Lymphovascular space invasion as a prognostic factor of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter study by the FRANCOGYN group.

BACKGROUND: The presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is not yet included in international recommendations neither as a prognostic factor nor as a parameter for the decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy in FIGO stage I/IIa ovarian cancer (OC). OBJECTIVE: This study set out to evaluate the impact of LVSI on Overall Survival (OS) and Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) in patients managed for epithelial OC. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study by the research group FRANCOGYN between January 2001 and December 2018. All patients managed for epithelial OC surgery and for whom histological slides for the review of LVSI were available, were included. The characteristics of patients with LVSI (LVSI group) were compared to those without LVSI (No-LVSI group). A Cox analysis for OS and RFS analysis was performed in all the populations. SETTING: French multicenter tertiary care centers RESULTS: Over the study period, 852 patients were included in the 13 institutions. Among them, 289 patients had LVSI (33.9%). There was a significant difference in the distribution of LVSI between early and advanced stages (p < 0.001). LVSI was an independent predictive factor for poorer Overall and Recurrence-Free Survival. LVSI affected OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p < 0.001), LVSI affected OS and RFS for early stages (p = 0.001; p = 0.001, respectively) and also for advanced stages (p = 0.01; p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of LVSI in epithelial ovarian epithelial tumors has an impact on OS and RFS and should be included in the routine pathology examination to adapt therapeutic management, especially for women in the early stages of the disease.

Patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: understanding the determinants of survival.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate management for patients with stage IV ovarian cancer remains unclear. Our objective was to understand the main determinants associated with survival and to discuss best surgical management. METHODS: Data of 1038 patients with confirmed ovarian cancer treated between 1996 and 2016 were extracted from maintained databases of 7 French referral gynecologic oncology institutions. Patients with stage IV diseases were selected for further analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival distribution. A Cox proportional hazards model including all the parameters statistically significant in univariable analysis, was used to account for the influence of multiple variables. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients met our inclusion criteria: 65 (31.3%) never underwent debulking surgery, 52 (25%) underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and 91 (43.8%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS). Patients not operated had a significantly worse overall survival than patients that underwent PDS or NACT-IDS (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, three factors were independent predictors of survival: upfront surgery (HR 0.32 95% CI 0.14-0.71, p = 0.005), postoperative residual disease = 0 (HR 0.37 95% CI 0.18-0.75, p = 0.006) and association of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel regimen (HR 0.45 95% CI 0.25-0.80, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of distant metastases should not refrain surgeons from performing radical procedures, whenever the patient is able to tolerate. Maximal surgical efforts should be done to minimize residual disease as it is the main determinant of survival.

Does lymphadenectomy improve survival in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer? A multicentric study from the FRANCOGYN Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: The role of lymphadenectomy in intermediate risk endometrial cancer remains uncertain. We evaluated the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival and relapse-free survival for patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients from the FRANCOGYN database with intermediate risk endometrial cancer, based on pre-operative and post-operative criteria (type 1, grade 1-2 tumors with deep (> 50%) myometrial invasion and no lymphovascular space invasion), who received primary surgical treatment between November 2002 and August 2013. We compared overall survival and relapse-free survival between staged and unstaged patients. RESULTS: From 1235 screened patients, we selected 108 patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Eighty-two (75.9%) patients underwent nodal staging (consisting of pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Among them, 35 (32.4%) had lymph node disease. The median follow-up was 25 months (range 0.4 to 155.0). The overall survival rates were 82.5% for patients staged (CI 64.2 to 91.9) vs 77.9 % for unstaged patients (CI 35.4 to 94.2) (P = 0.73). The relapse-free survival rates were 68.9% for staged patients (CI 51.2 to 81.3) vs 68.8% for unstaged patients (CI 29.1 to 89.3) (P=0.67). CONCLUSION: Systematic nodal staging does not appear to improve overall survival and relapse-free survival for patients with IR EC but could provide information to tailor adjuvant therapy. Sentinel lymph node dissection may be an effective and less invasive alternative staging technique and should provide a future alternative for this population.

Therapeutic value of surgical paraaortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multicenter cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN study group.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of surgical paraaortic staging remains unclear in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The objective of our study was to evaluate the survival impact of surgical staging in patients with LACC and no evidence of paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis on pre-operative imaging work-up. METHODS: Data of 1447 patients with cervical cancer treated between 1996 and 2016 were extracted from maintained databases of 10 French University hospitals. Patients with locally advanced disease (IB2 or more) treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and no evidence of paraaortic metastasis on pre-operative imaging work-up were selected for further analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival distribution. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to account for the influence of multiple variables. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-seven patients were included, 377 (58.3%) with surgical staging and 270 (41.7%) without, with a mean follow up of 38.1 months (QI 13.0-56.0). Pathologic analysis revealed positive lymph nodes in 47 patients (12.5%). In multivariate model analysis, surgical staging remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS (OR 0.64, CI 95% 0.46-0.89, p = 0.008) and OS (OR 0.43, CI 95% 0.27-0.68, p < 0.001). The other significant parameter in multivariate analysis for both DFS and OS was treatment by intracavitary brachytherapy (OR respectively of 0.7 (0.5-1.0) and 0.6 (0.4-0.9), p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nodal surgical staging had an independent positive impact on survival in patients with LACC treated with CRT with no evidence of metastatic PALN on imaging.

Identification of micro-RNA expression profile related to recurrence in women with ESMO low-risk endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Actual European pathological classification of early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) may show insufficient accuracy to precisely stratify recurrence risk, leading to potential over or under treatment. Micro-RNAs are post-transcriptional regulators involved in carcinogenic mechanisms, with some micro-RNA patterns of expression associated with EC characteristics and prognosis. We previously demonstrated that downregulation of micro-RNA-184 was associated with lymph node involvement in low-risk EC (LREC). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether micro-RNA signature in tumor tissues from LREC women can be correlated with the occurrence of recurrences. METHODS: MicroRNA expression was assessed by chip analysis and qRT-PCR in 7 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) LREC primary tumors from women whose follow up showed recurrences (R+) and in 14 FFPE LREC primary tumors from women whose follow up did not show any recurrence (R-), matched for grade and age. Various statistical analyses, including enrichment analysis and a minimum p-value approach, were performed. RESULTS: The expression levels of micro-RNAs-184, -497-5p, and -196b-3p were significantly lower in R+ compared to R- women. Women with a micro-RNA-184 fold change < 0.083 were more likely to show recurrence (n = 6; 66%) compared to those with a micro-RNA-184 fold change > 0.083 (n = 1; 8%), p = 0.016. Women with a micro-RNA-196 fold change < 0.56 were more likely to show recurrence (n = 5; 100%) compared to those with a micro-RNA-196 fold change > 0.56 (n = 2; 13%), p = 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the great interest of micro-RNA-184 as a prognostic tool to improve the management of LREC women.

Identification of a low risk population for parametrial invasion in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have challenged radical procedures for less extensive surgery in selected patients with early-stage cervical cancer at low risk of parametrial invasion. Our objective was to identify a subgroup of patients at low risk of parametrial invasion among women having undergone surgical treatment. METHODS: Data of 1447 patients with cervical cancer treated between 1996 and 2016 were extracted from maintained databases of 10 French University hospitals. Patients with early-stage (IA2-IIA) disease treated by radical surgery including hysterectomy and trachelectomy, were selected for further analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival distribution. A Cox proportional hazards model including all the parameters statistically significant in univariate analysis, was used to account for the influence of multiple variables. RESULTS: Out of the 263 patients included for analysis, on final pathology analysis 28 (10.6%) had parametrial invasion and 235 (89.4%) did not. Factors significantly associated with parametrial invasion on multivariate analysis were: age > 65 years, tumor > 30 mm in diameter measured by MRI, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) on pathologic analysis. Among the 235 patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes, parametrial disease was seen in only 7.6% compared with 30.8% of those with positive pelvic nodes (p < 0.001). In a subgroup of patients presenting tumors < 30 mm, negative pelvic status and no LVSI, the risk of parametrial invasion fell to 0.6% (1/173 patients). CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that there is a subgroup of patients at very low risk of parametrial invasion, potentially eligible for less radical procedures.

High postoperative fertility rate following surgical management of colorectal endometriosis.

STUDY QUESTION: What are fertility outcomes in patients surgically managed for large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum who intend to get pregnant postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER: Surgical management for rectal endometriosis is followed by high pregnancy rates, with a majority of natural conceptions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Optimal management such as surgery versus first-line ART for patients with severe deep endometriosis who desire pregnancy is not defined. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study included the patients enrolled in ENDORE randomized trial who attempted pregnancy after the surgery. From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a two-arm randomized trial, enrolling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring more than 20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth, and up to 50% of rectal circumference. Postoperative follow-up was prolonged in 55 patients recruited at Rouen University Hospital, and varied from 50 to 79 months. No women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients had either conservative surgery by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery by segmental resection. One gynecologist experienced in deep endometriosis surgery performed all the procedures, assisted when required by three general surgeons experienced in colorectal surgery. Institutional review board approval was obtained to extend postoperative follow-up to 10 years after the surgery. Among patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, women who intended to get pregnant after surgery were selected and followed up postoperatively every 6 months for 2 years, then every year. Pregnancy intention, fertility outcomes, conception mode, endometriosis recurrences and digestive and urinary outcomes were rigorously recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were conception mode, the delay to conception from the day of surgery and the day when hormonal treatment was stopped, and delivery rate. Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of conception after surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the 55 patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, 25 had conservative and 30 had radical surgery, and their postoperative follow-up varied from 50 to 79 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 55 patients, 36 intended to get pregnant after surgery, 23 of whom had unsuccessfully attempted to conceive for more than 12 months before surgery (63%). At the end of follow-up, 29 patients achieved pregnancy (81%), and natural conception was recorded in 17 of them (59% of conceptions). As several women had more than 1 pregnancy (range: 0-3), we recorded 37 pregnancies, 24 natural conceptions (65%) and 29 deliveries (78%). The probabilities of achieving pregnancy at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months postoperatively were 33.4% (95% CI: 20.6-51.3%), 60.6% (44.8-76.8%), 77% (61.5-89.6%) and 86.8% (72.8-95.8%), respectively. Women who had been advised to attempt natural conception achieved pregnancy significantly earlier than patients referred for ART (P = 0.008). In infertile patients, the postoperative pregnancy rate was 74%, and 53% of conceptions were natural. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main outcomes of the original trial were related to digestive function and not to fertility. Several factors impacting fertility could not be revealed due to small sample size. The study included a high percentage of young women with an overall satisfactory prognosis for fertility, as patients' median age was 28 years. The inclusion of only large infiltrations of the rectum does not allow the extrapolation of conclusions to small nodules of <2 cm in length. Only one skilled gynecologic surgeon performed all the procedures. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: First-line surgery can be considered in patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum and pregnancy intention. Patients receiving advice from experienced surgeons on conception modes were more likely to conceive faster after surgery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the clinical research program for hospitals (PHRC) in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The original randomized trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT 01291576).

Impact of hospital and surgeon case volume on morbidity in colorectal endometriosis management: a plea to define criteria for expert centers.

National and international guidelines recommend referring patients with severe forms of endometriosis to expert centers. However, there is a lack of clear criteria to define an expert center. We examined the roles of surgeon and hospital procedure volumes as determinants of morbidity in deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and sigmoid colon (DIERS). METHODS: We conducted a French retrospective multicenter study of hospital facilities performing colorectal surgery for DIERS in 2015. The primary end point was to analyze the relation between case volume and the incidence of complications. We estimated the optimal cut-off (OCO) determined by a minimal p-value approach. RESULTS: The study included 56 hospital facilities and collected data of 1135 cases of surgical management of colorectal endometriosis. The mean and median number of procedures per year and per surgeon were 9.17 and 5.58, respectively. The overall rate of grade III-V complication was 7.6% (82/1135). One grade V complication occurred. The rates of rectovaginal fistula, anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and ureteral fistula were: 2.7% (31/1135), 0.79% (9/1135), 3.4% (39/1135), and 0.70% (8/1135), respectively. An OCO of 20 procedures per center and per year (p < 0.001) was defined. The OCO per surgeon and per year varied between seven (p = 0.007) and 13 procedures (p = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis, we found that only the volume of activity was independently correlated to complication outcomes (p = 0.0013). CONCLUSION: Our results contribute to providing objective morbidity data to determine criteria for defining expert centers for colorectal surgery for endometriosis.

A Proposal for a Classification for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of a French Multicenter Database From the FRANCOGYN Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial cancer (EC) recurrences are relatively common with no standardized way of describing them. We propose a new classification for them called locoregional, nodal, metastasis, carcinomatosis recurrences (rLMNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 1230 women with EC who were initially treated by primary surgery were included in this French multicenter retrospective study. Recurrences were classified based on dissemination pathways: (1) locoregional recurrence (rL); (2) nodal recurrence (rN) for lymphatic pathway; (3) distant organ recurrence (rM) for hematogenous pathway; and (4) carcinomatosis recurrence (rC) for peritoneal pathway. These pathways were further divided into subgroups. We compared recurrence free survival and overall survival (OS) between the 4 groups (rL/rN/rM/rC). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 35.6 months (range, 1.70-167.60). One hundred ninety-eight women (18.2%) experienced a recurrence: 150 (75.8%) experienced a single-pathway recurrence and 48 (24.2%) a multiple-pathway recurrence. The 5-year OS was 34.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.02%-43.1%), and the median time to first recurrence was 18.9 months (range, 0-152 months). The median survival after recurrence was 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.7-18.8). Among women with single pathway of recurrence, a difference in 5-year OS (P < 0.001) and survival after recurrence (P < 0.01) was found between the 4 rLNMC groups. The carcinomatosis group had the worst prognosis compared with other single recurrence pathways. Women with multiple recurrences had poorer 5-year OS (P < 0.001) and survival after recurrence (P < 0.01) than those with single metastasis recurrence, other than women with peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSIONS: This easy-to-use and intuitive classification may be helpful to define EC recurrence risk groups and develop guidelines for the management of recurrence. Its prognosis value could also be a tool to select homogenous populations for further trials.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Discoid Resection and Segmental Resection for Colorectal Endometriosis Using a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our primary endpoint was to compare the intra- and postoperative complications, whereas secondary endpoints were the occurrence of voiding dysfunction and evaluation of the quality or life of segmental and discoid resection in patients with colorectal endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Tenon University Hospital in Paris. PATIENTS: Thirty-one 31 patients who underwent a conservative surgery and 31 patients who underwent. INTERVENTIONS: The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, with a median follow-up of 247 days (8.2 months). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Discoid colorectal resection was associated with a shorter operating time (155 vs 180 minutes, p = .03) and hospital stay (7 vs 8 days, p = .002) than segmental colorectal resection; however, a similar intra- and postoperative complication rate was found. A higher rate of postoperative voiding dysfunction was observed in the segmental resection group (19% vs 45%, p = .03) as well as duration of voiding dysfunction requiring bladder self-catheterization longer than 30 days (0 vs 22%, p = .005). CONCLUSION: Our PSM analysis suggests the advantages of discoid resection because it results in a similar surgical complication rate to segmental resection but with advantages in operating time, hospital stay, and voiding dysfunction.

Magnetic Resonance Enterography to Assess Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for multifocal (i.e., multiple lesions affecting the same digestive segment) and multicentric (i.e., multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis. DESIGN: A prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. PATIENTS: Patients with MRI-suspected colorectal endometriosis scheduled for colorectal resection from April 2014 to February 2016 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent both 1.5-Tesla MRI and MRE as well as laparoscopically assisted and open colorectal resections. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of MRI and MRE was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs). The interobserver variability of the experienced and junior radiologists was quantified using weighted statistics. Forty-seven patients were included. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients had unifocal lesions, 14 (30%) had multifocal lesions, and 11 (23.4%) had multicentric lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multifocal lesions were 0.29 (6/21), 1.00 (23/24), 15.36, and 0.71 for MRI and 0.57 (12/21), 0.89 (23/25), 4.95, and 0.58 for MRE. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multicentric lesions were 0.18 (1/11), 1.00 (1/1), 15, and 0.80 for MRI and 0.46 (5/11), 0.92 (33/36), 5.45, and 0.60 for MRE. Lower accuracies for MRI compared with MRE to diagnose multicentric (p = .01) and multifocal lesions (p = .004) were noted. The interobserver agreement for MRE was good for both multifocality (κ = 0.80) and multicentricity (κ = 0.61). CONCLUSION: MRE has better accuracy for diagnosing multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis than conventional MRI.

Management and Survival of Elderly and Very Elderly Patients with Endometrial Cancer: An Age-Stratified Study of 1228 Women from the FRANCOGYN Group.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist about the clinical management and survival of elderly patients with endometrial cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the management of elderly and very elderly patients with endometrial cancer as well as the overall survival (OS) rate, disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: Data from 1228 patients with endometrial cancer who received primary treatment between January 2001 and December 2012 were collected from a multicenter database. Clinical management, DFS, CSS, and OS were analyzed. RESULTS: Based on the international endometrial cancer risk classification, 36% (212/582) of women age 65 years or younger, 42% (220/526) of women ages 65-80 years, and 48% (58/120) of women older than 80 years showed high-risk endometrial cancer (p < 0.001). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed for 85% (230/271) of the women age 65 years or younger and 46% (33/71) of the women older than 80 years (p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was performed for 27% (33/120) of the very elderly and 40% (233/582) of the young patients (p = 0.009). The 3-year CSS rates were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-97%) for the women age 65 years or younger, 90% (95% CI, 87-94%) for the women ages 65-80 years, and 82% (95% CI, 73-93%) for the women older than 80 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The elderly and very elderly patients with endometrial cancer showed poorer prognosis than young patients. The significant lower CSS rate for the elderly patients could have be due to both the higher rate of high-risk endometrial cancer and undertreatment. Specific guidelines for the management of elderly and very elderly patients with endometrial cancer are needed to improve their prognosis.

Patterns of recurrence and outcomes in surgically treated women with endometrial cancer according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference risk groups: Results from the FRANCOGYN study Group.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyse the endometrial cancer (EC) patterns of recurrence based on a large French multicentre database according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO classification. METHODS: Data of women with histologically proven EC who received primary surgical treatment between January 2001 and December 2012 were retrospectively abstracted from seven institutions with prospectively maintained databases. The endpoints were recurrence, recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Time to the first EC recurrence in a specific site was evaluated by using cumulative incidence analysis (Gray's test). RESULTS: Data from 829 women were analysed in whom recurrences were observed in 176 (21%) with a median and mean time to recurrence of 13 and 19.5months, respectively. High (35%) and high-intermediate risk groups (16%) were associated with higher recurrence rates compared with low (9%) and intermediate (9%) risk patients (p<0.0001). Women with high risk EC had a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence (20.7%) than women with high-intermediate, intermediate and low risk EC (5.6%, 3.5%, 3.3%), (p<0.001), respectively. Women with high risk and high-intermediate risk EC had a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of loco-regional recurrence (24.3% and 16.6%, respectively) than women with intermediate and low risk EC (6.6% and 6.5%, respectively), (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We report specific time and site patterns of first recurrence according to the ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO classification. Sites and hazard rates for recurrence differ widely between subgroups over time. Defining patterns of EC recurrence may provide useful information for developing follow-up recommendations and designing therapeutic approaches.

Preoperative quality of life questionnaires are an adequate tool to select women with genital prolapse for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: No clear consensus exists on the selection of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) for surgery. There is a need to preoperatively identify candidates who will benefit from surgery as there is no strict correlation between POP anatomical abnormalities and changes in symptoms and quality of life (QOL) after surgical treatment. Therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the changes in QOL after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) for POP using validated questionnaires and to assess their relevance in selecting women for surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 48 women with advanced stages of POP treated by LSC from March 2005 to January 2015. We developed a recursive partitioning model from QOL PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 questionnaire scores to determine a preoperative cut-off score for predicting improvement after surgery. The model was then validated in 84 consecutive women. RESULTS: Optimal anatomical results were obtained in 129 of the 132 women (97.7%). Both questionnaires revealed a significant improvement after LSC (p < 0.01). The probability of improvement after surgery was 0% in women with a preoperative PFIQ-7 score of <45.25, and 84% in women with a PFIQ-7 score of ≥45.25. The probability of improvement after surgery was 0% in women with a preoperative PFDI-20 score of <52.15, 88.2% in those with a PFDI-20 score of ≥ 98.45, and 42.9% in those with a PFDI-20 score between 52.15 and 98.45. In the validation set, the discriminatory accuracies of the model were 0.96 (95% CI 0.925-0.998) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) for the PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20 questionnaires, respectively. The performance was accurate with a significant difference between observed outcome frequencies and predicted probabilities (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use QOL questionnaires to select women for LSC.

Predicting poor prognosis recurrence in women with endometrial cancer: a nomogram developed by the FRANCOGYN study group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a nomogram to predict 'poor prognosis recurrence' (PPR) in women treated for endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: The data of 861 women who received primary surgical treatment between January 2001 and December 2013 were abstracted from a prospective multicenter database. Data were randomly split into two sets: training and validation with a predefined 2/3 ratio. A Cox proportional hazards multivariate model of selected prognostic features was performed in the training cohort (n=574) to develop a nomogram predicting PPRs. The nomogram was validated in the validation cohort of 287 patients. RESULTS: In the training cohort, 82 (14.3%) developed subsequent PPR. Age, histologic type and grade, lymphovascular space invasion status, FIGO stage, and nodal staging (SLN±pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy) were independently associated with subsequent PPR. The nomogram showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.89) in the training set. The validation set showed a good discrimination with an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a robust tool that is able to predict subsequent PPRs in women with FIGO I-III EC.

Diagnostic Value of MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in a series of patients with an equivocal adnexal mass at ultrasonography (US) in the context of acute or subacute pelvic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived informed consent. All patients with acute or subacute pelvic pain who were undergoing MR examination for the exploration of an equivocal adnexal mass (January 2007 to December 2012) with surgical exploration or clinical and radiologic follow-up of at least 3 months were retrospectively included (n = 58). The prospective interpretations were recorded. Additionally, three radiologists who were blinded to the clinical, US, and surgical data retrospectively and independently reviewed MR images. Features associated with adnexal torsion were identified by using univariate and recursive partitioning multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (38%) had a diagnosis of adnexal torsion. The accuracy of MR imaging at the time of prospective interpretation was 80.6% (25 of 31 patients) and 85.1% (23 of 27 patients) in acute and subacute torsion, respectively. The accuracy of image interpretation by each retrospective reader was 83.9% (26 of 31 patients), 90.3% (28 of 31 patients), and 83.9% (26 of 31 patients) in the context of acute pelvic pain and 92.6% (25 of 27 patients), 88.9% (24 of 27 patients), and 81.5% (22 of 27 patients) in the context of subacute pelvic pain for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. At multivariate analysis, the whirlpool sign (odds ratio = 6.5 [95% confidence interval: 1.36, 31.0], P = .01) and a thickened tube (>10 mm) (odds ratio = 8.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.2, 56.8], P = .03) were associated with adnexal torsion, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.71-0.84 and 0.82-0.86, respectively). The presence of adnexal hemorrhagic content was associated with nonviable ovaries in seven of 10 patients (70%) and with viable ovaries in 12 of 45 patients (27%) (P = .009). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is an accurate technique for the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in patients who have an adnexal mass with acute or subacute pelvic pain.

Identification of microRNA expression profile related to lymph node status in women with early-stage grade 1-2 endometrial cancer.

Conventional methods used for histologic classification and grading of endometrial cancer (EC) are not sufficient to predict lymph node metastases. microRNA signatures have recently been related to EC pathologic characteristics or prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether microRNA profiles of grade 1-2 endometrioid adenocarcinomas can be related to nodal status and used as a tool to adapt surgical staging in early-stage EC. microRNA expression was assessed in nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EC primary tumors with positive lymph node and in 27 FFPE EC primary tumors with negative lymph node, matched for grade, stage, and lymphovascular space involvement status. A microarray analysis showed that there was more than a twofold significant difference in the expression of 12 microRNAs between the two groups. A quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR assay was used to confirm these results: the expression levels of five microRNAs (microRNA-34c-5p, -375, -184, -34c-3p, and -34b-5p) were significantly lower in the EC primary tumor with positive lymph node compared with those with negative lymph node. A minimal P-value approach revealed that women with a microRNA-375-fold change <0.30 were more likely to have positive lymph node (n=8; 53.3%) compared with those with a microRNA-375-fold change >0.30 (n=1; 4.8%), P=0.001. Furthermore, women with a microRNA 184-fold change <0.30 were more likely to have positive lymph node (n=6; 60.0%) compared with those with a microRNA 184-fold change >0.30 (n=3; 11.5%), P=0.006. This is the first study investigating the relative expression of mature microRNA genes in early-stage grade 1-2 EC primary tumors according to the nodal status. This microRNA expression profile provides a potential basis for further study of the microRNA function in EC and could be used as a diagnostic tool for nodal status.

Predictive Modeling: A New Paradigm for Managing Endometrial Cancer.

With the abundance of new options in diagnostic and treatment modalities, a shift in the medical decision process for endometrial cancer (EC) has been observed. The emergence of individualized medicine and the increasing complexity of available medical data has lead to the development of several prediction models. In EC, those clinical models (algorithms, nomograms, and risk scoring systems) have been reported, especially for stratifying and subgrouping patients, with various unanswered questions regarding such things as the optimal surgical staging for lymph node metastasis as well as the assessment of recurrence and survival outcomes. In this review, we highlight existing prognostic and predictive models in EC, with a specific focus on their clinical applicability. We also discuss the methodologic aspects of the development of such predictive models and the steps that are required to integrate these tools into clinical decision making. In the future, the emerging field of molecular or biochemical markers research may substantially improve predictive and treatment approaches.

New Pointers for Surgical Staging of Borderline Ovarian Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) is similar to that of ovarian cancer apart from lymphadenectomy. However, the complete procedure including peritoneal washing, infracolic omentectomy and random peritoneal biopsies remains a subject of controversy especially in presumed early stage BOTs. To evaluate the prognostic value of complete surgical staging on recurrence rates, recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in a multicentre cohort of BOTs. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included 428 patients with BOTs diagnosed from January 1980 to December 2008. Survival estimates were based on Kaplan-Meier calculations and RFS defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence. RESULTS: The median time of follow-up was 94.9 months (range: 60.00-207.3). The overall recurrence rate was 23.8 %. There was no difference in 5-year RFS between patients with and without complete surgical staging 78.1 % (95 % CI 68.9-88.6) and 70.9 % (95 % CI 64.6-77.8), (p = 0.0806). In the whole cohort, 5-year OS was higher for patients with complete surgical staging 98.4 % (95 % CI 96.8-1.0) and 93.8 % (95 % CI 88.1-1), (p = 0.0182) but this difference was not significant for patients with FIGO stage I 98.6 % (95 % CI 96.7-1) and 92.7 % (95 % CI 83.4-1.0), p = 0.1275, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Complete staging surgery should be considered as a cornerstone treatment for patients with advanced stage BOT but not for those with stage I disease.

Single-Port Extra- and Transperitoneal Approach for Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancers: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy (PALN), an important step in the management of gynecologic cancers, is associated with low morbidity. However, some concerns exist about the completeness of PALN according to the route (transperitoneal vs. single-port extraperitoneal). METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone an endoscopic PALN for a gynecologic cancer from May 2010 to August 2014 at the authors' center. The findings showed that 44 patients had a single-port extraperitoneal PALN and 56 had a transperitoneal PALN. The factors independently related to technical performances were tested with a multivariate model adjusted for a propensity score. RESULTS: A median of 16 lymph nodes were removed by the transperitoneal route and 12 by the extraperitoneal route (p = 0.04). No difference in the number of lymph nodes removed was observed after adjustment for the propensity score of patients who underwent the extraperitoneal approach (p = 0.9). The transperitoneal route was associated with more lymphocysts (20 vs. 2% for the extraperitoneal approach) (p = 0.008). The success rate for the extraperitoneal PALN was 91% (n = 40), with the three remaining patients requiring conversion to the transperitoneal route due to a peritoneal breach. CONCLUSION: This propensity-score-adjusted study supports the conclusion that the efficacy of the single-port extraperitoneal route is similar to that of the transperitoneal route for PALN.