A Stepwise Approach to Management of Open Radiocarpal Fracture-Dislocations: A Case Report.

Radiocarpal dislocations are uncommon and occur after significant trauma. We describe a unique case of open radiocarpal fracture-dislocation presenting with progressive neurovascular compromise. Staged management was necessary. As a first stage, emergent provisional bedside reduction in the emergency room with manual pressure through the open wounds was performed. The second stage then involved formal open reduction and internal fixation as soon as operating room staff and resources became available.

Capsulodesis of the wrist for scapholunate dissociation.

We have had favorable results with our early experience using the Mayo modification of the dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis. Our early experience with this technique has shown improvement in carpal alignment and pain relief with the tradeoff of a mild loss of wrist flexion. These results compare with reported results of the various capsulodesis techniques in evolution. Attention must also be paid as to the stage of dissociation at time of surgery. Dynamic dissociation has been treated with capsulodesis alone, whereas a combination of ligament repair in conjunction with dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis is used to treat both dynamic and static variants. Many other investigators report improvements in scapholunate alignment and improvement in pain relief and function with a loss of wrist flexion as a tradeoff. However, despite technical advances in surgical technique and intraoperative improvement of alignment and gapping, these results may diminish by the 2- to 3-year postoperative period. Scapholunate interosseous injuries remain a challenging problem to even experienced hand and upper extremity surgeons. The Mayo modification of the modified dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis is a technique that may be added to the armamentarium of treatment of this pathologic entity.

Scapula fractures: interobserver reliability of classification and treatment.

OBJECTIVES: There is substantial variation in the classification and management of scapula fractures. The first purpose of this study was to analyze the interobserver reliability of the OTA/AO classification and the New International Classification for Scapula Fractures. The second purpose was to assess the proportion of agreement among orthopaedic surgeons on operative or nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: Web-based reliability study. SETTING: Independent orthopaedic surgeons from several countries were invited to classify scapular fractures in an online survey. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three orthopaedic surgeons evaluated 35 movies of three-dimensional computerized tomography reconstruction of selected scapular fractures, representing a full spectrum of fracture patterns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fleiss kappa (κ) was used to assess the reliability of agreement between the surgeons. RESULTS: The overall agreement on the OTA/AO classification was moderate for the types (A, B, and C, κ = 0.54) with a 71% proportion of rater agreement (PA) and for the 9 groups (A1 to C3, κ = 0.47) with a 57% PA. For the New International Classification, the agreement about the intraarticular extension of the fracture (Fossa (F), κ = 0.79) was substantial and the agreement about a fractured body (Body (B), κ = 0.57) or process was moderate (Process (P), κ = 0.53); however, PAs were more than 81%. The agreement on the treatment recommendation was moderate (κ = 0.57) with a 73% PA. CONCLUSIONS: The New International Classification was more reliable. Body and process fractures generated more disagreement than intraarticular fractures and need further clear definitions.