Focused Critical Care Echocardiography: Development and Evaluation of an Image Acquisition Assessment Tool.

OBJECTIVES: Little attention has been placed on assessment tools to evaluate image acquisition quality for focused critical care echocardiography. We designed a novel assessment tool to objectively evaluate the image acquisition skills of critical care trainees learning focused critical care echocardiography and examined the tool for evidence of validity. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical-surgical ICUs at a tertiary care teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Trainees in our critical care medicine fellowship program. INTERVENTIONS: Six trainees completed a focused critical care echocardiography training curriculum followed by performing 20 transthoracic echocardiograms on patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. At three assessment intervals (the 1st and 2nd examinations, 10th and 11th examinations, and 19th and 20th examinations), echocardiograms performed by trainees were compared with those of critical care physicians certified in echocardiography and scored according to the focused critical care echocardiography assessment tool. The primary outcome was an efficiency score (overall assessment tool score divided by examination time). Differences in mean efficiency scores between echocardiographers of differing skill levels and changes in trainees' mean efficiency scores with increasing focused critical care echocardiography experience were compared by using t tests. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On the initial assessment, mean efficiency scores (SD) for trainees and experienced physicians were 1.55 (0.95) versus 2.78 (1.38), respectively (p = 0.02), and for the second and third assessments, the corresponding efficiency ratings for trainees and experienced physicians were 2.48 (0.97) versus 4.55 (1.32) (p < 0.01) and 2.61 (1.37) versus 4.17 (2.12) (p = 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees' efficiency in focused critical care echocardiography image acquisition improved quickly in the first 10 studies, yet, it could not match with the performance of experienced physicians after 20 focused critical care echocardiography studies. The focused critical care echocardiography assessment tool demonstrated evidence of validity and could discern changes in trainees' image acquisition performance with increasing experience.

Human patient simulation is effective for teaching paramedic students endotracheal intubation.

OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether the endotracheal intubation (ETI) success rate is different among paramedic students trained on a human patient simulator versus on human subjects in the operating room (OR). METHODS: Paramedic students (n = 36) with no prior ETI training received identical didactic and mannequin teaching. After randomization, students were trained for ten hours on a patient simulator (SIM) or with 15 intubations on human subjects in the OR. All students then underwent a formalized test of 15 intubations in the OR. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation. Secondary outcomes were the success rate at first attempt and the complication rate. The study was powered to detect a 10% difference for the overall success rate (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.20). RESULTS: The overall intubation success rate was 87.8% in the SIM group and 84.8% in the OR group (difference of 3.0% [95% confidence interval {CI} = -4.2% to 10.1%; p = 0.42]). The success rate on the first attempt was 84.4% in the SIM group and 80.0% in the OR group (difference of 4.4% [95% CI = -3.4% to 12.3%; p = 0.27]). The complication rate was 6.3% in the SIM group and 4.4% in the OR group (difference of 1.9% [95% CI = -2.9% to 6.6%; p = 0.44]). CONCLUSIONS: When tested in the OR, paramedic students who were trained in ETI on a simulator are as effective as students who trained on human subjects. The results support using simulators to teach ETI.

Utility of esophageal Doppler as a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitor: a review.

PURPOSE: The current bedside "gold standard" for cardiac output (CO) monitoring is thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) but there is a number of risks associated with its use. The primary objective of this review was to evaluate the utility of esophageal Doppler (ED) as a minimally invasive monitor of CO. SOURCE: Medline literature search from 1966 to 2001 with citation review for studies comparing ED to PAC thermodilution for CO in perioperative and critically ill patients. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Twenty-five publications were identified comparing ED and PAC measurement of CO in a broad range of patients. There was a good overall correlation between CO determined by ED and thermodilution (n = 18 studies, median R = 0.89, range 0.52 to 0.98) and minimal bias (n = 13, median -0.01, range 1.38 to 2 L x min(-1)). The precision of ED was only fair overall as assessed by limits of agreement. The ED technique was found to be responsive in detecting changes in thermodilution CO and was reliable demonstrating both low intra- and inter-observer variation. ED was reportedly easy to insert after minimal training and was safe, with no significant complications identified. CONCLUSION: ED is a practical, reliable, and valid device for measuring CO in perioperative and critically ill patients. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to determine if the limited precision observed is inherent to the technique, the diagnoses of patients studied, or the small sample sizes.