Proteotranscriptomic Discrimination of Tumor and Normal Tissues in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Clear cell renal carcinoma is the most frequent type of kidney cancer, with an increasing incidence rate worldwide. In this research, we used a proteotranscriptomic approach to differentiate normal and tumor tissues in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Using transcriptomic data of patients with malignant and paired normal tissue samples from gene array cohorts, we identified the top genes over-expressed in ccRCC. We collected surgically resected ccRCC specimens to further investigate the transcriptomic results on the proteome level. The differential protein abundance was evaluated using targeted mass spectrometry (MS). We assembled a database of 558 renal tissue samples from NCBI GEO and used these to uncover the top genes with higher expression in ccRCC. For protein level analysis 162 malignant and normal kidney tissue samples were acquired. The most consistently upregulated genes were IGFBP3, PLIN2, PLOD2, PFKP, VEGFA, and CCND1 (p < 10-5 for each gene). Mass spectrometry further validated the differential protein abundance of these genes (IGFBP3, p = 7.53 × 10-18; PLIN2, p = 3.9 × 10-39; PLOD2, p = 6.51 × 10-36; PFKP, p = 1.01 × 10-47; VEGFA, p = 1.40 × 10-22; CCND1, p = 1.04 × 10-24). We also identified those proteins which correlate with overall survival. Finally, a support vector machine-based classification algorithm using the protein-level data was set up. We used transcriptomic and proteomic data to identify a minimal panel of proteins highly specific for clear cell renal carcinoma tissues. The introduced gene panel could be used as a promising tool in the clinical setting.

TNMplot.com: A Web Tool for the Comparison of Gene Expression in Normal, Tumor and Metastatic Tissues.

Genes showing higher expression in either tumor or metastatic tissues can help in better understanding tumor formation and can serve as biomarkers of progression or as potential therapy targets. Our goal was to establish an integrated database using available transcriptome-level datasets and to create a web platform which enables the mining of this database by comparing normal, tumor and metastatic data across all genes in real time. We utilized data generated by either gene arrays from the Gene Expression Omnibus of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI-GEO) or RNA-seq from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET), and The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) repositories. The altered expression within different platforms was analyzed separately. Statistical significance was computed using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. False Discovery Rate (FDR) was computed using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. The entire database contains 56,938 samples, including 33,520 samples from 3180 gene chip-based studies (453 metastatic, 29,376 tumorous and 3691 normal samples), 11,010 samples from TCGA (394 metastatic, 9886 tumorous and 730 normal), 1193 samples from TARGET (1 metastatic, 1180 tumorous and 12 normal) and 11,215 normal samples from GTEx. The most consistently upregulated genes across multiple tumor types were TOP2A (FC = 7.8), SPP1 (FC = 7.0) and CENPA (FC = 6.03), and the most consistently downregulated gene was ADH1B (FC = 0.15). Validation of differential expression using equally sized training and test sets confirmed the reliability of the database in breast, colon, and lung cancer at an FDR below 10%. The online analysis platform enables unrestricted mining of the database and is accessible at TNMplot.com.

Predicting immune checkpoint therapy response in three independent metastatic melanoma cohorts.

While Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy shows significant efficacy in metastatic melanoma, only about 50% respond, lacking reliable predictive methods. We introduce a panel of six proteins aimed at predicting response to ICI therapy. Evaluating previously reported proteins in two untreated melanoma cohorts, we used a published predictive model (EaSIeR score) to identify potential proteins distinguishing responders and non-responders. Six proteins initially identified in the ICI cohort correlated with predicted response in the untreated cohort. Additionally, three proteins correlated with patient survival, both at the protein, and at the transcript levels, in an independent immunotherapy treated cohort. Our study identifies predictive biomarkers across three melanoma cohorts, suggesting their use in therapeutic decision-making.

Predicting immune checkpoint therapy response in three independent metastatic melanoma cohorts.

Introduction: While Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy shows significant efficacy in metastatic melanoma, only about 50% respond, lacking reliable predictive methods. We introduce a panel of six proteins aimed at predicting response to ICI therapy. Methods: Evaluating previously reported proteins in two untreated melanoma cohorts, we used a published predictive model (EaSIeR score) to identify potential proteins distinguishing responders and non-responders. Results: Six proteins initially identified in the ICI cohort correlated with predicted response in the untreated cohort. Additionally, three proteins correlated with patient survival, both at the protein, and at the transcript levels, in an independent immunotherapy treated cohort. Discussion: Our study identifies predictive biomarkers across three melanoma cohorts, suggesting their use in therapeutic decision-making.

Identifying Ferroptosis Inducers, HDAC, and RTK Inhibitor Sensitivity in Melanoma Subtypes through Unbiased Drug Target Prediction.

The utilization of PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of malignant melanoma (MM). However, resistance to targeted and immune-checkpoint-based therapies still poses a significant problem. Here we mine large scale MM proteogenomic data integrating it with MM cell line dependency screen, and drug sensitivity data to identify druggable targets and forecast treatment efficacy and resistance. Leveraging protein profiles from established MM subtypes and molecular structures of 82 cancer treatment drugs, we identified nine candidate hub proteins, mTOR, FYN, PIK3CB, EGFR, MAPK3, MAP4K1, MAP2K1, SRC and AKT1, across five distinct MM subtypes. These proteins serve as potential drug targets applicable to one or multiple MM subtypes. By analyzing transcriptomic data from 48 publicly accessible melanoma cell lines sourced from Achilles and CRISPR dependency screens, we forecasted 162 potentially targetable genes. We also identified genetic resistance in 260 genes across at least one melanoma subtype. In addition, we employed publicly available compound sensitivity data (Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal, CTRPv2) on the cell lines to assess the correlation of compound effectiveness within each subtype. We have identified 20 compounds exhibiting potential drug impact in at least one melanoma subtype. Remarkably, employing this unbiased approach, we have uncovered compounds targeting ferroptosis, that demonstrate a striking 30x fold difference in sensitivity among different subtypes. This implies that the proteogenomic classification of melanoma has the potential to predict sensitivity to ferroptosis compounds. Our results suggest innovative and novel therapeutic strategies by stratifying melanoma samples through proteomic profiling, offering a spectrum of novel therapeutic interventions and prospects for combination therapy. Highlights: (1) Proteogenomic subtype classification can define the landscape of genetic dependencies in melanoma (2) Nine proteins from molecular subtypes were identified as potential drug targets for specified MM patients (3) 20 compounds identified that show potential effectiveness in at least one melanoma subtype (4) Proteogenomics can predict specific ferroptosis inducers, HDAC, and RTK Inhibitor sensitivity in melanoma subtypes.

Pan-cancer analysis of antibody-drug conjugate targets and putative predictors of treatment response.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly expanding class of compounds in oncology. Our goal was to assess the expression of ADC targets and potential downstream determining factors of activity across pan-cancer and normal tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ADCs in clinical trials (n = 121) were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, corresponding to 54 targets. Genes potentially implicated in treatment response were identified in the literature. Gene expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (9000+ cancers of 31 cancer types), the Genotype-Tissue Expression database (n = 19,000 samples from 31 normal tissue types), and the TNMplot.com (n = 12,494 unmatched primary and metastatic samples) were used in this analysis. To compare relative expression across and within tumour types we used pooled normal tissues as reference. RESULTS: For most ADC targets, mRNA levels correlated with protein expression. Pan-cancer target expression distributions identified appealing cancer types for each ADC development. Co-expression of multiple targets was common and suggested opportunities for ADC combinations. Expression levels of genes potentially implicated in ADC response downstream of the target might provide additional information (e.g. TOP1 was highly expressed in many tumour types, including breast and lung cancers). Metastatic compared to primary tissues overexpressed some ADCs targets. Single sample "targetgram" plots were generated to visualise the expression of potentially competing ADC targets and resistance/sensitivity markers highlighting high inter-patient heterogeneity. Off-cancer target expression only partially explains adverse events, while expression of determinants of payload activity explained more of the observed toxicities. CONCLUSION: Our findings draw attention to new therapeutic opportunities for ADCs that can be tested in the clinic and our web platform (https://tnmplot.com) can assist in prioritising upcoming ADC targets for clinical development.

In Vitro Insertional Mutagenesis Screen Identifies Novel Genes Driving Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Metastasis, a complex, multistep process, is responsible for the overwhelming majority of cancer-related deaths. Despite its devastating consequences, it is not possible to effectively treat cancer that has spread to vital organs, the mechanisms leading to metastasis are still poorly understood, and the catalog of metastasis promoting genes is still incomprehensive. To identify new driver genes of metastasis development, we performed an in vitro Sleeping Beauty transposon-based forward genetic screen in nonmetastatic SKBR3 human breast cancer cells. Boyden chamber-based matrix invasion assays were used to harvest cells that acquired a de novo invasive phenotype. Using targeted RNA sequencing data from 18 pools of invasive cells, we carried out a gene-centric candidate gene prediction and identified established and novel metastasis driver genes. Analysis of these genes revealed their association with metastasis related processes and we further established their clinical relevance in metastatic breast cancer. Two novel candidate genes, G protein-coupled receptor kinase interacting ArfGAP 2 (GIT2) and muscle-associated receptor tyrosine kinase (MUSK), were functionally validated as metastasis driver genes in a series of in vitro and in vivo experimental metastasis models. We propose that our robust and scalable approach will be a useful addition to the toolkit of methodologic resources used to identify genes driving cancer metastasis. IMPLICATIONS: Novel metastasis drivers were identified in a human breast cancer cell line by performing an in vitro, Sleeping Beauty transposon-based forward genetic screen and an RNA fusion-based candidate gene prediction.

Emergency Use and Efficacy of an Asynchronous Teledermatology System as a Novel Tool for Early Diagnosis of Skin Cancer during the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: After the outbreak of the corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, teledermatology was implemented in the Hungarian public healthcare system for the first time. Our objective was to assess aggregated diagnostic agreements and to determine the effectiveness of an asynchronous teledermatology system for skin cancer screening. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included cases submitted for teledermatology consultation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up of the patients was performed to collect the results of any subsequent personal examination. Results: 749 patients with 779 lesions were involved. 15 malignant melanomas (9.9%), 78 basal cell carcinomas (51.3%), 21 squamous cell carcinomas (13.8%), 7 other malignancies (4.6%) and 31 actinic keratoses (20.4%) were confirmed. 87 malignancies were diagnosed in the high-urgency group (42.2%), 49 malignancies in the moderate-urgency group (21.6%) and 16 malignancies in the low-urgency group (4.6%) (p < 0.0001). Agreement of malignancies was substantial for primary (86.3%; κ = 0.647) and aggregated diagnoses (85.3%; κ = 0.644). Agreement of total lesions was also substantial for primary (81.2%; κ = 0.769) and aggregated diagnoses (87.9%; κ = 0.754). Conclusions: Our findings showed that asynchronous teledermatology using a mobile phone application served as an accurate skin cancer screening system during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Multispectral Imaging Algorithm Predicts Breslow Thickness of Melanoma.

Breslow thickness is a major prognostic factor for melanoma. It is based on histopathological evaluation, and thus it is not available to aid clinical decision making at the time of the initial melanoma diagnosis. In this work, we assessed the efficacy of multispectral imaging (MSI) to predict Breslow thickness and developed a classification algorithm to determine optimal safety margins of the melanoma excision. First, we excluded nevi from the analysis with a novel quantitative parameter. Parameter s' could differentiate nevi from melanomas with a sensitivity of 89.60% and specificity of 88.11%. Following this step, we have categorized melanomas into three different subgroups based on Breslow thickness (≤1 mm, 1-2 mm and >2 mm) with a sensitivity of 78.00% and specificity of 89.00% and a substantial agreement (κ = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.76). We compared our results to the performance of dermatologists and dermatology residents who assessed dermoscopic and clinical images of these melanomas, and reached a sensitivity of 60.38% and specificity of 80.86% with a moderate agreement (κ = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.39-0.43). Based on our findings, this novel method may help predict the appropriate safety margins for curative melanoma excision.

Comprehensive Outline of Whole Exome Sequencing Data Analysis Tools Available in Clinical Oncology.

Whole exome sequencing (WES) enables the analysis of all protein coding sequences in the human genome. This technology enables the investigation of cancer-related genetic aberrations that are predominantly located in the exonic regions. WES delivers high-throughput results at a reasonable price. Here, we review analysis tools enabling utilization of WES data in clinical and research settings. Technically, WES initially allows the detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs), and data obtained through these methods can be combined and further utilized. Variant calling algorithms for SNVs range from standalone tools to machine learning-based combined pipelines. Tools for CNV detection compare the number of reads aligned to a dedicated segment. Both SNVs and CNVs help to identify mutations resulting in pharmacologically druggable alterations. The identification of homologous recombination deficiency enables the use of PARP inhibitors. Determining microsatellite instability and tumor mutation burden helps to select patients eligible for immunotherapy. To pave the way for clinical applications, we have to recognize some limitations of WES, including its restricted ability to detect CNVs, low coverage compared to targeted sequencing, and the missing consensus regarding references and minimal application requirements. Recently, Galaxy became the leading platform in non-command line-based WES data processing. The maturation of next-generation sequencing is reinforced by Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved methods for cancer screening, detection, and follow-up. WES is on the verge of becoming an affordable and sufficiently evolved technology for everyday clinical use.