RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists as to whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients should be told their diagnosis, yet no research has been done examining older patients' attitudes on this topic. This study examines patient's attitudes toward this topic. DESIGN: A prospective, community-based study. Participants read vignettes of two patients, one with AD and one with terminal cancer, and then answered questions regarding their attitudes toward these illnesses. SETTING: A community-based retirement community in Charlottesville, Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six community-dwelling older persons (mean age 79.7 +/- 6.9 years). MEASUREMENTS: A structured questionnaire disclosed demographic data (age, sex, race, religion, marital status), personal experience with cancer and AD, and opinions about being told the diagnosis of these diseases. RESULTS: Most participants (n = 124, 79.5%) responded that they would prefer to know if they had AD, but the number was significantly fewer (Fischer exact test, P < .001) than those who would want to know if they had terminal cancer (n = 143, 91.7%) Interestingly, significantly fewer married subjects would want their spouse to know if the spouse had either illness. Only 65.7% (n = 69) of subjects would want their spouse to know if the spouse had AD (Fisher exact test, P = .008), whereas for cancer, 80.2% (n = 77) would want their spouse to know if the spouse had cancer (Fisher exact test P < .001). No demographic variables distinguished subjects who did from those who did not want to know the diagnosis for themselves or their spouses for either AD or cancer. Among the reasons some subjects gave for wanting to know of the diagnosis of AD was being able to consider suicide. CONCLUSION: Although these results may support disclosure of diagnosis for most patients with AD, clinical and ethical issues remain in individual cases.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Demografia , Feminino , Habitação para Idosos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , VirginiaRESUMO
Too often, the role of nursing in geriatric neurorehabilitation is defined in terms of extending the care of other disciplines and assuring continuity of selected aspects of care over 24 hours. This article argues that nursing has made significant clinical and scientific progress in contributing, independently and interdependently, to quality rehabilitation care for older adults; and that the role of nursing clearly exceeds the realm of mere extension and continuity of care. Reviewed are nursing's innovations in the areas of promoting comprehensive assessment; fostering functional independence, self-care, and self-care agency; enhancing communication; encouraging family involvement; improving cognitive status; and assuring quality physical care. We conclude with a discussion of the relationship of nursing to other disciplines, and how nursing's contributions can be optimized within the broader context of multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation.
RESUMO
This study compared the conceptual foci and methodological characteristics of research projects which tested the effects of nursing interventions, published in four general nursing research journals with predominantly North American, and two with predominantly European/International authorship and readership. Dimensions and variables of comparison included: nature of subjects, design issues, statistical methodology, statistical power, and types of interventions and outcomes. Although some differences emerged, the most striking and consistent finding was that there were no statistically significant differences (and thus similarities) in the content foci and methodological parameters of the intervention studies published in both groups of journals. We conclude that European/International and North American nursing intervention studies, as reported in major general nursing research journals, are highly similar in the parameters studied, yet in need of overall improvement. Certainly, there is no empirical support for the common (explicit or implicit) ethnocentric American bias that leadership in nursing intervention research resides with and in the United States of America.
Assuntos
Pesquisa em Enfermagem , Enfermagem , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , América do Norte , Pesquisa em Enfermagem/classificação , Pesquisa em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos de Amostragem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Alzheimer's disease creates various demands in terms of community-based and institutional long-term care resources and services needed for patients, caregivers, and families. Nurses play a pivotal role in helping patients, caregivers, and families decide what resources and services are needed. The determinants involved in the decision-making process related to short-term and long-term care options are described. Next, the home, community, and institutional care environments are reviewed. Finally, policy recommendations related to care environments for Alzheimer's patients are discussed.