Oral Relugolix for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Injectable luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (e.g., leuprolide) are the standard agents for achieving androgen deprivation for prostate cancer despite the initial testosterone surge and delay in therapeutic effect. The efficacy and safety of relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, as compared with those of leuprolide are not known. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with advanced prostate cancer, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive relugolix (120 mg orally once daily) or leuprolide (injections every 3 months) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (<50 ng per deciliter) through 48 weeks. Secondary end points included noninferiority with respect to the primary end point, castrate levels of testosterone on day 4, and profound castrate levels (<20 ng per deciliter) on day 15. Testosterone recovery was evaluated in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: A total of 622 patients received relugolix and 308 received leuprolide. Of men who received relugolix, 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.9 to 97.9) maintained castration through 48 weeks, as compared with 88.8% (95% CI, 84.6 to 91.8) of men receiving leuprolide. The difference of 7.9 percentage points (95% CI, 4.1 to 11.8) showed noninferiority and superiority of relugolix (P<0.001 for superiority). All other key secondary end points showed superiority of relugolix over leuprolide (P<0.001). The percentage of patients with castrate levels of testosterone on day 4 was 56.0% with relugolix and 0% with leuprolide. In the subgroup of 184 patients followed for testosterone recovery, the mean testosterone levels 90 days after treatment discontinuation were 288.4 ng per deciliter in the relugolix group and 58.6 ng per deciliter in the leuprolide group. Among all the patients, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was 2.9% in the relugolix group and 6.2% in the leuprolide group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving men with advanced prostate cancer, relugolix achieved rapid, sustained suppression of testosterone levels that was superior to that with leuprolide, with a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. (Funded by Myovant Sciences; HERO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03085095.).

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of low-dose chlormadinone in patients with low-risk prostate cancer: PROSAS study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of low-dose chlormadinone acetate, an antiandrogen agent, on the persistence rate of active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at 38 sites in Japan. Low-risk prostate cancer patients were randomly assigned to the chlormadinone group or the placebo group and the persistence rate of active surveillance was evaluated for 3 years. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients in the chlormadinone group and 72 patients in the placebo group were analyzed. The persistence rate of active surveillance [95% CI] at 3 years was 75.5% [62.5-84.6] in the chlormadinone group and 50.1% [36.7-62.2] in the placebo group, showing a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.0039). The hazard ratio [95% CI] of the chlormadinone group to the placebo group for discontinuation of active surveillance was 0.417 [0.226-0.770]. The chlormadinone group showed a significant decrease in prostate specific antigen level, testosterone level and prostate volume. The number of positive cores at 12 and 36 months biopsy was significantly lower in the chlormadinone group. The incidence of adverse events was 43.7% in the chlormadinone group and 12.5% in the placebo group. The most common adverse event in the chlormadinone group was constipation in 22.5%, followed by hepatobiliary disorders in 9.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low-risk prostate cancer, low-dose chlormadinone showed a reduced number of positive cores and prostate volume, and an increased persistence rate of active surveillance (UMIN000012284).

Recent trend of androgen deprivation therapy in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: Comparing between high- and middle-income Asian countries.

The number of newly diagnosed prostate cancer cases varies across Asia, with higher mortality-to-incidence ratio reported in developing nations. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), alone or in combination, remains the mainstay of first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Key findings of extensive research and randomized controlled trials have shaped current clinical practice and influenced clinical guideline recommendations. We describe here the recent trend of ADT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer for Asia focusing on Japan (high-income country) and Malaysia (middle-income country) based on the Asian Prostate Cancer (A-CaP) Study. The combination of radiotherapy and ADT or ADT alone was common in patients with intermediate-to-high risk localized and locally advanced disease. For metastatic prostate cancer, maximum androgen blockade (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone [GnRH] agonist/antagonist plus antiandrogen) was prevalent among the Japanese patients while primary ADT alone with GnRH agonist/antagonist was widely practiced in the Malaysian cohort. Upfront combined therapy (ADT plus docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitor) has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer. Its application, however, remains low in our cohorts due to patients' financial capacity and national health insurance coverage. Early detection remains the cornerstone in prostate cancer control to improve treatment outcome and patient survival.

Long-term outcomes of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer among Japanese men over 80 years old.

This study aimed to analyze the survival rate and to examine the risk of death from prostate cancer when accounting for competing risk of death, in men aged ≥80 y treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Data of patients with prostate cancer who had received ADT were extracted from a nationwide community-based database established by the Japan Study Group for Prostate Cancer. Prognostic variables, including progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and death rates were compared between men stratified by prostate cancer risk. Overall, 4760 patients older than 80 y were included. The proportion of low-, intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk, regional, and metastatic prostate cancer among super-elderly men was 9.5%, 14.6%, 48.8%, 9.0%, 3.2%, and 24.9%, respectively. Survival rates decreased with increasing risk stratification. The cumulative 5-y death rate by prostate cancer for low-, intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk, regional, and metastatic prostate cancer, was 0.92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2%-3.6%), 1.6% (95% CI: 0.8%-3.4%), 5.75% (95% CI: 4.25%-7.75%), 15.6% (95% CI: 11.6%-23.3%), 20.7% (95% CI: 13.1%-31.7%), and 36.9% (95% CI: 32.8%-41.4%), respectively. Our findings support that there is no need for immediate ADT for low- and intermediate-risk groups. Conversely, in high- or very high-risk, regional, and metastatic prostate cancer, more efforts for curative therapy and intensive therapy are needed in selected patients.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of enzalutamide for patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients in Japan. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to capture time spent by patients in various health states: stable, progression and death. Abiraterone acetate and docetaxel were set as active comparators. Clinical outcomes were obtained from the PREVAIL, COU-AA-302 and TAX327 trials. Treatment sequence, concomitant drugs and therapies for adverse events were estimated from responses to a survey by 14 Japanese prostate cancer experts. The analytic perspective was public healthcare payer, with a 10-year time horizon. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated from quality-adjusted life-years and Japanese public healthcare costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: According to the survey, the most common treatment sequences were (i) enzalutamide â†’ docetaxel â†’ cabazitaxel (enzalutamide-first sequencing), (ii) abiraterone â†’ enzalutamide â†’ docetaxel (abiraterone-first sequencing) and (iii) docetaxel→ enzalutamide â†’ cabazitaxel (docetaxel-first sequencing). In the base-case analysis, enzalutamide-first sequencing saved 1.74 million Japanese Yen versus abiraterone-first sequencing, with a 0.129 quality-adjusted life-year gain (dominant). Enzalutamide-first sequencing had a cost increase of 4.44 million Japanese Yen over docetaxel-first sequencing, with a 0.371 quality-adjusted life-years gain. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of enzalutamide-first sequencing versus docetaxel-first sequencing was estimated as 11.94 million Japanese Yen/quality-adjusted life-years. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that, compared with abiraterone-first sequencing, enzalutamide-first sequencing had an 87.4% probability of being dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Results modeled herein suggest that the enzalutamide-first sequencing is more cost-effective than the abiraterone-first sequencing, but less cost-effective than docetaxel-first sequencing for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Dynamics of conditional survival and risk factors in androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer using a multi-institutional Japan-wide database.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to analyze the conditional survival and prognostic factors in androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer using the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer database. METHODS: Data on patients treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy between 2001 and 2003 from a nationwide database of the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer were used. The conditional 5-year progression-free rate, cancer-specific survival and overall survival, as well as the conditional mortality owing to prostate cancer and other causes were calculated as per subgroups. Prognostic factors for progression-free rate, cancer-specific survival and overall survival at each time after androgen deprivation therapy initiation were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The conditional 5-year progression-free rate and cancer-specific survival, but not overall survival, gradually increased with time. The prognostic impact of stage IV characteristics (T4, N1 and M1) changed over time; however, the prognostic impact of the Gleason score remained unchanged. In the subgroup analysis, prostate-specific mortality risk reduced over time in patients with stage IV prostate cancer, whereas non-prostate cancer mortality increased over time in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Information regarding conditional survival and mortality obtained in this study would provide a benchmark for physicians and cancer survivors.

Regional and facility disparities in androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer from a multi-institutional Japan-wide database.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the differences in prognosis of prostate cancer patients receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy by region and facility type using a Japan-wide database. METHODS: Data on patients treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy between 2001 and 2003 from a nationwide community-based database established by the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer were obtained. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic variables, including progression, cancer-specific survival and overall survival, were compared according to region and facility type where the patients were treated. RESULTS: Among 19 162 patients, 7102 (37.1%) and 12 060 (62.9%) men were in urban and rural areas, respectively, and 3556 (18.6%), 13 623 (71.1%) and 1983 (10.3%) patients were enrolled from academic centers, non-academic hospitals and urological clinics, respectively. The risks of progression, cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality were comparable between urban and rural areas in propensity-score matched analysis. Risks of progression, cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality in urological clinics were higher than those in academic centers in propensity-score matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that Japan facility type, but not geographical regions, might affect the prognosis of prostate cancer patients receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy.

[Current Clinical Practice Pattern for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer(CRPC)in Japan].

Although various agents are reported against castration-resistant prostate cancer(CRPC), little is known about their actual clinical use in Japan. In this study, 484 patients diagnosed with CRPC during androgen-deprivation therapy were selected from Japan's leading multicenter collaborative research real-world database. The treatment details and prognosis were analyzed. It was observed that the castration treatment represented by the use of LH-RH agonists and antagonists was continued in almost all cases even after CRPC diagnosis. First-line non-castration agents for the CRPC treatment including certain novel agents approved from 2010 onwards and conventional agents used before that were selected for use in 76.5% and 23.5% of cases, respectively, with the 1-year continuation rates being 57.7%, and 52.4%, respectively. The 1.5-year overall survival rate from CRPC was 63.7%(90.0% in the conventional agents' group and 58.8% in the novel agents' group). Previously, conventional agents were sometimes selected for the CRPC treatment; hence, they still seemed to play a role in clinical practice in Japan.

Primary Androgen-Depletion Therapy Prevails Not Only for Metastatic but Also for Nonmetastatic Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer in Japan-Recent Trends and Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the real-world use of primary androgen-deprivation therapy(PADT; gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists[leuprorelin/goserelin]and antagonists[degarelix]/surgical castration), its clinical effectiveness, and the characteristics of Japanese patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with PADT. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, patients using PADT(≥1 record)in the 2016-2018 Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer registry were followed up from their initial date of PADT until October 2018. The primary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen( PSA)response rate(PSA<4 ng/mL)and duration of initial treatment. RESULTS: Of 1,895 patients, 47.7%, 24.4%, and 22.0% received leuprorelin, goserelin, and degarelix, respectively; 5.9% underwent surgical castration. The degarelix group had the highest median PSA at diagnosis(116.7 ng/mL)and proportion of patients with clinical Stage Ⅳ prostate cancer (72.9%)and Gleason score 9-10(59.7%). A concomitant antiandrogen was used in >80% and 70% of patients in the leuprorelin/goserelin and degarelix groups, respectively; bicalutamide was used most commonly(99.0%). Median duration of initial treatment was 20.8 months in the degarelix group and not yet reached in the leuprorelin/goserelin groups; continuation rates at 24 months were 44.6% and 81.6%/87.3%, respectively. The PSA response rate was the highest in the leuprorelin group(93.7%); median percentage change in PSA was comparable across all treatment groups(-99.1% to -99.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world use of PADT in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is likely based on its specific therapeutic attributes and patient characteristics.

Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma in Japan. METHODS: Patients prescribed temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma were registered and received temsirolimus (25 mg weekly, intravenous infusion for 30-60 minutes) in routine clinical settings (observation period: 96 weeks). RESULTS: Among 1001 patients included in the safety analysis data set (median age, 65.0 years; men, 74.8%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, 69.6%), 778 (77.7%) reported adverse drug reactions. The most common (≥10%) all-grade adverse drug reactions were stomatitis (26.7%), interstitial lung disease (17.3%) and platelet count decreased (11.1%). The incidence rate of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease was 4.5%. The onset of interstitial lung disease was more frequent after 4-8 weeks of treatment or in patients with lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (21.6% for score 0 vs 8.3% for score 4, P < 0.001). Among 654 patients in the effectiveness analysis data set, the response and clinical benefit rates were 6.7% (95% confidence interval 4.9-8.9) and 53.2% (95% confidence interval 49.3-57.1), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 16.9-21.1). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and effectiveness profile of temsirolimus observed in this study was similar to that observed in the multinational phase 3 study. The results are generalizable to the real-world scenario at the time of this research, and safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus as a subsequent anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma warrants further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01210482, NCT01420601).

