Comparison of wrist actimetry variables of paretic upper limb use in post stroke patients for ecological monitoring.

BACKGROUND: To date, many wrist actimetric variables dedicated to measuring the upper limbs (UL) in post-stroke patients have been developed but very few comparisons have been made between them. The objective of this study was to compare different actimetric variables of the ULs between a stroke and healthy population. METHODS: Accelerometers were worn continuously for a period of 7 days on both wrists of 19 post-stroke hemiparetic patients as well as 11 healthy subjects. Various wrist actimetry variables were calculated, including the Jerk ratio 50 (JR50, cumulative probability that the Jerk Ratio is between 1 and 2), absolute (FuncUse30) and relative (FuncUseRatio30) amounts of functional use of movements of the ULs with angular amplitude greater than 30°, and absolute (UH) and relative (UseHoursRatio) use hours. RESULTS: FuncUse30, FuncUseRatio30, UH, UseHoursRatio and JR50 of the paretic UL of stroke patients were significantly lower than in the non-dominant UL of healthy subjects. Comparing the ratio variables in stroke patients, FuncUseRatio30 was significantly lower than UseHoursRatio and JR50, suggesting a more clinically sensitive variable to monitor. In an exploratory analysis, FuncUseRatio tends to decrease with angular range of motion for stroke patients while it remains stable and close to 1 for healthy subjects. UseHoursRatio, FuncUseRatio30 and JR50 show linear correlation with Fugl-Meyer score (FM), with r2 equal to 0.53, 0.35 and 0.21, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study determined that the FuncUseRatio30 variable provides the most sensitive clinical biomarker of paretic UL use in post-stroke patients, and that FuncUseHours-angular range of motion relationship allows the identification of the UL behaviour of each patient. This ecological information on the level of functional use of the paretic UL can be used to improve follow-up and develop patient-specific therapy.

Upper Limb Isokinetic Strengthening Versus Passive Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of isokinetic strengthening of the upper limb (UL) in patients with chronic stroke as compared to passive mobilization. DESIGN: Randomized blinded assessor controlled trial. SETTING: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation departments of 2 university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=20) with incomplete hemiplegia (16 men; mean age, 64y; median time since stroke, 32mo). INTERVENTIONS: A 6-week comprehensive rehabilitation program, 3d/wk, 3 sessions/d. In addition, a 45-minute session per day was performed using an isokinetic dynamometer, with either isokinetic strengthening of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors (isokinetic strengthening group) or passive joint mobilization (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the increase in Upper Limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UL-FMA) score at day 45 (t1). Secondary endpoints were increases in UL-FMA scores, Box and Block Test scores, muscle strength, spasticity, and Barthel Index at t1, t2 (3mo), and t3 (6mo). RESULTS: Recruitment was stopped early because of excessive fatigue in the isokinetic strengthening group. The increase in UL-FMA score at t1 was 3.5±4.4 in the isokinetic strengthening group versus 6.0±4.5 in the control group (P=.2). Gains in distal UL-FMA scores were larger (3.1±2.8) in the control group versus 0.6±2.5 in the isokinetic strengthening group (P=.05). No significant group difference was observed in secondary endpoints. Mixed models confirmed those results. Regarding the whole sample, gains from baseline were significant for the UL-FMA at t1 (+4.8; P<.001), t2, and t3 and for the Box and Block Test at t1 (+3; P=.013) and t2. CONCLUSIONS: In a comprehensive rehabilitation program, isokinetic strengthening did not show superiority to passive mobilization for UL rehabilitation. Findings also suggest a sustained benefit in impairments and function of late UL rehabilitation programs for patients with stroke.

Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.

BACKGROUND: A large number of robotic or gravity-supporting devices have been developed for rehabilitation of upper extremity post-stroke. Because these devices continuously monitor performance data during training, they could potentially help to develop predictive models of the effects of motor training on recovery. However, during training with such devices, patients must become adept at using the new "tool" of the exoskeleton, including learning the new forces and visuomotor transformations associated with the device. We thus hypothesized that the changes in performance during extensive training with a passive, gravity-supporting, exoskeleton device (the Armeo Spring) will follow an initial fast phase, due to learning to use the device, and a slower phase that corresponds to reduction in overall arm impairment. Of interest was whether these fast and slow processes were related. METHODS: To test the two-process hypothesis, we used mixed-effect exponential models to identify putative fast and slow changes in smoothness of arm movements during 80 arm reaching tests performed during 20 days of exoskeleton training in 53 individuals with post-acute stroke. RESULTS: In line with our hypothesis, we found that double exponential models better fit the changes in smoothness of arm movements than single exponential models. In contrast, single exponential models better fit the data for a group of young healthy control subjects. In addition, in the stroke group, we showed that smoothness correlated with a measure of impairment (the upper extremity Fugl Meyer score - UEFM) at the end, but not at the beginning, of training. Furthermore, the improvement in movement smoothness due to the slow component, but not to the fast component, strongly correlated with the improvement in the UEFM between the beginning and end of training. There was no correlation between the change of peaks due to the fast process and the changes due to the slow process. Finally, the improvement in smoothness due to the slow, but not the fast, component correlated with the number of days since stroke at the onset of training - i.e. participants who started exoskeleton training sooner after stroke improved their smoothness more. CONCLUSIONS: Our results therefore demonstrate that at least two processes are involved in in performance improvements measured during mechanized training post-stroke. The fast process is consistent with learning to use the exoskeleton, while the slow process independently reflects the reduction in upper extremity impairment.

Correction to: Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.

The original article [1] contained an error whereby the co-author, Karima Bakhti's name was displayed incorrectly.

Post-polio syndrome is not a dysimmune condition.

BACKGROUND: Poliomyelitis is a global disabling disease affecting 12-20 million of people. Post poliomyelitis syndrome (PPS) may affect up to 80% of polio survivors: increased muscle weakness, pain, fatigue, functional decline. It relies on aging of an impaired neuro-muscular system with ongoing denervation processes. A late involvement of humoral or cellular pro-inflammatory phenomena is also suspected. AIM: To assess the dysimmune hypothesis of PPS by comparing lymphocyte subpopulations and humoral immune factors between PPS patients and controls. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Montpellier University Hospital. POPULATION: Forty-seven PPS and 27 healthy controls. METHODS: PPS patients and controls were compared on their lymphocyte subpopulations and humoral immune factors (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23, IFN-γ, TNF-α, GM-CSF, RANTES, MCP1, MIP-3a, IL-10, TGF-ß, IL4, IL13). Patients were further compared according to their dominant clinical symptoms. Sample size guaranteed a power >90% for all comparisons. RESULTS: PPS patients and controls were comparable in gender, age and corpulence. Most patients had lower limb motor sequelae (N.=45, 95.7%), a minority had upper limb motor impairment (N.=16, 34.0%). Forty-five were able to walk (94%), 35/45 with technical aids. The median of the two-minute walking test was 110 meters (interquartile range 55; 132). Eighteen (38%) required help in their daily life. Their quality of life was low (SF36). All described an increased muscular weakness, 40 (85%) a general fatigue, and 39 (83%) muscular or joint pain. Blood count, serum electrolytes, T and B lymphocyte subpopulations and cytokines were comparable between patients and controls, except for creatine phospho kinase that was significantly higher in PPS patients. None of these variables differed between the 20/47 patients whose late main symptoms were pain or fatigue, and other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PPS is not a dysimmune disease. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our results do not sustain immunotherapy for PPS. Our work suggest that PPS may be mostly linked to physiological age-related phenomena in a disabled neuromuscular condition. Thus, our results emphasize the role of prevention and elimination of aggravating factors to avoid late functional worsening, and the importance of rehabilitation programs that should be adapted to patients' specific conditions.

Recovering arm function in chronic stroke patients using combined anodal HD-tDCS and virtual reality therapy (ReArm): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: After a stroke, 80% of the chronic patients have difficulties to use their paretic upper limb (UL) in activities of daily life (ADL) even after rehabilitation. Virtual reality therapy (VRT) and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are two innovative methods that have shown independently to positively impact functional recovery of the paretic UL when combined with conventional therapy. The objective of the project will be to evaluate the impact of adding anodal high-definition (HD)-tDCS during an intensive 3-week UL VRT and conventional therapy program on paretic UL function in chronic stroke. METHODS: The ReArm project is a quadruple-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, bi-centre, two-arm parallel, and interventional study design. Fifty-eight chronic (> 3 months) stroke patients will be recruited from the Montpellier and Nimes University Hospitals. Patients will follow a standard 3-week in-patient rehabilitation program, which includes 13 days of VRT (Armeo Spring, 1 × 30 min session/day) and conventional therapy (3 × 30 min sessions/day). Twenty-nine patients will receive real stimulation (4x1 anodal HD-tDCS montage, 2 mA, 20 min) to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex during the VRT session and the other 29 patients will receive active sham stimulation (2 mA, 30 s). All outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, at the end of rehabilitation and again 3 months later. The primary outcome measure will be the wolf motor function test. Secondary outcomes will include measures of UL function (Box and Block Test), impairment (Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity), compensation (Proximal Arm Non-Use), ADL (Actimetry, Barthel Index). Other/exploratory outcomes will include pain, fatigue, effort and performance, kinematics, and motor cortical region activation during functional motor tasks. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial to determine the impact of adding HD-tDCS during UL VRT and conventional therapy in chronic stroke patients. We hypothesize that improvements in UL function will be greater and longer-lasting with real stimulation than in those receiving sham. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ReArm project was approved by The French Research Ethics Committee, (Comité de Protection des Personnes-CPP SUD-EST II, N°ID-RCB: 2019-A00506-51, http://www.cppsudest2.fr/ ). The ReArm project was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04291573 , 2nd March 2020.

Rehabilitation of the upper arm early after stroke: Video games versus conventional rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Few rehabilitation methods have proven their efficacy in increasing sensori-motor recovery and/or function of the upper limb (UL) after stroke. Video games (VGs) are promising tools in this indication. OBJECTIVE: To compare UL rehabilitation by using VGs and conventional rehabilitation (CR) in patients with sub-acute stroke. DESIGN: Single-blind, multicentric trial, with central randomization and stratification by center. SETTING: Physical and rehabilitation medicine departments of 2 university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adults within 3 months after a first vascular cerebral accident, with UL Fugl Meyer Score (UL-FMS)<30/66 and without major cognitive impairment. INTERVENTION: A 45-min additional session of conventional occupational therapy (OT) or a VG-based OT session as add-on therapy to usual rehabilitation programs, 5 days/week for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: UL-FMS. Secondary outcome: Box and Block Test (BBT), Wolf Motor Function test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Barthel Index and quality of life (SF-36). RESULTS: We included 51 patients (20 women) at a mean (SD) of 27.2 (19.4) days post-stroke (mean age 58 years [range 24-83]), 26 in the CR group and 25 in the VG group (23 in each group at 6-month follow-up). The mean duration of the additional rehabilitation session was similar in both groups: 29.3 (4.3) vs 28.0 (4.4) min in CR and VG groups. Shoulder pain occurred in 4 patients in the VG group versus 7 in the CR group. At day 45, gain in UL-FMS did not significantly differ between the groups (CR mean 17.8 [14.6] vs VG 24.1 [14.8]; P=0.10), whereas gain in BBT was doubled in the VG group (CR 7.4 [12.2] vs VG 15.7 [16.3]; P=0.02). At 6-month follow-up, the study was inconclusive about between-group differences in UL-FMS, BBT and other criteria. Post-hoc analysis showed that gains in UL-FMS or BBT were significantly higher in the VG than CR group for patients included within 30 days post-stroke. CONCLUSION: In general, we cannot conclude that video gaming and conventional OT led to different long-term sensorimotor recovery of the UL after sub-acute stroke. However, when applied within the first month after stroke, video gaming was more efficient than conventional rehabilitation on both sensorimotor recovery and gross grasping function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01554449).