patient had previously experienced a trauma-related injury to the PCL of the left knee that was left untreated. Imaging and physical examination confirmed the presence of left medial knee OA along with PCL rupture. To address these issues, the patient underwent UKA combined with PCL reconstruction. The patient's Lysholm score was 47 before surgery and 81 three months after surgery, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was 29 before surgery and 18 three months after surgery, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score was 56.3 before surgery and 74.7 three months after surgery. Six months after surgery, the patient's gait returned to normal, and he was able to jog. CONCLUSION: This case report presents the first instance of UKA combined with PCL reconstruction and introduces a novel treatment approach for patients suffering from medial knee OA and ligament injury.

Epidemiology and prognostic factors for new-onset deep venous thrombosis after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Patients who underwent knee joint arthroplasty were at risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), however, less studies were conducted to demonstrate the epidemiology and risk factors of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Objective of this study was to explore the incidence and prognostic factors of DVT after UKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary UKA from December 2018 to June 2022 were recruited in this study. Demographic characteristics, operation related variables and laboratory index were extracted and analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to detect the optimum cut-off value for variables of interest. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were performed to identify risk factors of DVT. RESULTS: 351 UKAs with a mean age of 65.4 ± 7.1 years were reviewed. After 12.9 ± 11.2 months follow-up, 35 DVTs were confirmed which indicating an incidence of 9.9%. The results showed that occupation (agricultural laborer) (P = 0.008), disease duration > 8.5 years (P = 0.035), operation time > 169 min (P = 0.003), intraoperative blood loss > 102 ml (P < 0.001), BMI > 26.8 kg/m 2 (P = 0.001), preoperative D-dimer > 0.29 mg/L (P = 0.001), prothrombin time < 10.7 s (P = 0.033) and INR < 0.98 (P = 0.032) between DVT and Non-DVT group were significantly different. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed intraoperative blood loss > 102 ml (OR, 3.707; P, 0.001), BMI > 26.8 kg/m 2 (OR, 4.664; P, 0.004) and D-dimer > 0.29 mg/L (OR, 2.882; P, 0.009) were independent risk factors of DVT after UKA. CONCLUSION: The incidence of DVT in the present study was 9.9%, extensive intraoperative blood loss, advanced BMI and high level of D-dimer would increase the risk of lower extremity thrombosis by 2-4 times.

Controlled posterior condylar milling technique for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty minimises tibia resection during gap balancing: Short-term clinical results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical utility of controlled posterior condylar milling (CPCM) in gap balancing while minimally resecting the tibia during fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent medial UKA for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the conventional group (n = 56) and the CPCM group (n = 66). In the CPCM group, the proximal tibia was resected at the level of the distal end of the subchondral bone. If the flexion gap was tighter than extension, the posterior condyle was additionally milled to adjust gap tightness. Standing knee X-ray and scanogram were used to evaluate alignment and tibia resection amount. Range of motion (ROM) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The CPCM group showed significantly smaller tibia resection (3.6 ± 1.9 mm) compared to the conventional group (5.2 ± 2.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Postoperative ROM (133.0 ± 8.3°, 135.2 ± 7.2°, n.s.) and WOMAC (19.3 ± 13.6, 23.6 ± 17.7, n.s.) were not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperative periprosthetic fractures occurred in two patients in conventional group, while the CPCM group had no periprosthetic fractures. CONCLUSION: The CPCM technique may be a simple and useful intraoperative technique that can achieve minimal tibia resection and promising clinical outcomes while easily adjusting gap tightness between flexion and extension during medial fixed-bearing UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Optimal intersurface stability for unicompartmental femoral component design with two pegs placed on the distal resection surface: 5 mm peg length increment and 10° peg inclination.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to identify the optimal design of the unicompartmental femoral component through parameter analysis and stability evaluation. METHODS: A finite element (FE) analysis was applied to analyse and adjust the parameter combinations of the anterior tilt angle of the posterior condyle resection surface, the position of the peg, the length of the peg and the inclination angle of the peg, resulting in 10 different FE models. Setting three knee flexion angles of 8.4° (maximum load state during walking), 40° (maximum load state during stair climbing) and 90° (maximum load state during squatting exercise), quantitatively analysing the micromotion values of the bone-prosthesis interface and defining a weighted scoring formula to evaluate the stability of different FE models. The validity of the FE analysis was verified using the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) device. RESULTS: The errors between the FE analysis and the DIC test at three flexion angles were 5.6%, 1.7% and 11.1%. The 10 different femoral component design models were measured separately. The FE analysis demonstrated that the design with a 0° anterior tilt angle of the posterior condyle resection surface, both pegs placed on the distal resection surface, lengthened 5 mm pegs and a 10° peg inclination angle provided the best stability. CONCLUSION: The current study proposed a method for evaluating the stability of the femoral component design. The optimal intersurface stability design of the unicompartmental femoral component was achieved with two pegs placed on the distal resection surface, a 5-mm peg length increment and a 10° peg inclination. These results might provide a reference for the selection of unicompartmental femoral components in clinical practice and therefore improve the survival rate of future unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of literature reporting on long-term outcomes following robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study assessed the long-term survivorship, patient-reported satisfaction and pain scores following robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A single surgeon's database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA with a cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis prior to May 2015. Patients were contacted to determine implant survivorship, satisfaction and pain. Kaplan-Meier models were applied to analyse survival. RESULTS: A total of 77 knees (70 patients) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.5 years (range: 8.1-13.3) were included. Five knees were revised, corresponding to a 10-year survivorship of 96.1% and estimated survival time of 12.7 ± 0.3 years (95% confidence interval: 12.2-13.2) with all-cause revision as the endpoint. Unexplained pain (40.0%) and progression of OA (40.0%) in contralateral compartments were the most reported reasons for revision. Among patients without revision, 94.4% were either satisfied or very satisfied with their lateral UKA and the average pain score was 1.1. CONCLUSION: Robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA led to high implant survivorship and patient satisfaction, and low pain scores at long-term follow-up. Progression of OA in contralateral compartments and unexplained pain were the most frequent reasons for revision. These findings support the continued use of robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment OA; however, its clinical value over conventional techniques remains to be established in prospective comparative studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

The mind matters: Psychological factors influence subjective outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-A prospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate how psychological factors, including pain catastrophizing (PC), anxiety and depression affect preoperative and postoperative subjective outcomes in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed among 150 patients undergoing medial or lateral UKA for isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis. Patients were categorized based on their preoperative PC and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, stratifying them into groups with PC, anxiety or depression, and those without these psychological factors. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short form (KOOS-PS), 5-level EQ5D Visual Analogue Scale (EQ5D-VAS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS-pain) were compared between groups preoperatively and at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 24 months, PC patients had inferior outcomes in KOOS-PS (66.9 ± 16.5 vs. 77.6 ± 14.7, p = .008), EQ5D-VAS (63.5 ± 19.9 vs. 78.9 ± 20.1, p = .003) and FJS (73.7 ± 14.3 vs. 84.6 ± 13.8, p = .003). Anxiety was associated with inferior KOOS-PS (65.4 ± 15.2 vs. 78.2 ± 14.5, p = <.001), EQ5D-VAS (64.2 ± 23.2 vs. 79.3 ± 19.4, p = .002), FJS (75.7 ± 16.8 vs. 84.6 ± 13.4, p = .008) and NRS-pain (27.4 ± 24.6 vs. 13.7 ± 19.3, p = .023) at 24 months. Depression consistently resulted in inferior outcomes in KOOS-PS, EQ5D-VAS, FJS and NRS-pain across all follow-up assessments (p = <.05). Additionally, patients with anxiety and depression experienced longer length of hospital stay compared to those without these psychological factors (anxiety: 2.3 ± 2.3 vs. 0.8 ± 0.8 days, p = .006; depression: 2.3 ± 2.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.8 days, p = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PC, anxiety and depression are associated with inferior subjective outcomes both prior to and following UKA. Among these factors, depression seemed to exert the most substantial adverse impact on outcomes following UKA. Patients with anxiety and depression had an extended duration of hospitalization lasting over twice as long as patients without these psychological factors. It seems that inferior outcomes primarily stem from the suboptimal preoperative condition rather than an inherent inability to benefit from UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective study.

Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restored prearthritic alignment and led to superior functional outcomes compared with conventional techniques.

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can ensure precise preoperative planning, minimise soft tissue damage and restore native coronal alignment. However, few studies have investigated how these advantages translate into differences in early postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to compare differences in early outcomes between conventional UKA (C-UKA) and robotic-assisted UKA (R-UKA). METHODS: This retrospective study investigated two groups of patients who underwent medial UKA: C-UKA group (n = 35) and R-UKA group (n = 35). We assessed (1) serum indicators (hemoglobin, creatine kinase and C-reactive protein) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 4 and 6; (2) radiologic parameters including joint line height change and arithmetic and mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA and mHKA); (3) patient-reported outcomes including Knee Society Scores, Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Despite similar serum indicator results, pain VAS was lower in the R-UKA group than in the C-UKA group at PODs 2 (2.5 ± 1.3 vs. 3.6 ± 1.2, p = 0.02), 4 (2.4 ± 0.9 vs. 3.3 ± 1.0, p = 0.03) and 6 (1.9 ± 1.1 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1, p < 0.01). The joint line height change was significantly lower in the R-UKA group than in the C-UKA group (0.9 mm ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.0 mm ± 1.3 mm, p = 0.02). The equivalence test for preoperative aHKA and postoperative mHKA revealed equivalence in only the R-UKA group (p < 0.01). The R-UKA group showed better WOMAC and FJS-12 compared to C-UKA group at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: R-UKA led to lower pain VAS in the early postoperative period compared with C-UKA. Additionally, R-UKA effectively restored the joint line and prearthritic lower limb alignment, resulting in superior functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up compared with C-UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Gender does not influence outcomes and complications in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The impact of gender on the outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains a topic of active discussion with limited exploration thus far. The study aims to elucidate the gender effect on clinical outcomes, complications, pre- and postoperative radiological outcomes following the implantation of a medial UKA at mid-term follow-up in a large section of patients. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study encompassing patients undergoing medial UKA between 2011 and 2019. The International Knee Society (IKS) Knee and Function score, patient satisfaction, complications, revisions, pre- and postoperative radiological outcomes (coronal plane alignment, femoral and tibial component positioning, posterior tibial slope) were evaluated. Survival rate at the time of the last follow-up was also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 366 knees that met the inclusion criteria, 10 were lost to follow-up, accounting for a 2.7% loss. Mean follow-up was 5.2 ± 2 years [2.1-11.3]. Out of the total population, 205 patients were females (57.6%, 205/356) and 151 were males (42.4%, 151/356). Men exhibited superior pre- and postoperative IKS function scores (p = 0.017). However, no significant differences were observed between women and men regarding improvements of IKS Knee and Function scores, radiographic outcomes and implant survivorship. CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of 5 years, this study revealed no significant impact of gender on clinical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing medial UKA. Furthermore, no significant differences were evident in radiographic outcomes, implant positioning and knee phenotype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The phenotypic diversity of anteromedial osteoarthritis before and after treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A radiographic analysis of 1000 knees.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess phenotypic variation in the coronal plane of knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis using the functional knee phenotype classification, before and after treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: The study comprised 1000 knees of 835 patients (45% females, 55% males, 90% Caucasian) who underwent medial UKA for anteromedial osteoarthritis. Pre and postoperative alignment was evaluated through the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). Knees were classified according to the functional knee phenotype system which combines limb phenotype (HKA), and femoral and tibial knee phenotypes (FMA and TMA, respectively). Restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment following medial UKA was evaluated by phenotype. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 76 distinct and 25 relevant (prevalence ≥1%) functional knee phenotypes were identified, of which VARHKA 6°VARFMA 3°NEUTMA 0° was the most common (9.4% of knees). The most prevalent limb phenotype, VARHKA 6°, comprised 15 distinct knee phenotypes (FMA and TMA combinations). Postoperatively, 58 distinct and 17 relevant functional knee phenotypes were observed, of which VARHKA 3°NEUFMA 0°NEUTMA 0° had the highest prevalence at 18.3%. Knees with combined tibial and femoral deformities were associated with a lower probability of restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment following medial UKA, compared to knees without extra-articular deformity, or knees with an isolated tibial or femoral deformity. CONCLUSION: Phenotype analysis using the functional knee phenotype system demonstrated a wide diversity of coronal alignment phenotypes among knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis in a predominantly Caucasian population. Following medial UKA, a reduction from 25 preoperative to 17 postoperative relevant phenotypes was observed. Consideration of phenotypic variation can be of importance when aiming to restore prearthritic coronal alignment during medial UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Preservation of prearthritic coronal knee phenotype and prearthritic coronal alignment yielded improved Kujala scores following ligament-guided medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of literature evaluating outcomes of the ligament-guided approach in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An improved comprehension of the distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns and their associations with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and implant survivorship could provide insights into its further application in daily practice. METHODS: A registry was reviewed for patients with a minimal 2-year follow-up who underwent robotic-assisted, ligament-guided, medial UKA between 2008 and 2016. Survivorship and postoperative PROMs were collected. CPAK phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns were determined. Survivorship, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala and patient satisfaction were compared between phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns. RESULTS: A total of 618 knees were included at a mean follow-up of 4.1 [2.0-9.6] years. Four-year conversion to the TKA survival rate was 98.9% [98.4%-99.3%] and 94.3% [93.3%-95.3%] for all-cause revision. Patients with preservation of the CPAK phenotype (84.5 ± 14.9, 81.8 ± 15.5, p = 0.033) and restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment (84.1 ± 14.9, 81.7 ± 15.9, p = 0.045) had a significantly higher Kujala score. No other significant differences in survivorship or PROMs were observed between phenotypes or sagittal tibial wear patterns. Additionally, no difference in survival rates was observed between preserved or altered phenotypes. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that preservation of CPAK phenotype and preservation of prearthritic coronal alignment yielded a significantly higher Kujala score. No other significant differences in PROMs or implant survivorship were observed, suggesting that robotic-assisted, ligament-guided medial UKA provides equal outcomes for all observed phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns in medial compartment OA as long as preoperative CPAK phenotype is preserved postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

One-day surgery is safe and effective in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective comparative study at 1 year of follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and complications of two perioperative protocols for the management of patients who underwent medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): 24 h (1-day surgery [OS]) versus 72 h (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]) of the length of hospital stay (LOS). In our hypothesis, the reduction of the LOS from 3 to 1 day did not influence the outcomes and complications. METHODS: A total of 42 patients (21 in each group) with isolated anteromedial knee osteoarthritis and meeting specific criteria were prospectively included in the study. Clinical outcomes included Knee Society Score (KSS) and Forgotten joint score while pain evaluation was performed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes were assessed measuring the knee range of motion (ROM) while radiographic outcomes were evaluated measuring the amelioration of the varus deformity through the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). RESULTS: Clinical and functional outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups. Complications occurred in 9.5% of OS and 4.7% of ERAS group patients. Significant improvements in knee ROM, VAS pain, KSS and HKA angle were observed postsurgery, with no significant differences between groups except in KSS expectations and function trends. CONCLUSION: The OS protocol is safe and effective and LOS, in a well-defined fast-track protocol, did not significantly impact clinical and functional outcomes. OS may lead to reduced hospitalisation costs and potential reductions in complications associated with prolonged stays, benefiting both patients and healthcare facilities. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings. Early mobilisation and rehabilitation protocols are key components of successful patient recovery following UKA procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Implant Position, Survivorship, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Manual Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Two related recent reports described high error rates for implant positioning and reduced implant survivorship in manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MUKA) compared to robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RUKA). The present study scientifically replicated these reports by comparing MUKAs similarly performed by an experienced high-volume surgeon in similar patients using the same study methods as these reports. METHODS: A total of 216 consecutive MUKAs were retrospectively evaluated radiographically for achievement of implant positioning targets. Achievement of targets was compared to the published MUKA and RUKA outcomes and correlated with revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: There were 20% of study MUKAs compared to 88.1% of comparison MUKAs (P < .001) and 31.4% of comparison RUKAs (P < .048) that failed to meet all 7 implant positioning targets. The MUKA revision rates were significantly lower in the study sample than for comparison MUKAs (3.2% versus 14.2%, P < .001). Implant survivorship was 91.7% (95% confidence interval 84.9, 98.5%) at 8.9 years compared to 70.0% (95% confidence interval 56.0, 80.0%) at 10.2 years, respectively. Most patient-reported outcome measures did not differ based on achievement of implant positioning targets (P ≥ .072). CONCLUSIONS: Present study findings indicate that observations in the 2 recent reports may not be generalizable to all UKA surgeons. Additional data on the relationship between implant positioning and revision as well as functional outcomes are needed to identify appropriate robotic arthroplasty applications.

A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Cemented and Cementless Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures are rare but serious complications of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Although cementless UKA has a lower risk of loosening than cemented, there are concerns that tibial fracture risk may be higher given the reliance on interference fit for primary stability. The risk of fracture and the effect of surgical fixation are currently unknown. We compared the periprosthetic fracture rate following cemented and cementless UKA surgery. METHODS: A total of 14,122 medial mobile-bearing UKAs (7,061 cemented and 7,061 cementless) from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episodes Statistics database were propensity score-matched. Cumulative fracture rates were calculated and Cox regressions were used to compare fixation groups. RESULTS: The three-month periprosthetic fracture rates were similar (P = .80), being 0.10% in the cemented group and 0.11% in the cementless group. The fracture rates were highest during the first three months postoperatively, but then decreased and remained constant between one and 10 years after surgery. The one-year cumulative fracture rates were 0.2% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.1 to 0.3) for cemented and 0.2% (CI: 0.1 to 0.3) for cementless cases. The 10-year cumulative fracture rates were 0.8% (CI: 0.2 to 1.3) and 0.8% (CI: 0.3 to 1.3), respectively. The hazard ratio during the whole study period was 1.06 (CI: 0.64 to 1.77; P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: The periprosthetic fracture rate following mobile bearing UKA surgery is low, being about 1% at 10 years. There were no significant differences in fracture rates between cemented and cementless implants after matching. We surmise that surgeons are aware of the higher theoretical risk of early fracture with cementless components and take care with tibial preparation. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Relationship Between Age and 30-day Outcomes Following Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: An enhanced understanding of the short-term complication profile following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve surgical decision-making and subsequent patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine if the difference in risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality between UKA and TKA varied as a function of patient age. METHODS: This retrospective study of a national quality improvement database using data from 2014 to 2020 included 403,342 patients undergoing UKA (n = 12,324) or TKA (n = 391,018). A generalized additive model (GAM) evaluated non-linear relationships between primary outcome and predictors (age, procedure type, and procedure type x age interaction) using a 1:5 UKA to TKA matched sample. Probabilities and odds ratios (95% CI [confidence interval]) estimated the relative risk of complications across the age spectrum. RESULTS: In the GAM, TKA patients relative to UKA had 1.30 higher odds (95% CI 1.19 to 1.43, P < 0.001) of 30-day morbidity and mortality. There was a significant, non-linear relationship between age and the primary outcome (P = 0.02), such that the odds were lowest at younger ages. They increased slowly until about age 65 years, at which point the slope became steeper. The interaction terms for age and procedure type were not significant (P = 0.30). The 30-day probability for short-term complications of a 65-, 75-, and 85-year-old undergoing UKA was 2.1% (95% CI, 1.8 to 2.3), 2.4% (95% CI, 2.0 to 2.8), and 3.2% (95% CI, 2.3 to 4.1), respectively. Conversely, the probability of a 65-, 75-, and 85-year-old undergoing TKA was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.7 to 3.0), 3.6% (95% CI, 3.3 to 3.8), and 5.5% (95% CI, 4.7 to 6.3). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing UKA had a quantifiable lower likelihood of morbidity or mortality than TKA at all ages. These data can provide individualized risk for UKA and TKA across the age spectrum and could be helpful in counseling patients regarding their risk for perioperative complications.

Return to Sport After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Patello-Femoral Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Data on sports/physical activity participation following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA) is variable and limited. The purpose of this study was to assess participations, outcomes, and limitations in sports following UKA and PFA. METHODS: Patients who underwent UKA and PFA at a single institution from 2015 to 2020 were surveyed on sports participation before and after surgery. Data was correlated with perioperative patient characteristics and outcome scores. Among 776 patients surveyed, 356 (50%) patients responded. Of respondents, 296 (83.1%) underwent UKA, 44 (12.6%) underwent PFA, and 16 (4.5%) underwent both UKA/PFA. RESULTS: Activity participation rates were 86.5, 77.3, and 87.5% five years prior, and 70.9, 61.4, and 75% at one year prior to UKA, PFA, and UKA/PFA, respectively. Return to sports rates were 81.6, 64.7, and 62.3% at mean 4.6 years postoperatively, respectively. The most common activities were recreational walking, swimming, cycling, and golf. Patients returned to a similar participation level for low-impact activities, whereas participation decreased for intermediate- and high-impact activities. Patients participating in activities had higher postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (P < .001), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (P = .045) and Mental Component Score (P = .012). Activity restrictions were reported among 25, 36.4, and 25% of UKA, PFA, and UKA/PFA patients, respectively, and were more commonly self-imposed than surgeon-directed. CONCLUSIONS: Though UKA patients' postoperative sports participation may improve compared to one year preoperatively, participation for patients surgically treated for isolated osteoarthritis is decreased compared to 5 years preoperatively and varies among patient subsets.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Not a Contraindication to Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has historically been considered a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the widespread use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has substantially improved the management of RA and prevented disease progression. The objective of this study was to ascertain whether RA impacts UKA revision-free survivorship. METHODS: Patients undergoing UKA from 2010 to 2021 were identified in an administrative claims database (n = 105,937) using Current Procedural Terminology code 27446. All patients who underwent UKA who had a diagnosis of RA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up (n = 1,422) were propensity score matched based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to those who did not have RA (n = 1,422). Laterality was identified using the 10th Revision of International Classification of Diseases codes. The primary outcome was ipsilateral revision to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within 2 years, and the secondary outcome was ipsilateral revision at any time. RESULTS: Among the 1,422 patients who had a UKA and a diagnosis of RA, 37 patients (2.6%) underwent conversion to TKA within 2 years, and 48 patients (3.4%) underwent conversion to TKA at any point. In comparison, 28 patients (2.0%) in the propensity-matched control group underwent conversion to TKA within 2 years, and 40 patients (2.8%) underwent conversion to TKA at any point. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in conversion to TKA between patients who had and did not have RA, either within 2 years (P = .31) or anytime (P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had RA and underwent UKA did not have an increased risk of revision to TKA compared to those who did not have RA. This may indicate that modern management of RA could allow for expanded UKA indications for RA patients.

Magnitude of Change in Leg Length and Clinical Impact Following Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Change in leg length and leg-length discrepancy (LLD) are common concerns among patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aimed to quantify the magnitude of leg-length change, prevalence of postoperative LLD, and their clinical implications following medial UKA. METHODS: Leg length and mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA) were retrospectively measured in 332 patients following unilateral robotic-arm assisted medial UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis, using calibrated long-leg radiographs. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Otcome Score for Joint Replacement and patient satisfaction were analyzed to assess impact of leg-length change and LLD on outcomes. RESULTS: Following medial UKA, median leg-length change was 2.0 mm (interquartile range, -1.0 to 5.0 mm; P < .001) with a mean correction in mHKA of 4.4° ± 2.7 (P < .001). A total of 158 patients (48%) had a leg-length increase by 0 to 5 mm, 64 (19%) by 6 to 10 mm, and 11 (3%) by >10 mm. Leg-length change was positively correlated with mHKA correction (R = 0.44, P < .001). Postoperatively, moderate (5 to 10 mm) and substantial LLD (≥10 mm) were present in 49% and 17% of patients, respectively. Four-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement were comparable between patients with and without substantial postoperative LLD (P = .976). Proportions of satisfied patients were similar between groups (P = .687). CONCLUSION: Following medial UKA, the majority of patients had a moderate increase in leg length, the magnitude of which was positively correlated to the correction in mechanical alignment. Postoperative substantial LLD was not uncommon (17% prevalence); however, it had no significant impact on patient-reported outcomes or satisfaction at 4 years follow-up.