Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients with Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Safer and More Effective than Endoscopic Biliary Drainage? A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the best initial procedure for performing preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane database were searched for all studies published until June 2016 comparing endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for preoperative biliary drainage. Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies were identified that met the criteria. The analysis was performed on 433 patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage for resectable PHCC. Of those, 275 (63.5%) had EBD and 158 (36.5%) had PTBD as the initial procedure. The overall procedure-related morbidity rate was significantly lower in the PTBD group than in the EBD group (39 of 147 [26.5%] vs 82 of 185 [44.3%]; odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-3.57; P = .0009). The rate of conversion from one procedure to the other was significantly lower in the PTBD group than in the EBD group (8 of 158 [5.0%] vs 73 of 275 [26.5%]; odds ratio, 4.76; 95% CI, 2.71-8.36; P < .00001). Pancreatitis occurred only in the EBD group (25 of 275 [9.0%] vs 0 of 158; OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 3.02-18.44; P < .0001). The cholangitis rate was significantly lower in the PTBD group than in the EBD group (12 of 158 [7.6%] vs 93 of 275 [33.8%]; OR, 5.41; 95% CI, 2.75-10.63; P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that PTBD has a lower rate of complications than EBD as the initial procedure to perform preoperative biliary drainage in resectable PHCC. PTBD is associated with less conversion and lower rates of pancreatitis and cholangitis.

Epidemiology of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma in the French population.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences between cholangiocarcinoma (CC) subtypes in terms of incidence rate, clinical presentation, management and survival by applying a stable anatomical classification in a population-based study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer data for the period 2000-2012 were obtained from a specialized digestive cancer registry in the Department of Calvados, France. Patients' files were checked, and the diagnosis was verified by two hepatobiliary surgeons. This approach prevents classifying perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), thereby allowing an accurate estimation of their respective epidemiological characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients with CC were included. ICC represented 41% (130), whereas PHCC and distal cholangiocarcinoma represented 36 (116) and 23% (74), respectively. The mean age at the time of diagnosis differed significantly between the three subtypes (P<0.05). ICC was discovered accidently more frequently than PHCC, which was associated significantly with clinical symptoms. No change in the incidence or survival rates of CC subtypes were noticed, except for PHCC, in which female individuals had a significantly shorter median and 5-year survival rate of 0% (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The frequency of PHCC is overestimated in the literature. The anatomical reclassification of CC subtypes shows the stability of their incidence and survival rates. Considering ICC and PHCC as two different entities implies the need to assign a specific topographic code for PHCC.