Determination of sensed and paced atrial-ventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Optimization of atrial-ventricular delay (AVD) during atrial sensing (SAVD) and pacing (PAVD) provides the most effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We demonstrate a novel electrocardiographic methodology for quantifying electrical synchrony and optimizing SAVD/PAVD. METHODS: We studied 40 CRT patients with LV activation delay. Atrial-sensed to RV-sensed (As-RVs) and atrial-paced to RV-sensed (Ap-RVs) intervals were measured from intracardiac electrograms (IEGM). LV-only pacing was performed over a range of SAVD/PAVD settings. Electrical dyssynchrony (cardiac resynchronization index; CRI) was measured at each setting using a multilead ECG system placed over the anterior and posterior torso. Biventricular pacing, which included multiple interventricular delays, was also conducted in a subset of 10 patients. RESULTS: When paced LV-only, peak CRI was similar (93 ± 5% vs. 92 ± 5%) during atrial sensing or pacing but optimal PAVD was 61 ± 31 ms greater than optimal SAVD. The difference between As-RVs and Ap-RVs intervals on IEGMs (62 ± 31 ms) was nearly identical. The slope of the correlation line (0.98) and the correlation coefficient r (0.99) comparing the 2 methods of assessing SAVD-PAVD offset were nearly 1 and the y-intercept (0.63 ms) was near 0. During simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing at short AVD, SAVD and PAVD programming did not affect CRI, but CRI was significantly (p < .05) lower during atrial sensing at long AVD. CONCLUSIONS: A novel methodology for measuring electrical dyssynchrony was used to determine electrically optimal SAVD/PAVD during LV-only pacing. When BiV pacing, shorter AVDs produce better electrical synchrony.

Relationship between QRS duration and resynchronization window for CRT optimization: Implications for CRT in narrow QRS patients.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is proportional to QRS duration (QRSd). We hypothesize that this is, in part, due to slower conduction velocity and hence wider range of programmed device settings that produce adequate electrical wavefront fusion and resynchronization in wider QRSd patients. METHODS: CRT patients (n = 122) with left ventricular (LV) conduction delay, sinus rhythm and intact atrioventricular node conduction were studied. Patients were categorized by QRSd: narrow (<120 ms; n = 20); moderate (120-150 ms, n = 37); and prolonged (≥150 ms; n = 65). Electrocardiographic data was acquired during native rhythm and LV-only pacing at varying atrioventricular delays (AVDs). Electrical synchrony was quantified as cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) using multi­lead electrocardiographic systems and a proprietary algorithm that quantified wavefront fusion. A Gaussian distribution equation was fitted to CRI response. RESULTS: Peak CRI was high (87.6 ± 6.3%) and similar (p = 0.716) across QRSd groups. The standard deviation of the Gaussian distribution significantly correlated with QRSd (R = 0.614, p < 0.001), and progressively and significantly (p < 0.001) increased as QRSd increased from narrow (34.8 ± 10.0 ms), to moderate (50.6 ± 8.4 ms), to prolonged (67.6 ± 18.3 ms). At AVDs 20 and 40 ms from optimal, CRI differed significantly (p < 0.001) between groups, with progressively higher CRI values as native QRSd increased. CONCLUSION: Electrical resynchronization with optimally programmed LV-only pacing was similar between patients with varying QRSd, including patients with narrow QRSd. The resynchronization window that corresponded with optimal electrical resynchronization decreased as native QRSd decreased. This finding provides one potential explanation for the lack of significant benefit of CRT in narrow QRSd patients in previous studies.

Electrical dyssynchrony mapping and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

PURPOSE: There is no clinical methodology for quantification or display of electrical dyssynchrony over a wide range of atrial-ventricular delays (AVD) and ventricular-ventricular delays (VVD) in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to develop a new methodology, based on wavefront fusion, for mapping electrical synchrony. METHODS: A cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) was measured at multiple device settings in 90 patients. Electrical dyssynchrony maps (EDM) were constructed for each patient to display CRI at any combination of AVD and VVD. An optimal synchrony line (OSL) depicted the AVD/VVD combinations producing the highest CRIs. Fusion of right ventricular paced (RVp), left ventricular paced (LVp), and native wavefront offsets were calculated. RESULTS: CRI significantly increased (p < 0.0001) from 58.0 ± 28.1% at baseline to 98.3 ± 1.7% at optimized settings. EDMs in patients with high-grade heart block (n = 20) had an OSL parallel to the simultaneous biventricular pacing (BiVPVV-SIM) line with leftward shift across all AVDs (RVp-LVpOFFSET = 50.5 ± 29.8 ms). EDMs in patients with intact AV node conduction (n = 64) had an OSL parallel to the BiVPVV-SIM line with leftward shift at short AVDs (RVp-LVpOFFSET = 33.4 ± 23.3 ms), curvilinear at intermediate AVDs (triple fusion), and vertical at long AVDs (native-LVpOFFSET = 85.2 ± 22.8 ms) in all patients except those with poor LV lead position (n = 6). CONCLUSION: A new methodology is described for quantifying and graphing electrical dyssynchrony over a physiologic range of AVDs/VVDs. This methodology offers a noninvasive, practical, clinical approach for measuring electrical synchrony that could be applied to optimization of CRT devices.

Electrical wavefront fusion in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Implications for optimization.

BACKGROUND: Novel metrics of electrical dyssynchrony based on multi-electrode mapping and ECG-based markers of fusion are better predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response than QRS duration. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new methodology for measuring electrical synchrony based on wavefront fusion and electrocardiographic cancellation in patients with CRT and its potential for CRT optimization. METHODS: Patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) type conduction and CRT (n = 84) were studied at multiple device settings using an ECG belt (53 anterior and posterior electrodes). The area between combinations of anterior and posterior curves (AUC) was calculated and cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) defined as percent change in AUC compared to LBBB. RESULTS: In 14 patients with complete heart block or atrial fibrillation, CRI at optimal ventriculo-ventricular delay (VVD) (40 ± 19 ms) was significantly higher than with simultaneous biventricular pacing (BiVp) (90 ± 8.6% vs. 54.2 ± 24.2%, p < 0.001). In all 70 patients paced LV-only, LV-paced wavefront was ahead of native wavefront at short atrio-ventricular delay (AVD) and CRI increased with increase in AVD, peaked, and then decreased. Optimal CRI during LV-only pacing was significantly better than optimal CRI with simultaneous BiVp (89.6 ± 8% vs. 64.4 ± 22%, p < 0.001), and occurred at AVD 68 ± 22 ms less than the atrial-RV sensed interval. With sequential BiVp, best CRI was 83.9 ± 13% (with LV preactivation of 40 ± 20 ms). Best CRI at any setting was markedly better than CRI at standard setting (91.6 ± 7.7% vs. 52.7 ± 23.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We describe a novel non-invasive investigational tool that quantifies wavefront fusion and electrical dyssynchrony, and may allow for individualized CRT optimization.

Body surface activation mapping of electrical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: Potential for optimization.

BACKGROUND: Electrical synchronization is likely improved by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but is difficult to quantify with 12-lead ECG. We aimed to quantify changes in electrical synchrony and potential for optimization with CRT using a body-surface activation mapping (BSAM) system. METHODS: Standard deviation of activation times (SDAT) was calculated in 94 patients using BSAM at baseline CRT (CRTbl), native, and different CRT configurations. RESULTS: SDAT decreased 20% from native to CRTbl (p<0.01) and an additional 26% (p<0.01) at optimal CRT (CRTopt), the minimal SDAT setting. Patients with LBBB and patients with QRS duration ≥150ms had higher native SDAT and greater decrease with CRTbl (p<0.01); however, the improvement from CRTbl to CRTopt was similar in all four groups (range: 24-28%). CRTopt was achieved with biventricular pacing in 52% and LV-only pacing in 44%. We propose that improved wavefront fusion demonstrated by BSAMs contributed substantially to the improved electrical synchrony. CONCLUSION: Optimization potential is similar regardless of pre-CRT QRS morphology or duration. BSAM could possibly improve CRT response by individualizing device programming to minimize electrical dyssynchrony.

Comparison of cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in patients with New York Heart Association functional class I/II versus III/IV heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Several randomized trials have shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I/II heart failure (HF) patients, but it is unknown if similar outcomes occur in the real-world. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients receiving CRT between 2003 and 2008 with ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and QRS duration ≥120 ms were included. Outcomes assessed were subjective clinical response, echocardiographic response, and survival free of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization. Baseline demographics in functional class I/II (n = 155) and functional class III/IV (n = 512) were similar, except for differences in age and several comorbidities. Clinical response was similar in both groups. The functional class I/II group had a greater decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension (P = .031), and trended toward greater improvements in LV end-systolic dimension (P = .056) and EF (P = .059). The functional class I/II group had a better 5-year survival rate (79 vs 54%; P < .0001) and survival free of CV hospitalization (45% vs 26%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world clinical scenario, NYHA functional class I/II CRT patients improved clinical status, and LV function and size as good as or better than those in NYHA functional class III/IV patients. These observations provide further support for the use of CRT in patients with mild symptoms of HF.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in the real world: comparison with the COMPANION study.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have confirmed that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in well defined patient populations. It is uncertain, however, whether outcomes are similar in real-world clinical settings. This study compared outcomes after CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) in a large real-world private-practice cardiology setting with those in the COMPANION multicenter trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 429 consecutive patients who received CRT-D for standard indications (group 1) were retrospectively compared with the 595 patients (group 3) in the COMPANION CRT-D cohort regarding survival and survival free of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization. A subgroup of the group 1 patients who met the COMPANION entrance criteria (group 2) was also compared with the COMPANION cohort (group 3) both with and without propensity-matching statistical analysis. Survival and survival free of CV hospitalization was better in group 1 than in group 3. Survival in group 2 with and without propensity matching was similar to group 3. However, survival free of CV hospitalization was better in the real-world patients (group 2) even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and CV hospitalization outcomes in a real-world clinical setting are as good as, or better than, those demonstrated in the COMPANION research trial.

Pacemaker optimization in nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular pacing as an available option.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic (ECHO)-guided pacemaker optimization (PMO) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) nonresponders acutely improves left ventricular (LV) function. However, the chronic results of LV pacing in this group are less understood. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 28 CRT nonresponders optimized based on ECHO to LV pacing and compared them to 28 age- and gender-matched patients optimized to biventricular (BiV) pacing. ECHOs with tissue Doppler imaging assessed LV hemodynamics before, immediately after, and 29 ± 16 months after PMO. Also, 56 age- and gender-matched CRT responders were included for comparison of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: PMO resulted in acute improvements in longitudinal LV systolic function and several measures of dyssynchrony, with greater improvements in the LV paced group. Chronic improvements in ejection fraction (EF) (3.2 ± 7.7%), and left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) (-11 ± 36 mL) and one dyssynchrony measure were seen in the combined group. Chronically, both LV and BiV paced patients improved some measures of systolic function and dyssynchrony although response varied between the groups. Survival at 3.5 years was similar (P = 0.973) between the PMO (58%) and nonoptimized groups (58%) but survival free of cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly (P = 0.037) better in the nonoptimized group. CONCLUSIONS: CRT nonresponders undergoing PMO to either LV or BiV pacing have acute improvements in longitudinal systolic function and some measures of dyssynchrony. Some benefits are sustained chronically, with improvements in EF, LVESV, and dyssynchrony. A strategy of ECHO-guided PMO results in survival for CRT nonresponders similar to that of CRT patients not referred for PMO.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization in nonresponders and incomplete responders using electrical dyssynchrony mapping.

BACKGROUND: Nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) occurs in ∼30%-50% of patients. There are no well-accepted clinical approaches for optimizing CRT in nonresponders. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effect of CRT optimization using electrical dyssynchrony mapping on left ventricular (LV) function, size, and dyssynchrony in selected patients with nonresponse/incomplete response to CRT. METHODS: We studied 39 patients with underlying left bundle branch block or interventricular conduction delay who had an LV ejection fraction of ≤40% after receiving CRT and had significant electrical dyssynchrony. Electrical dyssynchrony was measured at multiple atrioventricular delays and interventricular delays. The QRS area between combinations of 9 anterior and 9 posterior electrograms (QRS area under the curve) was calculated, and cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) was defined as the percent change in QRS area under the curve compared to native conduction. Electrical dyssynchrony maps depicted CRI over the wide range of settings tested. Patients were programmed to an optimal device setting, and echocardiograms were recorded 5.9 ± 3.7 months postoptimization. RESULTS: CRI increased from 49.4% ± 24.0% to 90.8% ± 10.5%. CRT optimization significantly improved LV ejection fraction from 31.8% ± 4.7% to 36.3% ± 5.9% (P < .001) and LV end-systolic volume from 108.5 ± 37.6 to 98.0 ± 37.5 mL (P = .009). Speckle-tracking measures of LV strain significantly improved by 2.4% ± 4.5% (transverse; P = .002) and 1.0% ± 2.6% (longitudinal; P = .017). Aortic to pulmonic valve opening time, a measure of interventricular dyssynchrony, significantly (P = .040) decreased by 14.9 ± 39.4 ms. CONCLUSION: CRT optimization of electrical dyssynchrony using a novel electrical dyssynchrony mapping technology significantly improves LV systolic function, LV end-systolic volume, and mechanical dyssynchrony. This methodology offers a noninvasive, practical clinical approach to treating nonresponders and incomplete responders to CRT.

Torsion and dyssynchrony differences between chronically paced and non-paced heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic right ventricular pacing may lead to left ventricular dyssynchrony, systolic dysfunction, remodeling, and heart failure. Cardiac mechanics may differ between paced and nonpaced heart failure patients, and their optimal treatment may also differ. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiograms were analyzed using tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking echocardiography in 20 patients with chronic right ventricular pacing for complete heart block (RVP group), 29 nonpaced patients with different heart failure etiologies but ejection fractions similar to the RVP group (HF group), and 25 control subjects without pacemakers or heart failure (control group). Left ventricle volumes were smaller in RVP than HF (end-diastolic volume = 93.6 ± 25.1 mL vs. 112.1 ± 22.8 mL), but intraventricular longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony were similar. Dyssynchrony within the septum was greater (number of segments lengthening during systole = 1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 0.9 ± 1.8), systolic torsion was lower (6.2 ± 7.3° vs. 10.6 ± 4.2°), untwisting was delayed (time from peak torsion to peak untwist rate = 188 ± 141 ms vs. 102 ± 73 ms), and apical rotation was reversed in more subjects (35% vs 0%) in RVP than HF groups (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Intraventricular dyssynchrony was similar between RVP and HF groups with similar ejection fraction. However, RVP subjects had smaller ventricles, greater dyssynchrony within the septum, lower torsion, altered apical rotation, and delayed untwisting.