Feasibility and Acceptability of Standardizing Portions in Restaurants.

Most restaurants serve customers excess calories which significantly contributes to the obesity epidemic. This pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of offering customers standardized portions to reduce caloric consumption when dining out in three restaurants. Portions were developed to limit quantity of food served, with lunches and dinners ≤ 700 cal and breakfast ≤ 500 cal. Participating restaurants developed an alternative "Balanced Portions Menu." Training and instructions were provided with respect to the volume and weight of food to be plated following the standardized guidelines and providing at least one cup of vegetables per lunch/dinner. We invited local residents to help us evaluate the new menu. We monitored restaurant adherence to guidelines, obtained feedback from customers, and incentivized customers to complete dietary recalls to determine how the new menus might have impacted their daily caloric consumption. Of the three participating restaurants, all had a positive experience after creating the new menus and received more foot traffic. One restaurant that did not want to change portion sizes simply plated the appropriate amount and packed up the rest to-go, marketing the meals as "Dinner today, lunch tomorrow." Two of the restaurants followed the guidelines precisely, while one sometimes plated more rice than the three-fourths cup that was recommended. A significant number of customers ordered from the Balanced Portions menus. Two of the three restaurants have decided to keep offering the Balanced Portions menus indefinitely. Following standardized portions guidelines is both feasible for restaurants and acceptable to customers.

Food prescription pilots: feasibility, acceptability and affordability of improving diet through menu planning and grocery delivery.

BACKGROUND: Lack of adherence is a primary reason people fail to maintain a healthy diet or lose weight. Multiple environmental factors, including aggressive marketing and convenience of nutrient-poor food, undermine people's best intentions. The aim was to assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact of food prescriptions in which participants' exposure to commercial food outlets is reduced, because the groceries are delivered with weekly menu plans and recipes. METHODS: This is a series of pre-post pilot proof-of-concept studies. We recruited 37 members of Kaiser Permanente interested in improving their diet or losing weight. Weekly meal plans meeting more than 90% of recommended dietary allowances were designed to be low cost, in line with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) allowances. Five separate pilots targeted different populations. Participants were required to provide 24-h dietary recalls (ASA24) before and during the interventions. Weight management pilot participants had height, weight and blood pressure measured before and after 4-week pilots and followed sustainability guidelines, limiting meat and dairy. RESULTS: Across pilots, the healthy eating index improved (+21.1 points; 95% CI [confidence interval] 15.9, 26.3). For the weight management pilots, most participants lost weight (average 10.3 lbs for men, 5.7 lbs for women; 95% CI -10.2, -5.4). The majority of participants liked the programme and considered it the easiest weight loss programme they ever tried. CONCLUSIONS: These pilots suggest that meal planning and grocery delivery can be affordable and acceptable and could ultimately have a major impact on diet-related chronic diseases. Longer-term studies are needed to confirm how long compliance will endure.

An exploration of customers' perceptions, preferences, experiences, and feasibility of offering standardized portions in restaurants.

Excess caloric intake increases the risk of weight gain, and diet-related chronic diseases. Restaurants play an integral role in the portions of food people consume. Standardization of portion sizes in restaurants can help customers recognize appropriate portions. Through customer interviews, we aimed to assess and understand the feasibility, perceptions, and acceptability of standardized portions in restaurants. Kaiser Permanente partnered with three restaurants in Southern California to create alternative menu options of meals that would not exceed 700 calories. Kaiser Permanente members who lived within a 5-mile radius of the restaurants were informed through email about the study. Customers (N=33), who dined at one of the restaurants participated in a one-on-one semi-structured interview. Interviews were recorded, typed, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes emerged from the analysis: 1) Customers perceive standard portions as a better choice and the benefits outweigh regular portions; 2) Individual and restaurant-related factors may influence portion preferences; 3) Restaurant portions are perceived to be in excess of what customers need; and 4) Portion standardization is an evolving area for restaurants. Our findings suggest positive perceptions and acceptance of standardized portions among restaurant customers. Customer awareness and restaurant standardization procedures can improve customers' dining experience.