Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume Assessments by Transthoracic Echocardiography and Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor in Critically ill Adult Patients: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: Bedside transthoracic echocardiography (TTEcho) is a noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring method that has grown recently. However, there are questions regarding its accuracy compared to invasive methods. We aimed to evaluate the agreement and correlation of TTEcho and pulse index continuous CO (PiCCO) monitor measurements for CO and systolic volume (SV) in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective experimental study included consecutive adult patients who required invasive hemodynamic monitoring admitted at an intensive care unit in the Federal District, Brazil, from January/2019 to January/2021. Correlation and agreement between SV and CO measurements by PiCCO and TTEcho were performed using the Spearman correlation and the Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The study enrolled 29 patients, with adequate TTEcho evaluations in all patients. There were very strong correlations between CO-TTEcho and CO-PiCCO (r = 0.845, P < .001) and SV-TTEcho and SV-PiCCO (r = 0.800, P < .001). TTEcho estimations for CO and SV were feasible within the limits of agreement in 96.6% (28/29) compared to PiCCO. The mean difference between CO-PiCCO and CO-TTEcho was 0.250 L/min (limits of agreement: -1.083 to 1.583 L/min, percentage error: 21.0%), and between SV-PiCCO and SV-TTEcho was 2.000 mL (limits of agreement: -16.960 to 20.960, percentage error: 24.3%). The reduced cardiac index (CI) measurements by TTEcho showed an accuracy of 89.7% (95% IC: 72.6%-97.8%) and an F1 score of 92.7% (95% IC: 75.0%-98.0%), considering the CI-PiCCO as the gold standard. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic measurements of CO and SV are comparable to measurements by PiCCO. These results reinforce echocardiography as a reliable tool to evaluate hemodynamics in critically ill patients.

Thyroid Function, Reverse Triiodothyronine, and Mortality in Critically Ill Clinical Patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association of thyroid hormones changes, including increased reverse triiodothyronine (rT3) level, with critically ill clinical patients´ mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed the observational data prospectively collected over 8 months (2018) in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in Brasilia, Brazil. All consecutive ICU-admitted clinical patients were included. Thyroxine (T4), free thyroxine (fT4), triiodothyronine (T3), free triiodothyronine (fT3), rT3, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were collected within 48 hours of ICU admission. Patients with hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism who were previously diagnosed were excluded. RESULTS: Of 353 included patients, age was 68.5 ± 19.0 years, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was 3.3 ± 2.9, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) was 17.1 ± 7.9. ICU mortality was 17.6% (n = 62). Non-survivor patients had a higher incidence of increased rT3 (69.3 vs 59.2%, p = 0.042), lower incidence of low T4 (4.8 vs 9.7%, p = 0.045), and increased age (75.2 ± 16.3 years vs 67.1 ± 19.3 years, p = 0.001), SOFA (3.0 ± 0.4 vs 2.8 ± 2.6, p <0.001), and APACHE II (23.5 ± 7.5 vs 15.7 ± 7.2, p <0.001). Alterations in other thyroid hormones did not show association with mortality. Increased rT3 [odds ratio (OR): 2.436; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.023-5.800; p = 0.020] and APACHE II (OR: 1.083, 95% CI: 1.012-1.158; p = 0.044) were associated with ICU mortality in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Increased rT3 was independently associated with increased ICU mortality. In contrast, other thyroid hormone alterations did not show an association with mortality. Determining rT3 levels may be a helpful test to identify an increased risk for ICU mortality in clinical patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: da Silveira CDG, de Vasconcelos FPJ, Moura EB, da Silveira BTG, Amorim FFP, Shintaku LS, et al. Thyroid Function, Reverse Triiodothyronine, and Mortality in Critically Ill Clinical Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1161-1166.

Difference in patient outcomes coming from public and private hospitals in an intensive care unit in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Compare demographic data, mortality and intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) in patients coming from public hospitals of the Brazilian Unified Health System and patients coming from private hospitals of the Brazilian Supplementary Health System in a single private general ICU. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients in the ICU of Hospital Anchieta in Brasilia, DF, Brazil, over a period of 2 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients from public hospitals of the Unified Health System group (PUBH, N = 75) and patients from private hospitals of the Brazilian Supplementary Health System group (PRIH, N = 1,614). RESULTS: In total, 1,689 patients were admitted. For the entire cohort, the median age was 62 ± 17 years, and the mean APACHE II score was 13 ± 7. The PUBH had a higher APACHE II score (18 ± 9 versus 12 ± 7, P = 0.00), were younger (53 ± 2 versus 63 ± 16 years, P = 0.00), and had higher incidence of circulatory shock (19.2 versus 11.4%, P = 0.01), and kidney injury or renal failure (38.4 versus 25.5%, P = 0.01) at the time of ICU admission, compared to the PRIH. The ICU LOS was longer for the PUBH compared to the PRIH (18 ± 18 versus 6 ± 14 days, P = 0.00). The overall mortality rate was higher for the PUBH compared to the PRIH (33.3 versus 9.7%, P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: In a single ICU, where patients had access to the same human and technological resources, patients from the PUBH had a higher APACHE II score, ICU LOS, and mortality rate than those from the PRIH.