Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 73(7): 717-21, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17674949

RESUMO

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in American women. Screening mammograms are recommended for women starting at age 40 for the early detection of breast cancer. An additional benefit of this routine screening tool may be to detect breast arterial calcifications (BAC) as a possible sign of CAD. The purpose of this study was to determine further the relationship between mammographically detected BAC and CAD. The medical records of 44 women who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution over 5 years were reviewed. These mammograms were examined for evidence of BAC. For all women included in the study, 18 of 44 (41%) had evidence of BAC on screening mammogram. This was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) compared with the prevalence of BAC reported in the general population in previous studies. Most were also overweight (61.1%), had hypertension (88.8%), and hypercholesterolemia (55.5%). This is the first study to look at the direct correlation between patients with known CAD requiring revascularization and BAC. Perhaps women with BAC seen on screening mammography should undergo further workup for CAD, with the potential benefit of early intervention.


Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Mamárias/epidemiologia , Calcinose/epidemiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Am Surg ; 70(5): 384-7; discussion 387-8, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15156944

RESUMO

Neointimal proliferation with plaque formation is the principal cause of coronary artery disease. In the neointima, inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) are expressed by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). These cytokines stimulate proliferation and migration of VSMCs, events that are crucial to neointima formation. Stents, liberating rapamycin, have been shown to reduce neointima formation in human coronary arteries. The purpose of this study was to determine if rapamycin could inhibit the production of TNF-alpha by VSMCs. With institutional review board approval, VSMCs were cultured from saphenous vein segments obtained from five patients. Cells were identified as VSMC by immunostaining for smooth muscle alpha-actin. Cells were exposed to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), LPS plus rapamycin, or LPS plus isoproterenol for 24 hours. Cells with no treatment served as controls. The culture medium was then removed and analyzed for TNF-alpha. Additionally, the effect of treatment on viability was determined by assay of mitochondrial activity. TNF-alpha released into the culture medium is expressed as pg TNF-alpha/mg cell protein. Statistical analysis was by ANOVA. In control cells, TNF-alpha was undetectable in the culture medium. The addition of LPS (10 microg/mL) increased TNF-alpha release to 4312 +/- 705 pg/mg at 24 hours. The addition of 1 ng/mL rapamycin with LPS reduced TNF-alpha production 50 per cent (P < 0.01 vs LPS alone). A similar reduction of TNF-alpha release was seen with 1 microM isoproterenol. LPS, rapamycin, or isoproterenol did not affect cell viability. These data show that rapamycin effectively inhibits the release of TNF-alpha from VSMCs stimulated with inflammatory mediators like LPS. Rapamycin is as effective as agents that raise intracellular cyclic AMP (e.g., isoproterenol). Therefore, a potential mechanism for the effectiveness of rapamycin-releasing stents is reduction of inflammatory cytokine expression by VSMCs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Músculo Liso Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Sirolimo/farmacologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/efeitos dos fármacos , Análise de Variância , Causalidade , Divisão Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Divisão Celular/fisiologia , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Movimento Celular/fisiologia , Células Cultivadas , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Doença das Coronárias/etiologia , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , AMP Cíclico/fisiologia , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Inflamação/imunologia , Isoproterenol/farmacologia , Lipopolissacarídeos/efeitos adversos , Músculo Liso Vascular/citologia , Músculo Liso Vascular/fisiologia , Veia Safena/citologia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/fisiologia , Túnica Íntima/efeitos dos fármacos , Túnica Íntima/fisiologia
3.
Am Surg ; 70(6): 526-8, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15212408

RESUMO

In the current study, we test the hypothesis that norepinephrine has greater anti-inflammatory effects versus dopamine over a range of doses in a model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cytokine release in human saphenous vein. Segments of saphenous vein were cut and separated into 1 mm x 1 mm squares and placed into two 24-well plates. These small segments of vessels were incubated in the presence of 20 microg/mL bacterial LPS, alone as a control or with 10x-6, 10x-5, 10x-4, 10x-3 concentration of dopamine or norepinephrine and LPS. The general linear models (GLM) statistical analysis for least squares means and adjustment for multiple comparisons was chosen to analyze the data. Both norepinephrine and dopamine were able to suppress the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in a dose-dependent fashion. Over the range of doses, norepinephrine is a more potent inhibitor of TNF production than dopamine. This is a statistically significant linear trend (P < .0001). Both norepinephrine and dopamine are powerful anti-inflammatory agents. Norepinephrine is a more potent inhibitor of TNF than dopamine.


Assuntos
Dopamina/farmacologia , Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Veia Safena
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA