Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Liver Transpl ; 28(6): 1039-1050, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919762

RESUMO

Long-term humoral immunity and its protective role in liver transplantation (LT) patients have not been elucidated. We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the persistence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in LT recipients 12 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 65 LT recipients were matched with 65 nontransplanted patients by a propensity score including variables with recognized impact on COVID-19. LT recipients showed a lower prevalence of anti-nucleocapsid (27.7% versus 49.2%; P = 0.02) and anti-spike IgG antibodies (88.2% versus 100.0%; P = 0.02) at 12 months. Lower index values of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were also observed in transplantation patients 1 year after COVID-19 (median, 0.49 [interquartile range, 0.15-1.40] versus 1.36 [interquartile range, 0.53-2.91]; P < 0.001). Vaccinated LT recipients showed higher antibody levels compared with unvaccinated patients (P < 0.001); antibody levels reached after vaccination were comparable to those observed in nontransplanted individuals (P = 0.70). In LT patients, a longer interval since transplantation (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.20) was independently associated with persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies 1 year after infection. In conclusion, compared with nontransplanted patients, LT recipients show a lower long-term persistence of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. However, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination after COVID-19 in LT patients achieves a significant increase in antibody levels, comparable to that of nontransplanted patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Imunidade Humoral , Transplante de Fígado , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(5): 266-271, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486960

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to assess emergency room frequentation, visit causes, and unscheduled readmissions within the first year after discharge from hospital following liver transplantation. Their impact on graft and patient survival was also assessed. This was a retrospective study of the medical records of 98 patients (mean age, 55.6 ± 8.59 years, 77.6 % males) who were consecutively discharged from hospital after undergoing a first liver transplant in our institution during 2012-2015. All visits to the emergency room during the first years after transplantation were analyzed, and survival at two years after transplantation was calculated. Fifty-six of the 98 patients (57.15 %) visited the emergency room on 117 occasions within the first year post-transplantation. Fever (n = 34; 29.05 %) and digestive symptoms (n = 32; 27.35 %) were the most common causes of consultation, and resulted in over half of visits. Thirty-five of these 56 patients (62.5 %) required an urgent readmission during 50 of the 117 (42.7 %) visits. This was primarily due to infectious complications (44 %) of diverse causes (bacterial pneumonia, cholangitis, Clostridium difficile colitis) and biliary tract-related issues. The likelihood of readmission increased from 11.22 % at 30 days after discharge to 22.4 % at 90 days after discharge. Patient survival at 1 and 2 years after transplantation was lower for patients who were readmitted (88.4 % and 80.7 %, respectively) when compared to those who were not readmitted (95.56 % and 91.17 %, respectively, p = 0.002).


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Readmissão do Paciente , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Am J Transplant ; 21(8): 2876-2884, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835707

RESUMO

The protective capacity and duration of humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet understood in solid organ transplant recipients. A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the persistence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies in liver transplant recipients 6 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resolution. A total of 71 liver transplant recipients were matched with 71 immunocompetent controls by a propensity score including variables with a well-known prognostic impact in COVID-19. Paired case-control serological data were also available in 62 liver transplant patients and 62 controls at month 3 after COVID-19. Liver transplant recipients showed a lower incidence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies at 3 months (77.4% vs. 100%, p < .001) and at 6 months (63.4% vs. 90.1%, p < .001). Lower levels of antibodies were also observed in liver transplant patients at 3 (p = .001) and 6 months (p < .001) after COVID-19. In transplant patients, female gender (OR = 13.49, 95% CI: 2.17-83.8), a longer interval since transplantation (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), and therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR = 7.11, 95% CI: 1.47-34.50) were independently associated with persistence of antibodies beyond 6 months after COVID-19. Therefore, as compared with immunocompetent patients, liver transplant recipients show a lower prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and more pronounced antibody levels decline.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Fígado , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplantados
4.
J Hepatol ; 74(1): 148-155, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32750442

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients are a matter of debate. METHODS: We performed a prospective nationwide study including a consecutive cohort of liver transplant patients with COVID-19 recruited during the Spanish outbreak from 28 February to 7 April, 2020. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care, and/or death. Age- and gender-standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR and SMR) were calculated using data from the Ministry of Health and the Spanish liver transplant registry. Independent predictors of severe COVID-19 among hospitalised patients were analysed using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 111 liver transplant patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (SIR = 191.2 [95% CI 190.3-192.2]). The epidemiological curve and geographic distribution overlapped widely between the liver transplant and general populations. After a median follow-up of 23 days, 96 patients (86.5%) were admitted to hospital and 22 patients (19.8%) required respiratory support. A total of 12 patients were admitted to the ICU (10.8%). The mortality rate was 18%, which was lower than in the matched general population (SMR = 95.5 [95% CI 94.2-96.8]). Overall, 35 patients (31.5%) met criteria of severe COVID-19. Baseline immunosuppression containing mycophenolate was an independent predictor of severe COVID-19 (relative risk = 3.94; 95% CI 1.59-9.74; p = 0.003), particularly at doses higher than 1,000 mg/day (p = 0.003). This deleterious effect was not observed with calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus and complete immunosuppression withdrawal showed no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Being chronically immunosuppressed, liver transplant patients have an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 but their mortality rates are lower than the matched general population. Upon hospital admission, mycophenolate dose reduction or withdrawal could help in preventing severe COVID-19. However, complete immunosuppression withdrawal should be discouraged. LAY SUMMARY: In liver transplant patients, chronic immunosuppression increases the risk of acquiring COVID-19 but it could reduce disease severity. Complete immunosuppression withdrawal may not be justified. However, mycophenolate withdrawal or temporary conversion to calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus until disease resolution could be beneficial in hospitalised patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Transplante de Fígado , Transplantados , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , Inibidores de Calcineurina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia
5.
EClinicalMedicine ; 74: 102737, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39114271

RESUMO

Background: The Gender-Equity Model for liver Allocation corrected by serum sodium (GEMA-Na) and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease 3.0 (MELD 3.0) could amend sex disparities for accessing liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to assess these inequities in Spain and to compare the performance of GEMA-Na and MELD 3.0. Methods: Nationwide cohort study including adult patients listed for a first elective LT (January 2016-December 2021). The primary outcome was mortality or delisting for sickness within the first 90 days. Independent predictors of the primary outcome were evaluated using multivariate Cox's regression with adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The discrimination of GEMA-Na and MELD 3.0was assessed using Harrell c-statistics (Hc). Findings: The study included 6071 patients (4697 men and 1374 women). Mortality or delisting for clinical deterioration occurred in 286 patients at 90 days (4.7%). Women had reduced access to LT (83.7% vs. 85.9%; p = 0.037) and increased risk of mortality or delisting for sickness at 90 days (adjusted RR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.09-2.28]; p = 0.017). Female sex remained as an independent risk factor when using MELD or MELD-Na but lost its significance in the presence of GEMA-Na or MELD 3.0. Among patients included for reasons other than tumours (n = 3606; 59.4%), GEMA-Na had Hc = 0.753 (95% CI 0.715-0.792), which was higher than MELD 3.0 (Hc = 0.726 [95% CI 0.686-0.767; p = 0.001), showing both models adequate calibration. Interpretation: GEMA-Na and MELD 3.0 might correct sex disparities for accessing LT, but GEMA-Na provides more accurate predictions of waiting list outcomes and could be considered the standard of care for waiting list prioritization. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spain), and European Union.

6.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 56(3): 526-536, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964052

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Long-term immunity after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in immunosuppressed patients is not well characterized. We aimed to explore the long-term natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant (LT) recipients compared to the non-transplanted population (control group). METHODS: Fifteen LT recipients and 15 controls matched according to variables associated with disease severity were included at 12 months following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) onset. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with peptide pools covering spike (S), nucleocapside (N), and membrane (M) proteins. Reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were identified using flow cytometry, and cytokine production was evaluated in the culture supernatants using cytometric bead array. Serum anti-N and anti-S IgG antibodies were detected with chemiluminescence. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a positive response in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against each viral protein and IL2, IL10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels was similar between LT recipients and controls. IFN-γ levels were positively correlated with the percentage of reactive CD4+ (p = 0.022) and CD8+ (p = 0.043) T cells to a mixture of M + N + S peptide pools. The prevalence and levels of anti-N and anti-S IgG antibodies were slightly lower in the LT recipients, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: LT recipients exhibited a similar T cell response compared to non-transplanted individuals one year after COVID-19 diagnosis.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Teste para COVID-19 , Leucócitos Mononucleares , Imunidade Celular , Imunoglobulina G , Anticorpos Antivirais
7.
Int J Infect Dis ; 134: 154-159, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321473

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Underlying immunodeficiency has been associated with worse clinical presentation and increased mortality in patients with COVID-19. We evaluated the mortality of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients (SOTR) hospitalized in Spain due to COVID-19. METHODS: Nationwide, retrospective, observational analysis of all adults hospitalized because of COVID-19 in Spain during 2020. Stratification was made according to SOT status. The National Registry of Hospital Discharges was used, using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision coding list. RESULTS: Of the 117,694 adults hospitalized during this period, 491 were SOTR: kidney 390 (79.4%), liver 59 (12%), lung 27 (5.5%), and heart 19 (3.9%). Overall, the mortality of SOTR was 13.8%. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, SOTR was not associated with higher mortality risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.03). However, lung transplantation was an independent factor related to mortality (OR = 3.26, 95% CI 1.33-7.43), while kidney, liver, and heart transplantation were not. Being a lung transplant recipient was the strongest prognostic factor in SOT patients (OR = 5.12, 95% CI 1.88-13.98). CONCLUSION: This nationwide study supports that the COVID-19 mortality rate in SOTR in Spain during 2020 did not differ from the general population, except for lung transplant recipients, who presented worse outcomes. Efforts should be focused on the optimal management of lung transplant recipients with COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Órgãos , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Transplantados , Sistema de Registros
8.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 114(5): 266-271, mayo 2022. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS (Espanha) | ID: ibc-205626

RESUMO

El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la frecuentación de la sala de emergencias, las causas de las visitas y los reingresos no programados dentro del primer año después del alta hospitalaria después del trasplante de hígado. También se evaluó su impacto en la supervivencia del injerto y del paciente. Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo de las historias clínicas de 98 pacientes (edad media, 55,6 ± 8,59 años, 77,6 % varones) que fueron dados de alta hospitalaria de forma consecutiva tras someterse a un primer trasplante hepático en nuestra institución durante 2012-2015. Se analizaron todas las visitas a urgencias durante los primeros años tras el trasplante y se calculó la supervivencia a los dos años tras el trasplante. Cincuenta y seis de los 98 pacientes (57,15 %) acudieron a urgencias en 117 ocasiones durante el primer año postrasplante. Fiebre (n = 34; 29,05 %) y síntomas digestivos (n = 32; 27. 35 %) fueron las causas más comunes de consulta y dieron lugar a más de la mitad de las visitas. Treinta y cinco de estos 56 pacientes (62,5 %) requirieron un reingreso urgente durante 50 de las 117 (42,7 %) visitas. Esto se debió principalmente a complicaciones infecciosas (44 %) de diversas causas (neumonía bacteriana, colangitis, colitis por Clostridium difficile) y problemas relacionados con las vías biliares. La probabilidad de reingreso aumentó del 11,22 % a los 30 días del alta al 22,4 % a los 90 días del alta. La supervivencia de los pacientes al año y 2 años después del trasplante fue menor para los pacientes que reingresaron (88,4 % y 80,7 %, respectivamente) en comparación con los que no reingresaron (95,56 % y 91,17 %, respectivamente, p = 0,002). (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Hospitais , Transplante de Fígado , Readmissão do Paciente , Fatores de Risco , Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA