Golden Hour Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis are time-dependent, with maximum efficacy when administered within the first "golden" hour after onset. Nevertheless, the impact of golden hour thrombolysis has not been well quantified. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to August 27, 2023. We included studies that reported safety and efficacy outcomes of ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis in the golden hour versus later treatment window. The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. The secondary efficacy outcome was a good functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2). The main safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 78,826 patients met the selection criteria. Golden hour thrombolysis was associated with higher odds of 90-day excellent functional outcomes (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.67) and 90-day good functional outcomes (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.13-1.69) compared with thrombolysis outside the golden hour. The number needed to treat to benefit for golden hour thrombolysis to reduce disability by at least 1 level on the modified Rankin Scale per patient was 2.6. Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality were similar between groups. INTERPRETATION: Golden hour thrombolysis significantly improved acute ischemic stroke outcomes. The findings provide rationale for intensive efforts aimed at expediting thrombolytic therapy within the golden hour window following the onset of acute ischemic stroke. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:582-590.

Pre-Hospital Stroke Care beyond the MSU.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mobile stroke units (MSU) have established a new, evidence-based treatment in prehospital stroke care, endorsed by current international guidelines and can facilitate pre-hospital research efforts. In addition, other novel pre-hospital modalities beyond the MSU are emerging. In this review, we will summarize existing evidence and outline future trajectories of prehospital stroke care & research on and off MSUs. RECENT FINDINGS: The proof of MSUs' positive effect on patient outcomes is leading to their increased adoption in emergency medical services of many countries. Nevertheless, prehospital stroke care worldwide largely consists of regular ambulances. Advancements in portable technology for detecting neurocardiovascular diseases, telemedicine, AI and large-scale ultra-early biobanking have the potential to transform prehospital stroke care also beyond the MSU concept. The increasing implementation of telemedicine in emergency medical services is demonstrating beneficial effects in the pre-hospital setting. In synergy with telemedicine the exponential growth of AI-technology is already changing and will likely further transform pre-hospital stroke care in the future. Other promising areas include the development and validation of miniaturized portable devices for the pre-hospital detection of acute stroke. MSUs are enabling large-scale screening for ultra-early blood-based biomarkers, facilitating the differentiation between ischemia, hemorrhage, and stroke mimics. The development of suitable point-of-care tests for such biomarkers holds the potential to advance pre-hospital stroke care outside the MSU-concept. A multimodal approach of AI-supported telemedicine, portable devices and blood-based biomarkers appears to be an increasingly realistic scenario for improving prehospital stroke care in regular ambulances in the future.

Randomized controlled double-blind trial of methylprednisolone versus placebo in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and cognitive deficits: study protocol of the post-corona-virus immune treatment (PoCoVIT) trial.

INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 Syndrome (PCS) includes neurological manifestations, especially fatigue and cognitive deficits. Immune dysregulation, autoimmunity, endothelial dysfunction, viral persistence, and viral reactivation are discussed as potential pathophysiological mechanisms. The post-corona-virus immune treatment (PoCoVIT) trial is a phase 2a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial designed to evaluate the effect of methylprednisolone versus placebo on cognitive impairment in PCS. This trial is designed based on the hypothesised autoimmunological pathogenesis and positive aberrations, employing a series of off-label applications. METHODS: Recruitment criteria include a diagnosis of PCS, a minimum age of 18 years and self-reported cognitive deficits at screening. A total of 418 participants will be randomly assigned to either verum or placebo intervention in the first phase of the trial. The trial will consist of a first trial phase intervention with methylprednisolone versus placebo for six weeks, followed by a six-week treatment interruption period. Subsequently, an open second phase will offer methylprednisolone to all participants for six weeks. Outpatient follow-up visits will take place two weeks after each trial medication cessation. The third and final follow-up, at week 52, will be conducted through a telephone interview. The primary outcome measures an intra-patient change of 15 or more points in the memory satisfaction subscale of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) from baseline to follow-up 1 (week 8). Key secondary outcomes include long-term intra-patient changes in memory satisfaction from baseline to follow-up 2 (week 20), changes in other MMQ subscales (follow-up 1 and 2), and changes in neuropsychological and cognitive scores, along with assessments through questionnaires focusing on quality of life, fatigue, and mood over the same periods. Exploratory outcomes involve molecular biomarkers variations in serum and cerebrospinal fluid, as well as structural and functional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters changes related to cognition. PERSPECTIVE: This trial aims to contribute novel evidence for treating patients with PCS, with a primary focus on those manifesting cognitive deficits. By doing so, it may enhance comprehension of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, thereby facilitating biomarker research to advance our understanding and treatment of patients with PCS.

Sex Differences in Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Injury After Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in presentation, treatment, and prognosis of cardiovascular disorders are well recognized. Although an association between acute myocardial injury and mortality after ischemic stroke has been demonstrated, it is unclear whether prevalence and outcome of poststroke acute myocardial injury differ between women and men. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively screened consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurements admitted to our center. Acute myocardial injury was defined as at least 1 high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T value above the upper reference limit (14 ng/L) with a rise/fall of >20%. Rates of acute myocardial injury were also calculated using sex-specific high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T cutoffs (women upper reference limit, 9 ng/L; men upper reference limit, 16 ng/L). Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between acute myocardial injury and outcomes. Of 1067 patients included, 494 were women (46%). Women were older, had a higher rate of known atrial fibrillation, were more likely to be functionally dependent before admission, had higher stroke severity, and more often had cardioembolic strokes (all P values <0.05). The crude prevalence of acute myocardial injury differed by sex (29% women versus 23% men, P=0.024). Statistically significant associations between acute myocardial injury and outcomes were observed in women (7-day in-hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.2 [95% CI, 1.07-9.3]; in-hospital mortality: aOR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.4-7.6]; modified Rankin Scale score at discharge: aOR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.4]) but not in men. The implementation of sex-specific cutoffs did not increase the prognostic value of acute myocardial injury for unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of acute myocardial injury after ischemic stroke and its association with mortality and greater disability might be sex-dependent. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03892226.

Optimization of sensitivity and specificity of a biomarker-based blood test (LVOCheck-Opti): A protocol for a multicenter prospective observational study of patients suspected of having a stroke.

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a time-critical medical emergency. For patients with large-vessel occlusions (LVO), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold-standard treatment. Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) provide on-site diagnostic capabilities via computed tomography (CT) and have been shown to improve functional outcomes in stroke patients, but are cost-efficient only in urban areas. Blood biomarkers have recently emerged as possible alternative to cerebral imaging for LVO diagnosis. Prehospital LVO diagnosis offers the potential to transport patients directly to centers that have MT treatment available. In this study, we assess the accuracy of combining two biomarkers, HFABP and NT-proBNP, with clinical indicators to detect LVO using ultra-early prehospital blood samples. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00030399). Methods and analysis: We plan a multicenter prospective observational study with 800 patients with suspected stroke enrolled within 24 h of symptom onset. Study participants will be recruited at three sites (MSUs) in Berlin, Germany. Blood-samples will be taken pre-hospitally at the scene and tested for HFABP and NT-proBNP levels. Additional clinical data and information on final diagnosis will be collected and documented in an electronic case report form (eCRF). Sensitivity and specificity of the combination will be calculated through iterative permutation-response calculations. Discussion: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of a combination of the biomarkers HFABP and NT-proBNP in LVO prediction. In contrast to most other biomarker studies to date, by employing MSUs as study centers, ultra-early levels of biomarkers can be analyzed. Point-of-care LVO detection in suspected stroke could lead to faster treatment in both urban and rural settings and thus improve functional outcomes on a broader scale. Clinical trial registration: Deutsches Register klinischer Studien https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030399, DRKS00030399.