Appraising Indigenous cultural safety within healthcare: Protocol of a scoping review of reviews.

AIM: The objective of this scoping review of reviews will be to synthesize the existing literature to identify key elements, conceptualizations and interventions of cultural safety to improve healthcare for Indigenous Peoples. DESIGN: Eligible studies will include reviews (e.g. scoping reviews, systematic reviews and narrative reviews) focused on Indigenous cultural safety in healthcare. METHODS: Guided by Weber-Pillwax's Indigenous principles of relationality and Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, a review of reviews will be conducted by searching peer-reviewed literature published between January 2010 and December 2020. The database search will include CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. This scoping review protocol was registered with the Joanna Briggs Institute on January 28, 2021. DISCUSSION: There is a paucity of knowledge on existing interventions and implementation strategies to support Indigenous cultural safety within the healthcare system. Improving Indigenous cultural safety in healthcare requires a comprehensive understanding of its core components and the specific interventions. IMPACT: This review will help guide future research and enhance cultural safety interventions for Indigenous Peoples, including Indigenous Peoples with diverse genders and sexualities. The findings from this review will provide critical insight and knowledge to inform cultural safety policies, programs and practices to support healthcare for Indigenous populations.

Indigenous-specific cultural safety within health and dementia care: A scoping review of reviews.

Globally, health inequities experienced by Indigenous communities are often described and documented in terms of deficits and disease. However, health disparities are complex and involve numerous underlying issues beyond the social determinants of health. Indigenous Peoples face unique barriers to accessing culturally safe and equitable healthcare, including racism, systemic injustice, and a historical legacy of colonialism. There is a paucity of knowledge on Indigenous-specific cultural safety interventions to support health and dementia care. The objective of this scoping review of reviews was to appraise the existing literature to identify key elements, conceptualizations, and interventions of cultural safety to improve health services and dementia care for Indigenous Peoples. Guided by Indigenous principles of relationality, we conducted a scoping review of reviews published between January 2010 to December 2020. We searched CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Given the limited literature focusing specifically on Indigenous people with dementia, our inclusion criteria focused broadly on Indigenous cultural safety in healthcare. A collaborative and relational rights-based approach co-led by Indigenous cisgender, Two-Spirit, and non-Indigenous cisgender health care providers was used to re-center Indigenous ways of knowing. A total of seventeen articles met our inclusion criteria. Our review identified a range of cultural safety themes from education initiatives to collaborative partnerships with Indigenous communities. Themes emerged at three levels: person-centered/individual level, health practitioner/student level, and healthcare organizational level. Few reviews described specific interventions, implementation strategies, evaluation methods, or the concept of sex and gender to improve cultural safety in healthcare delivery. Findings from this review can help to inform future research, inspire innovative collaborative methodologies, and enhance cultural safety interventions. In moving forward, there is an urgent need for anti-racism education, self-determination, and authentic partnerships to achieve Indigenous-specific cultural safety inclusive of sex and gender considerations in health and dementia care.

Advancing virtual primary care for people with opioid use disorder (VPC OUD): a mixed-methods study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of COVID-19 introduced a dual public health emergency in British Columbia, which was already in the fourth year of its opioid-related overdose crisis. The public health response to COVID-19 must explicitly consider the unique needs of, and impacts on, communities experiencing marginalisation including people with opioid use disorder (PWOUD). The broad move to virtual forms of primary care, for example, may result in changes to healthcare access, delivery of opioid agonist therapies or fluctuations in co-occurring health problems that are prevalent in this population. The goal of this mixed-methods study is to characterise changes to primary care access and patient outcomes following the rapid introduction of virtual care for PWOUD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a fully integrated mixed-methods design comprised of three components: (a) qualitative interviews with family physicians and PWOUD to document experiences with delivering and accessing virtual visits, respectively; (b) quantitative analysis of linked, population-based administrative data to describe the uptake of virtual care, its impact on access to services and downstream outcomes for PWOUD; and (c) facilitated deliberative dialogues to co-create educational resources for family physicians, PWOUD and policymakers that promote equitable access to high-quality virtual primary care for this population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for this study has been granted by Research Ethics British Columbia. We will convene PWOUD and family physicians for deliberative dialogues to co-create educational materials and policy recommendations based on our findings. We will also disseminate findings via traditional academic outputs such as conferences and peer-reviewed publications.

Truth before reconciliation, antiracism before cultural safety.

BackgroundCultural safety has been a constituent in nursing education for more than two decades. As evidence of racism and interpersonal violence in the health care system is mounting there is speculation on the meaning of cultural safety for nurses working in the field and with Indigenous peoples regarding the clarity of its intent. Objectives: Discussion Paper to revisit the foundation of Ramsden's work and articulate the rationale for specific antiracist language. Conclusions: Antiracist practice is a necessity for cultural safety to be successful. Impact Statement: Nurse educators must clarify the intention of cultural safety to explicitly include antiracist language, skills-based training, and pedagogy building on critical race theory.