Validación de un cuestionario de conocimientos adquiridos por los pacientes tras un taller educativo de artroplastia de rodilla.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgery that aims to restore function and relieve pain in advanced osteoarthritis. The Educational Workshop (EW) for TKA is given to patients in the pre-surgery period to inform them and facilitating their participation in their health process (empowerment). The aim of this study was developing and validating a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the acquired knowledge after the EW by the patients who will undergo the TKA procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was a longitudinal and prospective observational study with a sample of TKA candidate patients. The phases for the construction and validation of this ad hoc questionnaire were: Phase 1: A panel of experts who agreed on a final questionnaire of 20 items; Phase 2: Pilot test administered to 47 patients; Phase 3: Final test of 11 items administered to 50 patients, before and after the EW; Phase 4: Re-test, after the EW and 2 weeks after, administered to 58 patients. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty five patients were included. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the item's internal consistency of the final questionnaire, 11 items, was 0.78. To reach the criterion validity, in pre-EW the mean number of hits was: 4.92 (SD=1.78) and in post-EW 10.68 (SD=0.55), a difference that had a statistical significance p<.0001, with no overlap in the 95% CI of the mean: 4.46-5.38/10.54-10.82. The test for stability and reliability, re-test, obtained a mean of right answers 10.87 (SD=0.33) and for the re-test of 10.70 (SD=0.59). The correlation of the interclass coefficient for the re-test was 0.99, which corresponds almost to a maximum concordance. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire developed in this study is a reliable and easy tool to evaluate the acquired knowledge in the EW for patients who will be TKA operated.

Diferencias en el uso de las estrategias de afrontamiento, el catastrofismo y el estado de ánimo en función del tiempo de evolución del dolor crónico / No disponible

Introducción: este estudio describe el dolor crónico como un estresor complejo al que la persona debe adaptarse continuamente usando diferentes estrategias. Método: el objetivo de esta investigación es observar las diferencias que existen en las variables psicológicas y el uso de las estrategias de afrontamiento del dolor en función del tiempo de evolución. Los instrumentos de evaluación son: "Cuestionario del Dolor McGill" (MPQ), "Estrategias de Afrontamiento del Dolor Crónico" (CADR), "Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión" (HAD), "Escala de Catastrofismo del CSQ" (CSQ-C). Los 60 participantes del estudio son pacientes de una unidad de tratamiento especializada en el ámbito hospitalario. De estos se crearon dos grupos, uno de menor tiempo de evolución (de 1 a 5 años) y el otro de mayor tiempo de evolución (de más de 13 años). Resultados: los resultados muestran que tanto el tiempo de evolución como la edad del paciente se asocian con el uso de una estrategia pasiva, la "catarsis" y la evaluación del dolor tiene una relación positiva con el catastrofismo, las estrategias pasivas, la ansiedad y la depresión. Mediante el análisis de la comparación de medias de los dos grupos se confirma que el grupo de menor tiempo de evolución hace mayor uso de la estrategia de afrontamiento "catarsis" y además presenta puntuaciones más altas en "catastrofismo" en comparación con los componentes del otro grupo. Conclusión: se observa la relación entre del dolor y las variables psicológicas del estudio como también los cambios que pueden aparecer en diferentes etapas de la evolución del dolor

Introduction: preliminary study on the psychological variables and coping strategies in chronic pain related to duration. This study describes chronic pain as a stressor complex that the person using a coping strategies to adapt continuously. Method: the primary objective of this research observes differences in psychological variables and the use of pain coping strategies depending on the time of evolution. The assessment instruments are McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), "Strategies for Coping with Chronic Pain" (CADR), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), Catastro-phism Scale CSQ (CSQ-C). Participants of this study are patients with chronic pain and are treated in to specialized unit. The results show that duration and patient's age are associated with the use of a passive strategy, the "catharsis". The perception of pain has a positive relationship with catastrophizing, passive strategies, anxiety and depression. Results: results obtained by comparing the average of the two groups, one with 1 to 5 years of evolution, and another 13 to 33 years, show that the group of shorter duration makes greater use of the coping strategy of catharsis and it has scored higher on catastrophizing compared to another group. Conclusion: we observe the relationship between pain and psychological variables of this study and changes that may occur in different stages of duration of pain (AU)