[Rectal leiomyosarcoma, a rare malignant tumor diagnosed in ulcerative colitis]. / Le léiomyosarcome rectal, une tumeur maligne rare diagnostiquée au cours de la rectocolite ulcéro-hémorragique.

Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases (IBD) of the digestive tract are known to have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. These are usually adenocarcinomas, and the occurrence of malignant mesenchymal tumours, particularly leiomyosarcomas, is exceptional. We report one case in a 40-year-old woman, followed for 9 years for ulcerative colitis. The tumour measured 2cm in length and infiltrated the entire rectal wall as far as the subserosa. It was composed of fusiform cells, with 5 mitoses for 10 fields at ×400 magnification, and expressing actin, desmin and caldesmone under immunohistochemical study. We review the 2 cases of leiomyosarcomas associated with Crohn's disease and 3 cases developed during ulcerative colitis published in the literature.

Endoscopic Treatment of Enterocutaneous Fistulas in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Management of enterocutaneous fistulas in Crohn's disease is challenging. Most patients still need intestinal resection in the biologic era. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment for enterocutaneous fistulas. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of medical records. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a single institution. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients with Crohn's disease with an enterocutaneous fistula who underwent endoscopic fistula closure with the use of an over-the-scope clip or a hemostatic clip were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measured was the clinical success 3 months after the procedure, which was defined as the complete closure of all fistulas at physical examination and complete cessation of the drainage from the external opening, without surgery. RESULTS: Eight patients (men, 25%; median age 45 years [interquartile range, 33-51]) were followed. Fistulas were localized at the ileocolonic or colocolonic anastomosis in 7 patients and at the stomach in 1 patient. Seven patients were treated with an over-the-scope clip, and one was treated with a hemostatic clip. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Clinical success at 3 months was achieved in 75% of cases (6/8 patients). After a median 16-month (interquartile range, 13-23) follow-up, 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients had enterocutaneous fistula closure and 2 of 8 (25%) needed intestinal resection. No complications were observed. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature, the small sample size of the study, and the heterogeneity of the population limit the interpretation of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of enterocutaneous fistulas is feasible with a short-term effectiveness. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B614. TRATAMIENTO ENDOSCPICO DE FSTULAS ENTEROCUTNEAS EN ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: ANTECEDENTES:Es desafiante el manejo de las fístulas enterocutáneas en enfermedad de Crohn. En la era biológica, la mayoría de los pacientes todavía requieren de resección intestinal.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la eficacia por tratamiento endoscópico de fístulas enterocutáneas.ENTORNO CLINICO:Estudio retrospectivo de registros médicos.AJUSTE:Realizado en una sola institución.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes consecutivos con fístula enterocutánea en enfermedad de Crohn, sometidos a cierre endoscópico de la fístula con clip sobre el endoscopio o clip hemostático.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:El éxito clínico a los 3 meses después del procedimiento. Definido al examen físico, como el cierre completo de todas las fístulas y cese completo del drenaje por la abertura externa, sin cirugía.RESULTADOS:Se estudiaron a ocho pacientes (hombres, 25%, mediana de edad de 45 años (rango intercuartílico, 33-51)). En 7 pacientes, las fístulas se localizaron en la anastomosis ileocolónica o colocolónica y un paciente, en el estómago. Siete pacientes fueron tratados con clip sobre el endoscopio y uno con clip hemostático. Se logró éxito técnico en todos los casos. Se logró éxito clínico a los 3 meses en 75% de los casos (6/8 pacientes). Después de una mediana de 16 meses (rango intercuartílico, 13-23), de seguimiento 3/8 (37,5%) pacientes presentaron cierre de fístulas enterocutáneas y 2/8 (25%) requirieron resección intestinal. No se observaron complicaciones.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, pequeño tamaño de la muestra y heterogeneidad de la población, limitaron la interpretación de los resultados.CONCLUSIONES:Es posible el tratamiento endoscópico de fístulas enterocutáneas con efectividad a corto plazo. Se requieren nuevos estudios para confirmar estos resultados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B614. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Endoscopic treatment of large gastric leaks after gastrectomy using the combination of double pigtail drains crossing a covered stent.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy is the gold standard for the treatment of postoperative gastric leaks (GL). Large fistulas are associated with high rate of treatment failure. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of a combining technique using a covered stent (CS) crossing through pigtails (PDs) for large postsurgical GL leaks. METHODS: All consecutive patients with large (> 10 mm) postsurgical GL treated endoscopically with a combination of a CS and PDs were included in a single-center retrospective study. The primary endpoint was the rate of GL closure. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included. Twenty-five patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The fistula (median diameter 15 mm) was diagnosed 6 days (IQR 4-9) after surgery. Technical success was observed in all procedures. After a median follow-up of 10.7 months (IQR 3.8-20.7), GL closure was observed in 82.7% with a median time of 63 days (IQR 40-90). Surgical management was finally necessary in four patients after a median of 186 days (IQR 122-250). No complications related to combined endoscopic treatment were observed especially stent migration during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: An endoscopic strategy combining CS crossing through PDs appears to be effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of large GL.

No Benefit of Concomitant Immunomodulator Therapy on Efficacy of Biologics That Are Not Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is debate over whether patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with biologics that are not tumor necrosis factor antagonists (such as vedolizumab or ustekinumab) should receive concomitant treatment with immunomodulators. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulator therapy vs vedolizumab or ustekinumab monotherapy. METHODS: In a systematic search of publications, through July 31, 2019, we identified 33 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 27 cohort studies) of patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The primary outcome was clinical benefit, including clinical remission, clinical response, or physician global assessment in patients who did vs did not receive combination therapy with an immunomodulator. Secondary outcomes were endoscopic improvement and safety. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Overall, combination therapy was not associated with better clinical outcomes in patients receiving vedolizumab (16 studies: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.05; I2=13.9%; Q test P = .17) or ustekinumab (15 studies: OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.87-1.38; I2 = 11%; Q test P = .28). Results were consistent in subgroup analyses, with no difference in clinical remission or response in induction vs maintenance studies or in patients with Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis in studies of vedolizumab. Combination therapy was not associated with better endoscopic outcomes in patients receiving vedolizumab (3 studies: OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.48-2.68; I2 = 0; Q test P=.96) or ustekinumab (2 studies: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16; I2 = 47%; Q test P = .17). Combination therapy was not associated with an increase in adverse events during vedolizumab therapy (4 studies: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.75-1.84; I2 = 0; Q test P = .110). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of data from studies of patients with IBD, we found that combining vedolizumab or ustekinumab with an immunomodulator is no more effective than monotherapy in induction or maintenance of remission.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous procedure in a single session.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of PTE-RV performed in a single session. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospective database on ERCP between January 2014 and December 2018. PTE-RV was performed in case of second ERCP failure. Technical success was defined as the establishment of an intestinal access to the biliary tract using a PTE-RV procedure allowing an immediate internal biliary drainage. Safety endpoints included intra-operative complications, morbidity and mortality occurring within 30 days after the procedure. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (44 M/40F) with a median age of 69 years (range 40-91 years) underwent combined PTE-RV. The PTE-RVs were successfully performed in the same session in 80 subjects, resulting in an overall technical success rate of 95.2%. Adverse events were observed in 19% (16/84) of cases. The mortality rate within 30 days after the procedure was 9.5%. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous technique is feasible in a single session with acceptable level of risk. A randomized trial is required to compare EUBD and PTE-RV.

Complete Endoscopic Healing Associated With Better Outcomes Than Partial Endoscopic Healing in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mucosal healing (MH) has been associated with good outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). It is not clear what levels of endoscopic healing, based on CD endoscopic index score (CDEIS), associate with different courses of disease progression. We assessed long-term outcomes of patients with CD according to different levels of MH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 84 patients with CD and MH who received biologic therapy (80% with infliximab) from 2008 through 2015 at 2 university hospitals in France and compared outcomes of patients with CD endoscopic index scores (CDEISs) of 0 vs CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4. Patients were followed until treatment failure or through June 2016. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, defined by the need for biologic optimization, initiation of corticosteroids, or a Harvey-Bradshaw score above 4 associated with change in treatment, CD-related hospitalization, and/or intestinal resection. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.1-7.2), 27 patients (32%) had treatment failure and 3 patients (3.6%) underwent an intestinal resection. Rates of treatment failure were 25% in patients with a CDEIS of 0 and 48% in patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (P = .045). Median times to treatment failure were 21 months (interquartile range, 5-43 months) in patients with a CDEIS of 0 and 13 months (interquartile range, 3.6-35 months) in patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (P = .047). None of the patients with a CEDIS of 0 underwent intestinal resection whereas 11% patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 required intestinal resection (P = .031). Patients with a CDEIS of 0 also had a significant lower rate of CD-related hospitalizations than patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (3.5% vs 18%; P = .013). In multivariate analysis, CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (vs CDEIS = 0) was the only factor associated with treatment failure (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.8; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) is associated with better long-term outcomes than partial endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 1-4) in patients with CD, as well as fewer surgeries and hospitalizations and an overall decreased risk of treatment failure.

Incidence, Clinical Presentation, and Associated Factors of Microscopic Colitis in Northern France: A Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: To date, there are no epidemiological data on microscopic colitis (MC) in France. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of MC in the Somme department in Northern France, to evaluate clinical characteristics, and to search for risk factors for both collagenous colitis (CC) and lymphocytic colitis (LC). DESIGN: Between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, four pathology units in the Somme department recorded all new cases of MC diagnosed in patients living in the area. Colonic biopsies were reviewed by 4 pathologists together. For each incident case, demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and biological data were collected according to methodology of the EPIMAD registry. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty cases of MC, including 87 CC and 43 LC, were recorded during the three-year study. The mean annual incidence for MC was 7.9/105 inhabitants, 5.3/105 inhabitants for CC, and 2.6/105 inhabitants for LC. Annual standardized incidence of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in the EPIMAD registry during the same period (2005-2007) were 7.4/105 and 4.9/105, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years for MC, 70 for CC, and 48 for LC. The female-to-male gender ratio was 3.5 for MC, 4.1 for CC, and 2.6 for LC. Median time to diagnosis was 8 weeks. Chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain were, respectively, present in 93 and 47 % of the cases. An autoimmune disease was associated in 28 % of MC cases. At diagnosis, proton pump inhibitor treatment was more often reported in CC than in LC (46 vs 16 %; p = 0.003). Budesonide was effective on diarrhea in 77 % of patients, and thirteen percent of patients became steroid dependent. CONCLUSION: This population-based study shows that the incidence of MC in France is high and similar to Crohn's disease incidence and confirms that this condition is associated with female gender, autoimmune diseases, and medications.

Use of transanastomotic double-pigtail stents in the management of grade B colorectal leakage: a pilot feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication of colorectal surgery. The leakage is classified as grade B when the patient's clinical condition requires an active therapeutic intervention but does not require further surgery. The management of grade B AL commonly includes administration of antibiotics and/or the placement of a pelvic drainage performed under radiological guidance or transanal drain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of endoscopic transanastomotic drainage using double-pigtail stents (DPSs) in the management of grade B AL in colorectal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2011 and December 2014, 650 patients underwent a colorectal procedure in our university hospital; 8.7 % presented with AL, including 42.8 % with grade B. Fourteen patients required endoscopic management and constituted the study population. The study's primary objective was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of DPS placement for the treatment of grade B AL after colorectal surgery. The secondary endpoints were the requirement for radiological drainage, the DPS placement failure rate, the rate of stoma closure and, lastly, feasibility of chemotherapy (if indicated). RESULTS: DPS placement was feasible in 92.8 % of the 14 patients (n = 13). The overall success rate for endoscopic management was 78.5 % (n = 11). The median length of hospitalization after DPS placement was 5 days (3-17). The average duration of drainage through a DPS was 62 days (28-181). Five patients (35.7 %) also underwent drainage with radiological guidance. Of the 10 patients with stoma, closure occurred in 80 %. All patients that required adjuvant chemotherapy were able to receive it. CONCLUSION: The treatment of AL requires multidisciplinary collaboration to save the anastomosis. DPS placement under endoscopic control is associated with AL healing, good clinical tolerance and the ability to undergo chemotherapy and is an alternative to repeat laparotomy when radiological drainage is unfeasible or inefficient.

Non-invasive evaluation of mucosal healing by intestinal ultrasound or fecal calprotectin is efficient in Crohn's disease: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopy is still the gold, standard for assessing disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD). Its invasiveness, poor acceptability, and cost limit its use in the era of tight control and treat-to-target management. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are non-invasive alternatives to colonoscopy to assess disease activity. We aimed to evaluate the performance of IUS and FC to assess mucosal healing in CD. METHODS: All consecutive CD patients who underwent colonoscopy for mucosal healing assessment and IUS and/or FC within four weeks between September 2019 and April 2022 were included in a prospective cohort. The bowel-wall thickness (BWT) and color Doppler signal (CDS) were assessed for each segment. Endoscopic remission was defined by a CDEIS score < 3. RESULTS: In total, 153 patients were included, of whom 122 showed endoscopic mucosal healing. Eighty-two (53.6 %) were female, the median was age 36 years (IQR, 28-46), and the median disease duration was 10 years (IQR, 4-19). The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of a BWT < 3 mm to predict endoscopic mucosal healing were 56 %, 88 %, 95 %, and 36 %, respectively (patients misclassified as mucosal healing, 2.5 %). The best FC threshold (< 92.9 µg/g) provided similar results: 77 %, 89 %, 96 %, and 67 %, respectively (patients misclassified, 2.2 %). The association of an FC < 250 µg/g with a BWT < 3 mm and the absence of CDS increased the Sp and PPV: Se 58 %, Sp 95 %, PPV 97 %, VPN 43 %; patients misclassified, 1.3 %. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive evaluation of mucosal healing by IUS or calprotectin efficiently identifies patients with CD who have achieved endoscopic mucosal healing.

Intestinal Ultrasound, Fecal Calprotectin, and Their Combination to Predict Endoscopic Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-Life Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The development of noninvasive markers to assess mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis (UC) is essential in the treat-to-target era. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of intestinal ultrasound (IUS), fecal calprotectin (FC), and their combination to assess mucosal healing in UC patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients between January 2021 and September 2022 with UC who underwent a complete colonoscopy and IUS and/or an FC test within 4 weeks were included in a prospective cohort. Bowel wall thickness (BWT) and the color Doppler signal (CDS) were assessed for each segment. Endoscopic mucosal healing was defined by a Mayo score of 0 to 1. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were included, of whom 79% showed endoscopic healing (26 Mayo 0 and 11 Mayo 1). Among the patients, 16 (27.6%) of 58 had a BWT <3 mm, and 41 (70.7%) of 58 had no CDS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a BWT <3 mm to predict endoscopic mucosal healing were 37%, 77%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. The association of FC <150 µg/g, a BWT <3 mm, and a CDS = 0 increased the specificity and positive predictive value (sensitivity 33%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 89%, negative predictive value 48%). The combination of a normal IUS, no rectal bleeding, and an FC <172 µg/g identified all patients with mucosal healing. CONCLUSION: The combination of IUS and FC is effective in identifying mucosal healing in UC. Noninvasive evaluation of mucosal healing is possible for most UC patients.

Intestinal ultrasound and fecal calprotectin are efficient noninvasive tools to identify patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who achieved endoscopic mucosal healing. The combination of intestinal ultrasound and fecal calprotectin is effective to identify mucosal healing in UC in most patients with UC.

Positive margins and plexitis increase the risk of recurrence after ileocecal resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is debate over the impact of residual microscopic disease after ileocecal resection in Crohn's disease (CD) to predict recurrence. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of positive histological margins and plexitis after ileocecal resection on the risk of postoperative recurrence. METHODS: Using a systematic search, we identified. 30 studies evaluating the impact of inflammatory margins on CD recurrence. The primary outcome was the postoperative clinical recurrence and secondary outcomes were surgical, and endoscopic recurrence. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Thirty studies were analyzed, seven focused on myenteric plexitis, six on submucosal plexitis and twenty-three on positive margins. Inflammatory margins were associated with a higher rate of clinical and surgical recurrences: respectively 14 studies - OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.54 - 3.68- I2 = 68.2%, Q test-p = 0.0003 and 8 studies - OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07-2.16 - I2 =0%; Q test-p = 0.43. The presence of myenteric plexitis was associated with a higher rate of clinical recurrence (4 studies- OR, 1.60; 95%CI, 1.12-2.29; I2= 0%, Q-test-p = 0.61), and of endoscopic recurrence (4 studies - OR, 4.25; 95%CI; 2.06-8.76; I2= 0%, Q test-p = 0.97). Submucosal plexitis was not associated with an increased risk of endoscopic recurrence (4 studies - OR, 0.94; 95%CI; 0.58-1.52; I2= 0%, Q test-p = 0.79). CONCLUSION: Inflammatory margins and/or plexitis were associated with postoperative recurrence after ileocecal resection for CD. These elements should be taken into account in future algorithm for prevention of postoperative recurrence.

Managing complex perianal disease after anti-TNF failure: Where to go next?

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that affects various intestinal segments and can involve the perianal region. Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have revolutionized the management of Crohn's disease and improved the prognosis for patients with perianal Crohn's disease (pCD), their long-term effectiveness is limited: over 60% of patients relapse after one year of maintenance therapy. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the treatment of complex perianal fistulas after anti-TNF failure. Concomitant treatment with antibiotics and immunosuppressants improves the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment of anti-TNF therapy (targeting a higher trough level) might also improve treatment response. Novel therapeutic strategies might provide new opportunities for pCD management; for example, ustekinumab might be effective after anti-TNF treatment failure, although more studies are needed. As suggested in recent international guidelines, mesenchymal stem cell injection might be an effective, safe treatment for complex pCD.

Complete endoscopic healing is associated with lower disability than partial endoscopic healing in Crohn's disease: A prospective multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Crohn's disease (CD) has a significant impact on health status and quality of life, affecting physical and emotional well-being and impairing social and functional abilities. In the era of the treat-to-target concept, endoscopic healing has emerged as the goal to achieve to prevent intestinal damage and disability. It is not clear what level of endoscopic healing is associated with lower disability. We therefore aimed to compare disability associated with complete endoscopic healing to disability with partial endoscopic healing in patients with CD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective study, between September 2019 and November 2020, in one university hospital, one general hospital, and one private practice center. Consecutive patients with CD in clinical remission were included, having either complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) or partial endoscopic healing (CDEIS >0 and <4). The 10-item IBD-Disk self-assessment questionnaire was used to assess disability. Moderate to severe disability was defined as an overall IBD-Disk score ≥40. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included. Forty-four (53%) were women, the median age and disease duration were respectively 35.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 28.6-45.2) and 8.0 years (IQR, 3.0-17.0). The median overall IBD-Disk score was 26.5 (IQR, 9 -45.0), and 30 (36.6%) patients had moderate to severe disability. Complete endoscopic healing was observed in 48 patients (57.3%). The median IBD-Disk score was respectively 24 (IQR, 9.0-40.5) and 34 (IQR, 9.5-51.5) for patients with complete and partial endoscopic healing (p = 0.068). Respectively, 13/48 (27%) and 17/34 (50%) of patients with complete and partial endoscopic healing had moderate to severe disability (p = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, partial endoscopic healing (OR=5.82, 95% CI [1.65, 24.69], p = 0.0009), female gender (OR=4.0, 95%CI [1.13, 16.58], p = 0.04), and smoking (OR=8.33, 95% CI [1.96, 50.0] p = 0.006) were significantly associated with moderate to severe disability. Among the IBD-Disk sub scores, the defecation score (median, IQR) (0.0 [0.0-3.0] vs 4.0 [0.0-7.5], p = 0.028) and energy score (4.0 [0.0-6.0] vs 6.0 [2.5-8.0], p = 0.023) were significantly lower with complete endoscopic healing. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patient with endoscopic healing reported moderate to severe disability. Complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) was associated with lower disability than partial endoscopic healing (CDEIS >0 and <4). Deeper endoscopic healing may be needed to reduce the risk of disability in CD.

Gastric leak after sleeve gastrectomy: risk factors for poor evolution under conservative management.

BACKGROUND: Gastric leak (GL) is the most highly feared early postoperative complication after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), with an incidence of 1% to 2%. This complication may require further surgery/endoscopy, with a risk of management failure that may require additional surgery, including total gastrectomy, leading to a risk of mortality of 0% to 9%. OBJECTIVES: Assess the impact of factors that may lead to a poorer evolution of GL. SETTING: University Hospital, France, public practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of a group of patients managed for GL after SG between November 2004 and January 2019 (n = 166). Forty-three patients were excluded. The population study was divided into 2 groups: patients with easy closing of the GL (n = 73) and patients with difficult closing of the GL or failure to heal (n = 50). Patients were allocated to 1 of 2 groups depending on the time to heal (median time of 84 days). The study's primary efficacy endpoint was to determine the risk factors for a poorer evolution of GL. RESULTS: Among 123 patients included in this study, 103 patients had undergone primary SG (83.7%). The mean time to the appearance of GL was 15.1 days (range, 1-156 d). Seventy-four patients underwent a reoperation (60%). The mean number of endoscopies per patient was 2.7 (range, 2-7 endoscopies). The mean time to healing was 89.5 days (range, 18-386 d). There were 8 cases of healing failure (6.5%). Multivariate analysis identified body mass index (>47 kg/m2), time to referral (>2 d), and serum prealbumin level (<.1 g/dL) to be independent risk factors for a poorer evolution of GL. CONCLUSION: Improvement of nutritional status before SG and early referral for GL could reduce the risk of delayed closure or the need for further surgery.

Colonic Strictures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Epidemiology, Complications, and Management.

The management of colorectal stricture complicating inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] remains a challenging condition. Stricture raises concern about neoplastic complications, which cannot be fully ruled out by negative endoscopic biopsies. Also, impassable strictures restrict the endoscopic monitoring of upstream disease activity and dysplasia. Surgery remains the 'gold standard' treatment for colonic strictures but is associated with high morbidity. Over the past few decades, our therapeutic arsenal for IBD has been reinforced by biologics and therapeutic endoscopy. Few studies have focused on colonic strictures, and so current therapeutic strategies are based on a low level of evidence and applied by analogy with the treatment of ileal strictures. With a view to facilitating the decision making process in clinical practice, we reviewed the literature on the epidemiology, natural history, and management of colonic strictures in IBD.