Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(6): 2973-2980, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844565

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Time to surgery from admission is one of the few variables known to influence outcome after a hip fracture. We reviewed our hip fracture database to determine correlation between delays to surgery and mortality in our elderly hip fracture population. METHODS: Data on all hip fracture patients admitted to a large district hospital were prospectively collected between January 1989 and August 2021. Time of the injury, time of admission and time of surgery were recorded. Patients over 60 years old with a hip fracture requiring operative management were included. Patients with pathological fractures, those managed conservatively, and patients delayed for medical reasons were excluded. Surgical timing categories were divided into; under 12 h, 12-24 h, 24-72 h and over 72 h. RESULTS: Time from admission to surgery was recorded for 10,659 patients, of these time of fall was available for 10,346 patients. Mean age was 82.2 years (sd 8.39) for the cohort and 30 day mortality was 6.20%. Odds of 30-day mortality was 1.43 (CI 1.057-1.988, p = 0.025) for delay to surgery from admission of over 12 h compared to under 12 h. Odds ratios for 30-day mortality were not significant at any other time threshold. The odds of 30-day mortality for delay to surgery from time of fall were 1.550 (CI 1.026-2.459, p = 0.048) at the 12 h threshold. CONCLUSION: This is the largest prospective study to date in elderly patients with hip fractures demonstrating a statistically significant increase in 30-day mortality with a delay to surgery over 12 h.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Tempo para o Tratamento , Humanos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/mortalidade , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Idoso , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 31(7): 1443-1449, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33611640

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The use of arthroscopy to alleviate the symptoms of osteoarthritis has been questioned by recent high quality evidence. This has led to the development of guidelines by specialist and national bodies advocating against its use. AIMS: To examine the trends of the rates of arthroscopy in patients with knee osteoarthritis over the past five years and determining compliance with guidelines. METHODS: Multi-centre, retrospective audit in five hospital trusts in the United Kingdom. The number of arthroscopies performed by month from 2013 to 2017 was identified through hospital coding. Fifty randomly selected records from the year 2017 were further analysed to assess compliance with NICE guidelines. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2017, the number of arthroscopies performed annually in five trusts dropped from 2028 to 1099. In the year 2017, 17.7% of patients with no mechanical symptoms and moderate-to-severe arthritis pre-operatively had arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Knee arthroscopy continues to be used as a treatment for osteoarthritis, against national guidelines. Whilst overall numbers are declining, further interventions, including implementation of high-quality conservative care is required to further eliminate unnecessary procedures.


Assuntos
Artroscopia , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA