Apparent decrease in population clearance of theophylline: implications for dosage.

BACKGROUND: Having observed in recent years that the theophylline dose requirements needed to attain peak serum concentrations of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml infrequently reached previously described mean values, we hypothesized that a downward shift in the range of dose requirements had occurred among patients with asthma. STUDY DESIGN: We examined dosage requirements needed to attain peak serum concentrations of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml in all patients with chronic asthma treated with theophylline by the Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic at the University of Iowa from 1990 to 1994 (n = 300) and at the Pediatric Pulmonary Clinic at the University of Florida from 1992 to 1995 (n = 93). We then compared these doses to previous dose requirements from 1978 to 1983 determined in the same manner. RESULTS: Despite similar mean peak serum concentrations during both time periods (14 micrograms/ml), mean theophylline dosage requirements during the period of this study were approximately 25% lower among all age groups than those previously observed (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mean dosage requirements between the Iowa and Florida patients in any age group examined. CONCLUSIONS: Theophylline dose requirements needed to attain serum concentrations of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml have decreased significantly from those on which current dosing recommendations are based. This suggests a decrease in mean clearance of the population.

Levalbuterol nebulizer solution: is it worth five times the cost of albuterol?

Albuterol is a 50:50 mixture of R-albuterol, the active enantiomer, and S-albuterol, which appears to be inactive in humans. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved levalbuterol, the pure R-isomer, as a preservative-free nebulizer solution. Published studies indicate that it is neither safer nor more effective than an equimolar dose of racemic albuterol (levalbuterol 1.25 mg = albuterol 2.5 mg). However, these studies were conducted in patients with stable asthma (at the top of the dose-response curve), whereas a nebulized bronchodilator most likely would be used by patients with an acute exacerbation. Because such patients, in the hospital setting, often require higher doses of albuterol, the manufacturer's recommended dose of levalbuterol is likely to be too low for rescue therapy. Levalbuterol may cost as much as 5 times more than racemic albuterol, depending on purchase method. We conclude that levalbuterol offers no advantage over albuterol but is likely to be more costly.

Evaluation of a noninstrumented disposable method for quantifying serum theophylline concentrations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of a new point-of-care theophylline assay (AccuMeter) with that of a standard laboratory assay (TDx), and another point-of-care method (AccuLevel). DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of consecutive patients receiving theophylline. SETTING: University-based, ambulatory, allergy-pulmonary clinic. PATIENTS: Forty subjects receiving maintenance theophylline therapy for asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Theophylline concentrations obtained from AccuMeter, TDx, and AccuLevel were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The error, or difference, between TDx and AccuMeter results in 40 subjects on maintenance theophylline described accuracy. Mean error, an estimate of bias, was 1.1 (95% CI 0.72-1.5), 0.67 (0.34-1.0), and 0.98 (0.79-1.2) microg/ml for AccuMeter capillary, serum, and heparinized blood samples. Square root of the mean squared error, an estimate of precision, was 1.6 (1.2-2.0), 1.22 (0.90-1.5), and 1.14 (0.96-1.3) microg/ml for AccuMeter capillary, serum, and heparinized samples. Difference between AccuMeter and AccuLevel ME, an estimate of relative bias, was 0.59 (0.04-1.1) microg/ml. The difference in mean squared errors, an estimate of relative precision, was 0.86 (-0.54-2.3) microg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: AccuMeter demonstrated good precision and minimal bias compared with TDx and AccuLevel . Method of sample collection had no effect on its accuracy.

In vitro characteristics of tobramycin aerosol from ultrasonic and jet nebulizers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro performance of an ultrasonic nebulizer and a jet nebulizer in producing a respirable aerosol of tobramycin solution for injection. DESIGN: In vitro observational study DEVICES: Ultrasonic and jet nebulizers. INTERVENTION: Output was determined by measuring the difference in nebulizer weight before and after nebulizing 3 ml of tobramycin injection solution. Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and respirable mass were determined by sampling tobramycin aerosol into a cascade impactor. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean (SD) output was 1.14 (0.09) ml/minute for the ultrasonic nebulizer and 0.64 (0.08) ml/minute (p<0.001) for the jet nebulizer. Mean MMAD for the jet nebulizer (2.31 [0.10] microm) was less than that of the ultrasonic nebulizer (2.81 [0.17] microm, p<0.001). The majority of tobramycin aerosol produced was in the respirable range for both the ultrasonic (65.1% [4.10%]) and jet (60.6% [0.73%], p=0.008) nebulizers. CONCLUSION: Despite small, clinically unimportant differences in aerosol size and respirable fraction, either device would be acceptable to administer tobramycin injection solution.

Bronchoconstrictor additives in bronchodilator solutions.

Nebulized bronchodilator solutions are available in the United States as both nonsterile and sterile-filled products. Sulfites, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), or chlorobutanol are added to nonsterile products to prevent bacterial growth, but there have been reports of contaminated solutions containing preservatives. Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is added to some products to prevent discoloration of the solution. With the exception of chlorobutanol, all of these additives are capable of inducing bronchospasm in a concentration-dependent manner. However, it is rarely apparent to the patient or health care provider that the additive diminishes the bronchodilator effects. Older products (eg, isoproterenol and isoetharine) contain enough sulfites to produce bronchospasm in most patients with asthma, even in those without a prior history of sulfite sensitivity. Bronchoconstriction from inhaled BAC is cumulative, prolonged, and correlates directly with basal airway responsiveness. The multidose dropper bottle of albuterol contains 50 microg BAC/dose, which is below the threshold for bronchoconstriction whereas the screwcap unit-dose vial contains 300 microg/dose, which is above the threshold for many patients. If the screwcap product is used in the emergency department, a patient could receive as much as 1800 microg of BAC in the first hour. Three sterile-filled unit dose albuterol products contain no additives, whereas a fourth, (manufactured by Dey Laboratories) contains 300 microg of EDTA, which is also below the threshold dose for bronchoconstriction. Only additive-free sterile solutions should be used for hourly or continuous nebulization of albuterol. The multidose dropper bottle or the Dey product can be used when the interval between doses is longer, whereas the screwcap product should not be used for acute therapy. Ipratropium is available only as a sterile, additive-free unit-dose vial, as is levalbuterol.

Pulmonary function response to EDTA, an additive in nebulized bronchodilators.

BACKGROUND: Some nebulized bronchodilator solutions contain additives, such as EDTA, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), or both. OBJECTIVE: Although BAC-induced bronchoconstriction has been well documented in patients with asthma, there is no information on the effects of EDTA on FEV(1) when inhaled in the amounts that would be administered during emergency department treatment of asthma. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with stable asthma and airway responsiveness to methacholine were randomly assigned to inhale up to four 600-microg nebulized doses of EDTA, BAC (positive control), and normal saline (placebo) in a double-blind crossover manner on separate days. FEV(1) was measured 15 minutes after each dose. Treatments were repeated every 20 minutes until FEV(1) decreased by 20% or greater or a maximum of 4 doses were administered. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD maximum percent decrease in FEV(1) was 1.8% +/- 5.8% after EDTA, 16.6% +/- 13.9% after BAC, and 3.6% +/- 8.2% after placebo (P <.001); there was no significant difference between EDTA and placebo. CONCLUSION: The amount of EDTA contained in maximum recommended doses of nebulized bronchodilators does not induce bronchospasm. In contrast, BAC induces clinically important bronchospasm, which could decrease the efficacy of a bronchodilator during an emergency.