Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(7): 1230-1236, 2022 04 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34218280

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated differences in oral human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence by sex and race/ethnicity. In this study, we examined the impact of vaccination on these disparities. METHODS: We examined participants aged 18-59 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2011 to 2016 who reported their HPV vaccination status and submitted an adequate oral sample (N = 9437). Oral prevalence of HPV, grouped by any, low-risk, high-risk, 4 valent (4v) HPV, 9 valent (9v) HPV, and nonvaccine types, was examined by sex, race/ethnicity, and vaccination status. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios by vaccination status. Multivariable logistic regression models controlled for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The prevalence of any, nonvaccine, low-risk, high-risk, 4vHPV, and 9vHPV types was higher among males than females, even among vaccinated participants. Examination of racial/ethnic differences demonstrated differences in all HPV groups among unvaccinated males and among low-risk types in females. In all but the 2 vaccine-type groups, the prevalence of oral HPV was notably higher among Black males compared with other groups. Significant differences were not observed by race/ethnicity among vaccinated males or females. CONCLUSIONS: Males tested positive for oral HPV more frequently than females, even among those vaccinated. This may have resulted from a lower frequency of males being vaccinated before initiating oral sex than females. Vaccination of males at the recommended age, therefore, may decrease differences in oral HPV by sex. Racial/ethnic differences were observed only in unvaccinated individuals, suggesting these disparities will decrease as more individuals are vaccinated.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Vacinação
2.
Prev Med ; 164: 107228, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057389

RESUMO

Initial uptake of the cancer-preventative human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in the US was slow, especially among adolescent males. To address this, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) partnered with the Hager Sharp communications development company to launch a national campaign in 2015 to improve physician counseling and rebrand the vaccine as cancer prevention. In this study, we compared HPV vaccination rates among 13-17-year-old males before (2010-2014) and after (2015-2019) the CDC-Hager Sharp campaign using National Immunization Survey-Teen data to determine the potential impact of this campaign on improving vaccine uptake among adolescent males. Employing provider-verified vaccination data available for 49,644 males from 2010 to 2014 and 47,943 males from 2015 to 2019, we found that the adjusted prevalence ratios of 13-17-year-old males who initiated and completed the vaccine series increased approximately 5-fold between the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 periods. Increases in post-campaign initiation/completion rates were greatest among respondents with mothers who were married or had attended college, respondents who lived in the Northeast or Midwest, and those from households with annual incomes > $75,000. Together, these data suggest that the campaign contributed to the observed increase in HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent males. Although sociodemographic disparities were identified, the greater improvement in vaccination rates observed among individuals with higher socio-demographic status may simply reflect their relatively poorer rates of initial vaccine uptake. Overall, the data suggest that provider-targeted campaigns can be a useful tool to boost vaccinations and should be considered for inclusion in future vaccination campaigns.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Adolescente , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Imunização
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1625-1633, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33983416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Genital and oral cancers are often caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) types that can be prevented through HPV vaccination. Since HPV is sexually transmitted, knowledge of penile prevalence of vaccine-type HPV among US males can help predict potential disparities in these cancers. This study examines penile HPV prevalence by age and race/ethnicity among males. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Using data from penile swab samples collected from males between 2013 and 2016, the prevalence of 4vHPV and 9vHPV vaccine types was examined across age groups and by race/ethnicity. Logistic regression models adjusting for demographics, sexual behavior, and circumcision were examined to determine whether associations remained after accounting for confounders. RESULTS: Among 2548 males evaluated, HPV infection prevalence differed by race/ethnicity, with Black males exhibiting a higher prevalence of HPV. Examination of 4vHPV type prevalence by age group showed that 18-26-year-old males had a lower prevalence than older age groups. After controlling for confounders, 4vHPV prevalence was only significantly elevated among 27-34-year-old males, those who were single, and males with ≥3 lifetime sex partners. In adjusted models, 9vHPV type prevalence remained elevated among Black males compared with White males. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in 9vHPV type prevalence between Black and White individuals indicate future disparities in HPV-related genital cancers may continue in the United States during the next decade. Revaccinating certain populations with the 9vHPV vaccine may be appropriate to help mitigate this.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Etnicidade , Genitália , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 62(11): 1367-1374, 2016 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26962079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given high rates of anal disease, we investigated the natural history of high-risk anal human papillomavirus (HPV) among a multinational group of men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 18-64 years. METHODS: Anal specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-negative men from Brazil, Mexico, and the United States were genotyped. Over 2 years, 406 MSM provided evaluable specimens every 6 months for ≥2 visits. These men were stratified into men who have sex only with men (MSOM, n = 70) and men who have sex with women and men (MSWM, n = 336). Persistence was defined as ≥12 months' type-specific duration and could begin with either a prevalent or incident infection. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Poisson regression. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 2.1 years. Retention was 82%. Annual cumulative incidence of 9-valent vaccine types was 19% and 8% among MSOM and MSWM, respectively (log-rank P = .02). Duration of anal HPV did not differ for MSOM and MSWM and was a median of 6.9 months for HPV-16 after combining men from the 2 groups. Among men with prevalent high-risk infection (n = 106), a total of 36.8%, retained the infection for at least 24 months. For those with prevalent HPV-16 (n = 27), 29.6% were persistent for at least 24 months. Persistence of high-risk HPV was associated with number of male anal sex partners and inversely associated with number of female sex partners. CONCLUSIONS: MSM with prevalent high-risk HPV infection should be considered at increased risk for nontransient infection.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus/epidemiologia , Doenças do Ânus/virologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , América/epidemiologia , Canal Anal/virologia , Bissexualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , DNA Viral/análise , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Infect Dis ; 212(2): 202-12, 2015 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649172

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative men having sex with men (MSM) bear a substantial burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated disease, prospective studies of genital HPV infection in this population are scarce. METHODS: HPV genotyping was conducted on genital samples from men (aged 18-70 years) from Brazil, Mexico, or the United States who provided specimens at 6-month intervals for up to 4 years. Eligibility criteria included no history of genital warts or HIV infection. Evaluable specimens were collected from 564 MSM and 3029 men having sex with women (MSW). Incidence and clearance estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The 12-month cumulative incidence of genital HPV was high in both MSM (25%; 95% confidence interval, 21%-30%) and MSW (21%; 20%-23%). After stratifying by city, MSM and MSW incidence rates were comparable, with 3 exceptions where MSM had higher incidence in ≥1 city: the group of quadrivalent vaccine types, HPV-45, and HPV-11. Median times to HPV-16 clearance were also comparable, with point estimates of >6 months for both MSM and MSW. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike with many other sexually transmitted infections, genital HPV natural history may be similar in HIV-negative MSM and MSW. Study periods of ≤6 months, however, may not be long enough to accurately measure the persistence of these infections in men.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Doenças Virais Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Bissexualidade , Feminino , Heterossexualidade , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/transmissão , Doenças Virais Sexualmente Transmissíveis/transmissão , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Infect Dis ; 209(7): 1007-15, 2014 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24253288

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Published data are equivocal about the relative rates of male-to-female and female-to-male human papillomavirus (HPV) transmission. Our objective was to estimate genital HPV incidence among heterosexual partners from a broad age range and to investigate the effects of monogamy and relationship duration on incidence. METHODS: HPV genotyping was conducted for heterosexual partners, aged 18-70 years, from Tampa, Florida, who provided genital exfoliated cell specimens at semiannual visits during a 2-year study. The rate of incident HPV detection was assessed for 99 couples, and transmission incidence was estimated among a subset of 65 discordant couples. We also evaluated the effect of monogamy and relationship duration on transmission incidence. RESULTS: Couples were followed up for a median of 25 months and had a mean age of 33 years for both sexes. The HPV type-specific transmission incidence rate was 12.3 (95% confidence interval, 7.1-19.6) per 1000 person-months for female-to-male transmission and 7.3 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-13.5) per 1000 person-months for male-to-female transmission. Regardless of monogamy status or relationship duration, there was a similar pattern of increased incident HPV detection among men compared with women. CONCLUSIONS: HPV may be transmitted more often from women to men than from men to women, suggesting a need for prevention interventions, such as vaccination, for men.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/transmissão , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Genótipo , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Front Oncol ; 12: 926555, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924171

RESUMO

Background: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was approved in 2006 and has been shown to decrease vaccine-related HPV types in the oropharynx. Its impact on the incidence of HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has not been examined. We investigated the impact of HPV vaccination on the incidence of HPV-related OPSCC in the US among male and female adults from different age groups. Methods: The US Cancer Statistics 2001-2018 database and the National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program were used in this study. OPSCC incidence was age-adjusted to the US standard population in 2000. Cause-specific 5-year survival probability was calculated using 60 monthly intervals in SEER*Stat software. Results: Incidence of HPV-related OPSCC was much higher in males than in females. Age-adjusted annual incidence of OPSCC was significantly lower in 2014-2018 than in 2002-2006 among males 20-44 years old (11.4 vs 12.8 per 1,000,000, rate ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.84-0.93) and among females 20-44 years old (3.0 vs 3.6 per 1,000,000, rate ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.95), but increased in both 45-64 year old and 65+ year old males and females. Joinpoint regression revealed a significant joint in the HPV-OPSCC incidence trend for 20-44-year-old males in 2008 at which time the incidence began to decrease. Except for 20-44 year old females (74.8% in 2002-2006 vs. 75.7% in 2009-2013, p=0.84), cancer-specific 5-year survivals significantly improved for males and females of all age groups. Conclusions: HPV-related OPSCC was much more common in males. Incidence of HPV-related OPSCC declined among young adults during the vaccination era compared with pre-vaccination era. Cancer-specific 5-year survival was significantly improved in young males but not in young females.

8.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 15(11): 777-784, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35969832

RESUMO

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was indicated for the prevention of vulvovaginal cancers in 2008, but its impact on the incidence of vulvar cancers within the US is unknown. To determine this, we conducted a secondary analysis of 88,942 vulvar cancer cases among women 20+ years old using the US Cancer Statistics 2001-2018 databases. Data were stratified by tumor behavior (in situ or invasive), age (20-44, 45-64, 65+ years old), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic), and US census region (Northeast, South, Midwest, West), and incidence rates and average annual percentage changes (AAPC) were calculated by group. Reversing previous trends, the incidence of vulvar carcinoma in situ significantly decreased between 2001 and 2018 among women from all age groups, races/ethnicities, and regions (combined AAPC,  -4.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.7 to -3.8). The incidence of invasive vulvar squamous cell carcinoma decreased significantly among 20- to 44-year-old women (AAPC, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.3), but significantly increased among those 45 to 64 (AAPC, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-2.8) and 65+ years old (AAPC, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4). Regardless of tumor behavior, incidence was highest among non-Hispanic Whites and the Midwest region. Overall, the significant declines in vulvar carcinoma in situ among all ages, as well as invasive vulvar cancer among younger women, are encouraging and complement other recent data suggesting HPV vaccinations are already reducing anal and cervical cancer incidence. Over time, further declines in vulvar carcinoma incidence are likely as uptake and completion rates of the HPV vaccine increase in the US. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: We found evidence that HPV vaccinations likely contributed to a decrease in the incidences of vulvar carcinoma in situ and invasive vulvar carcinoma among 20- to 44-year-old women between 2001 and 2018. Our data add to the growing evidence that HPV vaccinations are reducing the incidence of HPV-related anogenital cancers.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Carcinoma in Situ , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias Vulvares , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Neoplasias Vulvares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Vulvares/complicações , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiologia , Carcinoma in Situ/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(9): 2914-2918, 2021 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34081572

RESUMO

Data are needed on the acceptability of Covid-19 vaccination among young, low-income, diverse populations. To assess this, we surveyed 18-45-year-old women on their intent to be vaccinated, experiences with Covid-19, and uptake of other vaccines. Among the 342 who completed the survey, only one-third were likely to accept the Covid-19 vaccine as soon as it was available. Less than half would accept it even if recommended by their doctor. Most (69%) wanted more information on its safety and 48% wanted proof it works. Likelihood of accepting the vaccine with a doctor's recommendation was associated with fear of catching Covid-19 and exposure to social media as well as HPV and annual flu vaccination. This demonstrates it will be necessary to help vaccine-hesitant individuals overcome their concerns to reach herd immunity in the US. Physician recommendation and social media may play important roles.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2 , Texas , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(7): 1952-1960, 2021 07 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517843

RESUMO

Provider recommendation is a primary reason for patient uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Most provider-focused educational interventions are focused on physicians, even though nurses are also important sources of vaccine-related information for their patients. This study examined whether a HPV educational intervention could improve nursing students' HPV knowledge, beliefs, and comfort with counseling. The same lecture on HPV and HPV vaccination was given to both medical and nursing students. To determine the effects of the lecture, students were asked to complete identical pre- and post-lecture tests with questions on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and comfort with counseling on the HPV vaccine. Pre- and post-lecture test scores were compared between nursing and medical students to assess whether there were differences in pre-lecture test scores and/or changes in post-lecture test scores. On the pre-lecture tests, fewer nursing students responded correctly to knowledge questions, indicated positive attitudes or comfort with counseling about the HPV vaccine compared to medical students. However, similar frequencies of nursing and medical students responded correctly to knowledge questions and indicated a positive attitude, as well as a high comfort level with counseling on the post-lecture tests. Study results show that integrating lectures in a nursing program curriculum could be a feasible way to increase students' HPV knowledge. Having health-care providers with similar levels of knowledge, attitudes, and comfort with counseling on HPV vaccination is ideal, as all share the responsibility of recommending the vaccine to patients.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Estudantes de Enfermagem , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação
11.
Cancer Med ; 9(14): 5272-5280, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32483924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has occurred unequally across the United States, potentially contributing to uneven vaccine-type HPV prevalence between regions. We examined whether emerging vaccine-related herd protection exhibits regional differences among unvaccinated girls and women. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of vaginal HPV among women 14-59 years of age from 2003 to 2014 using repeated cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Women who provided an adequate vaginal swab sample were included. Vaginal prevalence of vaccine-type HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) were examined in four regions of the United States between 2003 and 2014. We examined vaccine-type HPV prevalence in 2007-2014 in each US census region among younger participants (14-34 years old) stratified by vaccination status to determine whether one or both groups contributed to uneven HPV prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 12 175 participants 14-59 years of age met inclusion criteria. Vaccine-type HPV prevalence decreased in all regions. Vaccine-type HPV varied by region only among unvaccinated 14-34 year olds, with a higher prevalence in the Midwest (13.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7-17.0) and South (12.5%, 95% CI: 10.2-14.8) compared to the Northeast (8.9%, 95% CI: 6.5-11.2). No regional variation in vaccine-type HPV prevalence was observed among vaccinated participants. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prevalence of vaccine-type HPV among unvaccinated women in the South and Midwest may contribute to regional disparities in HPV-related cancer incidence, as emerging herd immunity may not be as strong in those regions.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/imunologia , Imunidade Coletiva/imunologia , Imunização/métodos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
12.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(5): 1139-1144, 2020 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809635

RESUMO

Many medical students are not comfortable recommending the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine because they do not feel prepared to discuss it with their patients. A prior study demonstrated that this is particularly a problem among unvaccinated students. Our purpose was to determine if medical student attitudes and comfort with counseling could be improved by attending a single lecture delivered by an expert on the topic. To assess the effects of the educational program, we conducted pre- and posttests on medical students before and after a single lecture on HPV vaccination. Changes in items related to attitude and comfort were examined. Student characteristics associated with changes in scores were also examined and compared. A total of 256 medical students participated in the pre- and posttests. Before the lecture, students demonstrated low knowledge of HPV vaccination and did not feel comfortable counseling parents of younger patients. However, students <30 years of age demonstrated significant improvements after the lecture in comfort. Asian and Hispanic students showed the greatest improvement in comfort with counseling, as did students who reported they had not received the HPV vaccine. Attending a single lecture given by an expert can improve medical students' attitudes and comfort with HPV vaccine counseling, especially if the students were not vaccinated themselves. This study suggests that including material on HPV vaccination in the standard medical student curriculum could help increase physician recommendation for the HPV vaccine.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Estudantes de Medicina , Aconselhamento , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação
13.
Adolesc Health Med Ther ; 10: 1-6, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30799964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic contact lenses (CCL) are popular among adolescents, but incorrect use can harm the eye. METHODS: This study assessed CCL hygiene behaviors among adolescents attending a Texas pediatric clinic. Anonymous surveys about CCL hygiene practices were administered to adolescents 13-18 years old. RESULTS: We found that 14% (53/392) of respondents had worn CCL, of which 83% were females. Over 70% reported first use at <15 years old. Knowledge about CCL was low and two-thirds of users had not been instructed on proper care. More than half stored them in water and did not rinse them with contact solution after removal. Over one-third wore CCL >8 hours/day. Moreover, 15% of CCL users reported borrowing someone else's CCL. Complications resulting from wearing CCL were common. CONCLUSION: This study highlights poor CCL hygiene among adolescents. These data demonstrate the need to develop interventions to educate adolescents on proper care and risks associated with CCLs.

14.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(3): 403-409, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601087

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess use, knowledge, and complications of cosmetic contact lenses (CCLs) among women of reproductive age. METHODS: A cross-sectional, anonymous self-administered survey assessing cosmetic or decorative contact lens knowledge and experiences was completed by 686 women in Texas in 2017. Main outcome measures were use, knowledge, and associated complications. RESULTS: Almost 1 in 4 women (164/686) reported prior use of CCLs and most had worn the lenses >3 times. Women born in the United States, who knew someone who wore cosmetic lenses, or had visited an eye doctor in the past year were more likely to have used CCLs. Knowledge scores were low and the majority of cosmetic lens users experienced complications (61%). The most frequently reported complications were eye pain and discomfort (35%); itchy, watery eyes (34%); and red, swollen eyes (28%). Borrowing lenses was significantly associated with medical complications (88% of borrowers reported complications). Among 18 respondents who sought medical attention for a CCL-related problem, only 11% obtained care within 24 hours. Few participants had discussed CCL use with an eye doctor in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: Many U.S. women have used CCLs obtained from unauthorized sources. Knowledge of safe practices is very limited and most users develop complications. Interventions are needed to educate the public about the risk of CCL use to reduce adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Lentes de Contato/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Lentes de Contato/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Texas , Adulto Jovem
15.
Vaccine ; 37(4): 595-601, 2019 01 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30580838

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is expected to reduce HPV-related disease and cancer in the US. However, many parents are hesitant to obtain the vaccine for their children. The purpose of this study is to examine how the reasons for refusing the HPV vaccine vary across regions of the US, across time, and by race/ethnicity. METHODS: This study used data on 13-17 year old adolescents collected by the National Immunization Survey - Teen (NIS-Teen) annually between 2008 and 2016. We evaluated the frequencies of parents who did not intend to vaccinate their children in the next year among unvaccinated children. Among these non-intenders, we evaluated how reasons for HPV vaccine hesitancy changed across time, by region of the US, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The proportion of non-intenders among unvaccinated decreased from 72% in 2010 to 58% in 2016. The most frequent reason for vaccine hesitancy was that parents felt HPV vaccination was not necessary (22.4%), followed by lack of provider recommendation (16.2%), and lack of knowledge (15.6%). Lack of provider recommendation increased in frequency as a reason for HPV vaccine hesitancy until 2012, then decreased in frequency through 2016. Cost was one reason that was elevated in all regions compared to the Northeast. Black non-intenders were less likely to report safety, costs, or their children's fear as reasons for not intending to vaccinate their children compared to white non-intenders. Hispanic non-intenders were more likely to report lack of knowledge and that the vaccine is not a school requirement as reasons not to vaccinate their children compared to white non-intenders. CONCLUSIONS: National advocacy for improving provider recommendation for HPV vaccination likely contributed to a sharp decline in HPV vaccine hesitancy due to lack of provider recommendation. Results indicate the need for multifaceted interventions to increase HPV vaccination.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Pais/psicologia , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Feminino , Geografia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(4): 693-701, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885413

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in prevalence of vaginal human papillomavirus (HPV) between 2009-2010 and 2013-2014 among both vaccinated and unvaccinated U.S. women. METHODS: We evaluated HPV prevalence among women 18-59 years old using cross-sectional survey data from three different cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Data were stratified into four age groups (18-26, 27-34, 35-44, and 45-49 years) to examine trends over time among women of different ages in the postvaccine era. Multivariable analyses, which controlled for descriptive variables, were used to examine the prevalence of quadrivalent vaccine-type HPV by vaccination status. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in the prevalence of vaccine-type HPV among women 18-59 years of age from 2009-2010 to 2013-2014. This decline was only significant in those 18-26 years old when the sample was stratified into the four age groups. Among vaccinated 18-26 year olds, HPV prevalence remained low from 2009-2010 (3.9%) to 2013-2014 (2.0%; prevalence ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.18-1.46). Unvaccinated women 18-26 years old also demonstrated a significant decrease over time from 19.5% in 2009-2010 to 9.7% in 2013-2014 (prevalence ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.91). Prevalence did not significantly change among unvaccinated women 26 years old or older. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in HPV infections among unvaccinated 18- to 26-year-old women suggests that young women in the United States are beginning to benefit from herd immunity resulting from the introduction of the HPV vaccine.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Coletiva , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vagina/virologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Vaccine ; 35(27): 3446-3451, 2017 06 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28526331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence that human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination may protect against oral HPV infection, no current research has demonstrated this in the general population. METHODS: We used repeated cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2009 and 2014. Participants 18-30years who indicated whether they had received the HPV vaccine and provided an adequate oral sample were included (N=3040). Oral HPV types were grouped by vaccine-type (types 6, 11, 16, 18) and by risk (high or low risk). Chi-square analyses compared oral HPV prevalence by vaccination status. RESULTS: Vaccinated adults had a lower prevalence of vaccine-type oral HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) compared to unvaccinated adults. Prevalence of non-vaccine high-risk oral HPV was similar between HPV vaccinated and unvaccinated participants. CONCLUSIONS: HPV vaccination appears to provide protection against vaccine-type oral HPV infection among males and females in the general population.


Assuntos
Boca/virologia , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/genética , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(9): 2150-2154, 2017 09 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28604258

RESUMO

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been available for over a decade but its uptake rate is still low. To explore the relationship between the HPV vaccination status of a child and their mother's beliefs, behaviors and knowledge, we surveyed 1497 women with at least one child aged 9-17 y between September 2011 and November 2015. Physician recommendation was the most important factor associated with reported child vaccination status. Mothers who reported receiving a provider recommendation for the HPV vaccine were 32 times more likely to have a child who had been vaccinated compared with mothers who did not report provider recommendation (aOR) = 32.17; 95% CI: 21.77, 47.54). Knowing someone who had received the vaccine was also strongly associated with vaccination uptake (59% vs 12%, p < .001). Additionally, prior HPV diagnosis (aOR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.18, 3.10) and knowing someone with cervical cancer (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.89) were associated with child vaccination status. Mothers who perceived moderate to high risk for their child contracting HPV or developing genital warts or cervical cancer were more likely to report that their daughters (but not their sons) had been vaccinated.


Assuntos
Mães/psicologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Núcleo Familiar , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA