Advanced age remains an achilles heel for liver resections.

BACKGROUND: As the general population is aging, surgery in elderly patients has become a major public health issue. This basic question is especially true for liver resection (LR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the operative risks of LR in the elderly. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a large recent and monocentric database of LR was performed between January 1, 2005 and May 31, 2011. Patients were categorized into three groups (<60, 60-74, and ≥75 years old) to analyze postoperative outcomes and 1-year mortality. Clinicopathologic factors likely to influence outcomes were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Altogether, 1,001 consecutive LRs were performed in 912 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years). The distribution of the LR by age was 372 (37.2 %), 477 (47.6 %), and 152 (15.2 %) in patients <60, 60-74, and ≥75 years, respectively. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 33.3 and 2.5 %, respectively. Age ≥75 years was independently associated with postoperative mortality [odds ratio (OR) 4.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.5-15.1; p = 0.008] and 1-year mortality (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.2-6.6; p = 0.015). The postoperative complication rate (p = 0.216) was not increased, even for major complications (p = 0.09). The other independent risk factors for mortality were a cirrhotic liver (p = 0.017), preoperative arterial chemoembolization (p = 0.001), caval vein clamping (p = 0.001), and intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Age beyond 75 years represent a risk factor of death after LR and should be avoided after chemoembolization or in cirrhotic patients. A specific assessment using geriatric indexes might be the key to success in this population.

Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, the impact on survival and the predictive factors of bile leakage (BL) in a recent large monocentric series of liver resections performed in a referral tertiary care centre. BACKGROUND: Previous reports dealing with bile leakage (BL) after liver resection are rare and have displayed conflicting results regarding incidence, impact on follow-up and predictive factors. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 912 patients who underwent a total of 1001 consecutive liver resections without biliary reconstruction, performed between January 2005 and May 2011. BL was defined by the presence of bile in the abdominal drains, a radiologically or surgically drained bilioma or biliary peritonitis. BL severity was established according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Fifty-eight pre-, per- and post-resection variables were analysed and the independent BL predictive factors were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of BL was 8%. Clavien-Dindo I-II, IIIa, IIIb or IV rates were 29%, 35%, 32.5% and 2.5%, respectively. BL did not increase in-hospital mortality (2.5% versus 2.9%, P = 1.0), but doubled the median duration of hospital stay (16 versus 9 days, P < 0.001) and increased 1-year mortality (11% versus 5%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified that pre-operative bevacizumab [odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, confidence interval (CI) 95% = 1.58-5.41] P = 0.001], a major hepatectomy [OR = 2.6 (CI 95% = 1.48-4.76) P = 0.001], a two-stage hepatectomy [OR = 2.5 (CI 95% = 1.17-5.52) P = 0.018], the selective clamping technique [OR = 2.6 (CI 95% = 1.03-6.78) P = 0.042], R1 or R2 resection [OR = 2.6 (CI 95% = 1.52-4.64) P = 0.001] and the absence of a methylene blue test [OR = 2.6 (IC 95% = 1.43-4.65) P = 0.002] were independent risk factors of BL. CONCLUSION: BL remains frequent after liver resection. It has a dramatic impact on patient survival and care costs. Its incidence could be reduced by avoiding the pre-operative use of bevacizumab, avoiding selective clamping and performing a blue dye test in all resections.

RAVEL: retrieval and visualization in ELectronic health records.

Because of the ever-increasing amount of information in patients' EHRs, healthcare professionals may face difficulties for making diagnoses and/or therapeutic decisions. Moreover, patients may misunderstand their health status. These medical practitioners need effective tools to locate in real time relevant elements within the patients' EHR and visualize them according to synthetic and intuitive presentation models. The RAVEL project aims at achieving this goal by performing a high profile industrial research and development program on the EHR considering the following areas: (i) semantic indexing, (ii) information retrieval, and (iii) data visualization. The RAVEL project is expected to implement a generic, loosely coupled to data sources prototype so that it can be transposed into different university hospitals information systems.

Optimization of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Targeting the Best Arterial Oxygen Transport in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The OPTIPEP Study.

The optimal setting for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilation remains controversial in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to determine the optimum PEEP level in ARDS, which we defined as the level that allowed the best arterial oxygen delivery (DO2). We conducted a physiologic multicenter prospective study on patients who suffering from ARDS according to standard definition and persistent after 6 hours of ventilation. The PEEP was set to 6 cm H2O at the beginning of the test and then was increased by 2 cm H2O after at least 15 minutes of being stabilized until the plateau pressure achieved 30 cm H2O. At each step, the cardiac output was measured by transesophageal echocardiography and gas blood was sampled. We were able to determine the optimal PEEP for 12 patients. The ratio of PaO2/FiO2 at inclusion was 131 ± 40 with a mean FiO2 of 71 ± 3%. The optimal PEEP level was lower than the higher PEEP despite a constant increase in SaO2. The optimal PEEP levels varied between 8 and 18 cm H2O. Our results show that in patients with ARDS the optimal PEEP differs between each patient and require being determined with monitoring.

The positive predictive value of guaiac faecal occult blood test in relation to the number of positive squares in two consecutive rounds of colorectal cancer screening.

The aim of this study was to define the positive predictive values of a positive guaiac faecal occult blood test according to the number of positive squares, in two consecutive rounds of colorectal cancer mass screening in a French region. A total of 4172 colonoscopies were analyzed. Sex, age, number of positive squares, and colonoscopic and histopathologic findings were studied. In the results obtained, 76.6% of positive tests were positive with one or two squares. The number of positive squares was not related to sex, age and rank of participation. The positive predictive value for cancers and adenomas increased significantly with age, sex (male) and number of positive squares from 6.6% (one to two squares) to 27.6% (five to six squares) and from 15.2% to 22.2%, respectively. Cancer was diagnosed 211 times (54.1%) and advanced neoplasia was diagnosed 696 times (65.3%) following positive tests with one to two squares. The TNM stage of cancer increased significantly with the number of positive squares: 85.8% of stages 0-1-2 for one to two positive squares and 66.3% for five to six positive squares (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of cancer and advanced neoplasia for male patients and aged persons. The number of positive squares significantly increased the risk of cancer (odds ratio=4.6 for five to six positive squares) and the risk of advanced neoplasia (odds ratio=2.9). Age, sex and number of positive squares were independent predictive factors of positive guaiac faecal occult blood test. The proportion of TNM stages 3-4 was significantly higher in those with five to six positive squares. Performing a complete colonoscopy in every individual having a positive test, especially aged men with a high number of positive squares, should be a priority in any screening programme.