Risk for intravesical recurrence of bladder cancer stratified by the results on two consecutive UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization tests: a prospective follow-up study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: A previous comparative study in Japan has demonstrated that the two consecutive UroVysion tests are useful tools to detect the presence of bladder cancer during follow-up after transurethral resection, but they also presented their high rates of false-positive results. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the UroVysion tests and subsequent intravesical recurrence. METHODS: In the previous study, patients without bladder cancer during the first analysis showed the same examination set repeated 3 months later as the second analysis. In this follow-up study, 326 patients showed negative findings confirmed on cystoscopy during the second UroVysion test. Recurrence-free survival was assessed using a median follow-up of 27 months. RESULTS: In the two consecutive UroVysion tests, 214 patients (65.6%) showed negative UroVysion results in both tests, whereas 91 presented a positive result on either tests and 21 patients presented positive results in both tests. During the follow-up, 40 patients (12.3%) had an intravesical recurrence with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The recurrence rates in patients with negative results in both tests, those with one positive result in either tests, and those with positive results in both tests were 8.4%, 16.5%, and 33.3%, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated that the history of bladder cancer and the consecutive UroVysion test pattern were independent risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirmed the effectiveness of two consecutive UroVysion tests in predicting intravesical recurrence after TURBT. Further prospective studies would help determine an appropriate interval for cystoscopy follow-up.

Family history in primary hormone therapy for prostate cancer: Analysis from a community-based multi-institutional Japan-wide database.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between hormone therapy and outcomes in a cohort of prostate cancer patients with a family history of prostate cancer. METHODS: Data of patients with prostate cancer who had received hormone therapy were extracted from a nationwide community-based database established by the Japan Study Group for Prostate Cancer. Family history of prostate cancer was available for 13 346 of these patients, who thus comprised the study cohort. Prognostic variables, including progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival, were compared between men with familial and men with sporadic prostate cancer. RESULTS: A positive family history was identified in 220 patients (1.6%). Patients with a positive family history were younger than those without; however, other clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses were comparable. In subgroup analysis, family history was identified as a possible favorable prognostic factor for overall survival among patients with a prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis <100 ng/mL and those with low or intermediate Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that familial prostate cancer has an early-onset feature or is diagnosed earlier than sporadic prostate cancer. However, the prognosis of individuals with familial prostate cancer undergoing hormone therapy is comparable to those with sporadic prostate cancer.

Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer in the Asia Pacific region: 'real-world' consideration of results from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2017.

OBJECTIVE: The Asia Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2018) brought together 20 experts from 15 APAC countries to discuss the real-world application of consensus statements from the second APCCC held in St Gallen in 2017 (APCCC 2017). FINDINGS: Differences in genetics, environment, lifestyle, diet and culture are all likely to influence the management of advanced prostate cancer in the APAC region when compared with the rest of the world. When considering the strong APCCC 2017 recommendation for the use of upfront docetaxel in metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer, the panel noted possible increased toxicity in Asian men receiving docetaxel, which would affect this recommendation in the APAC region. Although androgen receptor-targeting agents appear to be well tolerated in Asian men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, access to these drugs is very limited for financial reasons across the region. The meeting highlighted that cost and access to contemporary treatments and technologies are key factors influencing therapeutic decision-making in the APAC region. Whilst lower cost/older treatments and technologies may be an option, issues of culture and patient or physician preference mean, these may not always be acceptable. Although generic products can reduce cost in some countries, costs may still be prohibitive for lower-income patients or communities. The panellists noted the opportunity for a coordinated approach across the APAC region to address issues of access and cost. Developments in technologies and treatments are presenting new opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Differences in genetics and epidemiology affect the side-effect profiles of some drugs and influence prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: As the field continues to evolve, collaboration across the APAC region will be important to facilitate relevant research and collection and appraisal of data relevant to APAC populations. In the meantime, the APAC APCCC 2018 meeting highlighted the critical importance of a multidisciplinary team-based approach to treatment planning and care, delivery of best-practice care by clinicians with appropriate expertise, and the importance of patient information and support for informed patient choice.

