Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 29(5): 1019-1029, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31948834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty has clear advantages over alternative procedures and is used in 20% of all shoulder joint replacements. Because of cartilage wear, the clinical outcome of hemiarthroplasty is unreliable and controversial. This paper suggests that the optimal choice of prosthetic material may reduce cartilage degeneration and improve the reliability of the procedure. The specific objectives were to assess 3 materials and assess how the severity of arthritis might affect the choice of prosthetic material. METHODS: A CoCr alloy, an AL2O3 ceramic, and a polycarbonate urethane polymer (PCU) were mechanically tested against 5 levels of human osteoarthritic cartilage (from intact to severely arthritic, n = 45). A high friction coefficient, a decrease in Young's modulus, an increase in permeability, a decrease in relaxation time, an increase in surface roughness, and a disrupted appearance of the cartilage after testing were used as measures of cartilage damage. The biomaterial that caused minimal cartilage damage was defined as superior. RESULTS: The CoCr caused the most damage. This was followed by the AL2O3 ceramic, whereas the PCU caused the least amount of damage. Although the degree of arthritis had an effect on the results, it did not change the trend that CoCr performed worst and PCU the best. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study indicates that ceramic implants may be a better choice than metals, and the articulating surface should be as smooth as possible. Although our results indicate that the degree of arthritis should not affect the choice of prosthetic material, this suggestion needs to be further investigated.


Assuntos
Cartilagem Articular/lesões , Hemiartroplastia/efeitos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/instrumentação , Prótese de Ombro/efeitos adversos , Materiais Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Cerâmica/efeitos adversos , Ligas de Cromo/efeitos adversos , Módulo de Elasticidade , Fricção , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Poliuretanos/efeitos adversos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Nanomedicine ; 13(4): 1531-1542, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28238752

RESUMO

In this study, we investigated gold nanoparticle (AuNP) interactions in blood using thromboelastography as a rapid screening tool to monitor their influence on blood coagulation. 1.2 nM colloidal AuNPs ranging from 12 to 85 nm have no effect in the blood, however, 5 nM AuNPs demonstrate pro-thrombogenic concentration dependent effects with a reduction in clot formation. Size effects exhibit a non-linear trend with 45 and 85 nm particles resulting in a faster pro-thrombotic response. Clot strength decreased with AuNP size with the greatest reduction with 28 nm particles. We assessed AuNP interactions in the blood focusing on their biological activity. AuNP-RGD possessed pro-coagulant activities, while PEG-thiol, human fibrinogen and clopidogrel prevented blood clot formation and influenced platelet activity, and were more efficient when bound to nanocarriers than unbound ligands. Such tests could fill the knowledge gaps in thrombogenicity of NPs between in vitro test methods and predict in vivo haemocompatibility.


Assuntos
Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Coagulantes/química , Ouro/sangue , Nanopartículas Metálicas/química , Anticoagulantes/química , Humanos , Ligantes , Tamanho da Partícula , Tromboelastografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA