Pre-operative use of dexamethasone does not reduce incidence or intensity of bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity. A triple-blind, parallel-design, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of the administration of pre-operative dexamethasone on tooth sensitivity stemming from in-office bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A triple-blind, parallel-design, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 70 volunteers who received dexamethasone or placebo capsules. The drugs were administered in a protocol of three daily 8-mg doses of the drug, starting 48 h before the in-office bleaching treatment. Two bleaching sessions with 37.5% hydrogen peroxide gel were performed with a 1-week interval. Tooth sensitivity (TS) was recorded on visual analog scales (VAS) and numeric rating scales (NRS) in different periods up to 48 h after bleaching. The color evaluations were also performed. The absolute risk of TS and its intensity were evaluated by using Fisher's exact test. Comparisons of the TS intensity (NRS and VAS data) were performed by using the Mann-Whitney U test and a two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test, respectively. RESULTS: In both groups, a high risk of TS (Dexa 80% x Placebo 94%) was detected. No significant difference was observed in terms of TS intensity. A whitening of approximately 3 shade guide units of the VITA Classical was detected in both groups, which were statistically similar. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the administration pre-operatively of dexamethasone, in the proposed protocol, does not reduce the incidence or intensity of bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of dexamethasone drug before in-office bleaching treatment does not reduce incidence or intensity of tooth sensitivity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02956070.

Effect of a dentifrice containing nanohydroxyapatite on the roughness, color, lightness, and brightness of dental enamel subjected to a demineralization challenge.

The dental profession is still pursuing the most effective way to treat white-spot lesions in order to produce a sound and esthetically pleasing enamel surface. The aim of the present research was to evaluate in vitro the effects of a dentifrice with nanohydroxyapatite (nano-HAp) on the roughness, color, lightness, and brightness (gloss) of bovine enamel subjected to pH cycling. Twelve enamel discs prepared from bovine incisors were divided into 2 experimental groups: dentifrice with sodium fluoride (Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint) and dentifrice with nanoHAp (Megasonex). For 14 days, the specimens were subjected to 30 cycles of simulated brushing twice a day as well as to a pH cycling model (6 hours of demineralization and 18 hours of remineralization daily). The roughness, color, lightness, and brightness of all specimens were evaluated at baseline (immediately after specimen preparation) and after 7 and 14 days of treatment. A Tukey test demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences in the effects of the dentifrices on any parameter after 7 days (P > 0.05). After 14 days, however, there was a statistically significant increase in mean roughness in the group brushed with fluoride dentifrice (P < 0.05). Thus, the nanoHAp containing dentifrice promoted less superficial roughness after 14 days, but both dentifrices were similar in relation to color variation, lightness, and brightness.

Influence of surface sealants on the quality of posterior restorations with bulk-fill composites: A 4-year randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of surface sealants associated with a bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations after 4 years. METHODS: A total of 174 posterior restorations were performed on 57 participants using a self-etch adhesive system and a bulk-fill composite. The groups were then divided into the following categories: 1) without surface sealant (NoS), 2) with surface sealant Biscover (Bisco, SBi), and 3) with surface sealant Permaseal (Ultradent, SPe). Restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at baseline and after 1 and 4 years. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Chi-square test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: After 4 years, only one restoration was lost (1 in the NoS group). The fracture/retention rate (with 95% confidence interval) was 98% for NoS and 100% for both SBi and SPe (p = 0.76). The majority of secondary outcomes showed minor defects, with no significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among the groups in terms of marginal staining and marginal adaptation (p = 0.03). In both items, twelve restorations (nine in NoS, one in SBi, and two in SPe) showed minor marginal discrepancies favoring the sealant groups (SBi and SPe). SIGNIFICANCE: Regardless of the use of surface sealants, the bulk-fill composite restorations showed excellent clinical performance after 4 years. However, the groups that received sealants showed better marginal adaptation and less marginal discoloration compared to those that did not receive sealants.

Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This is a double-blind, split-mouth, randomized clinical study that aims to evaluate the influence of bulk-fill composite packaging presented in syringes (BSy) and capsules (BCa), and the effect of selective enamel etching (SEE) on the clinical performance of class I and II bulk-fill resin composite restorations after 24 months. METHODOLOGY: A total of 295 class I or class II restorations were performed on 70 patients. One universal adhesive was applied in all restorations. SEE was used in 148 restorations and self-etching mode (SET) in 147 restorations. After the adhesive application, cavities were restored with Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior Restorative in syringes (BSy), Filtek One Bulk-fill in capsules (BCa), or Filtek Supreme Ultra in syringes with the incremental technique (In). All restorations were evaluated using the FDI criteria after one week and after six, 12, and 24 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Pearson's Chi-square test were used (α=0.05) for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After 24 months, 62 patients were evaluated and four restorations were lost due to fracture (one for SEEBSy, two for SEEIn, and one for SETIn). No significant differences in the fracture and retention rate were found between groups (p>0.05). SEE showed significantly fewer marginal adaptation defects than SET (p<0.05). BCa and BSy groups showed fewer marginal discrepancies compared to In (p<0.05). Restorations performed with BCa showed less color mismatch than BSy or In (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Although all restorations exhibited satisfactory clinical performance after 24 months of clinical service, the clinical behavior of class I and II restorations' improved when performed with a bulk-fill composite in capsules, mainly when associated with a universal adhesive applied with SEE.

Five-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesive applied following different bonding techniques: A randomized multicenter clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied following different adhesive strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 5 years. METHODS: Fifty participants were included. Futurabond U (Voco) was applied in NCCLs using four adhesive strategies (n = 50 each): only self-etch (SE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET + SE); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERD); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERW). All cavities were restored with Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 1, 3, and 5 years using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. RESULTS: After 5 years, retention rates were 81 % (65.8-90.5) for SE, 87 % (73.2-94.4) for SET + SE, 84 % (69.6-92.6) for ERD, and 78 % (63.6-88.9) for ERW (p > 0.05). Thirty-five restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 5-year recall (14 for SE, 9 for SET + SE, 6 for ERD, and 6 for ERW; p > 0.05). Sixteen restorations were detected as a minor marginal discoloration (6 for SE, 4 for SET + SE, 1 for ERD, and 5 for ERW; p > 0.05) and one restoration showed a recurrence of caries (1 for ERW; p > 0.05) at the 5-year recall. No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity after 5 years. SIGNIFICANCE: NCCLs restorations using a universal adhesive showed satisfactory clinical performance after 5 years, regardless of the adhesive strategy.

Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of a new dual-cure universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco) when applied using different application strategies in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 36 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Futurabond U was applied in NCCLs of 50 subjects using four adhesion strategies (n = 50 restorations per group): only self-etch (SEE); selective enamel etching + self-etch (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry); and etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). All cavities were restored using Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco). Restorations were evaluated after 36 months using the World Federation criteria (FDI) and the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. RESULTS: The after 36-month retention rates were 87% (75-92%) for SEE, 94% (83-98%) for SET, 91% (80-97%) for ERDry, and 94% (83-98%) for ERWet. Forty-three restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the 36-month recall (18 for SEE, 12 for SET, 7 for ERDry, and 6 for ERWet; p > 0.05). One restoration was detected as a minor marginal discoloration at the 36-month recall (1 for SET; p > 0.05). No restorations showed postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence at 36 months. CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of the Futurabond U did not depend on the employed bonding strategy, and it was considered reliable after 36 months of clinical evaluation. However, greater marginal discrepancy was observed in the self-etch groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: NCCLs restorations using a dual-cure universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes showed satisfactory clinical performance after 36 months.

In vitro analysis of the pH stability of dental bleaching gels during in-office procedures.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that acidic bleaching gels could lead to worse collateral effects during an in-office bleaching procedure, while neutral or basic products leads towards a better experience. Considering this fact, the main purpose of this study was to evaluate the pH behavior of 6 in-office bleaching gels, compared to the information provided by their manufacturers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty enamel discs of bovine teeth were prepared, the initial colors of which were measured by a spectrophotometer and then divided into 6 groups. A pH meter was used to measure the pH every 30 seconds until the end of each procedure, when a new color evaluation was then made. The Tukey test was used for statistical analysis of the results. RESULTS: There was no difference in the color variation (ΔE) between the groups (p> 0.05). In two groups, the pH variation (ΔpH) showed neutral stability, with initial and final pH averages of 7.04 and 7.11 (p = 0.08) and 7.21 and 7.19 (p = 0.55), respectively; in another, there was alkaline stability, with an initial and final pH average of 8.54 and 8.37 (p = 0.14). In the other three brands, however, the results showed acidification, with initial and final pH averages of 6.14 and 5.22 (p = 0.001), 6.05 and 5.16 (p = 0.001) and 7.14 and 5.83 (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In 3 of the evaluated gels, a discrepancy existed between the manufacturer's information and the data obtained, which could lead, considering previous studies discussed throughout this article, to unexpected collateral effects on the patients, especially dental sensitivity. Thus, clinicians and researchers should be aware about pH stability studies of in-office bleaching gels for better predictability and safety on their clinical usage. Key words:Tooth bleaching, Bleaching agents, Hydrogen-ion concentration, Dentin sensitivity, Hydrogen peroxide.

Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial.

The objectives of this double-blind randomized clinical trial were to compare (a) the clinical times and (b) the occurrence and severity of postoperative sensitivity, of posterior restoration that used a universal adhesive, in a self-etch or selective enamel-etching technique, along with incremental or bulk-fill composites (presented in syringes or capsules). A total of 295 posterior restorations were placed according to the following groups: SETB - self-etch/bulk-fill in syringe; SETC - self-etch/bulk-fill in capsules; SETI - self-etch/incremental; SEEB - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in syringe; SEEC - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in capsules; and SEEI - selective enamel-etching/incremental. Clinical time was assessed by a reason (s/mm3) between the total volume of resin inserted and the total time required to perform the restorations. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated using two scales (Numeric Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale). Mean clinical time results, analyzed by Wald's Chi-square, showed significant statistical differences among all groups (p<0.001), indicating that the restorative strategy affected the time required for the restoration. A generalized estimating equation model statistical analysis, performed to compare postoperative sensitivity, showed that neither the restorative technique, the adhesive strategy nor the presentation mode of the bulk-fill composite affected the overall risk of postoperative sensitivity (4.06 [2.22-6.81]). The use of bulk-fill composite, presented in capsules or syringes, is less time consuming and does not increase the risk or intensity of postoperative sensitivity relative to the traditional incremental technique.

Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objectives This is a double-blind, split-mouth, randomized clinical study that aims to evaluate the influence of bulk-fill composite packaging presented in syringes (BSy) and capsules (BCa), and the effect of selective enamel etching (SEE) on the clinical performance of class I and II bulk-fill resin composite restorations after 24 months. Methodology A total of 295 class I or class II restorations were performed on 70 patients. One universal adhesive was applied in all restorations. SEE was used in 148 restorations and self-etching mode (SET) in 147 restorations. After the adhesive application, cavities were restored with Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior Restorative in syringes (BSy), Filtek One Bulk-fill in capsules (BCa), or Filtek Supreme Ultra in syringes with the incremental technique (In). All restorations were evaluated using the FDI criteria after one week and after six, 12, and 24 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Pearson's Chi-square test were used (α=0.05) for statistical analysis. Results After 24 months, 62 patients were evaluated and four restorations were lost due to fracture (one for SEEBSy, two for SEEIn, and one for SETIn). No significant differences in the fracture and retention rate were found between groups (p>0.05). SEE showed significantly fewer marginal adaptation defects than SET (p<0.05). BCa and BSy groups showed fewer marginal discrepancies compared to In (p<0.05). Restorations performed with BCa showed less color mismatch than BSy or In (p<0.05). Conclusion Although all restorations exhibited satisfactory clinical performance after 24 months of clinical service, the clinical behavior of class I and II restorations' improved when performed with a bulk-fill composite in capsules, mainly when associated with a universal adhesive applied with SEE.

Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract The objectives of this double-blind randomized clinical trial were to compare (a) the clinical times and (b) the occurrence and severity of postoperative sensitivity, of posterior restoration that used a universal adhesive, in a self-etch or selective enamel-etching technique, along with incremental or bulk-fill composites (presented in syringes or capsules). A total of 295 posterior restorations were placed according to the following groups: SETB - self-etch/bulk-fill in syringe; SETC - self-etch/bulk-fill in capsules; SETI - self-etch/incremental; SEEB - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in syringe; SEEC - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in capsules; and SEEI - selective enamel-etching/incremental. Clinical time was assessed by a reason (s/mm3) between the total volume of resin inserted and the total time required to perform the restorations. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated using two scales (Numeric Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale). Mean clinical time results, analyzed by Wald's Chi-square, showed significant statistical differences among all groups (p<0.001), indicating that the restorative strategy affected the time required for the restoration. A generalized estimating equation model statistical analysis, performed to compare postoperative sensitivity, showed that neither the restorative technique, the adhesive strategy nor the presentation mode of the bulk-fill composite affected the overall risk of postoperative sensitivity (4.06 [2.22-6.81]). The use of bulk-fill composite, presented in capsules or syringes, is less time consuming and does not increase the risk or intensity of postoperative sensitivity relative to the traditional incremental technique.

Protocolo das possibilidades técnicas de aplicação dos sistemas adesivos universais: revisão de literatura com relato de caso / Clinical strategies using universal adhesive systems: literature review with case report

Este relato de caso demonstra a utilização clínica de um novo sistema adesivo universal, Xeno Universal (Dentsply DeTrey, Alemanha) descrevendo quatro formas possíveis de aplicação: autocondicionante, com ou sem condicionamento seletivo do esmalte, ou com condicionamento ácido total, seguido da aplicação do adesivo sobre dentina seca ou úmida. Os adesivos universais de uma maneira geral são de fácil aplicação e versáteis, uma vez que o mesmo produto pode ter várias formas de aplicação, reduzindo o tempo clínico e em muitas situações a sensibilidade técnica. No entanto, mais estudos laboratoriais e clínicos que comprovem a eficácia deste novo adesivo universal em particular são necessários, antes que seu uso seja bem indicado aos cirurgiões-dentistas.

This case report describes the clinical application of a new universal adhesive system, Xeno Universal (Dentsply DeTrey, Germany) describing four application modes: self-etching, with or without selective enamel etching, or total etching followed by adhesive application on dry or moist dentin. Universal adhesive systems usually are versatile and easy to use, facilitating the operator, since the same product has several technical possibilities, thus reducing the operating time and the technique sensitivity. However, long-term laboratory studies and more clinical reports and/or clinical trials are needed to prove the quality of this new universal adhesive system, before dentists can start using them in their dental offices.

Efeito da temperatura de armazenamento na resistência coesiva de um compósito / Effect of storage temperature on the composite cohesive strength

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência à tração diametral de um compósito fotopolimerizável em diferentes temperaturas de armazenamento. Foram confeccionados 12 espécimes cilíndricos (n = 6),que foram divididos em dois grupos: G1- resina à temperatura ambiente (25ºC) e G2- resina utilizada imediatamente após remoção do refrigerador (5ºC). Cada espécime foi confeccionado em três incrementos, cada incremento polimerizado por 40 segundos. Realizouse o teste a uma velocidade de 1.0 mm/min até a falha. Após cada teste, a resistência à tração diametral foi calculada (MPa) e os resultados submetidos à análise estatística, pelo teste t-student (p > 0,05). Não houve efeito da temperatura de armazenamento na resistência coesiva da resina utilizada neste estudo.

Avaliação do potencial remineralizante de pastas e soluções com compostos bioativos no esmalte dental bovino submetido a ciclos de desafio erosivo / Remineralizing effectiveness of different bioactive principles in bovine enamel subjected to acidic challenges

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar in vitro por meio da Fluorescência de Raios X por Dispersão de Energia (XRF), Microdureza Vickers (MV) e Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV) o efeito remineralizante de diferentes princípios bioativos, tais quais, nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio (nanoHAp) associadas ou não a fluoreto, fosfopeptídeos de caseína do leite e fosfato de cálcio amorfo (CPP-ACP) associados ou não a fluoreto, fluoreto de sódio e saliva no esmalte dental bovino submetido a ciclagem des-remineralizante simulando lesão erosiva por alto desafio ácido. Foram obtidos 58 corpos de prova (CP) a partir de 58 incisivos bovinos que foram divididos aleatoriamente em 8 grupos, com 7 CP cada um e 2 CP para obtenção de imagem em MEV do esmalte hígido. Cada grupo foi denominado conforme os respectivos tratamentos a serem utilizados. Grupo 1 (G1) Controle; Grupo 2 (G2) Desensibilize Nano P experimental (nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio); Grupo 3 (G3) Desensibilize Nano P (nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio e flúor); Grupo4 (G4) GC Tooth Mousse (CPP-ACP, fosfopeptídios de caseína e fosfato de cálcio amorfo –Recaldent ™); Grupo 5 (G5) GC Tooth Mousse Plus (CPP-ACP, fosfopeptídios de caseína e fosfato de cálcio amorfo –Recaldent ™ + 900 ppm de flúor); Grupo 6 (G6) solução aquosa de fluoreto de sódio (0,05%); Grupo 7 (G7) solução aquosa de nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio (0,375%) e Grupo 8 (G8) solução aquosa de nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio (0,375%) + flúor (0,05%). Foram obtidos os valores de XRF e MV antes e depois do tratamento. Durante um período experimental de 10 dias, os CPs foram submetidos a um processo cíclico de des-remineralização incluindo vários ataques diários com ácido cítrico 0,05M (pH 2,3), 6 vezes de 2 minutos ao dia, bem como as aplicações das soluções teste e períodos de remineralização em saliva artificial. O tempo entre os ciclos ...

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro by X-ray fluorescence technique (XRF), surface microhardness (SMH) and SEM the remineralizing effect of different bioactive principles.We used 58bovine incisors that were sectioned into fragments (CP) and randomly divided into 8 groups. All teeth were initially evaluated to obtain the count of elements phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) interpreted from a range of X-Ray Fluorescence obtained by Artax ™ 200 and to obtain the initial SMH. Over a 10-day experimental period, the enamel samples weresubjected to erosive demineralization that was performed by immersion in 250 ml 0.05 M citric acid (pH 2.3) for 6 X 2 min per day. Subsequently, the samples were rinsed with distilled water for 1 min and afterwards received the corresponding treatments Group 1 (G1) Positive control; Group 2 (G2) Experimental Desensibilize Nano P (nanoparticles of calcium hydroxyapatite); Group 3 (G3) Desensibilize Nano P (nanoparticles of calcium hydroxyapatite and Fluor); Group 4 (G4) Recaldent: GC Tooth Mousse (CPP-ACP fosfopeptídios casein and amorphous calcium phosphate-Recaldent ™), Group 5 (G5) GC Tooth Mousse (CPP-ACP fosfopeptides casein and amorphous calcium phosphate-Recaldent ™ and 900 ppm Fluor); Group 6 (G6) NaF aqueous solution; (G7) nanoHAp aqueous solution and Group 8 (G8) nanoHAp + NaF aqueous solution. The samples were rinsed again with distilled water for 1 min and stored in artificial saliva. The time between cycles was 1.5 h. In the control group, the samples were eroded 6 X 2 min per day and stored in artificial saliva. All CP were evaluated again. SEM images for surface analysis were obtained after treatment. Through statistical analysis by Student t test ( p = 0.05 ) , the following results were found: control group had a severe demineralization, there was an increase in the count of P in all treated groups except G1 , that was an increase in Ca count in all treated ...

Avaliação do potencial remineralizante de pastas e soluções com compostos bioativos no esmalte dental bovino submetido a ciclos de desafio erosivo / Remineralizing effectiveness of different bioactive principles in bovine enamel subjected to acidic challenges

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar in vitro por meio da Fluorescência de Raios X por Dispersão de Energia (XRF), Microdureza Vickers (MV) e Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV) o efeito remineralizante de diferentes princípios bioativos, tais quais, nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio (nanoHAp) associadas ou não a fluoreto, fosfopeptídeos de caseína do leite e fosfato de cálcio amorfo (CPP-ACP) associados ou não a fluoreto, fluoreto de sódio e saliva no esmalte dental bovino submetido a ciclagem des-remineralizante simulando lesão erosiva por alto desafio ácido. Foram obtidos 58 corpos de prova (CP) a partir de 58 incisivos bovinos que foram divididos aleatoriamente em 8 grupos, com 7 CP cada um e 2 CP para obtenção de imagem em MEV do esmalte hígido. Cada grupo foi denominado conforme os respectivos tratamentos a serem utilizados. Grupo 1 (G1) Controle; Grupo 2 (G2) Desensibilize Nano P experimental (nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio); Grupo 3 (G3) Desensibilize Nano P (nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio e flúor); Grupo4 (G4) GC Tooth Mousse (CPP-ACP, fosfopeptídios de caseína e fosfato de cálcio amorfo –Recaldent ™); Grupo 5 (G5) GC Tooth Mousse Plus (CPP-ACP, fosfopeptídios de caseína e fosfato de cálcio amorfo –Recaldent ™ + 900 ppm de flúor); Grupo 6 (G6) solução aquosa de fluoreto de sódio (0,05%); Grupo 7 (G7) solução aquosa de nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio (0,375%) e Grupo 8 (G8) solução aquosa de nanopartículas de hidroxiapatita de cálcio (0,375%) + flúor (0,05%). Foram obtidos os valores de XRF e MV antes e depois do tratamento. Durante um período experimental de 10 dias, os CPs foram submetidos a um processo cíclico de des-remineralização incluindo vários ataques diários com ácido cítrico 0,05M (pH 2,3), 6 vezes de 2 minutos ao dia, bem como as aplicações das soluções teste e períodos de remineralização em saliva artificial. O tempo entre os ciclos ...

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro by X-ray fluorescence technique (XRF), surface microhardness (SMH) and SEM the remineralizing effect of different bioactive principles.We used 58bovine incisors that were sectioned into fragments (CP) and randomly divided into 8 groups. All teeth were initially evaluated to obtain the count of elements phosphorus (P) and calcium (Ca) interpreted from a range of X-Ray Fluorescence obtained by Artax ™ 200 and to obtain the initial SMH. Over a 10-day experimental period, the enamel samples weresubjected to erosive demineralization that was performed by immersion in 250 ml 0.05 M citric acid (pH 2.3) for 6 X 2 min per day. Subsequently, the samples were rinsed with distilled water for 1 min and afterwards received the corresponding treatments Group 1 (G1) Positive control; Group 2 (G2) Experimental Desensibilize Nano P (nanoparticles of calcium hydroxyapatite); Group 3 (G3) Desensibilize Nano P (nanoparticles of calcium hydroxyapatite and Fluor); Group 4 (G4) Recaldent: GC Tooth Mousse (CPP-ACP fosfopeptídios casein and amorphous calcium phosphate-Recaldent ™), Group 5 (G5) GC Tooth Mousse (CPP-ACP fosfopeptides casein and amorphous calcium phosphate-Recaldent ™ and 900 ppm Fluor); Group 6 (G6) NaF aqueous solution; (G7) nanoHAp aqueous solution and Group 8 (G8) nanoHAp + NaF aqueous solution. The samples were rinsed again with distilled water for 1 min and stored in artificial saliva. The time between cycles was 1.5 h. In the control group, the samples were eroded 6 X 2 min per day and stored in artificial saliva. All CP were evaluated again. SEM images for surface analysis were obtained after treatment. Through statistical analysis by Student t test ( p = 0.05 ) , the following results were found: control group had a severe demineralization, there was an increase in the count of P in all treated groups except G1 , that was an increase in Ca count in all treated ...