Post-marketing observational study of everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC. METHODS: Patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC were included and were followed for up to 1 year from the start of everolimus. The study was conducted at 618 investigational sites in Japan from March 2010 through January 2018. Safety endpoints include adverse events (AEs), and efficacy endpoints were presence/absence of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rate. RESULTS: Of 1694 patients, majority were male (76.33%). Overall, 97.64% of patients experienced AEs and 49% reported serious AEs. The most common serious AEs (incidence of ≥ 5%) include malignant neoplasm progression (21.13%) and interstitial lung disease (10.86%). The incidences of adverse reactions of priority investigation items are as follows: interstitial lung disease (27.74%), infections (11.57%), stomatitis (45.45%), increased in serum creatinine (5.61%), hyperglycemia (14.23%), exacerbation of renal impairment (26.14%), and exacerbation of hepatic impairment (1.15%). The overall tumor response rate was 6.81% with 0.08% CR, and 6.73% PR. The SD was reported in 68.74% of patients. The median PFS was 196 days (95% CI: 181-216 days). The 365-day cumulative OS rate was 82.42%. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptable safety and efficacy findings in patients with unresectable or metastatic RCC were confirmed in this study, and are similar to those of pivotal study, which led to the approval, and no new issues were detected. There were no safety or efficacy issues in special populations including elderly and patients with renal/hepatic impairment.

Report of the forth Asian Prostate Cancer (A-CaP) study meeting.

The Asian Prostate Cancer (A-CaP) Study is an Asia-wide prospective registry study for surveying the treatment outcome of prostate cancer patients who have received a histopathological diagnosis. The study aims to clarify the clinical situation for prostate cancer in Asia and use the outcomes for the purposes of international comparison. Following the first meeting in Tokyo on December 2015, the second meeting in Seoul, Korea 2016, the third meeting in Chiang Mai, Thailand, on October 2017, the fourth meeting was held in Seoul, again on August 2018 with the participation of members and collaborators from 13 countries and regions. In the meeting, participating countries and regions presented the current status of data collection and the A-CaP office presented a preliminary analysis of the registered cases received from each country and region. Participants discussed ongoing challenges relating to data cleaning and data up-dating which is the next step of the A-CaP study following the data collection phase between 2016 and 2018. There was specific difference in term of the patient characteristics, and initial treatment pattern among East Asia, Southeast Asia and Turkey, and Jordan. Finally, a close relationship between prevalence of PSA test and disease stage of the patients at diagnosis in Japan and Malaysia was discussed.

[The 2nd Japan Public-Private Dialogue Forum-A Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue on Universal Health Coverage for Cancer in Asia-Seeking an Approach to Asia Health and Wellbeing Initiative].

On 5 September 2018 the UICC-Asia Regional Office(UICC-ARO)convened the second Japan Public-Private Dialogue Forum at the House of Councilors Members' Building as a follow-up to the previous meeting held at United Nations University in Tokyo in April 2018. Senior representatives of government, academia and industry met to discuss the progress made since April, noting the significance of the Japanese government having included specific reference to cancer in its revised basic policy on the Asia Health and Wellbeing Initiative, which was adopted in July 2018. The meeting provided an opportunity for all stakeholders to discuss ways forward for improving access to cancer care, with the WHO Cancer Report and other global initiatives in mind.

Efficacy and safety of 3-month dosing regimen of degarelix in Japanese subjects with prostate cancer: A phase III study.

Non-inferiority in the cumulative castration rate of the 3-month formulation of degarelix compared with the 3-month formulation of goserelin was evaluated in subjects with prostate cancer. A phase III, open-label, parallel-arm study was carried out. An initial dose of 240 mg degarelix or 3.6 mg goserelin was given s.c.; after day 28, a maintenance dose of 480 mg degarelix or 10.8 mg goserelin was given once every 84 days. Non-inferiority in castration rate and safety of degarelix to goserelin were evaluated. The primary end-point was the cumulative castration rate from day 28 to day 364 and the non-inferiority margin was set to be 10%. A total of 234 subjects with prostate cancer were randomized to the degarelix group (n = 117) and the goserelin group (n = 117). The cumulative castration rate was 95.1% in the degarelix group and 100.0% in the goserelin group. As there were no events in the goserelin group, an additional analysis was carried out using 95% confidence intervals of the difference in the proportion of subjects with castration. Analyses indicated the non-inferiority of the 3-month formulation of degarelix to goserelin. Degarelix showed more rapid decreases in testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and prostate-specific antigen levels compared with goserelin. The most common adverse events in the degarelix group were injection site reactions. Non-inferiority of the 3-month formulation of degarelix to goserelin was shown for testosterone suppression. The 3-month formulation of degarelix was also found to be tolerated as an androgen deprivation therapy for patients with prostate cancer. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01964170).

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of sorafenib in kidney cancer patients aged 75 years and older: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The average age of patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing, but a limited number of reports have described therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor for elderly RCC patients. Hence, we analysed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in elderly patients aged ≥75 years with advanced RCC. METHODS: Data were extracted from <75-year-old and ≥75-year-old patient groups, matching those demographics considered to affect prognosis. Differences in patients' characteristics, dose modification, adverse events, tumour response, progression-free survival, and renal function (glomerular filtration) were evaluated between the groups. RESULTS: From 2536 and 703 patients aged <75 and ≥75 years, respectively, 397 pairs were matched. Median daily dose was higher and duration of treatment longer in patients <75 years; however, progression-free survival and tumour response were similar in both age groups. Incidence of all adverse events was not significantly different between groups. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment was higher in patients ≥75 years, but there was no significant difference between groups in the number patients discontinuing due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: For patients aged ≥75 years, sorafenib treatment had minimal additional negative impact compared to younger patients and showed similar efficacy and safety without reducing renal function.

NCCN Asia Consensus Statement prostate cancer.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, an NPO organization comprised of university hospitals and cancer centers in the US. The publication of clinical practice guidelines on the treatment, diagnosis, prevention and screening is one of important activities. Background factors of prostate cancer patients, such as the prevalence, age at the diagnosis and mortality are markedly different between Western countries and Asia. Thus, various factors should be taken into consideration at the treatment choice for individual patients. Experts from Asian countries were published as the Asia Consensus Statement. In this review, we explain important points of the Asia Consensus Statement such as differences in the epidemiological backgrounds of patients, differences in treatment options and differences in medical insurance systems.

Clinical evaluation of two consecutive UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization tests to detect intravesical recurrence of bladder cancer: a prospective blinded comparative study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the use of UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization tests to detect the intravesical recurrence of bladder cancer during follow-up after a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). METHODS: In this prospective, blinded, comparative study, 486 patients treated by TURBT within the prior 2 years were registered at 12 centers. Urine cytology and UroVysion tests were performed once or twice at a central testing laboratory. For the patients with no suspicious findings of bladder cancer in the first analysis, the same examination set was repeated 3 months later as the second analysis. Totals of 468 and 399 patients were eligible for the first and second analyses, respectively. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of two consecutive UroVysion tests. RESULTS: Bladder cancers were identified in 44 patients at the first analysis. The UroVysion test had 50.0% (95% CI 35.2-64.8%) sensitivity and 72.4% (68.3-76.8%). Urine cytology had 4.5% (0.0-10.7%) sensitivity and 99.8% (99.3-100.0%) specificity. The concordant rate of the first and second UroVysion test results was 72% (kappa coefficient 0.157). Interestingly, the patients with two consecutive positive UroVysion test results had the highest cancer detection rate (14.8%), which is greater than those of the patients with a positive result in either (7.2%) or neither (1.2%) of the two tests at the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The UroVysion test provided higher sensitivity than urine cytology to detect bladder cancer during post-TURBT follow-up. Two consecutive UroVysion tests might be a better indicator to predict intravesical recurrence.