4CMenB journey to the 10-year anniversary and beyond.

The 4-component meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB, the first broadly protective, protein-based MenB vaccine to be licensed, is now registered in more than 50 countries worldwide. Real-world evidence (RWE) from the last decade confirms its effectiveness and impact, with infant immunization programs showing vaccine effectiveness of 71-95% against invasive MenB disease and cross-protection against non-B serogroups, including a 69% decrease in serogroup W cases in 4CMenB-eligible cohorts in England. RWE from different countries also demonstrates the potential for additional moderate protection against gonorrhea in adolescents. The real-world safety profile of 4CMenB is consistent with prelicensure reports. Use of the endogenous complement human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against 110 MenB strains may enable assessment of the immunological effectiveness of multicomponent MenB vaccines in clinical trial settings. Equitable access to 4CMenB vaccination is required to better protect all age groups, including older adults, and vulnerable groups through comprehensive immunization policies.

Invasive meningococcal disease, caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis(meningococcus), is rare but often devastating and can be deadly. Effective vaccines are available, including vaccines against meningococcal serogroup B disease. In 2013, the 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, 4CMenB, became the first broadly protective, protein-based vaccine against serogroup B to be licensed, with the second (bivalent vaccine, MenB-FHbp) licensed the following year. 4CMenB is now registered in more than 50 countries, in the majority, for infants and all age groups. In the US, it is approved for individuals aged 10­25 years. Evidence from immunization programs in the last decade, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals and the same population before and after vaccination, confirms the effectiveness and positive impact of 4CMenB against serogroup B disease. This also demonstrates that 4CMenB can provide protection against invasive diseases caused by other meningococcal serogroups. Furthermore, N. meningitidis is closely related to the bacterium that causes gonorrhea, N. gonorrhoeae, and emerging real-world evidence suggests that 4CMenB provides additional moderate protection against gonococcal disease. The safety of 4CMenB when given to large numbers of infants, children, adolescents, and adults is consistent with the 4CMenB safety profile reported before licensure.For the future, it would be beneficial to address differences among national guidelines for the recommended administration of 4CMenB, particularly where there is supportive epidemiological evidence but no equitable access to vaccination. New assays for assessing the potential effectiveness of meningococcal serogroup B vaccines in clinical trials are also required because serogroup B strains circulating in the population are extremely diverse across different countries.

Changing patterns of invasive meningococcal disease and future immunization strategies.

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a life-threatening disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis and has high mortality rates. Survivors often exhibit long-term sequelae and reduced life expectancy. Disease incidence is highest in infants and toddlers, with a resurgence of cases in adolescents and older adults (>50 years of age). Substantial heterogeneity exists in the recommendations of meningococcal vaccines included in National Immunization Programs (NIPs) across countries. Recommendations are usually based on infant/toddler immunization, with some countries recommending immunization only for toddlers. While existing recommendations have led to a reduced incidence of IMD in children <5 years of age, there has been an increase in cases among adolescents and older adults. Currently, older adults are not included in the recommendations. The higher healthcare burden and the economic costs associated with IMD in these age groups suggest that it is time to consider including adolescents and older adults in NIPs to protect against IMD caused by the five most prevalent serogroups. Currently, the lack of equity of access to vaccines in the immunization programs is a glaring gap in the betterment of public health, and a broader meningococcal strategy is recommended to provide optimal protection for all age groups.

Invasive meningococcal diseases, which include meningitis, are rare and unpredictable, but may lead to very important/debilitating long-term sequelae, death, or reduced life expectancy. Vaccination is the best way to prevent them. Vaccination recommendations provided by national health agencies usually target infants (or toddlers), children, and adolescents. Older adults are only considered when they are at risk for invasive meningococcal diseases.Here, we analyzed the vaccination strategies for invasive meningococcal disease in different countries to identify the gaps preventing access to vaccination.We found that recommendations for invasive meningococcal disease vaccination vary markedly among countries. Vaccination programs target mainly infants and toddlers, and they successfully reduced the number of cases among them. However, we also observed that the disease now affects more adults. We also found that the lack of equitable access to vaccination prevents broader meningococcal protection for persons of any age.With this analysis, we suggest improving the current meningococcal vaccination guidelines to also provide adolescents and healthy older adults with access to vaccines. Promoting equal access to vaccination for everyone could reduce the impact on the healthcare system and help reduce social disparity. In order to do so, we advise universal recommendation of meningococcal vaccines, which would provide clear guidance to health-care practitioners.

Safety and immunogenicity of co-administered meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine: A literature review.

The four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is indicated for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. Co-administering 4CMenB with other vaccines may improve vaccine uptake provided that the safety and immunogenicity of either are not affected. Published literature on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 4CMenB co-administered with other routine childhood and adulthood vaccines was reviewed. From 282 publications identified, data were collated from 10 clinical studies, 3 real-world studies, and 3 reviews. The evidence showed that 4CMenB co-administration is not associated with significant safety concerns or clinically relevant immunological interferences. The increased reactogenicity (e.g., fever) associated with 4CMenB co-administration can be adequately managed with prophylactic paracetamol in children. Thus, 4CMenB co-administration has the potential to maximize vaccine coverage and improve protection against IMD globally.

Use of expanded Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B panels with the serum bactericidal antibody assay for the evaluation of meningococcal B vaccine effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION: Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (NmB) antigens are inherently diverse with variable expression among strains. Prediction of meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine effectiveness therefore requires an assay suitable for use against large panels of epidemiologically representative disease-causing NmB strains. Traditional serum bactericidal antibody assay using exogenous human complement (hSBA) is limited to the quantification of MenB vaccine immunogenicity on a small number of indicator strains. AREAS COVERED: Additional and complementary methods for assessing strain coverage developed previously include the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS), Meningococcal Antigen Surface Expression (MEASURE) assay, and genotyping approaches, but these do not estimate vaccine effectiveness. We provide a narrative review of these methods, highlighting a more recent approach involving the hSBA assay in conjunction with expanded NmB strain panels: hSBA assay using endogenous complement in each vaccinated person's serum (enc-hSBA) against a 110-strain NmB panel and the traditional hSBA assay against 14 (4 + 10) NmB strains. EXPERT OPINION: The enc-hSBA is a highly standardized, robust method that can be used in clinical trials to measure the immunological effectiveness of MenB vaccines under conditions that mimic real-world settings as closely as possible, through the use of endogenous complement and a diverse, epidemiologically representative panel of NmB strains.

Meningococcal disease refers to illnesses caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus), including infections of the brain lining and spinal cord (meningitis) and bloodstream (septicemia). It is rare but often severe and can be deadly. Invasive meningococcal disease can be prevented through vaccination. Nearly all cases are caused by six serogroups (types) of meningococci, including meningococcal serogroup B. Vaccines are available against meningococcal serogroup B but, because of the uncommonness of the disease, standard clinical trials could not be performed to prove these vaccines are effective. Instead, an indirect measure, called the 'hSBA assay' (serum bactericidal antibody assay using human complement), is used to measure the ability of vaccines to provide protection against specific N. meningitidis strains that have antigens (substances that cause the immune system to react) sharing characteristics with components of the vaccines. However, meningococcal serogroup B strains are diverse in the genetic composition and expression of vaccine antigens. Hence, a large number of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains would have to be tested to make sure that the vaccine is effective against these strains. This is not feasible using the traditional hSBA assay, which requires a human complement (a protein system, which is part of the immune system) that has not come from the vaccinated person and is difficult and time-consuming to source. Recently, an alternative hSBA assay was developed that uses the complement present in each vaccinated person's blood (endogenous complement) and which overcomes these challenges. By allowing testing against a broad panel of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains, this new assay may enable a more accurate estimation of the effectiveness of vaccines against serogroup B meningococci.

A Decade of Fighting Invasive Meningococcal Disease: A Narrative Review of Clinical and Real-World Experience with the MenACWY-CRM Conjugate Vaccine.

