Stereotactic radiosurgery versus active surveillance for asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas: an international, multicenter matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. RESULTS: The combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p < 0.001, HR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9%) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. SRS should be offered as an alternative to active surveillance as the initial management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. Active surveillance policies do not currently specify the optimal time to intervention when meningioma growth is noted. Our results indicate that if active surveillance is the initial management of choice, SRS should be recommended when radiologic tumor progression is noted and prior to clinical progression.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus active surveillance for incidental, convexity meningiomas: a matched cohort analysis from the IMPASSE study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy of asymptomatic, convexity meningiomas, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of patients with asymptomatic convexity meningiomas. METHODS: Data of SRS-treated patients from 14 participating centers and patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, convexity-located meningioma were compared. Local tumor control rate and development of new neurologic deficits were evaluated in the active surveillance and in the SRS-treated cohorts. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohorts, there were 99 SRS-treated patients and 140 patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, convexity meningioma. Following propensity score matching for age, there were 98 patients in each cohort. In the matched cohorts, tumor control was achieved in 99% of SRS-treated, and in 69.4% of conservatively managed patients (p < 0.001). New neurological deficits occurred in 2.0% of patients in each of the matched cohorts (p = 1.00). Increasing age was predictive of tumor growth [(OR 1.1; 95% CI (1.04 - 1.2), (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first reports to suggest that SRS is a low risk and effective treatment strategy for asymptomatic incidentally discovered convexity meningiomas. In this study, tumor control was achieved in significantly more patients after radiosurgery compared to those managed with active surveillance. SRS may be offered at diagnosis of an asymptomatic convexity meningioma and should be recommended when meningioma growth is noted on follow-up.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for asymptomatic petroclival region meningiomas: a focused analysis from the IMPASSE study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of asymptomatic, petroclival meningiomas remains incompletely defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas. METHODS: This retrospective, international, multicenter study involved patients treated with SRS for an asymptomatic, petroclival region meningioma. Study endpoints included local tumor control rate, procedural complications, and the emergence of new neurological deficits. RESULTS: There were 72 patients (22 males, mean age 59.53 years (SD ± 11.9)) with an asymptomatic meningioma located in the petroclival region who were treated with upfront SRS. Mean margin dose and maximum dose were 13.26 (SD ± 2.72) Gy and 26.14 (SD ± 6.75) Gy respectively. Median radiological and clinical follow-up periods post-SRS were 52.5 (IQR 61.75) and 47.5 months (IQR 69.75) respectively. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in all patients. SRS-related complications occurred in 6 (8.33%) patients, with 3 of them (4.17%) exhibiting new neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront SRS for asymptomatic, petroclival region meningiomas affords excellent local tumor control and does so with a relatively low risk of SRS-related complications. SRS can be considered at diagnosis of an asymptomatic petroclival region meningioma. If active surveillance is initially chosen, SRS should be recommended when growth is noted during radiological follow-up.

Yield and utility of routine postoperative imaging after resection of brain metastases.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) is routinely performed after resection of brain metastases (BrM), regardless of whether there are specific clinical concerns about residual tumor or potential complications. Routine imaging studies contribute a significant amount to the cost of medical care, and their yield and utility are unknown. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review study was performed to analyze all craniotomies for BrM performed at our institution from 2005 to 2012. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the yield of postoperative imaging. 218 consecutive patients underwent 226 craniotomies for BrM. In 21 cases, new or worsened neurologic deficits occurred after surgery (9.0%), and 19 of the 21 underwent postoperative imaging. 9 of the 19 patients (47%) had significant findings on postoperative imaging, and 2 patients required reoperation. 201 patients had no new neurologic deficits (91%), and 23 of these patients had no postoperative imaging. Of the 178 remaining patients, 160 underwent postoperative MRI and 18 underwent postoperative CT. 9 patients (5.1%) had unexpected adverse imaging findings; 6 had small stroke, 1 had a subdural hemorrhage and 2 had possible or definite venous sinus occlusion. None of the imaging findings led to changes in management. 182 patients underwent imaging appropriate to detect residual tumor (177 gadolinium enhanced MRI and 5 contrast enhanced CT). Of these patients, 16 were known to have small residual tumors based on intraoperative findings. Of the remaining 166 patients felt to have had gross total tumor resection, 9 (5.4%) were found to have a small amount of residual tumor on postoperative imaging; no patient had a change in treatment plan as a result. Routine postoperative imaging in patients undergoing craniotomy for BrM has a very low yield and may not be appropriate in the absence of new neurologic deficits, or specific clinical concerns about large amounts of residual tumor or intraoperative complications.

Retrospective comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for surgical evacuation of nontraumatic, supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.

Surgical evacuation of nontraumatic, supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is uncommonly performed, and outcomes are generally poor. On the basis of published experimental data and the authors' anecdotal observations, a retrospective chart review study was performed to test the hypothesis that large decompressive craniectomies (DCs), compared with craniotomies, would improve clinical outcomes after surgical evacuation of SICH. For patients with putaminal SICH, DC was associated with a statistically significant improvement in midline shift, compared with craniotomy. Decompressive craniectomies also resulted in a strong trend toward decreased likelihood of poor neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 3). For patients with lobar SICH, no associations were found between DC or craniotomy and clinical outcomes. For patients selected to undergo surgical evacuation of putaminal SICH, a DC in addition to surgical evacuation of the hematoma might improve outcome.

Delayed subdural fluid collections after Ommaya reservoir placement.

BACKGROUND: Delayed subdural fluid collections can occur after Ommaya reservoir placement and can cause neurological symptoms and interfere with treatment. We performed a retrospective chart review to study risk factors for delayed subdural fluid collections and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing Ommaya reservoir placement between 2010-2019 at our institution. RESULTS: Out of 53 patients who had Ommaya reservoir placement during the study period, 11 developed delayed subdural fluid collections (21%). HIV infection was the only statistically significant risk factor (P=0.001, Fisher's Exact Test). Thrombocytopenia, ventricle size, use of the reservoir, and suboptimal catheter placement were not associated with development of delayed subdural fluid collections. 2 patients, both HIV positive, required surgical evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed subdural fluid collections occur in a significant minority of patients after Ommaya reservoir placement, and some patients require surgical intervention. HIV infection is associated with a higher risk of development of delayed subdural fluid collections. This patient subpopulation may benefit from closer monitoring or adjustment of management protocols.

Safety Analysis of a New Portable Electrical Drill With a Smart Autostop Mechanism for Bedside Cranial Procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bedside procedures are often helpful for neurosurgical patients, especially in neurocritical care. Portable drills with technological advancements may bring more safety and efficiency to the bedside. In this study, we compared the safety and efficiency of a new cordless electric drill with smart autostop ("HD"-Hubly Cranial Drill, Hubly Surgical) with those of a well-established standard traditional electrical neurosurgical perforator ("ST"). METHODS: A cadaveric study was conducted using both drills to perform several burr holes in the fronto-temporo-parietal region of the skull. An evaluation was performed on the number of dura plunges, and complete burr hole success rates were compared. RESULTS: A total of 174 craniotomies using the HD and 36 burr holes using the ST perforator were performed. Despite significantly exceeding intended drill bit tolerance by multiple uses of a single-use disposable HD, autostop engaged in 100% of the 174 craniotomies and before violating dura in 99.4% of the 174 craniotomies, with the single dura penetration occurring on craniotomy no. 128 after the single-use drill bit had significantly dulled beyond its single-use tolerance. Autostop engaged before dura penetration for 100% of the 36 burr holes drilled with the ST perforator ( P = .610). All the perforations were complete using the HD after resuming drilling. An autostop mechanism in a cranial drill is not commonly available for portable bedside perforators. In the operating room, most use a mechanical method to stop the rotation after losing bone resistance. This new drill uses an electrical mechanism (smart autostop) to stop drilling, making it a single-use cranial drill with advanced features for safety and efficiency at the bedside. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the safety and efficacy of the new cordless electric drill with smart autostop when performing craniotomies compared with a traditional well-established electric cranial perforator with mechanical autostop on a cadaveric model.

Neurologic Outcomes for Octogenarians Undergoing Emergent Surgery for Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Determining the appropriate surgical indications for obtunded octogenarians with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) has been challenging. We sought to determine which easily available data would be useful adjuncts to assist in early and quick decision-making. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective review of patients aged ≥80 years with confirmed traumatic aSDH who had undergone emergent surgery. The clinical measurements included the Karnofsky performance scale score, Charlson comorbidity index, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and abbreviated injury score. The radiographic measurements included the Rotterdam computed tomography score, aSDH thickness, midline shift, and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The neurologic outcomes were defined using the extended Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOS-E) at hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare the ONSD with all clinical, radiographic, and outcome variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the discharge and 3-month GOS-E scores between all clinical and radiographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 82.5 ± 1.6 years (range, 80-85 years), and the mean GCS score was 11.2 ± 4.1 (range, 4-15). The mean discharge and 3-month GOS-E scores were 3.4 ± 2.6 (range, 1-8) and 2.3 ± 2.1 (range, 1-7), respectively. We found significant negative correlations between the ONSD and the GCS score (r = -0.62; P < 0.01) and the ONSD and discharge GOS-E score (r = -0.49; P = 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between the abbreviated injury score and the discharge GOS-E score (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians sustaining aSDH and requiring emergent surgery have poor outcomes. More data are needed to determine whether the ONSD can be a useful adjunct tool to predict the efficacy of emergent surgery.

Simple wound closure compared with surgery for civilian cranial gunshot wounds.

OBJECTIVE: A carefully selected subset of civilian cranial gunshot wound (CGSW) patients may be treated with simple wound closure (SWC) as a proactive therapy, but the appropriate clinical scenario for using this strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare SWC and surgery patients in terms of their neurological outcomes and complications, including infections, seizures, and reoperations. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective review of the prospectively maintained institutional traumatic brain injury and trauma registries. Included were adults who sustained an acute CGSW defined as suspected or confirmed dural penetration. Excluded were nonfirearm penetrating injuries, patients with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3, patients with an initial GCS score of 4 and nonreactive pupils, and patients who died within 48 hours of presentation. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were included; 17 (25.4%) were treated with SWC and 50 (74.6%) were treated with surgery. The SWC group had a lower incidence of radiographic mass effect (3/17 [17.6%] SWC vs 31/50 [62%] surgery; absolute difference 44.4, 95% CI -71.9 to 16.8; p = 0.002) and lower incidence of involvement of the frontal sinus (0/17 [0%] SWC vs 14/50 [28%] surgery; absolute difference 28, 95% CI -50.4 to 5.6; p = 0.01). There were no differences in the frequency of Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores ≥ 5 between the SWC and surgery groups at 30 days (4/11 [36.4%] SWC vs 12/35 [34.3%] surgery; OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.3-4.5; p > 0.99), 60 days (2/7 [28.6%] SWC vs 8/26 [30.8%] surgery; OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-3.4; p > 0.99), and 90 days (3/8 [37.5%] SWC vs 12/26 [46.2%] surgery; OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-3.6; p > 0.99). There were no differences in the incidence of infections (1/17 [5.9%] SWC vs 6/50 [12%] surgery; OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-4.1; p = 0.67), CSF fistulas (2/11 [11.6%] SWC vs 3/50 [6%] surgery; OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.3-13.7; p = 0.60), seizures (3/17 [17.6%] SWC vs 9/50 [18%] surgery; OR 1, 95% CI 0.2-4.1; p > 0.99), and reoperations (3/17 [17.6%] SWC vs 4/50 [8%] surgery; OR 2.5, 95% CI 0.5-12.4; p = 0.36) between the SWC and surgery groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were important clinically relevant differences between the SWC and surgery groups. SWC can be considered a safe and efficacious proactive therapy in a carefully selected subset of civilian CGSW patients.

Inhibitory effects of GHRH antagonists on human GH-secreting adenoma tissue.

Experimental data indicate that antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) could be used clinically in disorders characterized by excessive GHRH/growth hormone (GH) secretion, but direct evidence for the effectiveness of GHRH antagonists on human pituitary tissue is still lacking. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effect of our GHRH antagonists MZ-4-71 and JV-1-36 and the somatostatin (SST) analog RC-160 on superfused pituitary cells obtained from a human GH-secreting adenoma. Using Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated profuse expression of the GHRH receptor and its major splice variant SV1 and an increase in the expression of Gsa protein in the adenoma tissue. Exposure of the tumor cells to exogenous pulses of GHRH induced definite GH responses, causing a 3- to 5-fold elevation of the basal GH level. The antagonists MZ-4-71 and JV-1-36 did not alter basal GH secretion, indicating that the adenoma cells did not secrete GHRH in an autocrine manner. However, both antagonists prevented the stimulatory effect of exogenous GHRH. Similarly to the GHRH antagonists, neither SST-14 nor the SST analog RC-160 had an effect on the basal GH secretion of the tumor cells, but both peptides inhibited the stimulatory effect of exogenous GHRH, with RC-160 being more potent than SST. Our study provides direct evidence for the effectiveness of potent GHRH antagonists such as MZ-4-71 and JV-1-36 on human pituitary GH-secreting adenoma tissue and strongly suggests that these drugs could be used for therapy of GHRH-associated forms of acromegaly, particularly for those patients in whom surgery fails or is not an option.

Lymphocytic hypophysitis in a patient presenting with sequential episodes of optic neuritis.

A 41-year-old man presented with left optic neuritis (ON) without evidence of other autoimmune disease or hormonal imbalance. MRI showed enlargement of the left optic nerve but no sellar lesion. The patient recovered after steroid therapy but later developed right ON and required treatment again. Follow-up MRI revealed an ill-defined, enlarging sellar lesion with enhancement extending into the right cavernous sinus, and the patient developed symptoms of fatigue and loss of libido. Hormonal studies revealed hypogonadism and hypocortisolism. All laboratory investigation for autoimmune and infectious diseases remained negative. A transsphenoidal biopsy of the lesion revealed lymphocytic hypophysitis. The concomitant development of lymphocytic hypophysitis and optic neuritis suggests a common and likely autoimmune etiology. Visual loss in patients with LYH can sometimes be due to ON rather than compression of the optic apparatus, with significant implications for treatment strategies.

Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma-A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study.

Meningioma is a common incidental finding, and clinical course varies based on anatomical location. The aim of this sub-analysis of the IMPASSE study was to compare the outcomes of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma who underwent active surveillance to those who underwent upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Data were retrospectively collected from 14 centres. The active surveillance (n = 28) and SRS (n = 84) cohorts were compared unmatched and matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up (n = 25 each). The study endpoints included tumor progression, new symptom development, and need for further intervention. Tumor progression occurred in 52.0% and 0% of the matched active surveillance and SRS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.0%) treated with SRS developed treatment related symptoms compared to none in the active monitoring cohort (p = 0.329). No patients in the matched cohorts developed symptoms attributable to treatment. Three patients managed with active surveillance (10.7%, unmatched; 12.0%, matched) underwent an intervention for tumor growth with no persistent side effects after treatment. No patients subject to SRS underwent further treatment. Active monitoring and SRS confer a similarly low risk of symptom development. Upfront treatment with SRS improves imaging-defined tumor control. Active surveillance and SRS are acceptable treatment options for incidental frontobasal meningioma.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Compared With Active Surveillance for Asymptomatic, Parafalcine, and Parasagittal Meningiomas: A Matched Cohort Analysis From the IMPASSE Study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of asymptomatic, presumed WHO grade I meningiomas remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared with active surveillance for the management of patients with asymptomatic parafalcine/parasagittal (PFPS) meningiomas. METHODS: Data from SRS-treated patients from 14 centers and patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, PFPS meningioma were compared. Local tumor control rate and new neurological deficits development were evaluated in the active surveillance and the SRS-treated cohorts. RESULTS: There were 173 SRS-treated patients and 98 patients managed conservatively in the unmatched cohorts. After matching for patient age and tumor volume, there were 98 patients in each cohort. The median radiological follow-up period was 43 months for the SRS cohort and 36 months for the active surveillance cohort (P = .04). The median clinical follow-up for the SRS and active surveillance cohorts were 44 and 36 months, respectively. Meningioma control was noted in all SRS-treated patients and in 61.2% of patients managed with active surveillance (P < .001). SRS-related neurological deficits occurred in 3.1% of the patients (n = 3), which were all transient. In the active surveillance cohort, 2% of patients (n = 2) developed neurological symptoms because of tumor progression (P = 1.0), resulting in death of 1 patient (1%). CONCLUSION: Up-front SRS affords superior radiological PFPS meningioma control as compared with active surveillance and may lower the risk of meningioma-related permanent neurological deficit and/or death.

An international multicenter matched cohort analysis of incidental meningioma progression during active surveillance or after stereotactic radiosurgery: the IMPASSE study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with incidental meningiomas remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the radiologic and neurological outcomes of expectant and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) management of asymptomatic meningioma patients. METHODS: Using data from 14 centers across 10 countries, the study compares SRS outcomes to active surveillance of asymptomatic meningiomas. Local tumor control of asymptomatic meningiomas and development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor were evaluated in the SRS and conservatively managed groups. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohorts, 727 meningioma patients underwent SRS and were followed for a mean of 57.2 months. In the conservatively managed cohort, 388 patients were followed for a mean of 43.5 months. Tumor control was 99.0% of SRS and 64.2% of conservatively managed patients (P < .001; OR 56.860 [95% CI 26.253-123.150]). New neurological deficits were 2.5% in the SRS and 2.8% of conservatively managed patients (P = .764; OR 0.890 [95% CI 0.416-1.904]). After 1:1 propensity matching for patient age, tumor volume, location, and imaging follow-up, tumor control in the SRS and conservatively managed cohorts was 99.4% and 62.1%, respectively (P < .001; OR 94.461 [95% CI 23.082-386.568]). In matched cohorts, new neurological deficits were noted in 2.3% of SRS-treated and 3.2% of conservatively managed patients (P = .475; OR 0.700 [95% CI 0.263-1.863]). CONCLUSIONS: SRS affords superior radiologic tumor control compared to active surveillance without increasing the risk of neurological deficits in asymptomatic meningioma patients. While SRS and active surveillance are reasonable options, SRS appears to alter the natural history of asymptomatic meningiomas including tumor progression in the majority of patients treated.

Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is often performed to treat brain metastases (BrMs). Widely referenced guidelines have suggested post-treatment imaging studies at 3-month intervals. However, clinicians frequently obtain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies at <3 months after GKRS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review study to assess the utility of early (<3 months) MRI after GKRS in patients with BrMs. RESULTS: A total of 415 GKRS procedures were performed. For 325 patients, early MRI studies were obtained. A total of 31 patients had new or worsened neurological symptoms. The early MRI studies showed adverse findings in 25 patients (78%), which in 23 (72%) had resulted in a change in treatment. For 294 patients, no new or worsened neurological symptoms were found on early MRI studies. Of these 294 patients, 86 (29%) had ≥1 adverse finding on MRI, and 60 (20%) had a change in management as a result. However, no rapidly growing tumors or other emergent adverse findings were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Early MRI (within 3 months) after post GKRS will frequently show adverse findings even in asymptomatic patients, more often in patients aged <65 years and patients with multiple treated BrMs. However, according to the nature of the adverse findings observed in our retrospective study, it is unlikely that the clinical outcomes would have been affected if the post-GKRS MRI studies had been deferred to 3 months after treatment. Our data support deferring post-GKRS MRI to 3 months after treatment in the absence of new neurological signs or symptoms.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma mimicking pituitary apoplexy: case report.

Lymphoma involving the pituitary gland is very rare and usually results from metastatic spread of systemic lymphoma. We present a case of primary central nervous system (CNS) large B cell lymphoma that manifested as pituitary apoplexy. A 45-year-old woman presented with headache, and then rapidly developed a third nerve palsy and bitemporal hemianopsia. Imaging suggested a pituitary macroadenoma, with spontaneous necrosis, extending into the suprasellar region, compressing the optic chiasm and invading the right cavernous sinus. The patient underwent transsphenoidal resection which revealed a vascular, firm tumor. An aggressive decompression of the optic chiasm was performed with complete resolution of both visual fields and third nerve palsy. Final pathology showed B cell lymphoma. Systemic work-up including bone marrow aspiration and CSF studies showed no other foci of lymphoma, and the patient was HIV-negative. Chemotherapy with methotrexate, vincristine, procarbazine, and dexamethasone was administered for primary CNS lymphoma. This is an uncommon diagnosis of which the clinician should be aware in order to tailor surgical intervention and provide early institution of proper therapy.

Outcomes and management strategies after nondiagnostic stereotactic biopsies of brain lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A significant minority of stereotactic biopsies (SBs) of brain lesions is nondiagnostic, yet there are no optimal strategies for preventing nondiagnostic SB (NDSB) and for managing patients after NDSB. We performed this study in order to identify risk factors for NDSB, to determine how diagnoses are eventually reached in these patients, and to ascertain whether NDSB affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients at our institution who underwent SB of brain lesions. RESULTS: Twenty-four out of 100 SBs were nondiagnostic. NDSB was less likely in contrast-enhancing brain lesions in immunocompetent patients, with larger lesions and in the setting of diagnostic findings on intraoperative frozen section analysis. Of 16 patients with adequate postoperative follow-up, a diagnosis was eventually reached in 11, via further review of the pathology, retrieval of additional tissue specimens or additional noninvasive testing. Survival times for patients with NDSB and eventual tumor diagnoses were within expected ranges for patients with similar tumors. Three of the 5 patients who never received a final diagnosis enjoyed prolonged survival without progressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should consider taking additional specimens in the case of nondiagnostic intraoperative frozen section during SB. If a tumor is suspected and final pathology is nondiagnostic, outside review of the slides may be helpful, and sampling further tissue should be considered. For diseases other than tumors, the diagnosis will generally be made without a repeat biopsy. The delays in diagnosis resulting from NDSB do not appear to affect survival, at least in patients eventually found to have brain tumors.

Delayed symptom progression after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is generally treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS), with improved symptoms in the majority of patients. We performed a retrospective chart review study in order to describe patterns of, and risk factors for, delayed symptom progression after initially successful VPS placement. 69 consecutive patients underwent VPS placement for NPH, and were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. 55 patients (80%) had objective improvement in their NPH symptoms after surgery. Of these, 27 patients (49%) developed delayed deterioration of at least one of their NPH symptoms, at a mean of 28.3 months postoperatively (range, 3-77). 1 of the 27 patients was found to have shunt malfunction; 19 had specific clinical or imaging evidence of shunt function. 6/19 patients had transient improvement in their symptoms (lasting 30 days or more) after adjustment of their programmable shunt valves (32%), although symptoms in all of these patients later worsened. During a mean follow up period of 44.4 months (range, 15-87), 12 patients (44%) received other neurological diagnoses felt to at least partially explain their symptoms. Increased patient age was associated with likelihood of delayed symptom progression. We conclude that delayed symptom progression is common after VPS placement for NPH, including after initial symptom improvement; that symptom progression can often be temporarily palliated by shunt valve pressure adjustment; and that older patients are more likely to experience delayed symptom progression. We suggest that patients and their families be counselled accordingly before surgery.

Prospective Study of Nonbeneficial Care in Neurocritical Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether a set of simple criteria can identify patients in the neuroscience intensive care unit (NICU) at high risk of poor outcome and delivery of nonbeneficial care early in the course of their illness. Secondarily, factors affecting limitation of care protocols were assessed. METHODS: We prospectively identified patients who were admitted to the NICU with partial loss of brainstem reflexes persisting for >24 hours due to an intrinsic lesion of the brain (trauma, stroke, hemorrhage, etc.). RESULTS: The study included 102 patients. Seventy-two of them died after a mean of 16 days (median: 8 days), and 23 remained comatose, locked-in, or in a vegetative state. Four were conscious and following commands, while 3 were minimally conscious, episodically obeying simple commands. Three out of 4 conscious patients were young males with traumatic brain injuries. Patients who remained full code spent a mean of 22.2 days in the NICU, compared with 10.4 for those who had withdrawal of care (P = 0.022) and 11.9 for patients who received a do-not-resuscitate order (P = 0.045). Time to death did not differ significantly between the groups. Overall, institution of various limitations of care protocols correlated positively with older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, P = 0.0008), being treated on the neurology service (OR = 4.4, P = 0.043), and having health insurance (OR = 5.4, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We identified simple criteria that can be used to identify patients in the NICU setting for whom continued aggressive care is likely nonbeneficial. Our analysis revealed demographic, social, and economic factors correlating with proxies' willingness to consider limitation of care.