Factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) recognizes distinct molecular features within hypoxia-inducible factor-α (HIF-α) versus ankyrin repeat substrates.

Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH) catalyzes the ß-hydroxylation of asparagine residues in HIF-α transcription factors as well as ankyrin repeat domain (ARD) proteins such as Notch and Gankyrin. Although FIH-mediated hydroxylation of HIF-α is well characterized, ARDs were only recently identified as substrates, and less is known about their recognition and hydroxylation by FIH. We investigated the molecular determinants of FIH substrate recognition, with a focus on differences between HIF and ARD substrates. We show that for ARD proteins, structural context is an important determinant of FIH-recognition, but analyses of chimeric substrate proteins indicate that the ankyrin fold alone is not sufficient to explain the distinct substrate properties of the ARDs compared with HIF. For both substrates the kinetic parameters of hydroxylation are influenced by the amino acids proximal to the target asparagine. Although FIH tolerates a variety of chemically disparate residues proximal to the asparagine, we demonstrate that certain combinations of amino acids are not permissive to hydroxylation. Finally, we characterize a conserved RLL motif in HIF and demonstrate that it mediates a high affinity interaction with FIH in the presence of cell lysate or macromolecular crowding agents. Collectively, our data highlight the importance of residues proximal to the asparagine in determining hydroxylation, and identify additional substrate-specific elements that contribute to distinct properties of HIF and ARD proteins as substrates for FIH. These distinct features are likely to influence FIH substrate choice in vivo and, therefore, have important consequences for HIF regulation.

Identification of residues in the N-terminal PAS domains important for dimerization of Arnt and AhR.

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH).PAS dimeric transcription factors have crucial roles in development, stress response, oxygen homeostasis and neurogenesis. Their target gene specificity depends in part on partner protein choices, where dimerization with common partner Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt) is an essential step towards forming active, DNA binding complexes. Using a new bacterial two-hybrid system that selects for loss of protein interactions, we have identified 22 amino acids in the N-terminal PAS domain of Arnt that are involved in heterodimerization with aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Of these, Arnt E163 and Arnt S190 were selective for the AhR/Arnt interaction, since mutations at these positions had little effect on Arnt dimerization with other bHLH.PAS partners, while substitution of Arnt D217 affected the interaction with both AhR and hypoxia inducible factor-1α but not with single minded 1 and 2 or neuronal PAS4. Arnt uses the same face of the N-terminal PAS domain for homo- and heterodimerization and mutational analysis of AhR demonstrated that the equivalent region is used by AhR when dimerizing with Arnt. These interfaces differ from the PAS ß-scaffold surfaces used for dimerization between the C-terminal PAS domains of hypoxia inducible factor-2α and Arnt, commonly used for PAS domain interactions.

Sulfonation and phosphorylation of regions of the dioxin receptor susceptible to methionine modifications.

Tagged murine dioxin receptor was purified from mammalian cells, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by capillary HPLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and -MS/MS. Several chromatographically distinct semitryptic peptides matching two regions spanning residues Glu(409)-Arg(424) and Ser(547)-Arg(555) of the dioxin receptor were revealed by de novo sequencing. Methionine residues at 418 and 548 were detected in these peptides as either unmodified or modified by moieties of 16 (oxidation) or 57 amu (S-carboxamidomethylation) or in a form corresponding to degradative removal of 105 amu from the S-carboxamidomethylated methionine. MS/MS spectra revealed that the peptides containing modified methionine residues also existed in forms with a modification of +80 amu on serine residues 411, 415, and 547. The MS/MS spectra of these peptide ions also revealed diagnostic neutral loss fragment ions of 64, 98, and/or 80 amu, and in some instances combinations of these neutral losses were apparent. Taken together, these data indicated that serines 411 and 547 of the dioxin receptor were sulfonated and serine 415 was phosphorylated. Separate digests of the dioxin receptor were prepared in H(2)(16)O and H(2)(18)O, and enzymatic dephosphorylation was subsequently performed on the H(2)(16)O digest only. The digests were mixed in equal proportions and analyzed by capillary HPLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and -MS/MS. This strategy confirmed assignment of sulfonation as the cause of the +80-amu modifications on serines 411 and 547 and phosphorylation as the predominant cause of the +80-amu modification of serine 415. The relative quantitation of phosphorylation and sulfonation enabled by this differential phosphatase strategy also suggested the presence of sulfonation on a serine other than residue 411 within the sequence spanning Glu(409)-Arg(424). This represents the first description of post-translational sulfonation sites and identification of a new phosphorylation site of the latent dioxin receptor. Furthermore this is only the second report of serine sulfonation of eukaryotic proteins. Mutagenesis studies are underway to assess the functional consequences of these modifications.

Amino acid substitutions in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain reveal YH439 as an atypical AhR activator.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is traditionally defined as a transcription factor activated by exogenous polyaromatic and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH/HAH) ligands. Active AhR induces genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism, including cytochrome P4501A1, which function to metabolize activating ligands. However, recent studies implicate AhR in biological events that are apparently unrelated to the xenobiotic response, implying that endogenous activation mechanisms exist. Three AhR genes in zebrafish (Danio rerio) encode proteins that demonstrate differential activation in response to PAH/HAHs, with the nonresponsive drAhR1a having some sequence divergence from the PAH/HAH-responsive AhRs in the ligand binding domain (LBD). We used these differences to guide the mutagenesis of mouse AhR (mAhR), aiming to generate variants that functionally discriminate between activation mechanisms. We found substitution of histidine 285 in the LBD with tyrosine gave a receptor that could be activated by isopropyl-2-(1,3-dithietane-2-ylidene)-2-[N-(4-methylthiazol-2-yl)carbamoyl]acetate (YH439), a potential AhR ligand chemically distinct from classic PAH/HAH-type ligands, but prevented activation by both exogenous PAH/HAH ligands and the endogenous activation mimics of suspension culture and application of shear-stressed serum. The differential response of H285Y mAhR to YH439 suggests that this activator has a novel mode of interaction that tolerates tyrosine at position 285 in the LBD and is distinct from the binding mode of the well characterized PAH/HAH ligands. In support of this, the PAH-type antagonist 3',4'-dimethoxyflavone blocked mAhR activation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin but not YH439. Furthermore, the strict correlation between response to exogenous PAH/HAH ligands and mimics of endogenous activation suggests that a PAH-type ligand may underpin endogenous mechanisms of activation.

The mammalian basic helix-loop-helix/PAS family of transcriptional regulators.

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)/PAS proteins are critical regulators of gene expression networks underlying many essential physiological and developmental processes. These include transcriptional responses to environmental pollutants and low oxygen tension, mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon (Dioxin) receptor and hypoxia inducible factors (HIF), respectively, and controlling aspects of neural development, mediated by the single minded (SIM) proteins. bHLH proteins must dimerise to form functional DNA binding complexes and bHLH/PAS proteins are distinguished from other members of the broader bHLH superfamily by the dimerisation specificity conferred by their PAS homology domains. bHLH/PAS proteins tend to be ubiquitous, latent signal-regulated transcription factors that often recognise variant forms of the classic E-box enhancer sequence bound by other bHLH proteins. Two closely related forms of each of the hypoxia inducible factors alpha and single minded proteins and the general partner protein, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), are present in many cell types. Despite high sequence conservation within their DNA binding and dimerisation domains, and having very similar DNA recognition specificities, the homologues are functionally non-redundant and biologically essential. While the mechanisms controlling partner choice and target gene activation that determine this functional specificity are poorly understood, interactions mediated by the PAS domains are essential. Information on structures and protein/protein interactions for members of the steroid hormone/nuclear receptor superfamily has contributed to our understanding of the way these receptors function and assisted the development of highly specific agonists and antagonists. Similarly, it is anticipated that developing a detailed mechanistic and structural understanding of bHLH/PAS proteins will ultimately facilitate drug design.

Novel DNA binding by a basic helix-loop-helix protein. The role of the dioxin receptor PAS domain.

Central issues surrounding the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) superfamily of dimeric transcription factors concern how specificity of partner selection and DNA binding are achieved. bHLH proteins bind DNA through the basic sequence that is contiguous with a helix-loop-helix dimerization domain. For the two subgroups within the family, dimerization is further regulated by an adjacent Per-Arnt-Sim homology (PAS) or leucine zipper (LZ) domain. We provide evidence that for the bHLH.PAS transcription factors Dioxin Receptor (DR) and Arnt, the DR PAS A domain has a unique interaction with the bHLH region that underpins both dimerization strength and affinity for an atypical E-box DNA sequence. A PAS swap heterodimer, where the DR bHLH domain was fused to Arnt PAS A and the Arnt bHLH fused to DR PAS A, gave strong DNA binding, but dimerization was only effective with the native arrangement, suggesting the PAS A domain is critical for each process via distinct mechanisms. LZ domains, which regulate heterodimerization for the bHLH.LZ family members Myc and Max, could not replace the PAS domains for either dimerization or DNA binding in the DR/Arnt heterodimer. In vitro footprinting revealed that the PAS domains influence the conformation of target DNA in a manner consistent with DNA bending. These results provide the first insights for understanding mechanisms of selective dimerization and DNA interaction that distinguish bHLH.PAS proteins from the broader bHLH superfamily.

Contribution of the Per/Arnt/Sim (PAS) domains to DNA binding by the basic helix-loop-helix PAS transcriptional regulators.

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) PAS transcriptional regulators control critical developmental and metabolic processes, including transcriptional responses to stimuli such as hypoxia and environmental pollutants, mediated respectively by hypoxia inducible factors (HIF-alpha) and the dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor (DR). The bHLH proteins contain a basic DNA binding sequence adjacent to a helix-loop-helix dimerization domain. Dimerization among bHLH.PAS proteins is additionally regulated by the PAS region, which controls the specificity of partner choice such that HIF-alpha and DR must dimerize with the aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (Arnt) to form functional DNA binding complexes. Here, we have analyzed purified bacterially expressed proteins encompassing the N-terminal bHLH and bHLH.PAS regions of Arnt, DR, and HIF-1alpha and evaluated the contribution of the PAS domains to DNA binding in vitro. Recovery of functional DNA binding proteins from bacteria was dramatically enhanced by coexpression of the bHLH.PAS regions of DR or HIF-1alpha with the corresponding region of Arnt. Formation of stable protein-DNA complexes by DR/Arnt and HIF-1alpha/Arnt heterodimers with their cognate DNA sequences required the PAS A domains and exhibited KD values of 0.4 nM and approximately 50 nM, respectively. In contrast, the presence of the PAS domains of Arnt had little effect on DNA binding by Arnt homodimers, and these bound DNA with a KD of 45 nM. In the case of the DR, both high affinity DNA binding and dimer stability were specific to its native PAS domain, since a chimera in which the PAS A domain was substituted with the equivalent domain of Arnt generated a destabilized protein that bound DNA poorly.

Stabilization of the biotinoyl domain of Escherichia coli acetyl-CoA carboxylase by interactions between the attached biotin and the protruding "thumb" structure.

We previously reported (Chapman-Smith, A., Forbes, B. E., Wallace, J. C., and Cronan, J. E., Jr. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26017-26022) that the biotinylated (holo) species of the biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP) biotinoyl domain is much more resistant to chemical modification and proteolysis than the unbiotinylated (apo) form. We hypothesized that the increased stability was due to a conformational change engendered by interaction of the domain with biotin protein ligase, the enzyme that attaches the biotin moiety. We now report that a BCCP-87 species to which the biotin moiety was attached by chemical acylation rather than by biotin protein ligase showed the characteristically greater stability of the holo biotinoyl domain. This result demonstrates that our hypothesis was incorrect; the attached biotin is solely responsible for the increased stability. The bacterial and chloroplast multisubunit acetyl-CoA carboxylases are unusual in that the highly symmetrical and conserved structure of the biotinoyl domain of the BCCP subunit is disrupted by a structured loop called the "thumb" that protrudes from body of the domain. Prior structural work showed that the thumb interacts with uriedo ring of the attached biotin moiety. We have tested whether the thumb-biotin interactions are responsible for the greater holo form stability by examination of two BCCP-87 species that lack the thumb. These BCCP species were produced in both the apo and holo forms, and their sensitivities to trypsin digestion were compared. The holo forms of these proteins were found to be only marginally more stable than their apo forms and much more sensitive to trypsin digestion than the wild type holo-BCCP-87. Therefore, removal of the thumb has an effect similar to lack of biotinylation, indicating that thumb-biotin interactions are responsible for most (but not all) of the increased stability of the holo biotinoyl domain. In the course of these experiments we demonstrated that treatment of Escherichia coli with the peptide deformylase inhibitor, actinonin, results in the expected (but previously unreported) accumulation of an N-formylated protein species.