RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT), and graft versus host disease (GVHD) increases the risk of CMV reactivation. Letermovir is approved for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive patients, but has only been studied through day 100 post-transplantation in the registration trial. Its efficacy in preventing CMV in patients with GVHD requiring treatment beyond the day 100 milestone has not been studied. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent an AHCT at a single center over a period of 24 months, and identified a cohort of 20 patients who received extended duration of letermovir (beyond 100 days) after the diagnosis of GVHD. The primary end point was the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection, defined as onset of CMV disease or initiation of preemptive therapy with alternative antiviral agents. RESULTS: In this high-risk cohort, only one patient (5%) developed a clinically significant CMV infection, requiring preemptive therapy. No patients developed CMV organ disease. Three additional patients developed CMV viremia of ≥150 IU/mL while on letermovir and after the onset of GVHD, and none required additional treatment. Receipt of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and low CD4 count after the development of GVHD were associated with breakthrough CMV viremia while on extended duration letermovir. CONCLUSIONS: Extended duration letermovir was efficacious in preventing clinically significant CMV infections in patients with GVHD.
Assuntos
Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Citomegalovirus , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The past decade has seen an increase in oral anticancer drug (OACD) approvals. Polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) likely contribute to OACD toxicity. We assessed a one-time pharmacist-led video consultation to identify DDIs. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm telehealth intervention of a one-time 30-minute pharmacist-led video consultation among patients initiating OACDs. The visit focused on identifying polypharmacy and DDIs. Feasibility was defined as ≥50% completion of all study interventions. We determined the prevalence, characteristics, and severity of OACD-related potential DDIs. We also assessed the prevalence of medication list inaccuracies, polypharmacy, patient satisfaction, and patient perception of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. RESULTS: Of 58 eligible patients, 43 (74%) completed the intervention and 33 (57%) completed all evaluations. Median medication per patient was nine (range 4-21), and 98% of patients had at least five prescriptions. The median number of medication list errors was two (range 0-16), with at least one error for 76% and >1 for 52%. Pharmacists identified OACD-related interactions in 18 cases (42%), including change in drug metabolism (eight), elimination (one), and absorption (three). Interactions were classified as Lexicomp categories C (13), D (five), or X (one) requiring close monitoring or a change in treatment. All patients expressed high satisfaction with the intervention and agreed or completely agreed that it was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy, medication list errors, and DDIs are prevalent among patients initiating OACDs. A one-time remote pharmacist-led video consultation can address OACD-related DDIs, which may decrease medication complexity and improve adherence.
RESUMO
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation and EBV-related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are often fatal complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The risk of EBV reactivation may be mitigated by depletion of B cells with rituximab. Starting in January 2020, allo-HSCT recipients undergoing T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab received 1 dose of rituximab before transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD in recipients of allo-HSCT and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab who received pre-HSCT rituximab compared to patients who did not. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients who consecutively received an HLA-identical allo-HSCT between January 2019 and May 2021 and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab. Patients were included in the rituximab cohort if they received rituximab within 6 months before their transplantation. The primary endpoint was incidence of EBV reactivation at day 180 among those receiving pre-HSCT rituximab versus those not receiving rituximab. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of EBV-PTLD at 1 year, time to engraftment, immune reconstitution, and incidence of infections and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at day 180. Eighty-six consecutive patients who received an allo-HSCT with alemtuzumab T-cell depletion were reviewed; 43 patients who received pre-HSCT rituximab after our protocol modification were compared to 43 patients who did not receive pre-HSCT rituximab before this change. Median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 40-69) years, and the majority of patients had acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Baseline characteristics were similar between the cohorts. EBV reactivation at day 180 occurred in 23 (53%) patients without prior rituximab exposure versus 0 patients with pre-HSCT rituximab exposure (P < .0001). Similarly, 6 patients without prior rituximab exposure developed PTLD at 1 year compared to no cases of PTLD among patients receiving pre-HSCT rituximab. There was no difference in neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, or aGVHD at day 180 between the 2 cohorts. There was a delay in time to platelet engraftment in the rituximab cohort (median 16 [IQR 15-20] days versus 15 [IQR 14-17] days; P = .04). Administration of pre-HSCT rituximab before allo-HSCT in patients receiving T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab was associated with a significant decrease in the risk for EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD, without increasing aGVHD or infection rates.
Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Lymphocryptovirus , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Herpesvirus Humano 4/fisiologia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/complicações , Alemtuzumab/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/etiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/epidemiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine which pediatric populations, if any, benefit from exogenous melatonin supplementation. METHODS: PubMed was utilized for the purposes of this systematic review. The studies selected evaluated melatonin use in pediatric special populations and included randomized controlled trials, crossover studies, and meta-analyses. Each study's objectives, measures of outcomes, and dosing strategies of melatonin were reviewed along with the results and author's conclusions. RESULTS: Our analysis of the available data offers mixed results and recommendations with regard to the decision of whether to add supplementation of melatonin. CONCLUSION: With further regulation of melatonin supplements, it may be plausible to hold larger, multicenter trials and come to a firm recommendation in the future. At this time, we believe that the benefit of exogenous melatonin supplementation outweighs the risks of adverse events and therefore would recommend its use in aiding patients in improving their sleep. Exogenous supplementation with melatonin should be used at the physician's and patient's discretion.