Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 64(12): 1671-4, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20946272

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The UK government target expects all suspected cancer patients to be seen within 2 weeks of referral made by general practitioners. This has significant impact on the workload for colorectal surgeons. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of this colorectal service. METHOD: A retrospective study of all patients referred to a 2-week wait colorectal clinic over a 12-month period was assessed, documenting diagnosis and staging. Comparison of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) presenting via other routes in the same period was made. RESULTS: Over the 12-month period, all 1100 patients were seen in the 2-week wait clinic; 938 (85%) patients fulfilled the referral criteria, but only 81 (7.3%) were diagnosed with cancer. Conversely, 136 CRC patients presented to the surgeons via urgent referrals (n = 86), emergency (n = 13), routine colorectal clinic (n = 19) and bowel screening (n = 18). The 2-week cohort had more advanced staging than those referred by standard letter and pilot screening. Cancers in the symptomatic population are predominantly Dukes' B and Dukes' C whereas in pilot screening group predominantly Dukes' A. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of 2-week wait referral was poor, confirming its lack of validity. Further work is required to offer primary care stricter inclusion and exclusion referral criteria.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Prognóstico , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA