A trial of methadone tapering schedules in pediatric intensive care unit patients exposed to prolonged sedative infusions.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a low-dose methadone tapering schedule to a high-dose methadone tapering schedule in pediatric intensive care unit patients exposed to infusions of fentanyl, with or without infusions of midazolam, for ≥ 5 days. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-eight patients, 74 of whom had been receiving infusions of both fentanyl and midazolam, were randomized. Forty-one patients were randomized to the low-dose methadone group and 37 were randomized to the high-dose methadone group. Sixty patients successfully completed the trial, 34 were in the low-dose methadone group, and 26 were in the high-dose methadone group. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive methadone either at a starting dose of 0.1 mg/kg/dose (low-dose methadone group) or at a starting dose based on both the patient's weight and the most recent fentanyl infusion rate (high-dose methadone group). In each group, methadone was administered every 6 hrs for the first 24 hrs and then every 12 hrs for the second 24 hrs. The methadone was then decreased to once daily and tapered off over the next 10 days. Patients were monitored for withdrawal symptoms using the Modified Narcotic Withdrawal Score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The percentage of patients who successfully completed the 10-day methadone taper was the same in the low-dose methadone group as in the high-dose methadone group (56% vs. 62%; p = .79). Patients that failed to complete the assigned methadone taper had a greater total fentanyl dose and longer pediatric intensive care unit length of stay compared to patients who completed the assigned methadone taper. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received infusions of fentanyl for at least 5 days were just as likely to complete a low-dose methadone taper as a high-dose methadone taper. Because of the risks of both withdrawal and oversedation with any fixed methadone schedule, the methadone dose must be adjusted according to each patient's response.

Evaluating the Use of Octreotide for Acquired Chylothorax in Pediatric Critically Ill Patients Following Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of octreotide on time to resolution of chylothorax compared with conventional therapy. Secondary outcomes include the following: time to reduction of chest tube output by 20%, additional surgeries for chylothorax, hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and adverse drug reactions. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of octreotide vs conventional therapy for treatment postoperative chylothorax in pediatric patients in the cardiac ICU following surgery for congenital heart disease between October 2008 and June 2017. RESULTS: Final analysis included 32 patients with chylothorax who met inclusion criteria. Patients who received octreotide had a longer duration of chest tube drainage than those who received conventional therapy (24 vs 9 days, p < 0.001). Resolution of chylothorax was achieved in 13 of 16 (81.3%) octreotide patients and 16 of 16 (100%) conventional patients (p = 0.178). There was a comparable time to reduction by 20% in drainage (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.337). There was no significant correlation between time after starting conventional management and reduction chylous output in either the octreotide or conventional therapy group (p = 0.809, p = 0.107, respectively). However, there was a significant and moderate correlation between octreotide and reduction in a chylous output following initiation of octreotide (R 2 = 0.464, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide is potentially a safe and effective therapy for treatment in pediatric patients with refractory chylothorax following surgery for congenital heart disease.

Head lice and the use of spinosad.

BACKGROUND: Head lice infestations are responsible for social and economic distress. Despite a reported increase in resistance, permethrin 1% is still the first-line treatment of head lice. Alternative topical pediculicidal agents include malathion and benzyl alcohol, but resistance is of growing concern. In 2011, a new pediculicide, spinosad, was introduced. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to review the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, tolerability, and current place in therapy of spinosad for the treatment of head lice. METHODS: Pertinent articles and abstracts were identified through searches of MEDLINE/Ebsco and MEDLINE/Ovid from 1948 to September 2011 and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1966 to September 2011. RESULTS: Two reports described 3 trials of spinosad used for the treatment of head lice. One study (n = 120) demonstrated efficacy of both spinosad 0.5% and spinosad 1% compared with placebo, with 82.5% and 86.1% of patients free of live lice 14 days after treatment, respectively, compared with 25.6% in the placebo group (P < 0.001 for each treatment). The difference between the spinosad 0.5% and 1% treatment groups was not significant. Two trials (n = 1038) comparing spinosad 0.9% with permethrin 1% reported greater efficacy for spinosad with absence of live lice 14 days after 1 or 2 treatments for 84.6% and 86.7%, respectively, of primary cases compared with 44.9% and 42.9% with permethrin (P < 0.001 for both studies). The most common reported adverse events were eye and scalp irritation, but they were not statistically significant (P = 0.329 and P = 0.395, respectively). Only application-site erythema reactions showed statistical significance, with 6.8% in the permethrin group versus 3.1% in the spinosad group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited, the available literature suggests that spinosad is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of head lice. In a time of increasing resistance, spinosad has demonstrated superior performance compared with permethrin. A review of the literature did not identify any studies comparing spinosad to benzyl alcohol 5% or malathion 0.5%.