Editorial Commentary: There Is Value in Standardizing the Position of the Arm During Magnetic Resonance Imaging Arthrogram of the Shoulder When Evaluating for Suspected Instability (and It Doesn't Have to Be Painful to the Patient!).

Evaluating and treating a shoulder with suspected instability remains a challenge for all. Most authors and surgeons would agree that clinical history and physical examination of the patient are the most important aspects of this evaluation. Over the past 15 years, however, radiographic imaging has become a much more prevalent (and essential) component. Magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram has become the gold standard to evaluate a patient for suspected instability and is currently considered the most appropriate advanced study by the American College of Radiologists to do so in both traumatic and atraumatic presentations.

Risk factors for complications and return to the emergency department after interscalene block using liposomal bupivacaine for shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) has recently gained favor for use in interscalene regional blocks for shoulder surgery. While effective for pain relief, this does have adverse effects that can lead to postoperative emergency department (ED) visits. This study aimed to identify any patient risk factors that are associated with complications leading to ED return visits owing to interscalene blocks using Exparel before shoulder surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing shoulder surgery with an Exparel interscalene block in an 8-month period. For each patient, demographic information, comorbidities, type of block, postoperative complications, ED return visits, and readmissions were recorded. The 5-factor modified Frailty Index score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index score were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to identify risk factors associated with increased complications and return to the ED. RESULTS: Overall, 352 patients were included; most patients were men, were aged between 51 and 70 years, and had a body mass index of 25.0-35.0. Postoperative complications related to the Exparel interscalene block occurred in 58 patients (16.5%), including 37 minor complications (10.5%) and 21 major complications (6.0%) that led to return ED visits. Univariate analysis yielded American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = .03) as a significant predictor of minor complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis yielded ASA score (P = .096; odds ratio, 1.64) as trending toward being a significant risk factor for minor complications. Univariate analysis yielded age (P = .006), ASA score (P = .009), and Charlson Comorbidity Index score (P = .002) as significant predictors of major complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis yielded ASA score (P = .049; odds ratio, 2.25) as the only significant risk factor for major complications. CONCLUSION: Surgeons and anesthesiologists should strongly consider a patient's ASA score, in addition to his or her pulmonary and cardiac history, when deciding whether the patient is an appropriate candidate for an interscalene regional block using Exparel for shoulder surgery.

Surgeon-rated visualization in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized blinded controlled trial comparing irrigation fluid with and without epinephrine.

PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to compare surgeon-rated visualization in shoulder arthroscopy using irrigation fluid with and without epinephrine. METHODS: Eighty-three patients were randomized to receive irrigation fluid with (44 patients) or without (39 patients) epinephrine during their arthroscopic shoulder procedures. After each procedure, the blinded senior author (G.F.C.) evaluated visualization based on a visual analog scale (VAS), and all clinically important procedure variables were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-three arthroscopic shoulder procedures were included in the study. Fifty-four of these procedures were arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, allowing a subset analysis of this specific procedure. There was a significant difference, with improved visualization in the epinephrine group versus the group without epinephrine when comparing all procedures (P < .0001) and when comparing only rotator cuff repairs (P < .0001). However, there was no statistical difference in other clinically important variables, including operative time and amount of irrigation fluid used. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of epinephrine to irrigation fluid significantly improves surgeon-rated visualization in shoulder arthroscopy. Without an observed significant difference in operative time or volume of irrigation fluid used, the clinical significance of this improved visualization is unclear, and the use of irrigation fluid without epinephrine remains a viable option in the hands of an experienced surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, high-quality randomized controlled trial with statistically significant difference.

Bone density and its relation to the development of acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Postoperative acromial stress fracture is a troublesome postoperative complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our study aims to utilize routinely performed preoperative computed tomography scans to identify differences in the material properties of the acromion in patients who did and did not develop a postoperative acromial stress fracture. Methods: Treatment records and computed tomography scans for 99 reverse shoulder arthroplasties were collected. Scans were calibrated using a phantom and transferred for post-processing where the acromion, full scapula, and humeral head were isolated. The final segmented model was used to assess acromial volume and volumetric bone mineral density for each region of interest. Results: There was no association between age and volumetric bone mineral density in any region of interest (all R 2 ≤ 0.048, all p > 0.082). Patients who developed an acromial stress fracture were not significantly different from those who did not in terms of age, acromial volume, or acromial volumetric bone mineral density (all p > 0.559). Patients with known osteoporosis or osteopenia had slightly lower volumetric bone mineral density, but the differences were not significant (all p ≥ 0.072). Conclusion: Postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty cannot be predicted by computed tomography-derived volumetric bone mineral density or volume. These mechanical characteristics also do not predictably decrease with age or osteoporosis diagnosis.

The role of acromial morphometry in the development of acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are expanding, and postoperative acromial stress fractures are a troubling postoperative complication. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in acromial morphometry were present between cohorts with and without this complication. METHODS: A retrospective review of 101 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures met criteria for the study. A total of eight acromial measurements on preoperative computed tomography scans were performed in axial, coronal, and sagittal views. Postoperative acromial stress fractures were confirmed by computed tomography scan on six patients and classified by fracture type. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The median acromial thickness at the posterior and lateral half was significantly thinner in the fracture cohort compared to the non-fracture cohort. Fracture and non-fracture cohort measurements demonstrated a median lateral thickness of 6.8 and 8.7 mm (p = 0.010), respectively, and median posterior thickness of 7.6 and 9.5 mm (p = 0.008), respectively. There were no demographic differences between cohorts. DISCUSSION: Two acromial measurements (lateral and posterior thickness) were associated with the development of postoperative acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. These findings suggest that a thinner acromion in the lateral and posterior half is a risk factor for an acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

The operative treatment of shoulder pain in patients with a concurrent diagnosis of cervical spondylosis and shoulder dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Etiology of neck and shoulder pain may be multifactorial. When surgical intervention is indicated, the choice of whether to start with spine or shoulder surgery is an important clinical decision to make based on severity of pathologies, comorbidities, and patient preference. The literature includes with very few studies exploring the incidence or results of the surgical treatment paths followed in this clinical situation. This study compares patient-reported outcomes of patients with both cervical spine and shoulder pathology who underwent intervention for cervical, shoulder, or both pathologies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 154 charts at a single institution between 2009-2017 who had both cervical spine and shoulder pathology while undergoing operative intervention of one or both pathologies. For each patient, demographics, patient-perceived success, NRS pain scores, functional outcomes (Focus on Therapeutic Outcome scores and neck disability index scores), and post-operative opioid use were reported. RESULTS: Patient-reported success (P=0.85), NRS pain score decreases (P=0.45), all functional outcomes except for final external rotation range of motion (P=0.02), and post-operative opioid use (P=0.30) were similar when comparing only cervical spine to shoulder intervention. Success (P=1.00), NRS pain score decreases (P=0.37), both functional outcomes, and post-operative opioid use (P=0.08) were all similar when comparing patients who underwent cervical then shoulder intervention to shoulder then cervical intervention. Finally, statistical significance was found when comparing reported success (P=0.0004) but not NRS decreases (P=0.18), functional outcomes, or post-operative opioid use (P=0.43) in patients who underwent both operation types versus only one. CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcomes are seen when comparing isolated surgical intervention types and order of surgeries when undergoing both interventions. Multiple surgical intervention types, regardless of order, tends to result in higher rates of patient-reported success but similar post-operative outcomes compared to one.

Performance and Injury Characteristics of Pitchers Entering the Major League Baseball Draft After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) has been studied and shown to be a successful procedure for returning overhead athletes to sport. Many studies of Major League Baseball (MLB) players have shown high levels of return to play with successful statistical performance. No study has followed professional advancement of drafted pitchers who underwent UCLR as amateurs when compared with drafted pitchers who did not undergo the procedure before selection in the MLB draft. HYPOTHESIS: There would be no difference in professional advancement, statistical performance, or injury rate between the UCLR and control groups. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Thirty-eight pitchers with a UCLR as an amateur and 114 controls were identified in the MLB draft between 2006 and 2010. Highest level of professional baseball achieved was collected from all players, as well as statistical performance metrics including velocity, wins, earned run average (ERA), and walks and hits per inning pitched (WHIP). Additional data on future injuries were analyzed for days on the disabled list (DL), risk of being placed on the DL, and DL assignment for elbow injury. RESULTS: Thirteen of 38 UCLR pitchers reached the major league level (34.2%) compared with 29 of 114 (25.4%) control pitchers, which was not statically significant (P = .295). The UCLR and control groups were similar for average velocity, peak velocity, innings pitched, games, games started, innings per game, ERA, WHIP, wins, losses, saves, batters faced, and innings pitched per year, as well as hits, runs, home runs allowed, strikeouts, batters walked, and batters struck per inning. The UCLR group had a significantly increased rate of DL assignment when compared with controls (86.8% vs 64.0%; P = .008); however, days on DL (152.8 vs 135.6; P = .723) and DL assignment for elbow injury (45.5% vs 43.8%; P = .877) were similar. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the rate of professional advancement among pitchers drafted by the MLB who had undergone UCLR as amateurs compared with controls. Both groups had similar statistical performance. Pitchers in the UCLR group had an increased risk of DL assignment but no increase in the number of days on DL or risk of DL placement for elbow injury.

Coracoid fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a report of 2 cases.

Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is largely successful, there are still complications that require appropriate diagnostic workup and treatment. These 2 cases of patients with a coracoid fracture were encountered at 3 months and 15 months after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. One patient presented with new-onset pain in the coracoid region without significant functional deficit, and the other presented with functional deficit and complaint of a strange noise at the anterior aspect of the operative shoulder. While standard radiographs did not detect the fracture, computed tomography imaging was sufficient to establish the diagnosis. Ultimately, nonoperative management led to resolution of these symptoms.

Pectoralis major rupture in a 49-year-old woman.

Pectoralis major ruptures have been increasing in incidence over the past decade, most likely attributable to physical activities, such as sports and weight training. Men account for the vast majority of cases with elderly women making up the remaining small percentage. In this case report, we describe a pectoralis major rupture in a middle-aged woman that has never been documented and provide a brief review of the literature.

Traumatic obturator hip dislocation in a 9-year-old boy.

Traumatic hip dislocation is a rare but potentially devastating injury in a child. Although most hip dislocations are posterior, other variants have been described. An anterior dislocation in the pediatric population is uncommon and, to our knowledge, this is the first case of anterior-inferior (obturator) dislocation (ie, the femoral head lies in the obturator foramen), to be reported in the English-language literature. In this article, we describe the case of a young boy with a traumatic obturator hip dislocation treated conservatively with closed reduction and followed closely for 1 year. The patient did not develop any sequelae throughout the follow-up year. This case report, along with a review of the literature, will help guide clinicians in the care of patients with this rare injury.

Evaluation of reliability of the Mason classification for radial head fractures.

In the study reported here, we sought to determine the interobserver reliability and the intraobserver reproductibility of the Mason classification. We also evaluated the effect of having an external rotation oblique view on agreement in radiographic readings. Four readers reviewed 50 radial head fracture radiographs approximately 2 months apart. Half the radiographs had an anteroposterior view and a lateral view; the other half had an additional external rotation oblique view. There was a trend toward improved interobserver agreement in the 3-view radiographs. Three of the 4 readers demonstrated substantial intraobserver reproducibility, which was noted to be higher when 3 views were available.

Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty is a complex and challenging problem. Frequently, the defects encountered are irregular in size and shape. Since 1998, we have been using impaction bone allografting for constrained and unconstrained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. We prospectively studied the mid-term results of 48 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties with substantial bone loss treated with impaction allograft. Average followup was 3.8 years. Knee Society scores improved from a preoperative average of 57.0 to a postoperative average of 89.8 points (p < 0.001). Knee Society functional scores improved from a pre-operative average of 52.3 to a postoperative average of 80.3 points (p < 0.001). There have been no mechanical failures of the revisions and all radiographs have shown incorporation and remodeling of the bone graft. There were six complications out of the 42 revisions available for followup (14%); two periprosthetic fractures, one early infection salvaged with irrigation and antibiotics, one late infection resulting in fusion, and two patellar clunk syndromes. Though time consuming and technically demanding, impaction grafting for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty has excellent durability and versatility. It has become our preferred technique for the management of substantial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series).

Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Impaction bone grafting is an important tool in managing the irregularly sized and shaped bone defects observed in revision total knees. The technique is described in detail and includes tightly packing cancellous bone chips about an intramedullary stem and into the periprosthetic bone defects, then fully cementing a component in place. If needed, wire mesh can be used to contain bone defects. Results to date in 42 patients with 2 to 7 years of follow up are reported. They show the average flexion was 111 degrees; the final Knee Society score was 89 points, and there were no mechanical failures. There were 2 infections and 2 late periprosthetic fractures. The results have been encouraging, and this technique remains our procedure of choice for managing large bone defects in revision knee surgery.