Mammographic Breast Density in Pakistani Women, Factors Affecting It, and Inter-Observer Variability in Assessment.

Introduction Breast density on mammography can affect the sensitivity of breast cancer detection and is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. The incidence of breast cancer in Pakistani women is reported to be the highest among women in Asia. No published data is describing the patterns of mammographic breast density in this population. We undertook this study to assess the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) patterns of breast density on mammography, factors that affect breast density, and inter-observer variability in breast density assessment. Methods Bilateral breast mammograms were retrospectively reviewed for breast density by two separate readers (resident and attending radiologist). Breast density was categorized into four types according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Types 1 and 2 were grouped into non-dense and types 3 and 4 into dense breasts. The association of patient factors with breast density was assessed, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The inter-observer variability in breast density assessment between the two readers was calculated using Cohen's κ coefficient. Results A total of 612 women underwent mammography in the study period. Type 3 (heterogeneously dense breast parenchyma) was the most frequent pattern (51.6%) followed by type 2 (scattered fibroglandular) pattern (38.9%). Fatty parenchyma (type 1) and extremely dense parenchyma (type 4) were the least common. Breast density was inversely related to age (p < 0.001) and parity (p <0.002). Breast density was also lower in postmenopausal women (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in mean age at menarche, age at first delivery, family history of breast cancer, or presence of cancer among women with dense and non-dense breasts. The inter-observer agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.86).  Conclusion The majority of women in our population (56.9%) had dense breasts (BI-RADS type 3 and 4) which decrease the sensitivity of breast cancer detection on mammography suggesting it may be insufficient as the sole screening/diagnostic tool in this population. Lower breast density was associated with increasing age, parity, and post-menopausal status. Breast density assessment was almost perfect among the resident and attending radiologist.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Additional Diagnostic Mammographic Views for the Evaluation of Asymmetric Mammographic Densities.

Introduction Many young females present with an advanced stage of breast cancer, which has a negative effect on the prognosis. Digital breast tomosynthesis is a new emerging imaging technique that aids in improving the specificity of mammography with subsequent early detection of breast cancer, especially in women with radiographically dense breasts. Tomosynthesis is subjectively preferred to conventional mammography and may offer superior diagnostic accuracy for the evaluation of breast lesions. Method Two breast radiologists retrospectively reviewed asymmetric densities using protocols that were institutional review board-approved in 185 patients aged 18 - 70 years (mean: 48 years) who underwent diagnostic mammography and tomosynthesis. Each asymmetric density was interpreted once with tomosynthesis and once with supplemental mammographic views; both modes included the mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views in a fully crossed and balanced design by using a five-category Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment and a probability-of-malignancy score. If the abnormality persisted and appeared benign or completely disappeared on both modalities, the agreement between additional views and tomosynthesis was determined by calculating Kappa value. If there was a discrepancy between additional views and tomosynthesis, the abnormality was subjected to ultrasound. In our study, 89 asymmetric densities were subjected to ultrasound. Results In a total of 182 cases, 84 (46.15%) were categorized as BIRADS-0; 97 (53.30 %) as BIRADS-I, and one (0.55 %) as BIRADS-II on an additional view. Among the asymmetric densities categorized as BIRADS-0 on additional mammography views, digital breast tomosynthesis categorized 72, six, five, and one patient as BIRADS-0, BIRADS-I, BIRADS-II, and BIRADS-IV, respectively. For densities categorized as BIRADS-I (97) on additional view, digital breast tomosynthesis categorized 10 and 87 densities as BIRADS-0 and BIRADS-I, respectively. No change in the BIRADS category was observed among BIRADS-II and BIRADS-IV. A significant difference was observed with the chi-square test among BIRADS categories assigned by an additional view and digital breast tomosynthesis with a p-value of < 0.001. There was, however, a substantial agreement among additional views and tomosynthesis with a kappa value of 0.767. Conclusion Our study results suggest that tomosynthesis may be equivalent to, if not more equivalent to, additional imaging in the assessment of mammographically-detected asymmetric densities, thus improving BI-RADS classification and patient management.

Interobserver Reliability of the RENAL Nephrometry Scoring System: Experience From a Developing Nation.

Introduction The RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to the collecting system or sinus in millimeters, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score (RENAL-NS) has been described as a structured and quantifiable method to describe a renal tumor's relevant anatomic features as they relate to the complexity of the lesion. We aim to evaluate a tumor's RENAL-NS and to assess the reproducibility of the score among different observers. Methods This retrospective study included 49 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had complete computed tomography (CT) data, RENAL-NS, and histopathology results. All patients underwent renal surgery/intervention at our center between January 2008 and December 2018. The radius of the lesion, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness to the collecting system, anterior or posterior description, and location relative to the polar lines was used to calculate the score. Tumor complexity was graded as low, intermediate, or high. Two body imaging radiologists evaluated the data independently. Results Interobserver agreement for each of the RENAL-NS parameters, respectively, and overall complexity was calculated. The total agreement was 82%, 51%, 84%, 69%, 73%, and 90%, corresponding to Kappa values of 0.72, 0.33, 0.44, 0.49, 0.58, and 0.83, respectively. The radius, nearness to the collecting system, and total complexity showed the best agreement. Exophytic properties of the lesion showed the least agreement. For cases that were discordant in terms of the final score, no major implications in surgical planning were observed. Conclusion The results of this study show that the RENAL-NS is a useful tool to assess the anatomical features of renal tumors and it is easily reproducible, even for less experienced radiologists in a developing nation.

Interobserver Agreement on Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Blunt Abdominal Injury.

Introduction Trauma constitutes a major public health problem. Ninty percent of world's fatalities on road occur in low and middle-income countries. Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) has a key role in trauma investigation, altering subsequent management in a significant number of patients. There is a rising trend of introducing FAST examination to non-radiologists and junior members of healthcare team to hasten triage of trauma patients. Objective To determine interobserver agreement on focused assessment with sonography for trauma in blunt abdominal injury between senior and junior residents. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital. Three hundred patients with blunt abdominal trauma meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled. FAST was performed using standard curvilinear 3.5-5 MHz transducer. Agreement between junior and senior residents was measured and Kappa statistic was calculated. Results Mean age of the patients included in the study was 30.04 ± 18.09 years. Among these 237 (79%) were male and 63 (21%) were female. Sixteen (5.3%) were positive for intraperitoneal free fluid while the remaining 284 (94.7%) were negative. A total of 19 FAST examinations were reported positive by junior residents, of which 15 (78.9%) were confirmed by a senior resident to be correct, while four (21.05%) were falsely labeled positive by a junior resident. A total of 281 negative FAST examinations were reported by junior residents, of which 280 (99.6%) were confirmed by a senior resident, while only one (0.003%) was falsely labeled negative. Kappa statistic was calculated for inter-observer agreement on FAST examination findings, which showed a kappa value of 0.84 (very good agreement), with a p-value of <0.001. Conclusion Our study suggests very good interobserver agreement on FAST examination between senior and junior resident in patients with blunt trauma to the abdomen. Results suggest that FAST can be easily learnt with minimal radiology training and may have greater applicability in trauma.