RESUMO
In a retirement community group of 73 relatively fit elderly white persons, a cross-sectional study of 53 different blood tests was conducted. The five test categories for blood values were hematology, chemistry, thyroid function, protein electrophoresis, and immunology. Fifteen percent of the blood findings were outside the range accepted as normal by the examining laboratories. Most of the subjects showed between 5 and 10 "abnormal" values within the five test categories. Since the findings were fairly predictable in view of the patho-anatomic changes that accompany aging, and since the manifestations of disease were at most subclinical, only minor alterations in individual management were needed. Subsequent appropriate clinical re-evaluation of these subjects during a six-month follow-up revealed no striking changes. It would appear that the ranges of "normal" reference values may need to be expanded. Although cross-sectional laboratory studies are useful, longitudinal studies seem essential if clinicians are to attain a more valid perspective.