The quadrivalent A, C, W and Y meningococcal vaccine conjugated to nontoxic mutant of diphtheria toxin (MenACWY-CRM) has been licensed since 2010 for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), an uncommon but life-threatening condition. Here, we summarize the experience accrued with MenACWY-CRM during the first decade since its licensure, by providing an overview of clinical trials investigating the safety, immunogenicity and co-administration of MenACWY-CRM with other vaccines as well as presenting real-world evidence regarding the impact of MenACWY-CRM vaccination on carriage and IMD incidence. MenACWY-CRM has demonstrated an acceptable clinical safety profile across a wide range of age groups; no safety concerns have been reported in special populations, such as immunocompromised infants and toddlers, or pregnant women. MenACWY-CRM has also been proven to be immunogenic in various age groups and geographic settings, and a booster dose has been shown to elicit strong anamnestic responses in all studied populations, irrespective of the vaccine used for priming. With no clinically relevant vaccine interactions reported, MenACWY-CRM is being conveniently integrated into existing vaccination programs for various age and risk groups; this possibility of co-administration helps improving vaccine coverage and streamlining the healthcare process of fighting preventable infectious diseases. Vaccination of adolescents and adults has been proven to reduce nasopharyngeal carriage for serogroups C, W and Y, which is an important element in reducing transmission. Real-world evidence indicates that MenACWY-CRM can reduce IMD incidence even in high-exposure groups. When combined with vaccines against serogroup B meningococci, MenACWY-CRM can offer protection against five of the most common serogroups responsible for IMD, which is an important advantage in the continuously evolving landscape of meningococcal serogroup epidemiology.

Invasive meningococcal disease is an uncommon but life-threatening infection that appears as meningitis and/or sepsis. It is caused by Neisseria meningitidis, a bacteria commonly present in the throat or nose. Vaccination with MenACWY-CRM (Menveo, GSK) helps to prevent invasive meningococcal disease caused by four of the most common N. meningitidis serogroups (A, C, W and Y). This vaccine has been licensed for 10 years: we summarized here all available evidence gathered since the vaccine has been available in general practice, from clinical development to real-world experience. Information gained during clinical trials of MenACWY-CRM confirms that vaccination is well tolerated, has an acceptable safety profile and would induce significant protection when given to individuals of various ages such as infants, toddlers, children, adolescents and adults, and when administered at the same time as routine or traveler vaccinations as well as vaccines against serogroup B meningococci (4CMenB). Vaccination with MenACWY-CRM has been shown to decrease the number of serogroup C, W and Y meningococci found in the nose and throat in adolescents and adults as well as the occurrence of invasive meningococcal disease in a high-exposure population from a real-world setting. MenACWY-CRM can conveniently be integrated into most of the existing vaccination schedules for various age and risk groups. When combined with vaccination against serogroup B meningococci, MenACWY-CRM can contribute to providing protection against five of the most common serogroups responsible for invasive meningococcal disease.

Proceedings of the Expert Consensus Group meeting on meningococcal serogroup B disease burden and prevention in India.

Meningococcal disease is highly transmissible, life-threatening and leaves significant sequelae in survivors. Every year, India, which has a plethora of risk factors for meningococcal disease, reports around 3000 endemic cases. However, the overall disease burden and serogroup distribution are unknown, creating a setting of general disease negligence and unawareness. Vaccination with quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine A, C, W, and Y is only recommended for high-risk children, and there is no overall guidance for meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination. MenB vaccines, which recently have been licensed in many countries but not in India, have significantly aided the fight against meningococcal disease. However, these MenB vaccines are not available in India. An Expert Consensus Group meeting was held with leading meningococcal disease experts to better understand the current disease epidemiology, particularly serogroup B, the prevalence gaps, and feasible ways to bridge them. The proceedings are presented in this paper.

Evolving strategies for meningococcal vaccination in Europe: Overview and key determinants for current and future considerations.

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a life-threatening, unpredictable condition. Vaccines are available against 5 of the 6 meningococcal serogroups (Men) accounting for nearly all IMD cases worldwide; conjugate monovalent MenC, quadrivalent MenACWY, and protein-based MenB vaccines are commonly used. We provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of meningococcal vaccination strategies employed in national immunization programmes (NIPs) and their impact on IMD incidence in Europe. A more in-depth description is given for several countries: the United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands, Greece, Italy, and Ireland. We searched European health authorities' websites and PubMed. Various vaccines and immunization schedules are used in 21 NIPs. Most countries implement MenC vaccination in infants, MenACWY in adolescents, and a growing number, MenB in infants. Only Malta has introduced MenACWY vaccination in infants, and several countries reimburse immunization of toddlers. The UK, Italy, Ireland, Malta, Andorra, and San Marino recommend MenB vaccination in infants and MenACWY vaccination in adolescents, targeting the most prevalent serogroups in the most impacted age groups. Main factors determining new vaccination strategies are fluctuating IMD epidemiology, ease of vaccine implementation, ability to induce herd protection, favorable benefit-risk balance, and acceptable cost-effectiveness. Since 1999, when the UK introduced MenC vaccination, the reduction in IMD incidence has been gradually enhanced as other countries adopted routine meningococcal vaccinations. Meningococcal vaccination strategies in each country are continually adapted to regional epidemiology and national healthcare priorities. Future strategies may include broader coverage vaccines when available (e.g., MenABCWY, MenACWY), depending on prevailing epidemiology.

Equity in vaccination policies to overcome social deprivation as a risk factor for invasive meningococcal disease.

INTRODUCTION: Social deprivation is associated with poorer healthcare access. Vaccination is among the most effective public health interventions and achieving equity in vaccination access is vitally important. However, vaccines are often reimbursed by public funds only when recommended in national immunization programs (NIPs), which can increase inequity between high and low socioeconomic groups. Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious vaccination-preventable disease. This review focuses on vaccination strategies against IMD designed to reduce inequity. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed meningococcal epidemiology and current vaccination recommendations worldwide. We also reviewed studies demonstrating an association between social deprivation and risk of meningococcal disease, as well as studies demonstrating an impact of social deprivation on uptake of meningococcal vaccines. We discuss factors influencing inclusion of meningococcal vaccines in NIPs. EXPERT OPINION: Incorporating meningococcal vaccines in NIPs is necessary to reduce inequity, but insufficient alone. Inclusion provides clear guidance to healthcare professionals and helps to ensure that vaccines are offered universally to all target groups. Beyond NIPs, cost of vaccination should be reimbursed especially for disadvantaged individuals. These approaches should help to achieve optimal protection against IMD, by increasing access and immunization rates, eventually reducing social inequities, and helping to protect those at greatest risk.

According to the World Health Organization, health equity is achieved when every person has access to the highest attainable health standard regardless of socioeconomic status. Achieving health equity in access to vaccination is particularly important, as vaccination is one of the most effective public health measures. However, vaccines are often paid by public funds only when they are recommended in the country's National Immunization Program. This can increase inequity between the rich and poor, as people with fewer resources are less likely to have private insurance and be aware of vaccines that are not suggested by their doctor. Invasive meningococcal disease is uncommon and unpredictable but a serious infection that can result in long-term disability and can kill within 24 hours. Vaccination is the best measure to prevent it.We reviewed scientific studies to assess the link between socioeconomic status, the risk of having the disease, and the likelihood of being vaccinated against it. We found that the poorest households have the highest risk of getting the disease and the lowest vaccination rates, even in countries with successful vaccination programs.Achieving universal vaccination against invasive meningococcal disease is challenging for financial reasons and because the disease is uncommon. Key factors identified to improve vaccination uptake and reduce health inequity are the need for publicly funded vaccines, increased parents' knowledge of available vaccines, and stronger engagement of vaccination recommendation by doctors/nurses (see also Supplementary Figure 1).

Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Moving Target and a Case for Routine Preventative Vaccination.

Outbreaks of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) are unpredictable, can be sudden and have devastating consequences. We conducted a non-systematic review of the literature in PubMed (1997-2020) to assess outbreak response strategies and the impact of vaccine interventions. Since 1997, IMD outbreaks due to serogroups A, B, C, W, Y and X have occurred globally. Reactive emergency mass vaccination campaigns have encompassed single institutions (schools, universities) through to whole sections of the population at regional/national levels (e.g. serogroup B outbreaks in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region, Canada and New Zealand). Emergency vaccination responses to IMD outbreaks consistently incurred substantial costs (expenditure on vaccine supplies, personnel costs and interruption of other programmes). Impediments included the limited pace of transmission of information to parents/communities/healthcare workers; issues around collection of informed consents; poor vaccine uptake by older adolescents/young adults, often a target age group; issues of reimbursement, particularly in the USA; and difficulties in swift supply of large quantities of vaccines. For serogroup B outbreaks, the need for two doses was a significant issue that contributed substantially to costs, delayed onset of protection and non-compliance with dose 2. Real-world descriptions of outbreak control strategies and the associated challenges systematically show that reactive outbreak management is administratively, logistically and financially costly, and that its impact can be difficult to measure. In view of the unpredictability, fast pace and potential lethality of outbreak-associated IMD, prevention through routine vaccination appears the most effective mitigation tool. Highly effective vaccines covering five of six disease-causing serogroups are available. Preparedness through routine vaccination programmes will enhance the speed and effectiveness of outbreak responses, should they be needed (ready access to vaccines and need for a single booster dose rather than a primary series).

Mass gatherings: a review of the scope for meningococcal vaccination in the Indian context.

The risk of meningococcal transmission is increased with crowding and prolonged close proximity between people. There have been numerous invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) outbreaks associated with mass gatherings and other overcrowded situations, including cramped accommodation, such as student and military housing, and refugee camps. In these conditions, IMD outbreaks predominantly affect adolescents and young adults. In this narrative review, we examine the situation in India, where the burden of IMD-related complications is significant but the reported background incidence of IMD is low. However, active surveillance for meningococcal disease is suboptimal and laboratory confirmation of meningococcal strain is near absent, especially in non-outbreak periods. IMD risk factors are prevalent, including frequent mass gatherings and overcrowding combined with a demographically young population. Since overcrowded situations are generally unavoidable, the way forward relies on preventive measures. More widespread meningococcal vaccination and strengthened disease surveillance are likely to be key to this approach.

A Comprehensive Review of Meningococcal Disease Burden in India.

INTRODUCTION: Meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis has a high case fatality rate. Of 12 distinct serogroups, A, B, C, W-135 (W) and Y cause the majority of infections. The meningococcal disease burden and epidemiology in India are not reliably known. Hence, we performed a narrative review with a systematically conducted search to summarize information on meningococcal disease burden and epidemiology and vaccination recommendations for meningococcal disease in India. METHODS: A search of Medline and Embase databases was undertaken to identify relevant publications published in the last 25 years. RESULTS: Results from 32 original publications, 11 of which were case reports, suggest a significant burden of meningococcal disease and related complications. Meningococcal disease is increasingly reported among adolescents and adults, and large outbreaks have been reported in this population. Meningococcal disease in India is caused almost exclusively by serogroup A; serogroups B, C, W and Y have also been documented. Meningococcal disease burden data remain unreliable because of limited disease surveillance, insufficient laboratory capacity, misdiagnosis and prevalence of extensive antibiotic use in India. Lack of access to healthcare also increases under-reporting, thus bringing the reliability of the data into question. Conjugate meningococcal vaccines are being used for disease prevention by national governments and immunization programs globally. In India, meningococcal vaccination is recommended only for certain high-risk groups, during outbreaks and for international travelers such as Hajj pilgrims and students pursuing studies abroad. CONCLUSION: Meningococcal disease is prevalent in India but remains grossly underestimated and under-reported. Available literature largely presents outbreak data related to serogroup A disease; however, non-A serogroup disease cases have been reported. Reliable epidemiologic data are urgently needed to inform the true burden of endemic disease. Further research into the significance of meningococcal disease burden can be used to improve public health policy in India. Fig. 1 Plain language summary.

Modelling the impact of 4CMenB and MenACWY meningococcal combined vaccination strategies including potential 4CMenB cross-protection: An application to England.

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), an uncommon but severe disease, affects mainly infants, young children and adolescents. Meningococcal B (4CMenB) and ACWY (MenACWY) vaccines targeting IMD-causing serogroups B and A, C, W and Y, respectively are available for these mostly-affected age-groups. The objective was to assess the impact of 4CMenB and/or MenACWY vaccination strategies on IMD in England, considering MenACWY carriage protection and potential cross-protection of 4CMenB against non-B serogroups. A novel dynamic transmission model was developed, accounting for vaccine characteristics, with separate variables for meningococcal carriage and IMD for three groups: B; ACWY; and 'Other' mostly non-pathogenic serogroups. A dynamic force of infection is assumed for each group. The model analysis uses data from England before 2015 (when 4CMenB and MenACWY were introduced), and accounts for existing MenC vaccination impact. Compared with no vaccination, the smallest decrease in IMD cases is observed for MenACWY strategies (toddler and/or adolescent). 4CMenB (infant or infant/adolescent), alone or with MenACWY, always results in the most rapid and steep decline in IMD cases. Combined strategies with adolescent 4CMenB result in the largest decrease in IMD cases, whereas adding MenACWY for toddlers has a minor impact. With potential 4CMenB cross-protection, 4CMenB infant strategy has a notable impact on reduction of MenW and MenY IMD cases in strategies where MenACWY toddler and/or adolescent vaccination is absent. This novel model allows for analysis of combined 4CMenB and MenACWY strategies including potential 4CMenB cross-protection. In settings comparable to England, a comprehensive meningococcal vaccination programme should include infant 4CMenB as essential building block. Decisions to include MenACWY toddler programmes should consider herd effects of MenACWY adolescent programmes and 4CMenB potential cross-protection effects. Extending 4CMenB infant and MenACWY adolescent programmes with a 4CMenB adolescent programme allows for the largest overall reduction in IMD cases.

Recent changes in the epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W across the world, current vaccination policy choices and possible future strategies.

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious disease that is fatal in 5-15% and disabling in 12-20% of cases. The dynamic and unpredictable epidemiology is a particular challenge of IMD prevention. Although vaccination against meningococcal serogroups A (MenA), MenC and, more recently, MenB, are proving successful, other serogroups are emerging as major IMD causes. Recently, surges in MenW incidence occurred in South America, Europe, Australia and parts of sub-Saharan Africa, with hypervirulent strains being associated with severe IMD and higher fatality rates. This review describes global trends in MenW-IMD epidemiology over the last 5-10 years, with emphasis on the response of national/regional health authorities to increased MenW prevalence in impacted areas. Several countries (Argentina, Australia, Chile, the Netherlands and UK) have implemented reactive vaccination campaigns to reduce MenW-IMD, using MenACWY conjugate vaccines. Future vaccination programs should consider the evolving epidemiology of MenW-IMD and the most impacted age groups.

Vaccination with a multicomponent meningococcal B vaccine in prevention of disease in adolescents and young adults.

Vaccination programs employing capsular-based meningococcal vaccines have proved successful in a variety of settings globally since first introduced over 40 years ago. Similar successes have been demonstrated using meningococcal vaccines for use against serogroup B (MenB) outbreak strains but the diversity of MenB strains has limited vaccine use outside targeted geographic regions. MenB continues to be a significant cause of outbreaks in adolescents and young adults, as recently demonstrated in university settings in the US (Princeton, New Jersey and Santa Barbara, California) and has the potential for hyperendemic disease levels such as currently experienced in Québec and the United Kingdom. In adolescents, increased endemic disease rates and outbreak potential are likely associated with social behaviors putting individuals at risk for carriage acquisition and may explain regional and temporal variations in epidemiology. A protein-based, multi-component MenB vaccine (4CMenB) is currently licensed for use in 37 countries including EU/EEA countries, Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Uruguay, and the US. In this article we review the most recent clinical trial data with 4CMenB with a focus on adolescents and young adults. The vaccine appears to have an acceptable safety profile and is well-tolerated in adolescents and young adults while providing robust, persistent levels of bactericidal antibodies considered protective for each of the four antigenic components of the vaccine. With the recent availability of this vaccine, health care providers have the first comprehensive opportunity to control meningococcal disease, a highly disruptive public health problem with a disproportionate impact on adolescents and young adults.

Combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and polio vaccine (dTpa-IPV) for booster vaccination of adults.

Many countries recommend diphtheria, tetanus and/or poliomyelitis boosters in adolescents or adults and the need for pertussis booster vaccination beyond childhood is increasingly recognized. A new combined reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine provides booster vaccination against all four diseases in one single injection. The immunogenicity and safety of the dTpa-IPV vaccine was compared to that of licensed dTpa+IPV or Td-IPV vaccines in 806 adolescents >14 years of age and adults with a heterogeneous vaccination history. The dTpa-IPV vaccine was immunogenic and well tolerated. No clinically significant differences were observed between groups. Anti-tetanus antibody kinetics indicated that each of the vaccines could be used for tetanus prophylaxis in acute wound management. For all vaccines, the lowest post-vaccination antibody concentrations were observed in subjects >40 years of age, those seronegative prior to vaccination and those subjects whose last vaccination was > or =20 years ago. In conclusion, dTpa-IPV vaccination of subjects over 14 years of age was as immunogenic and well tolerated as the licensed dTpa+IPV or Td-IPV vaccines. Vaccination coverage of adults is poor and the use of combined vaccines such as dTpa-IPV during vaccination visits, or for wound management, maximizes opportunities for boosting in these difficult to reach age groups.