Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(2): 551-555, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633085

RESUMO

Although the benefit/risk profile for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is recognised as extremely favourable, appendicitis is currently considered an adverse event (AE) of special interest. We describe the case of a 58-year-old female who presented with signs and symptoms of appendicitis approximately 48 hours after her first injection of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Abdominal ultrasound revealed fluid collection in the right iliac fossa and cecal wall thickening. Following the surgical visit, CT scan with contrast showed a distended appendix with thickened walls, suggestive of acute appendicitis. The patient tested negative to upper respiratory COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Clinical trials and observational studies suggest a possible association between appendicitis and COVID-19 vaccines. Th-1 driven granulomatous inflammation reported in our case represents an infrequent nonspecific chronic inflammation of the appendix, especially in the setting of delayed or interval appendectomy. In view of the current paediatric vaccination campaign, we recommend monitoring the safety profile and potential gastrointestinal AEs associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to swiftly manage subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms and prevent potential complications.


Assuntos
Apendicite , COVID-19 , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Inflamação , Doença Aguda , RNA Mensageiro
2.
Phytother Res ; 37(11): 5289-5299, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463655

RESUMO

The safety of Serenoa repens (SR)-containing products was evaluated conducting a retrospective worldwide analysis of pharmaco- and phytovigilance report forms of suspected adverse reactions (SARs) collected up to 31 January 2022. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of serious SAR. A total of 1810 report forms were analysed; 92% of subjects were males, with a median age of 69 years; 44% of cases were defined as serious. Subjects exposed to dietary supplements had a higher risk of developing serious SARs (OR: 1.60 [95% CI: 1.20-2.15]), as subjects exposed to 2-5 (OR: 1. 83 [95% CI: 1.30-2.58]) or more than 5 (OR: 3.45 [95% CI: 2.36-5.06]) suspect/interacting products. The probability of experiencing serious SAR was higher for subjects exposed to concomitant products (OR: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.15-2.08]), to more than four active compounds (OR: 4.38 [95% CI: 3.21-5.99]) and to SR for more than 14 days (OR: 1.89 [95% CI: 1.10-3, 22]), and lower for subjects exposed to higher doses of SR (OR: of 0.34 [95% CI: 0.20-0.58]). This evidence improves awareness on safety of SR containing products, suggesting the need of a further update of periodic reviews by national and international regulatory agencies.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Prostática , Serenoa , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Feminino , Serenoa/efeitos adversos , Farmacovigilância , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(4): 1518-1528, 2022 04 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34273158

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Limited data about use of biosimilars (BIOs) are available in children with JIA. This study therefore aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of switching from etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) originators to their biosimilars (BIOs), in children with JIA, in a real-world setting. METHODS: This is a retro-prospective non-interventional multicentre Italian comparative cohort study. Medical charts of JIA children treated with biosimilars of ETA or ADA were included. Efficacy and safety of TNF-inhibitors therapy was evaluated at last follow-up during originator and at 3, 6 and 12 months following the switch to biosimilar. RESULTS: A total of 59 children (42 female, median age at onset 88 months) were treated with biosimilar of ETA (21) and ADA (38). Forty-five switched from the originator to the BIO (17 ETA, 28 ADA). At time of switch, 12/17 patients on ETA and 18/28 on ADA were in remission. No significant difference has been found at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switch. Ten patients discontinued biosimilars due to disease remission (4 ETA, 3 ADA), family willing (1 ETA), occurrence of burning at injection site (1 ETA) and persistent activity (1 ADA). No statistically significant difference was observed between originator and BIOs, nor between originator and BIOs, and between ADA and ETA in time to disease remission achievement, time to relapse and number of patients who experienced adverse event (AE). CONCLUSION: Our real-life results seem to confirm the efficacy and safety profile of switching from originator of ADA and ETA to their respective BIOs, also in paediatric patients with JIA.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Juvenil , Medicamentos Biossimilares , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Substituição de Medicamentos/métodos , Etanercepte/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Vidro , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(9): 1511-1519, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35732964

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Benzodiazepines (BZD), Z-drugs (ZD), and opioids share a high risk of abuse. This study assessed and characterised adverse events (AEs) related to BDZ, ZD, and opioids leading to emergency department (ED) visits in the Italian setting. METHODS: ED accesses related to BDZ, ZD, and/or opioids were analysed from the MEREAFaPS database. Information on AEs, suspected and concomitant medications was retrieved. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of hospitalisation according to the different treatments. RESULTS: A total of 5,970 pharmacovigilance reports involving BZD/ZD (n = 3,106), opioids (n = 2,767), or their combination (n = 97) were analysed. Compared to opioids, patients with BZD/ZD-related AEs were often younger (51 vs 64 years), more frequently presented 2+ suspected medications (13 vs 3%), and often had a history of abuse (4%). Twenty-three percent of BZD/ZD-related AEs were related to drug abuse (vs 2% of opioid-related ones) and frequently required patient hospitalisation (52% vs 24%), despite the significantly lower clinical complexity of these patients as compared to those on opioids. An increased risk of hospitalisation was found for flurazepam (ROR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.18-2.22), prazepam (2.66; 1.05-6.70), lorazepam (1.26; 1.07-1.49), and morphine (1.76; 1.11-2.79). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, in Italy, the inappropriate use of BZD/ZD is a relevant heath issue, often leading to serious AEs requiring patients' ED visits and hospitalisation, especially in young women and patients with a history of substance abuse.


Assuntos
Benzodiazepinas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
5.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 268-272, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36259343

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: to assess the occurrence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in residents of Tuscany nursing homes (NHs) and its variation before and after NH entry. DESIGN: retrospective observational study using data from the Regional Administrative Database of Tuscany. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study involved residents of 67 Tuscan NHs identified between 2011 and 2012. To estimate PIP prevalence before and after NH, a subset of 10 indicators of the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: prevalence of PIP. RESULTS: considering 2,801 NH residents, the proportion of PIP ranged from 0.0% to 55.2% and from 0.0% to 33.9% before and after the NH admission, respectively. Overall, this study showed a decrease in the occurrence of PIP after the NH admission for most of the indicators, reaching statistical significance for indicator 3 (tricyclic antidepressants in combination with an opiate or calcium channel blockers), 7 (prescription of NSAIDs in heart failure patients), and 9 (warfarin in combination with NSAIDs). CONCLUSIONS: although the reduction of PIP after NH admission may suggest greater awareness about the appropriateness of drug use, more efforts still need to be made.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada , Alcaloides Opiáceos , Humanos , Idoso , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos , Varfarina , Itália/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides
6.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 32(10): 2057-2064, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32227283

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimal blood pressure (BP) control can prevent major adverse health events, but target values are still controversial, especially in older patients with comorbidities, frailty and disability. AIMS: To evaluate mortality according to BP values in a cohort of older adults enrolled in the Fiesole Misurata Study, after a 6-year follow-up. METHODS: Living status as of December 31, 2016 was obtained in 385 subjects participating in the Fiesole Misurata Study. Patients' characteristics were analysed to detect predictors of mortality. At baseline, all participants had undergone office BP measurement and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. RESULTS: After a 6-year follow-up, 97 participants had died (25.2%). After adjustment for comorbidities and comprehensive geriatric assessment, mortality was significantly lower for SBP 140-159 mmHg as compared with 120-139 mmHg (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89). This result was also confirmed in patients aged 75 + (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.85), and in those with disability (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.86) or taking antihypertensive medications (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86). DISCUSSION: An intensive BP control may lead to greater harm than benefit in older adults. Indeed, the European guidelines recommend caution in BP lowering in older patients, especially if functionally compromised, to minimize the risk of hypotension-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: After a 6-year follow-up, mortality risk was lower in participants with SBP 140-159 mmHg as compared with SBP 120-139 mmHg, in the overall population and in the subgroups of subjects aged 75 + , with a disability or taking anti-hypertensive medications.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
7.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 34(3): 684-689, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31667868

RESUMO

AIMS: The short version of the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) has 33 items of Likert type whose answers vary from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), and is used to assess the grief after perinatal loss and to identify women at major need of specific support. This is the first attempt to validate an Italian version of PGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English version of PGS by Potvin et al. was translated into Italian by a professional mother tongue English translator. The survey was administered at 3 different times (translated Italian version; original English version after 10 days; and same Italian version after other 10 days) to 16 Italian/English bilingual women who had experienced a perinatal loss. The reproducibility among the three administrations and concordance were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and Cohen's kappa, respectively. RESULTS: Considering the PGS, median score ranged from 74.5 (58.5-94.5) to 78 (64-95), with no significant difference among the three questionnaire administrations (p = 0.616). No significant difference emerged among the three administered questionnaires for subscales (p = 0.095, 0.410 and 0.410 for 'active grief' AG, 'difficulty in coping' DC and 'despair' D scores, respectively). Concordance varied from good to very good among all questionnaire administrations. CONCLUSIONS: This Italian version of the PGS can be used by clinicians to assess Italian women's responses to stillbirth and perinatal loss, as well as by researchers for research purposes.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Morte Fetal , Pesar , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Psicometria , Traduções , Adulto , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Gravidez , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 113, 2019 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30704436

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in pain modulation have been reported to be associated to opioid efficacy and safety in different clinical settings. METHODS: The association between COMT Val158Met polymorphism (rs4680) and the inter-individual differences in the response to opioid analgesic therapy was investigated in a cohort of 87 Italian paediatric patients receiving opioids for cancer pain (STOP Pain study). Furthermore, a systematic review of the association between opioid response in cancer patients and the COMT polymorphism was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook and the Prisma Statement. RESULTS: In the 87 paediatric patients, pain intensity (total time needed to reach the lowest possible level) was significantly higher for G/G than A/G and A/A carriers (p-value = 0.042). In the 60 patients treated only with morphine, the mean of total dose to reach the same pain intensity was significantly higher for G/G than A/G and A/A carriers (p-value = 0.010). Systematic review identified five studies on adults, reporting that opioid dose (mg after 24 h of treatment from the first pain measurement) was higher for G/G compared to A/G and A/A carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Present research suggests that the A allele in COMT polymorphism could be a marker of opioid sensitivity in paediatric cancer patients (STOP Pain), as well as in adults (Systematic Review), indicating that the polymorphism impact could be not age-dependent in the cancer pain context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: CRD42017057831 .


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Dor do Câncer/genética , Catecol O-Metiltransferase/genética , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália , Masculino , Morfina/sangue , Medição da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único
9.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 568, 2018 May 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29776346

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inter-patient variability in response to opioids is well known but a comprehensive definition of its pathophysiological mechanism is still lacking and, more importantly, no studies have focused on children. The STOP Pain project aimed to evaluate the risk factors that contribute to clinical response and adverse drug reactions to opioids by means of a systematic review and a clinical investigation on paediatric oncological patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in EMBASE and PubMed up to the 24th of November 2016 following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts along with full-text papers; disagreements were resolved by discussion with two other independent reviewers. We used a data extraction form to provide details of the included studies, and conducted quality assessment using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. RESULTS: Young age, lung or gastrointestinal cancer, neuropathic or breakthrough pain and anxiety or sleep disturbance were associated to a worse response to opioid analgesia. No clear association was identified in literature regarding gender, ethnicity, weight, presence of metastases, biochemical or hematological factors. Studies in children were lacking. Between June 2011 and April 2014, the Italian STOP Pain project enrolled 87 paediatric cancer patients under treatment with opioids (morphine, codeine, oxycodone, fentanyl and tramadol). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies on cancer pain should be designed with consideration for the highlighted factors to enhance our understanding of opioid non-response and safety. Studies in children are mandatory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42017057740 .


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Fatores Etários , Variação Biológica da População , Dor do Câncer/diagnóstico , Dor do Câncer/etiologia , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Medição da Dor , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 84(9): 2040-2047, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29768673

RESUMO

AIMS: The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) during breastfeeding is increasing, mainly because of their presumed greater safety compared with conventional medications. However, CAMs can cause serious adverse effects, and there is limited high-quality evidence supporting their use during lactation. In Italy, specific investigations on the attitude of lactating women towards CAMs are lacking. The Herbal supplements in Breastfeeding InvesTigation (HaBIT) study aimed to explore attitudes to and knowledge on CAMs among lactating women. METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted over a 6-year period among lactating women resident in Tuscany, Italy. Data on lactating behaviour, CAMs use during pregnancy or breastfeeding, and women's knowledge about the efficacy and safety of CAMs were collected. RESULTS: A total of 388 lactating women answered the questionnaire. The majority of them were primiparae, with a high educational level. Of these, 204 women declared themselves to have used CAMs during breastfeeding. Moreover, 61% and 48% of subjects reported also using CAMs before and during pregnancy, respectively. A significant proportion of subjects were unable to identify correctly the types of CAMs they were using. Seventy-three per cent of women were convinced that CAMs were equally safe or safer than conventional medications; nevertheless, 65% of women admitted to have no scientific information about the potential risks of CAMs, and 14 CAMs users reported that they had experienced side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the need for healthcare providers to increase the awareness of breastfeeding women about CAMs. Further research is needed to support the evidence base for nonpharmaceutical approaches for symptom control during breastfeeding.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Suplementos Nutricionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Lactação/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Terapias Complementares/efeitos adversos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Itália , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 82(1): 238-48, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26991794

RESUMO

AIM: Drug-induced liver injury is one of the most serious adverse drug reactions and the most frequent reason for restriction of indications or withdrawal of drugs. Some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were withdrawn from the market because of serious hepatotoxicity. We estimated the risk of acute and serious liver injury associated with the use of nimesulide and other NSAIDs, with a prevalence of use greater than or equal to 5%. METHODS: This is a multicentre case-control study carried out in nine Italian hospitals from October 2010 to January 2014. Cases were adults, with a diagnosis of acute liver injury. Controls presented acute clinical disorders not related to chronic conditions, not involving the liver. Adjusted odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated initially with a bivariate and then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We included 179 cases matched to 1770 controls. Adjusted OR for acute serious liver injury associated with all NSAIDs was 1.69, 95% CI 1.21-2.37. Thirty cases were exposed to nimesulide (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.28-3.47); the risk increased according to the length of exposure (OR > 30 days: 12.55, 95% CI 1.73-90.88) and to higher doses (OR 10.69, 95% CI 4.02-28.44). Risk of hepatotoxicity was increased also for ibuprofen, used both at recommended dosages (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.13-3.26) and at higher doses (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.11-12.46) and for ketoprofen ≥ 150 mg (OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.33-10.00). CONCLUSION: Among all NSAIDs, nimesulide is associated with the higher risk, ibuprofen and high doses of ketoprofen are also associated with a modestly increased risk of hepatotoxicity.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/epidemiologia , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Itália/epidemiologia , Cetoprofeno/administração & dosagem , Cetoprofeno/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Risco , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem
12.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 299: 96-104, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850898

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess the GAIA! app, designed to assist pregnant women and healthcare professionals in managing infectious diseases during pregnancy, and to bridge the information gap between health professionals and expectant mothers. STUDY DESIGN: This collaborative initiative in Italy involved partnerships with the University of Florence, Careggi University Hospital, and other institutions. The app, built on the Ionic framework, is available on both Apple and Google App Stores. It offers two distinct modes: "healthcare providers" and "patients." Content for the app was derived from extensive literature reviews and clinical guidelines. RESULTS: Since its August 2022 launch, the GAIA! app has garnered over 2,500 downloads, indicating its effectiveness and acceptance within the community. The app differentiates itself from others, such as the Sanford Guide, by focusing specifically on the needs of pregnant women. It ensures cross-platform compatibility, a user-friendly interface, and offline functionality. CONCLUSIONS: The GAIA! app has successfully addressed a niche in infectious disease management for pregnant women, gaining significant traction within the community. While it has seen substantial success, challenges like continuous updates and potential language expansion remain. Future endeavors will address these challenges and further evaluate the app's impact on maternal and child health.

13.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 25(4): 433-45, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780690

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Poor adherence to medications is a major health concern especially among older subjects. To plan future studies to improve adherence, an epidemiological study, called "Fiesole Misurata", was conducted. The aim of the present paper was to verify the representativeness of the database in evaluating the AntiHyperTensives (AHTs)-taking behaviour. METHODS: Demographic records of all subjects aged ≥65 years (n = 2,228) living in the community of Fiesole (Florence, Italy) was retrieved from the Registry Office of Fiesole Municipality. The corresponding healthcare records were obtained from administrative archives of the Local Health Authority (claim dataset). Moreover, a cohort of subjects aged ≥65 years (n = 385) living in the community was screened by means of a multidimensional geriatric evaluation (cross-sectional dataset). RESULTS: In claim dataset, biyearly prevalences of hospitalization for ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and stroke were 3.7, 3.0, and 3.2%, respectively. In the cross-sectional dataset, prevalences were 11.2, 6.7, and 7.1%, respectively. The most used drugs were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (43.6% in the claim dataset, 45.3% in the cross-sectional dataset) and diuretics (35.6% and 47.0%, respectively). Among the incident users of AHTs, 63.5% was highly adherent (≥80%) over the first 6 months of follow-up, while 14.3 and 22.2% were intermediate (40-79%) and low (<40%) adherent. The percentage of high adherers decreased with time and reached 31.2% at the 24th month. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that "Fiesole Misurata" study database can be used to develop future strategies aimed at improving the adherence to AHTs in older individuals.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiomiopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Cardiomiopatias/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Farmacoepidemiologia , Prevalência , Características de Residência , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
14.
J Clin Med ; 12(19)2023 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37834784

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic affected the perinatal emotional landscape in Italy, a country that had high mortality and implemented a strict lockdown during the pandemic. This study explores the emotions and challenges of pregnant and postpartum women during the pandemic, using AI-based mixed methods. The study analyzed 1774 women from the national survey COVID-ASSESS: 1136 pregnant and 638 postpartum women. The survey had qualitative questions on emotions and feelings related to birth, communication with healthcare professionals, media, and peers and family. We used natural language processing and machine learning to classify emotions, identify themes, and extract citations from the data. Fear and anxiety replaced joy as dominant emotions during the pandemic: trust and joy decreased by 49.3% and 36.4%, respectively, while sadness and fear increased by 52.3% and 49.3%, respectively. The pandemic also induced loneliness, isolation, frustration, and anger. Women faced challenges related to birth, communication with HCPs, media, and peers and family. They also used coping strategies such as self-care, news limitation, and trying to cultivate gratitude and hope. This study provides a comprehensive exploration of the perinatal emotional landscape of Italian women during the pandemic. The findings underscore the significant psychological impact of the pandemic and also highlight women's resilience and coping strategies.

15.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(2)2023 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36673605

RESUMO

This post hoc analysis aimed to assess and characterise adverse events (AEs) related to the triple whammy (i.e., combination therapy of ACE inhibitors, ACE-I, and/or angiotensin receptor blockers, ARBs, with diuretics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs) leading to emergency department (ED) visits and/or hospitalisations in the Italian setting. The MEREAFaPS database was analysed. ED visits related to co-treatment with ACE-I and/or ARBs, diuretics, and NSAIDs were considered. Information on the AE (including classification, seriousness, and outcome), suspected and concomitant drugs, and concomitant conditions was retrieved and analysed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of hospitalisation associated with the drugs of interest. Between 1 January 2007, and 31 December 2018, 80 patients visited the ED for AEs related to the triple whammy, and a total of 261 suspected drugs were involved. Patients were mostly Caucasian females, with a median age of 85 years, and only 9 of them had renal manifestations. In this subset, drug-drug interaction contributed to kidney injury. Most patients presented a Charlson comorbidity index of 4-5. Overall, 47 patients were hospitalised (58.75%), but no significant differences in the risk of hospitalisation were found according to demographic, clinical, or therapeutic features.

16.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1195409, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37546295

RESUMO

Introduction: Development of Robust and Innovative Vaccine Effectiveness (DRIVE) was a European public-private partnership (PPP) that aimed to provide annual, brand-specific estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) for regulatory and public health purposes. DRIVE was launched in 2017 under the umbrella of the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) and conducted IVE studies from its pilot season in 2017-2018 to its final season in 2021-2022. Methods: In 2021-2022, DRIVE conducted four primary care-based test-negative design (TND) studies (Austria, Italy, Iceland, and England; involving >1,000 general practitioners), nine hospital-based TND studies (France, Iceland, Italy, Romania, and Spain, for a total of 21 hospitals), and one population-based cohort study in Finland. In the TND studies, patients with influenza-like illness (primary care) or severe acute respiratory infection (hospital) were enrolled, and laboratory tested for influenza using RT-PCR. Study contributor-specific IVE was calculated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and calendar time, and pooled by meta-analysis. Results: In 2021-2022, pooled confounder-adjusted influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) estimates against laboratory-confirmed influenza (LCI) overall and per type and subtype/lineage was produced, albeit with wide confidence intervals (CI). The limited circulation of influenza in Europe did not allow the network to reach the optimal sample size to produce precise IVE estimates for all the brands included. The most significant IVE estimates were 76% (95% CI 23%-93%) for any vaccine and 81% (22%-95%) for Vaxigrip Tetra in adults ≥65 years old and 64% (25%-83%) for Fluenz Tetra in children (TND primary care setting), 85% (12%-97%) for any vaccine in adults 18-64 years (TND hospital setting), and 38% (1%-62%) in children 6 months-6 years (population-based cohort, mixed setting). Discussion: Over five seasons, DRIVE collected data on >35,000 patients, more than 60 variables, and 13 influenza vaccines. DRIVE demonstrated that estimating brand-specific IVE across Europe is possible, but achieving sufficient sample size to obtain precise estimates for all relevant stratifications remains a challenge. Finally, DRIVE's network of study contributors and lessons learned have greatly contributed to the development of the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness platform COVIDRIVE.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estações do Ano , Eficácia de Vacinas , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
17.
J Clin Med ; 12(10)2023 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37240575

RESUMO

The present study examined the role of the perception of risks and benefits for the mother and her babies in deciding about the COVID-19 vaccination. In this cross-sectional study, five hypotheses were tested using data from a convenience sample of Italian pregnant and/or breastfeeding women (N = 1104, July-September 2021). A logistic regression model estimated the influence of the predictors on the reported behavior, and a beta regression model was used to evaluate which factors influenced the willingness to become vaccinated among unvaccinated women. The COVID-19 vaccination overall risks/benefits tradeoff was highly predictive of both behavior and intention. Ceteris paribus, an increase in the perception of risks for the baby weighed more against vaccination than a similar increase in the perception of risks for the mother. Additionally, pregnant women resulted in being less likely (or willing) to be vaccinated in their status than breastfeeding women, but they were equally accepting of vaccination if they were not pregnant. COVID-19 risk perception predicted intention to become vaccinated, but not behavior. In conclusion, the overall risks/benefits tradeoff is key in predicting vaccination behavior and intention, but the concerns for the baby weigh more than those for the mother in the decision, shedding light on this previously neglected aspect.

19.
J Clin Med ; 11(12)2022 Jun 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35743619

RESUMO

Recent years, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, can be considered a turning point for pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology in terms of their role in drug safety and drug utilisation monitoring in clinical practice [...].

20.
Front Public Health ; 10: 965306, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36081482

RESUMO

Background: At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, support for breastfeeding was disrupted in many countries. Italy was severely impacted by the pandemic and is known to have the lowest exclusive breastfeeding rate of all European countries. Considering the inverse association between anxiety and breastfeeding, maternal concerns about the COVID-19 emergency could reduce breastfeeding rates. The aim of the study is to explore the association between infant feeding practices and maternal COVID-19 concerns. Methods: This paper is a secondary analysis of the cross-sectional study COVID-ASSESS conducted in Italy in 2020. The original survey was administered in two phases: during the first lockdown and during the reopening. The survey included five sections: socio-demographic, medical history, concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, infant feeding practices and psychometric evaluation. Participants were considered eligible for the post-hoc analyses if they were exclusively breastfeeding or they were feeding with infant formula (either alone or with breastfeeding) at the time of the interview. Results: Between phase 1 and phase 2 there was a decrease in anxiety and concerns about the danger of COVID-19 to general health, except for concerns about their baby's health. Women using formula were more concerned about all the health topics investigated. Moreover, they showed higher levels of stress, state anxiety, somatization and PTSD symptoms. Conclusion: Breastfeeding during the first pandemic lockdown in Italy seems to have been an independent factor associated with lower anxiety about COVID-19, fewer psychopathological symptoms, and a positive experience of infant feeding.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Pandemias
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA