Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope. METHODS: ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (ß -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.

Preemptive simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation has survival benefit to patients.

Several organ allocation protocols give priority to wait-listed simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplant recipients to mitigate the higher cardiovascular risk of patients with diabetes mellitus on dialysis. The available information regarding the impact of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation on recipient and graft outcomes is nonetheless controversial. To help resolve this, we explored the influence of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants on patient and graft survival through a retrospective analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database, encompassing 9690 simultaneous transplant recipients between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analysis was performed applying a propensity score analysis to minimize bias. Of these patients, 1796 (19%) were transplanted preemptively. At ten years, recipient survival was significantly superior in the preemptive group when compared to the non-preemptive group (78.9% vs 71.8%). Dialysis at simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation was an independent significant risk for patient survival (hazard ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.32-2.09]), especially if the dialysis duration was 12 months or longer. Preemptive transplantation was also associated with significant superior kidney graft survival compared to those on dialysis (death-censored: 84.3% vs 75.4%, respectively; estimated half-life of 38.57 [38.33 -38.81] vs 22.35 [22.17 - 22.53] years, respectively). No differences were observed between both groups neither for pancreas graft survival nor for post-transplant surgical complications. Thus, our results sustain the relevance of early referral for pancreas transplantation and the importance of pancreas allocation priority in reducing patient mortality after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Subgenomic RNA in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Remdesivir.

INTRODUCTION: There is no reliable microbiological marker to guide responses to antiviral treatment in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the dynamics of subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) RT-PCR before and after receiving treatment with remdesivir compared with genomic RNA (gRNA) RT-PCR and its use as a surrogate marker of viral replication. METHODS: We analyzed gRNA and sgRNA at baseline and after remdesivir treatment in KTR who received remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 infection from November 2021 to February 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-four KTR received remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median time since transplantation was 80 months (IQR 3-321) and 75% of patients had previously received 3 doses of a mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Three patients (8%) were classified with mild, 25 (73%) with moderate, and 6 (17%) with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thirty-two (94%) patients received 5 doses of remdesivir and two patients received 2 doses. The median time between symptom onset to remdesivir treatment was 5 days (IQR 3-8.5). The median days of hospitalization were 6 (IQR 2-112). gRNA was positive in all patients at baseline and after remdesivir. Five (15%) patients had negative sgRNA at baseline and 20 (59%) after receiving remdesivir. Patients presenting with negative sgRNA at baseline were discharged from hospital in ≤ 6 days without complications. Moreover, those with negative sgRNA after remdesivir therapy did not require ICU admission and had favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, patients with positive sgRNA after antiviral treatment presented worse outcomes, with 47% requiring ICU admission and the three (9%) recorded deaths in the study were in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, we hypothesize that sgRNA may have clinical utility to help monitor virologic response more accurately than gRNA in KTR who receive remdesivir. Moreover, patients with negative sgRNA at baseline may not require antiviral treatment and others presenting positive sgRNA at day 5 could benefit from prolonged or combined therapies.

Factor B Inhibition with Iptacopan in Recurrent C3 Glomerulopathy Following Kidney Transplant: A Report of Two Cases.

C3 glomerulopathy is a rare disease caused by fluid phase dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. Currently, treatment depends on clinical and histological severity and includes nephroprotection, unspecific immunosuppression, and terminal complement blockers (C5), without having an etiological treatment approved. C3 glomerulopathy has high recurrence rates after kidney transplantation with a high risk of graft loss. Fortunately, new molecules are being developed that specifically target the proximal alternative complement pathway, such as iptacopan, a factor B inhibitor that showed promising results in native kidneys and cases of transplant recurrence in a phase 2 clinical trial. We present 2 "real-world" cases of C3 glomerulopathy recurrence in kidney allografts treated with iptacopan, with initial excellent clinical response and safety profile, especially with early introduction. We also present follow-up biopsies that showed no C3 deposition during factor B inhibition. Our cases suggest that proximal blockade of the alternative complement pathway can be effective and safe in the treatment of C3 glomerulopathy recurrence in kidney transplantation, bringing other questions such as dual blockade (eg, in C3 and C5), the optimal patient profile to benefit from factor B inhibition or treatment duration and its potential use in other forms of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (eg, immune complex-mediated).

Challenges in perioperative blood transfusions in kidney transplantation and the need for Patient Blood Management.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is highly prevalent in end-stage chronic kidney disease patients, increasing their risk of receiving blood transfusions during and on the days after a kidney transplant (KTx) surgery. However, there is currently a lack of data that thoroughly describes this phenomenon in this population, the associated risk factors, and how they could benefit from the application of Patient Blood Management (PBM) guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational study. All adult patients who received a KTx between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, were included and followed up to six months after transplantation. Those who received a multiorgan transplant, whose data was missing in the electronic health records, and who had primary non-function were excluded. We recorded donor and recipient characteristics, cold ischemia time, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, iron status deficiency biomarkers, incidence of delayed graft function and biopsy-proven graft rejections, and graft function at discharge and 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: We found that a high amount (39%) of KTx recipients required at least one blood transfusion during the perioperative period. And that 1) most of these patients had anemia at the time of transplantation (85.4%), 2) iron status upon admission was associated with the transfusion of more blood units (3.9 vs 2.7, p=0.019), 3) surgical reintervention (OR 7.28, 2.35-22.54) and deceased donor donation (OR 1.99, 1.24-3.21) were associated with an increased risk of transfusion, and finally, 4) there was an association between a higher number of blood units transfused and impaired kidney graft function six months after hospital discharge (1.6 vs 1.9, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PBM guidelines should be applied to patients on the KTx deceased donor waiting list and especially those scheduled to receive a transplant from a living donor. This could potentially increase the utilization efficiency of blood products and avoid transfusion-related severe adverse effects.

Remdesivir in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in Kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 01, 2020 and December 31, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir. The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir. DISCUSSION: A total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all pacients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53-71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16-82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9-27) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

[Remdesivir in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]. / Remdesivir en pacientes trasplantados renales con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2.

Background: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir.The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir. Discussion: A total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all patients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53-71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16-82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low-oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high-flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9-27) days. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Outcomes in older kidney recipients from older donors: A propensity score analysis.

Background: The age of patients referred for kidney transplantation has increased progressively. However, the precise influence of age on transplant outcomes is controversial. Methods: Etrospective study in which graft and recipient survival were assessed in a cohort of ≥75 years old kidney recipients and compared with a contemporary younger one aged 60-65 years through a propensity score analysis. Results: We included 106 recipients between 60-65 and 57 patients of ≥75 years old with a median follow-up of 31 [13-54] months. Unadjusted one- and five-year recipient survival did not significantly differ between the older (91% and 74%) and the younger group (95% and 82%, P=0.06). In the IPTW weighted Cox regression analysis, recipient age was not associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.88 95%CI [0.81-4.37], P=0.14). Unadjusted one- and five-year death-censored graft survival did not significantly differ between both groups (96% and 83% for the older and 99% and 89% for the younger group, respectively, P=0.08). After IPTW weighted Cox Regression analysis, recipient age ≥75 years was no associated with an increased risk of graft loss (HR 1.95, 95%CI [0.65-5.82], P=0.23). Conclusions: These results suggest that recipient age should not be considered itself as an absolute contraindication for kidney transplant.

Incidence of severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated kidney transplant and haemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Given the increased COVID-19 observed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and haemodialysis patients, several studies have tried to establish the efficacy of mRNA vaccines in these populations by evaluating their humoral and cellular responses. However, there is currently no information on clinical protection (deaths and hospitalizations), a gap that this study aims to fill. METHODS: Observational prospective study involving 1,336 KTRs and haemodialysis patients from three dialysis units affiliated to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain, vaccinated with two doses of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The outcomes measured were SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed by a positive RT-PCR fourteen days after the second vaccine dose, hospital admissions derived from infection, and a severe COVID-19 composite outcome, defined as either ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or death. RESULTS: Six per cent (18/302) of patients on haemodialysis were infected, of whom four required hospital admission (1.3%), only one (0.3%) had severe COVID-19, and none of them died. In contrast, 4.3% (44/1034) of KTRs were infected, and presented more hospital admissions (26 patients, 2.5%), severe COVID-19 (11 patients, 1.1%) or death (4 patients, 0.4%). KTRs had a significantly higher risk of hospital admission than HD patients, and this risk increased with age and male sex (HR 3.37 and 4.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need for booster doses in KTRs. In contrast, the haemodialysis population appears to have an adequate clinical response to vaccination, at least up to four months from its administration.

Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses After a 3-dose Course of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

In kidney transplant recipients, there is discordance between the development of cellular and humoral response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. We sought to determine the interplay between the 2 arms of adaptive immunity in a 3-dose course of mRNA-1273 100 µg vaccine. Methods: Humoral (IgG/IgM) and cellular (N- and S-ELISpot) responses were studied in 117 kidney and 12 kidney-pancreas transplant recipients at the following time points: before the first dose, 14 d after the second dose' and before and after the third dose, with a median of 203 and 232 d after the start of the vaccination cycle, respectively. Results: After the second dose, 26.7% of naive cases experienced seroconversion. Before the third dose and in the absence of COVID-19, this percentage increased to 61.9%. After the third dose, seroconversion occurred in 80.0% of patients. Naive patients who had at any time point a detectable positivity for S-ELISpot were 75.2% of the population, whereas patients who maintained S-ELISpot positivity throughout the study were 34.3%. S-ELISpot positivity at 42 d was associated with final seroconversion (odds ratio' 3.14; 95% confidence interval' 1.10-8.96; P = 0.032). Final IgG titer was significantly higher in patients with constant S-ELISpot positivity (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of kidney transplant recipients developed late seroconversion after 2 doses. Cellular immunity was associated with the development of a stronger humoral response.

Routine Biomarkers for the Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia May Present Differently in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based on the patient's clinical status and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. The comparative activity of these biomarkers in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and non-SARS-CoV-2 etiologies is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and inflammatory parameters at admission of KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia over the same period. METHODS: Biomarkers were measured and compared between KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 20) from March 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable demographics. The KT patients with COVID-19 had fewer neutrophils (6824 ± 5000 vs 8969 ± 4206; P = .09) than the non-COVID group, although there was no significant difference in the lymphocyte count. Non-COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher d-dimer (median, 921 [interquartile range (IQR), 495-1680] vs median, 2215 [IQR, 879-3934]; P = 0.09) and interleukin-6 (median, 35 [IQR, 20-128] vs median, 222 [IQR, 38-500]; P = 0.006) levels. The ferritin level was higher in the COVID-19 group (median, 809 [IQR, 442-1,330] vs median, 377 [IQR, 276-885]; P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, only d-dimer (hazard ratio [HR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI],1-1.002; P = .02) and ferritin (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.9-0.9; P = .02) increase the statistic signification. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pneumonia in KT patients shows a different presentation of inflammatory biomarkers than other non-COVID pneumonias. It could be useful to identify KT patients with COVID-19. More detailed studies are necessary to understand the presentation of biomarkers in KT with COVID-19.

Use and Safety of Remdesivir in Kidney Transplant Recipients With COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Remdesivir has demonstrated antiviral activity against coronavirus, shortening the time to recovery in adults hospitalized with moderate/severe COVID-19. Severe adverse events such as acute kidney injury have been reported. Scant data are available on the use and safety of remdesivir in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We present a multicenter cohort study of 51 kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir. Outcomes and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 60 years, with a median time since kidney transplant of 4.5 years. Mean time since admission to remdesivir was 2 days. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) required mechanical ventilation (19 noninvasive). Mortality was 18.9% and markedly higher if aged ≥65 years (45% vs. 3.2% in younger patients). Acute kidney injury was present in 27.7% of patients, but was diagnosed in 50% before treatment. No patients required remdesivir discontinuation because of adverse events. We did not find significant hepatoxicity or systemic symptoms resulting from the drug. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of kidney transplant recipients, remdesivir was well tolerated and safe in renal and hepatic toxicity, but randomized trials are needed to assess its efficacy.

Remdesivir en pacientes trasplantados renales con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 / Remdesivir in kidney transplant patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Introducción: El remdesivir es el único tratamiento antiviral que ha demostrado ser útil frente al SARS-CoV-2 acortando el tiempo de hospitalización frente a placebo. Su efecto en pacientes trasplantados renales (TR) se limita a algunos casos publicados.Material y métodosEstudio retrospectivo observacional de los pacientes TR que ingresaron entre el 1 de agosto de 2020 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2020 con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 y recibieron remdesivir.El objetivo es describir la experiencia de una cohorte de pacientes TR con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con remdesivir.Resultados37 pacientes TR ingresaron por infección secundaria a SARS-CoV-2, 7 de ellos recibieron tratamiento con remdesivir. El resto de pacientes fueron excluidos por CKD-EPI menor a 30mL/min o por no presentar criterios clínicos. Además de remdesivir, todos recibieron dexametasona y anticoagulación. Cuatro eran hombres, siendo la mediana de edad de 59 (53-71) años. La mediana de tiempo post-trasplante fue de 43 (16-82) meses. Todos los pacientes presentaban neumonía y requirieron oxigenoterapia de bajo flujo al ingreso, precisando en tres de ellos oxigenoterapia de alto flujo durante el ingreso. Dos presentaron deterioro de la función del injerto al diagnóstico, no precisando en ningún caso hemodiálisis, y recuperándose al alta. Dos pacientes elevaron 1,5 veces el valor normal de las transaminasas. Ningún paciente falleció ni precisó ingreso en unidad de críticos. La mediana de días de ingreso fue de 12 (9-27) días.ConclusionesNuestro estudio sugiere que el uso de remdesivir podría ser útil en los pacientes TR con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 sin presentar efectos secundarios. Son necesarios más estudios con un mayor número de pacientes para ampliar el conocimiento de este fármaco en la infección por SARS-CoV-2. (AU)

Background: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir.The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir.DiscussionA total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all patients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53–71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16–82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low-oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high-flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9–27) days.ConclusionsOur study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection. (AU)