Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 68(5): 715-720, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29885168

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of myrtus communis L. solution in the treatment of dandruff and to compare it with ketoconazole. METHODS: This double-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, from December 2015 to August 2016, and comprised patients with dandruff aged 18-60 years visiting the dermatology out-patient clinic. The subjects were randomised into two equal groups. The treatment group received myrtus communis L. solution and a placebo shampoo, while the control group received ketoconazole shampoo and a placebo solution. The total duration of the study for each subject was one month and subjects in both groups used their respective interventions 8 times during that period. The parameters studied were pruritus, erythema, severity of scaling, and the extent of scalp involvement. All subjects underwent scalp scaling tests at the beginning, after 10 days and at the end of the 30th day. SPSS 21 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 90 individuals, there were 45(50%) in each of the two groups. However, 74(82%) subjects completed the third visit and, of them, there were 37(50%) in each group. Both groups showed significant improvement in all outcome measures (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of efficacy, satisfaction rate and side effects (p>0.05 for each outcome). CONCLUSIONS: Myrtus solution was found to be effective in the treatment of dandruff.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Caspa/tratamento farmacológico , Cetoconazol/uso terapêutico , Myrtus , Fitoterapia , Preparações de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antifúngicos/efeitos adversos , Caspa/complicações , Método Duplo-Cego , Eritema/etiologia , Feminino , Preparações para Cabelo/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Cetoconazol/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Fitoterapia/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Prurido/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
2.
Complement Ther Med ; 52: 102440, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetic and antinociceptive activity of eugenol, as the main ingredient of clove, was determined in previous researches. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of its topical nanoemulsion gel vs. placebo in controlling pain caused by arteriovenous fistula (AVF) needling in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). DESIGN: In this double-blinded cross-over trial, the patients were randomly allocated to eugenol gel 4% (n = 34) and placebo gel (n  = 34) groups. For each patient, a tip of finger unit of gel was applied 2 cm around the insertion site of hemodialysis needles. After 10 min, AVF needling was done. AVF needling-related pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) immediately after the puncture. All patients were tested at three different states: (1) before using any intervention; (2) after using either the eugenol or placebo gel; and (3) after crossing over the groups. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the mean of patients' pain severity score in the three states (p = 0.001). It was reported as low as 3.29 ±â€¯0.67 in patients who received eugenol nanoemulsion. Also, the highest pain severity score (5.03 ±â€¯0.57) was reported at the no-intervention state. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that topical application of eugenol nanoemulsion may significantly decrease AVF cannulation related pain intensity score in patients undergoing HD. However, further studies with larger sample size and longer intervention period should be done for better judgment on its efficiency and safety.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Eugenol/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor/prevenção & controle , Diálise Renal , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor
3.
Acta Med Hist Adriat ; 13 Suppl 2: 103-14, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26959635

RESUMO

Although the development of modern medicine has helped us detect and treat diseases better than in the past, especially in the field of surgery; the history of medicine may be a trigger that can help us use neglected aspects of prior knowledge for the advancement of modern-day science. Since historical papers that have specifically focused on anorectal diseases are rare, but those that exist contain brief discussions in this field, the current study aims to present a detailed review of Avicenna's approach to anorectal diseases. Therefore, we reviewed On the Diseases of the Anus, the 17th chapter of the third volume of the Canon of Medicine written by Avicenna, and compared his views on the classification and diagnosis of, and the approach to anorectal diseases with that of modern proctology. Avicenna discussed in detail about anorectal diseases such as hemorrhoid, fissure, perianal abscess and fistula, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence, and pruritus ani. In addition, we introduce herbs which Avicenna used to treat these diseases. Our findings show that Avicenna's views on the classification and diagnosis of, and the approach to anorectal diseases have few fundamental differences with modern medicine. In addition, the pharmacological effects of some of the herbs that were recommended by Avicenna, and are used in current medicine are proven. Thus the Medieval knowledge can be further scientifically investigated to develop new therapeutic options for anorectal diseases.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus/história , Doenças Retais/história , Doenças do Ânus/terapia , História Medieval , Humanos , Pérsia , Doenças Retais/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA