Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Neurooncol ; 115(3): 429-35, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24037499

RESUMO

Interesting neurological and cytological response rates after intrathecal (i.t) liposomal cytarabine have been observed in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) from solid tumors. However, the potential use of those responses as early predictors of time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) is unexplored. 27 consecutive patients with LMC treated with 50 mg i.t liposomal cytarabine under compassionate drug use were retrospectively studied. All patients received i.t treatment every 2 weeks during induction and every 4 weeks during maintenance periods. Neurological and cytological responses were assessed before every liposomal cytarabine cycle. Most of the patients were female (17/27) diagnosed with breast cancer (15/27). A complete neurological response was seen among 11 % of the patients; partial response in 22 % of the patients; stable disease in 30 % of the patients and progressive disease in 37 % of them. Cytological assessment was available in 11/27 patients showing a 26 % complete response rate. The median time to neurological and cytological response was 15 days and 14 days, respectively. Patients showing a combined neurological and cytological response showed a significantly longer median TTP (122 vs. 3 days; p = 0.001) and OS (141 vs. 3 days; p = 0.002) compared to those showing both neurological and cytological progression. No grade 4 toxicities were recorded. According to these preliminary results, early neurological and cytological responses may be further studied as early predictors of TTP and OS in patients receiving i.t liposomal cytarabine for LMC.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Citarabina/efeitos adversos , Citodiagnóstico , Injeções Espinhais , Carcinomatose Meníngea/mortalidade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lipossomos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Carcinomatose Meníngea/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinomatose Meníngea/secundário , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/patologia , Prognóstico , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 11(2): 168-74, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23146567

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Small-cell carcinoma (SCC) comprises 1% of primary bladder tumors and approximately 2% of prostate neoplasms. Metastatic disease at diagnosis is common, and survival outcomes are extremely poor. There is controversy about the ideal clinical management of these patients. The neuron-specific enolase (NSE) serum levels have never been studied in patients with small-cell carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCCUT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the clinical outcome of 12 consecutive SCCUT patients treated during the past 10 years. We also study the NSE levels at diagnosis and during treatment. RESULTS: Patients with limited disease (LD) experienced a non-significant longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with extensive disease (ED) subjects. Patients with bladder SCC showed a significantly higher median PFS compared with prostate SCCUT patients (22 vs. 6 months; P = .034), although that difference did not impact on a significant longer OS. NSE levels decreased during chemotherapy administration in all patients with ED and baseline high levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our patients showed a poor prognosis as described in previous studies. A better outcome for patients with bladder SCC compared with prostate SCC could be suggested. Serum NSE levels should be further evaluated to prove its potential use in early diagnosis and treatment monitoring during chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Pequenas , Neoplasias Renais , Fosfopiruvato Hidratase/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/sangue , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/sangue , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/sangue , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Sistema Urinário/patologia
3.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 11(2): 78-84, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23260990

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frontline treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) consists of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. The median time to progression (TTP) from chemotherapy initiation is 6 to 8 months. Ketoconazole, a nonspecific cytochrome P17 inhibitor (CYP17i), blocks adrenal androgen synthesis. Low-dose ketoconazole (LDK), (200 mg three times daily [t.d.s]) has shown activity in mCRPC after progression to androgen deprivation. The role of a CYP17i after docetaxel treatment in the maintenance setting has been unexplored. METHODS: We identified 38 patients with mCRPC who showed progression to luteinizing hormone releasing-hormone agonists (LHRHa) and who were treated with a median of 7 cycles of frontline three-weekly docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) plus prednisone (10 mg/d) and LHRHa. Medical charts of 20 patients who showed no progression to docetaxel were reviewed. After the last docetaxel cycle, 10 patients received LDK maintenance treatment plus prednisone (10 mg/d) and LHRHa, whereas 10 patients received LHRHa alone. TTP was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 27 months, disease in all patients receiving LHRHa alone progressed, whereas 8/10 patients progressed to maintenance therapy. Median TTP from docetaxel initiation was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-16.6) for maintenance therapy and 9.2 months (95% CI, 8.5-9.9) for LHRHa alone (P = .047). The maintenance treatment was well tolerated. Only 1 patient experienced a grade 4 adverse event due to a nonsymptomatic pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating a CYP17i for maintenance therapy after docetaxel therapy. We showed a 2-month significant benefit in TTP for patients with mCRPC treated with LDK maintenance therapy after docetaxel, with a favorable toxicity profile. A large prospective randomized study using a CYP17i is warranted.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cetoconazol/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroide 17-alfa-Hidroxilase/antagonistas & inibidores , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de 14-alfa Desmetilase/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de 14-alfa Desmetilase/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Cetoconazol/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA