Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anaesthesist ; 65(4): 250-7, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007777

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been shown to significantly improve survival rates. Prone positioning reduces collapse of dorsal lung segments with subsequent reduction of alveolar overdistension of ventral lung segments, optimizes lung recruitment and enhances drainage. Patients with ARDS treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can also benefit from prone positioning; however, the procedure is associated with a possible higher risk of serious adverse events. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prone positioning for patients with severe ARDS during ECMO therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study involved a retrospective analysis of all patients placed in a prone position while being treated by venovenous ECMO (vvECMO) for severe hypoxemia in ARDS as bridge to recovery in the interdisciplinary intensive care unit at the University Hospital Leipzig between January 2009 and August 2013. Baseline data, hospital mortality and serious adverse events were documented. Serious adverse events were defined as dislocation or obstruction of endotracheal tube or tracheal cannula, ECMO cannulas and cardiac arrest. Prone positioning was carried out by at least one doctor and three nurses according to a standardized protocol. Results are given as the median (1st and 3rd quartiles). RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were treated with vvECMO as bridge to recovery due to severe ARDS. Causes for ARDS were pneumonia (n = 20) and aspiration (n = 2) and four patients had different rare causes of ARDS. The median time on ECMO was 8 days (6;11) and during this period 134 turning events were documented. Patients were proned for a median of 5 (3;7) periods with a median duration of 12 h (8;12). No serious adverse events were recorded. The hospital mortality was 42% and mortality during the ECMO procedure was 35%. CONCLUSION: Prone positioning significantly reduces the mortality of patients with severe ARDS. In this series of 26 patients with severe ARDS during ECMO therapy no serious adverse events were found during the use of prone positioning.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Decúbito Ventral , APACHE , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Cuidados Críticos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hipóxia/etiologia , Hipóxia/mortalidade , Hipóxia/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Posicionamento do Paciente , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/complicações , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/mortalidade , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Infection ; 42(2): 309-16, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24217959

RESUMO

PURPOSE: From mid-2010 to early 2013 there was a large single-center (Leipzig University Hospital, Germany) outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) type 2 producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-2-KP) involving a total of 103 patients. The aim of this study was to compare KPC-positive liver transplant recipients (LTR) and KPC-negative controls to determine both the relative risk of infection following colonization with KPC-2-KP and the case fatality rate associated with KPC-2-KP. METHODS: The study cohort of this retrospective observational study comprised nine patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation (LTx) (median age of 52 years, range 28-73 years) with confirmed evidence of colonization with KPC-2-KP. The data from these nine LTR were matched to 18 LTR (1:2) in whom carbapenem-resistant pathogens were not present and compared for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of these nine cases, eight (89 %) progressed to infection due to KPC-2-KP, and five (56 %) were confirmed to have bloodstream infection with KPC-2-KP. Matched-pair analysis of KPC-positive LTR and KPC-negative controls revealed a substantially increased relative risk of 7.0 (95 % confidence interval 1.8-27.1) for fatal infection with KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae after transplantation with a mortality rate of 78 % (vs. 11 %, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Colonization with KPC-2-KP in LTR leads to high infection rates and excess mortality. Therefore, frequent screening for carbapenem-resistant bacteria in patients on LTx waiting lists appears to be mandatory in an outbreak setting. Patients with evidence of persistent colonization with KPC-producing pathogens should be evaluated with extreme caution for LTx.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Klebsiella , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , beta-Lactamases/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/mortalidade , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA