The CSB chromatin remodeler regulates PARP1- and PARP2-mediated single-strand break repair at actively transcribed DNA regions.

Efficient repair of oxidized DNA is critical for genome-integrity maintenance. Cockayne syndrome protein B (CSB) is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler that collaborates with Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase I (PARP1) in the repair of oxidative DNA lesions. How these proteins integrate during DNA repair remains largely unknown. Here, using chromatin co-fractionation studies, we demonstrate that PARP1 and PARP2 promote recruitment of CSB to oxidatively-damaged DNA. CSB, in turn, contributes to the recruitment of XRCC1, and histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1), and promotes histone PARylation. Using alkaline comet assays to monitor DNA repair, we found that CSB regulates single-strand break repair (SSBR) mediated by PARP1 and PARP2. Strikingly, CSB's function in SSBR is largely bypassed when transcription is inhibited, suggesting CSB-mediated SSBR occurs primarily at actively transcribed DNA regions. While PARP1 repairs SSBs at sites regardless of the transcription status, we found that PARP2 predominantly functions in actively transcribed DNA regions. Therefore, our study raises the hypothesis that SSBR is executed by different mechanisms based on the transcription status.

Dynamic Interplay between Cockayne Syndrome Protein B and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 during Oxidative DNA Damage Repair.

Oxidative stress contributes to numerous diseases, including cancer. CSB is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler critical for oxidative stress relief. PARP1 is the major sensor for DNA breaks and fundamental for efficient single-strand break repair. DNA breaks activate PARP1, leading to the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) on itself and neighboring proteins, which is crucial for the recruitment of DNA repair machinery. CSB and PARP1 interact; however, how CSB mechanistically participates in oxidative DNA damage repair mediated by PARP1 remains unclear. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by quantitative PCR, we found that CSB and PARP1 facilitate each other's chromatin association during the onset of oxidative stress, and that CSB facilitates PARP1 removal when the level of chromatin-bound CSB increases. Furthermore, by monitoring chromatin PAR levels using Western blot analysis, we found that CSB sustains the DNA damage signal initiated by PARP1, and may prevent PARP1 overactivation by facilitating DNA repair. By assaying cell viability in response to oxidative stress, we further demonstrate that PARP1 regulation by CSB is a major CSB function in oxidatively-stressed cells. Together, our study uncovers a dynamic interplay between CSB and PARP1 that is critical for oxidative stress relief.

A Novel Flow Cytometric Assay to Identify Inhibitors of RBPJ-DNA Interactions.

Notch signaling is often involved in cancer cell initiation and proliferation. Aberrant Notch activation underlies more than 50% of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL); accordingly, chemicals disrupting Notch signaling are of potential to treat Notch-dependent cancer. Here, we developed a flow cytometry-based high-throughput assay to identify compounds that disrupt the interactions of DNA and RBPJ, the major downstream effector of Notch signaling. From 1492 compounds, we identified 18 compounds that disrupt RBPJ-DNA interactions in a dose-dependent manner. Cell-based assays further revealed that auranofin downregulates Notch-dependent transcription and decreases RBPJ-chromatin interactions in cells. Most strikingly, T-ALL cells that depend on Notch signaling for proliferation are more sensitive to auranofin treatment, supporting the notion that auranofin downregulates Notch signaling by disrupting RBPJ-DNA interaction. These results validate the feasibility of our assay scheme to screen for additional Notch inhibitors and provide a rationale to further test the use of auranofin in treating Notch-dependent cancer.

Heterozygous mutations in valosin-containing protein (VCP) and resistance to VCP inhibitors.

In recent years, multiple studies including ours have reported on the mechanism of resistance towards valosin-containing protein (VCP) inhibitors. While all these studies reported target alterations via mutations in VCP as the primary mechanism of resistance, discrepancies persist to date regarding the zygosity of these mutations responsible for the resistance. In addition, the extent to which resistant cells harbor additional mutations in other genes is not well described. In this study, we performed global transcript analysis of the parental and previously reported VCP inhibitor (CB-5083) resistant cells and found additional mutations in the resistant cells. However, our CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing studies indicate that specific mutations in VCP are sufficient to produce resistance to CB-5083 suggesting the importance of on-target mutations in VCP for resistance. Strikingly, our analysis indicates a preexisting heterozygous frameshift mutation at codon 616 (N616fs*) in one of the VCP alleles in HCT116 cells, and we showed that this mutant allele is subjected to the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Accordingly, we identified a heterozygous mutation at codon 526 (L526S) in genomic DNA sequencing but a homozygous L526S mutation in complementary DNA sequencing in our independently generated CB-5083 resistant HCT116 cells, implying that the L526S mutation occurs in the allele that does not harbor the frameshift N616fs* mutation. Our results suggest the NMD as a possible mechanism for achieving the homozygosity of VCP mutant responsible for the resistance to VCP inhibitors while resolving the discrepancies among previous studies. Our results also underscore the importance of performing simultaneous genomic and complementary DNA sequencing when attributing mutational effects on the functionality particularly for an oligomer protein like VCP.