Danish translation and cultural adaptation of the Psoriatic arthritis UnclutteRed screening Evaluation (PURE-4) scale.

OBJECTIVES: Screening tools are needed to help to identify psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. The Psoriatic arthritis UnclutteRed screening Evaluation (PURE-4) questionnaire was developed for this purpose and has been shown to perform very well. The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the PURE-4 scale into the Danish language. METHOD: The translational process followed the guidelines provided by the Mapi Research Trust, which include the following steps: forward translation, backward translation, cognitive interviews, and proofreading. Following the guidelines helps to maintain the content validity of the questionnaire and secures a translation that is both literally and culturally appropriate for the target population. RESULTS: All four items were modified throughout the translation process, involving mainly minor changes such as the addition of more colloquial words in the Danish version. The new Danish version of PURE-4 was reviewed and approved by the original developers. CONCLUSIONS: A Danish version of the PURE-4 questionnaire was produced. The translation and cultural adaptation of PURE-4 constitute the first step in the validation of the questionnaire in Danish patients with psoriasis.

Disease activity-guided tapering of biologics in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pragmatic, randomized, open-label, equivalence trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether disease activity-guided tapering of biologics compared to continuation as usual care enables a substantial dose reduction while disease activity remains equivalent. METHOD: In this pragmatic, randomized, open-label, equivalence trial, adults with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis in low disease activity on stable-dose biologics for ≥ 12 months were randomized 2:1 into either the tapering group, i.e. disease activity-guided prolongation of the biologic dosing interval until flare or withdrawal, or the control group, i.e. maintaince of baseline biologics with a possible small interval increase at the patients request. The co-primary outcome in the intention-to-treat population was met if superiority in ≥ 50% biologic reduction at 18 months was demonstrated and disease activity was equivalent (equivalence margins ± 0.5). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were randomized to tapering and 47 to control, of whom 37% (35/95) versus 2% (1/47) achieved ≥ 50% biologic reduction at 18 months. The risk difference was statistically significant [35%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24%-45%], while disease activity remained equivalent [mean difference 0.05, 95% CI -0.12-0.29]. A statistically significant flare risk was observed [tapering 41% (39/95) vs control 21% (10/47), risk difference 20%, 95% CI 4%-35%]; but, only 1% (1/95) and 6% (3/47) had persistent flare and needed to switch to another biological drug. CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity-guided tapering of biologics in patients with inflammatory arthritis enabled one-third to achieve ≥ 50% biologic reduction, while disease activity between groups remained equivalent. Flares were more frequent in the tapering group but were managed with rescue therapy.

Faecal calprotectin detects subclinical bowel inflammation and may predict treatment response in spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Intestinal inflammation is frequent in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Here, we test the validity of faecal calprotectin as a marker of intestinal inflammation in SpA patients and evaluate the response of adalimumab in patients with and without intestinal lesions. METHOD: Patients were included on the basis of active SpA with a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ≥ 4. After a 4 week non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug washout period, patients were divided into two groups based on faecal calprotectin level (> 100 mg/kg, n = 15, and < 50 mg/kg, n = 15). Adalimumab 40 mg every other week was initiated. Patients with calprotectin >100 mg/kg received an additional 40 mg of adalimumab at baseline. Patients were followed with clinical examination at weeks 12, 20, and 52; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at weeks 0, 20, and 52; and endoscopy at weeks 0 and 20. RESULTS: The groups were similar with regard to clinical disease activity measures at baseline. Faecal calprotectin above 100 mg/kg accurately identified patients with intestinal inflammation. Twelve of the 15 patients with elevated calprotectin had bowel lesions, compared to only one patient in the control group. On MRI, the group with elevated calprotectin had more inflammation in the sacroiliac joints. Finally, the group with intestinal inflammation had a better clinical response to adalimumab, as evaluated by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score. CONCLUSION: Elevated faecal calprotectin accurately identified SpA patients with bowel inflammation and more inflammation on MRI. Elevated faecal calprotectin at baseline may predict a better treatment response.

Hepcidin plasma levels are not associated with changes in haemoglobin in early rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: A reduction in haemoglobin level is a frequent complication among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Hepcidin has been linked to disturbed erythropoiesis. The objective of this study was to investigate the longitudinal changes in hepcidin in patients with early RA. METHOD: Hepcidin plasma concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients with early RA (n = 80) and healthy volunteers (HV, n = 40). Haemoglobin and other iron-related proteins were also measured. At baseline, all patients had active disease and were treatment naïve. Patients were treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and with additional adalimumab (ADA, n = 42) or placebo (PLA, n = 38) during 52 weeks, using a treat-to-target strategy, aiming for a 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) < 3.2. RESULTS: At baseline, hepcidin levels [median (interquartile range)] were 9.7 ng/mL (5.2-19.4 ng/mL) in DMARD + ADA and 11.3 ng/mL (5.9-19.1 ng/mL) in DMARD + PLA. Both were significantly higher than seen in HV (6.0 ng/mL (3.3-9.3 ng/mL) (p < 0.001). After 12 months, both treatment regimens resulted in normalization of hepcidin. DAS28 correlated with hepcidin at baseline (r = 0.48, p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between levels of haemoglobin and hepcidin at baseline or during the 52 week follow-up. No change in haemoglobin levels was seen as a function of hepcidin changes. In a mixed statistical model, no single factor was connected with the regulation of haemoglobin in early RA. CONCLUSION: The changes in hepcidin were not associated with changes in haemoglobin levels. Thus, hepcidin could not be used as a prognostic marker in patients with early RA.