Clinical correlations of extraocular motility limitation pattern in orbital fracture cases: a retrospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma centre.

PURPOSE: Ocular pathology (OP) following orbital fracture can vary vastly in complexity and severity. Extra-ocular motility (EOM) limitations are frequently present in orbital trauma cases, with patterns of duction limitations being symmetrical or asymmetrical. The aim of this study was to identify if there was any association between increased OP following orbital fracture cases based on the pattern of EOM deficits. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with fractured orbits presenting with or without EOM limitations to a level 1 trauma center between August 2015 to January 2018. All pertinent elements of the ophthalmic examination were recorded. Outcome measures: Chi-square analyses assessed for association between symmetrical or asymmetrical EOM limitation and OP. Odds ratios were calculated with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: 278 orbits with wall fractures were included in this study. A significant correlation between EOM limitation and increased OP following orbital trauma was found (p = 0.000081). Cases with symmetrical and asymmetrical EOM limitation were 7.9 (95%CI: 2.3-27.2) and 5.22 (95%CI: 1.9-13.9) times more likely to have OP than cases with no EOM limitation, respectively. With extraocular muscle entrapment excluded, cases with symmetrical limitations had a significantly higher incidence of OP than cases with asymmetrical limitations (p = 0.0161). CONCLUSIONS: OP is frequently observed in cases of orbital fracture. While any EOM limitations should prompt the clinicians to anticipate OP, intra-ocular injury may be more likely in cases of symmetrical EOM limitation. Future prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the relationship between EOM symmetricity and OP following orbital trauma.

Visual and refractive outcomes and complications in femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: findings from a randomised, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare visual and refractive outcomes, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), and complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) to conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) in paired eyes from the same patients. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of an intraindividual, randomised, controlled clinical trial including 110 paired eyes from 55 patients that were randomised into either FLACS or CPS groups. Outcomes were recorded at baseline and postoperatively during a 3-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity were similar between FLACS and CPS over the follow-up period (p>0.05). The mean absolute refractive error was not significantly different between the two groups at postoperative month 1 (POM1) (0.3±0.2 D in FLACS vs 0.4±0.3 D in CPS, p=0.18) and month 3 (POM3) (0.3±0.3 D in FLACS vs 0.3±0.3 D in CPS, p=0.71). IOP was statistically higher in the FLACS group on postoperative day 1 (20.6±5.7 mm Hg for FLACS and 18.0±4.9 mm Hg for CPS, p=0.01). However, it was similar between the two groups subsequently (p>0.05). Intraoperatively, one case of posterior capsular block syndrome was observed in the FLACS group. Postoperatively, one case of newly developed glaucoma was observed in the FLACS group and one case of retinal tears in the CPS group. CONCLUSION: The 3-month postoperative refractive and visual outcomes were comparable between FLACS and CPS in paired eyes from the same patients. Complication rate was low in the study population.

Comparison of changes in corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness between conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a randomised, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To identify changes in endothelial cell density (ECD) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) compared with conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS). METHODS: This is an intraindividual randomised, controlled clinical trial. One eye was randomised to receive FLACS, while the contralateral eye of the same patient received CPS. The femtosecond laser pretreatment included creating main and side-port corneal incisions, capsulotomy and lens fragmentation. Non-contact endothelial cell microscopy and pachymetry were performed preoperatively and at postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1 and month 3. RESULTS: A total of 134 paired eyes from 67 patients were included in the analysis. ECD was not significantly different between the two groups at either postoperative month 1 (2370±580 cells/mm2 and 2467±564 cells/mm2 in FLACS and CPS groups, respectively; p=0.18) or at postoperative month 3 (2374±527 cells/mm2 and 2433±526 cells/mm2 in FLACS and CPS groups, respectively; p=0.19). No significant difference was observed in the mean CCT values between the two groups over the follow-up period (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Postoperative corneal ECD and CCT were comparable between FLACS and CPS during the 3 months' follow-up period.

Refractive and Visual Outcomes and Rotational Stability of Toric Intraocular Lenses in Eyes With and Without Previous Ocular Surgeries: A Longitudinal Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes and rotational stability of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in eyes with previous ocular surgeries. METHODS: This controlled, longitudinal cohort study included a total of 133 eyes (59 study cases with a history of corneal, vitreoretinal, and/or glaucoma surgery and 74 randomly selected controls without a history of ocular surgery) that had cataract and corneal astigmatism treated with toric IOL implantation. Postoperative outcomes were recorded at postoperative 1 month and 3 to 12 months. RESULTS: Refractive prediction errors were within ±1.00 diopter (D) of target in 93.5% and 88.4% of the study cases at postoperative 1 month and 3 to 12 months, respectively. They were within ±0.50 D of target in 56.5% and 60.5% of the cases during the same follow-up intervals, respectively. Study cases showed statistically significantly inferior uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to controls at 1 month postoperatively (0.27 ± 0.24 and 0.17 ± 0.21 logMAR, respectively, P = .027) but not during the later follow-up (0.19 ± 0.19 and 0.16 ± 0.19 logMAR, respectively, P = .431). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was slightly lower in the study cases than in controls at 1 month postoperatively (0.13 ± 0.16 and 0.07 ± 0.14, respectively, P = .005) and subsequent follow-up months (0.10 ± 0.13 and 0.03 ± 0.10, respectively, P < .001). Of the examined study cases, 93.9% and 88.4% had IOL axes within 5° of intended axis at postoperative 1 month and 3 to 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Toric IOLs provided significant and sustained improvement in visual acuity and refraction in eyes with a history of prior ophthalmic surgery. Refractive outcomes achieved postoperatively were comparable to those in eyes without a prior history of ophthalmic surgery, although the rate of visual recovery may be different. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(12):781-788.].