Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from a large multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter registry included 53 patients (mean age, 79±8 years; men, 57%) who suffered IE after TAVI of 7944 patients after a mean follow-up of 1.1±1.2 years (incidence, 0.67%, 0.50% within the first year after TAVI). Mean time from TAVI was 6 months (interquartile range, 1-14 months). Orotracheal intubation (hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-9.64; P=0.004) and the self-expandable CoreValve system (hazard ratio, 3.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-7.14; P=0.007) were associated with IE (multivariate analysis including 3067 patients with individual data). The most frequent causal microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (21%) and enterococci (21%). Vegetations were present in 77% of patients (transcatheter valve leaflets, 39%; stent frame, 17%; mitral valve, 21%). At least 1 complication of IE occurred in 87% of patients (heart failure in 68%). However, only 11% of patients underwent valve intervention (valve explantation and valve-in-valve procedure in 4 and 2 patients, respectively). The mortality rate in hospital was 47.2% and increased to 66% at the 1-year follow-up. IE complications such as heart failure (P=0.037) and septic shock (P=0.002) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IE at 1 year after TAVI was 0.50%, and the risk increased with the use of orotracheal intubation and a self-expandable valve system. Staphylococci and enterococci were the most common agents. Although most patients presented at least 1 complication of IE, valve intervention was performed in a minority of patients, and nearly half of the patients died during the hospitalization period.

Two-Year Follow Up After Surgical Versus Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Non-Randomized Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) has emerged as an alternative treatment. Predictors of survival and procedural success are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To review our experience in the treatment of PVL and evaluate efficacy, mortality, predictors of success, and outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of percutaneous PVL procedures between years 2008 and 2014. Survival and results were compared with a control cohort of surgical patients. RESULTS: Percutaneous closure was attempted in 51 patients. The surgical group had 36 patients. Defects were perimitral in 67 patients (77%). Mean follow-up (FU) was 784.5 days. After propensity score analysis in-hospital mortality was higher in the surgical group (30.6% vs. 9.8%, OR 6, P 0.01). Clinical improvement was higher in the percutaneous group (71.4% vs. 36.4%, P 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed normal creatinine (OR 15, P < 0.001) as independent predictor of clinical improvement. For the composite end-point of all-cause mortality or readmission, older age (OR 10.7, P 0.001), renal failure, (OR 18, P < 0.01), poor functional class and the absence of clinical improvement (OR 3.9, P < 0.001) were related with a higher risk. There were no differences in survival free from the composite end-point according to the treatment received (surgical or percutaneous). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous PVL closure has a reasonable rate of success and low complication rates, and results compare favorably with surgical treatment. Older patients and those with poor functional class or renal failure (RF) showed a worse prognosis even after a successful closure. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prognostic Impact of Age and Hemoglobin in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Reperfusion Therapy.

Advanced age and low hemoglobin levels have been associated with a poor prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We studied 1,111 patients with STEMI who received reperfusion treatment (1,032 [92.9%] primary angioplasty and 79 [7.1%] fibrinolysis without rescue percutaneous coronary intervention). Mean age was 64.1 ± 14.0 years, and 23.2% were women. Patients in the last age quartile (>76 years) were more frequently women, presented more risk factors (except smoking), received thrombolysis less frequently, had less complete revascularization, and presented more complications and higher mortality. Hemoglobin level at admission was associated with age and ranged from 14.8 ± 1.5 g/dl in the first quartile to 13.2 ± 1.8 g/dl in the last, p <0.001. Multivariate analysis identified age as a predictor of in-hospital and long-term mortality (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.07, hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.08). Hemoglobin levels were associated with better survival (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9, hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.92). The other predictors of inhospital mortality were Killip class, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, significant pericardial effusion, and ventricular arrhythmias. The association of hemoglobin with hospital mortality was seen in men and in women ≥65 years. In men ≥65 years, this association was also present in those with hemoglobin levels in the normal range. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, hemoglobin is an independent predictor of inhospital and long-term mortality, especially in those aged ≥65 years. This association is also present in men ≥65 years with normal hemoglobin levels.

Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction: Is it only the age?

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that, after an acute myocardial infarction, women have worse prognosis than males. However, it is not clear if female sex is an independent predictor of mortality risk. Our aim was to analyse sex influence on the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: Retrospective registry of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from January 2010 to April 2015. RESULTS: From 1111 patients, 258 (23.2%) were women. Compared with men, they presented higher risk profiles with older age (70.1±14.4years vs. 62.3±13.4, P<0.001), more cardiovascular risk factors (except smoking), longer time from symptoms onset to hospital arrival (5.2±4.1h vs. 4.2±3.7), higher Killip classification (1.6±1.1 vs. 1.4±0.8), fewer complete revascularizations (175 [67.8%] vs. 662 [77.9%] in men) and higher in-hospital mortality (26 [10.1%] vs. 34 [4.0%]); all p values <0.003. At discharge, women less frequently received ACE inhibitors (189 [81.1%] vs. 702 [85.8%], p=0.045) and presented more major adverse events (death, bleeding, infection, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or heart failure) during the first month after discharge (10.5% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and higher long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). After adjusting by age, most of the differences disappeared, and sex was not an independent factor of in-hospital (odds ratio 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99) or long-term mortality (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute STEMI, the association of female sex with poor prognosis is mainly explained by age. Sex does not seem to be an independent prognostic factor.

Very low risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction? It exists and may be easily identified.

BACKGROUND: Early discharge protocols have been proposed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) low risk patients despite the existence of few but significant cardiovascular events during mid-term follow-up. We aimed to identify a subgroup of patients among those considered low-risk in which prognosis would be particularly good. METHODS: We analyzed 30-day outcomes and long-term follow-up among 1.111 STEMI patients treated with reperfusion therapy. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified seven variables as predictors of 30-day outcomes: Femoral approach; age>65; systolic dysfunction; postprocedural TIMI flow<3; elevated creatinine level>1.5mg/dL; stenosis of left-main coronary artery; and two or higher Killip class (FASTEST). A total of 228 patients (20.5%), defined as very low-risk (VLR), had none of these variables on admission. VLR group of patients compared to non-VLR patients had lower in-hospital (0% vs. 5.9%; p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 6.25%: p<0.001). They also presented fewer in-hospital complications (6.6% vs. 39.7%; p<0.001) and 30-day major adverse events (0.9% vs. 4.5%; p=0.01). Significant mortality differences during a mean follow-up of 23.8±19.4months were also observed (2.2% vs. 15.2%; p<0.001). The first VLR subject died 11months after hospital discharge. No cardiovascular deaths were identified in this subgroup of patients during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: About a fifth of STEMI patients have VLR and can be easily identified. They have an excellent prognosis suggesting that 24-48h in-hospital stay could be a feasible alternative in these patients.

Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Physicians cannot rely solely on the angiographic appearance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis when evaluating patients with myocardial ischemia. Instead, sound knowledge of coronary vascular physiology and of the methods currently available for its characterization can improve the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of invasive assessment of the coronary circulation, and help improve clinical decision-making. In this article we summarize the current methods available for a thorough assessment of coronary physiology.