Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Heart J ; 165(6): 956-63, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23708167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is a marker of increased delay between septal and left ventricular (LV) lateral wall electrical activation and is a predictor of which patients will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Recent analysis has suggested that one-third of patients meeting the conventional electrocardiogram criteria for LBBB are misdiagnosed, and new strict LBBB criteria have been proposed. We tested the hypothesis that patients with strict LBBB have greater LV mechanical dyssynchrony than do patients meeting the nonstrict LBBB criteria, whereas there is no difference between patients with nonstrict LBBB and LV conduction delay with a QRS duration of 110 to 119 ms. METHODS: Sixty-four patients referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial tagging. The patients were classified as strict LBBB, nonstrict LBBB, or non-LBBB (nonspecific LV conduction delay with a QRS duration of 110-119 ms). The time delay between septal and lateral LV wall peak circumferential strain (septal-to-lateral wall delay) was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance. RESULTS: Patients with strict LBBB (n = 31) had a greater septal-to-lateral wall delay compared with patients with nonstrict LBBB (n = 19) (210 ± 137 ms vs 122 ± 102 ms, P = .045). There was no significant difference between nonstrict LBBB and non-LBBB (n = 14) septal-to-lateral wall delay (122 ± 102 ms vs 100 ± 86 ms, P = .51). CONCLUSIONS: Strict LBBB criteria identify patients with greater mechanical dyssynchrony compared with patients only meeting the nonstrict LBBB criteria, whereas there was no significant difference between patients with nonstrict LBBB and non-LBBB. The greater observed LV dyssynchrony may explain why patients with strict LBBB have a better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.


Assuntos
Bloqueio de Ramo/diagnóstico , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/métodos , Eletrocardiografia , Ventrículos do Coração/patologia , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Contração Miocárdica/fisiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Bloqueio de Ramo/fisiopatologia , Bloqueio de Ramo/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia
2.
J Electrocardiol ; 46(3): 249-55, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23540937

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy is severely worsened by myocardial scar at the left ventricular (LV) pacing site. We aimed to describe the diagnostic performance of electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria based on the Selvester QRS scoring system, first in localizing myocardial scar and second in screening for any non-septal scar in patients with strictly defined LBBB. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 39 cardiomyopathy patients with LBBB, 17 with scar, 22 without scar, late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMR-LGE) and 12-lead ECGs were analyzed for scar presence in 5 LV wall segments. The ECG criteria with the best diagnostic performance in detecting scar in each segment and in the four non-septal segments together were identified. Criteria for detecting non-septal scar had 75% (95% CI: 51%-90%) sensitivity, 95% (78%-99%) specificity, 92% (67%-99%) positive predictive value and 84% (65%-94%) negative predictive value. For each individual wall segment, 40%-60% sensitivities and 77%-100% specificities were found. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-lead ECG can convey information about scar presence and location in this population of cardiomyopathy patients with LBBB. ECG screening criteria for scar in potential CRT LV pacing sites were identified. Further exploration is required to determine the clinical utility of the 12-lead ECG in combination with other imaging modalities to screen for scar in potential LV pacing sites in CRT candidates.


Assuntos
Bloqueio de Ramo/complicações , Bloqueio de Ramo/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatias/complicações , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Miocárdio Atordoado/diagnóstico , Miocárdio Atordoado/etiologia , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA