Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 216, 2024 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the rate of benign histology among resected renal tumors suspected to be malignant is increasing. We evaluated the rates in the Republic of Korea and assessed the racial effect using recent multi-institutional Korean-United States data. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 11,529 patients (8,812 from The Republic of Korea and 2,717 from the United States) and compared the rates of benign histology between the two countries. To evaluate the racial effect, we divided the patients into Korean, Asian in the US, and Non-Asian in the US. RESULTS: The rates of benign histology and small renal masses in Korean patients were significantly lower than that in United States patients (6.3% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001) and (≤ 4 cm, 7.6% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001), respectively. Women, incidentaloma, partial nephrectomy, minimally invasive surgery, and recent surgery were associated with a higher rate of benign histology than others. CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, the rate of benign histology among resected renal tumors was significantly lower than that in the United States. This disparity could be caused by environmental or cultural differences rather than racial differences. Our findings suggest that re-evaluating current context-specific standards of care is necessary to avoid overtreatment.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Rim/patologia , Nefrectomia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
2.
Cancer ; 128(3): 479-486, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609761

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the utility of self-reported quality of life (QOL) metrics in predicting mortality among all-comers with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and externally tested the findings in a registry of patients with small renal masses. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) captured QOL metrics composed of mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores. Regression models assessed associations of MCS and PCS with all-cause, RCC-specific, and non-RCC-specific mortality. Harrell's concordance statistic (the C-index) and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) determined predictive accuracy and parsimony, respectively. Findings were tested in the prospective Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses (DISSRM) registry. RESULTS: In SEER-MHOS, 1494 patients had a median age of 73.4 years and a median follow-up time of 5.6 years. Each additional MCS and PCS point reduced the hazard of all-cause mortality by 1.3% (95% CI, 0.981-0.993; P < .001) and 2.3% (95% CI, 0.971-0.984; P < .001), respectively. Models with QOL metrics demonstrated higher predictive accuracy (C-index, 72.3% vs 70.1%) and parsimony (AIC, 9376.5 vs 9454.5) than models without QOL metrics. QOL metrics exerted a greater effect on non-RCC-specific mortality than RCC-specific mortality. External testing in the DISSRM registry confirmed these findings with similar results for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Models with self-reported QOL metrics predicted all-cause mortality in patients with RCC with higher accuracy and parsimony than those without QOL metrics. Physical health was a stronger predictor of mortality than mental health. The findings support the incorporation of QOL metrics into prognostic models and patient counseling for RCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Idoso , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Medicare , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Autorrelato , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Urol ; 208(4): 794-803, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35686837

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Active surveillance (AS) with the possibility of delayed intervention (DI) is emerging as a safe alternative to immediate intervention for many patients with small renal masses (SRMs). However, limited comparative data exist to inform the most appropriate management strategy for SRMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Decision analytic Markov modeling was performed to estimate the health outcomes and costs of 4 management strategies for 65-year-old patients with an incidental SRM: AS (with possible DI), immediate partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and thermal ablation. Mortality, direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were evaluated over 10 years. RESULTS: The 10-year all-cause mortality was 22.6% for AS, 21.9% for immediate partial nephrectomy, 22.4% for immediate radical nephrectomy, and 23.7% for immediate thermal ablation. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year, AS was the most cost-effective management strategy. The results were robust in univariate, multivariate, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Clinical decision analysis demonstrated that the tumor's metastatic potential, patient age, individual preferences, and health status were important factors influencing the optimal management strategy. Notably, if the annual probability of metastatic progression from AS was sufficiently low (under 0.35%-0.45% for most ages at baseline), consistent with the typical metastatic potential of SRMs <2 cm, AS would achieve higher health utilities than the other strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to immediate intervention, AS with timely DI offers a safe and cost-effective approach to managing patients with SRMs. For patients harboring tumors of very low metastatic potential, AS may lead to better patient outcomes than immediate intervention.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Conduta Expectante
4.
J Urol ; 207(6): 1214-1221, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35050721

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The role of endogenous testosterone in de novo prostate cancer pathogenesis in humans remains unclear. The effect of testosterone on the tumor genome is not explored. We sought to explore the correlation between perioperative testosterone level and genomic risk score in a cohort of men who underwent radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (2013-2018) and had adverse pathological features in their final surgical specimens (positive margin, and/or pT3a or higher). The outcome of interest was the genomic risk score: low (<0.45), intermediate (0.45-0.6) and high (>0.6). The associations between serum testosterone level and 188 gene expression-based signatures were examined. Secondary outcomes of interest included biochemical recurrence and receipt of secondary treatment. RESULTS: The median genomic risk score was lower in the low testosterone group compared to the intermediate and normal testosterone groups (0.38 vs 0.52 vs 0.53, respectively; p=0.049). There was no difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival between the 3 testosterone groups (p=0.9). Patients with low testosterone levels had higher odds of receiving secondary treatment (OR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.14-4.50; p=0.02) than those with normal levels. A total of 43 (of 188) gene expression signatures were associated with testosterone level (p <0.05). In total, 33 signatures were positively associated with serum testosterone levels, including 12 signatures involved in DNA repair pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the correlation of preoperative testosterone level on the tumor transcriptome and showed no clinical correlation between pre-defined genomic risk score groups and testosterone groups. This study adds to the notion of the limited role of endogenous testosterone on the development of de novo high-risk localized prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Testosterona , Genômica , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco
5.
J Urol ; 205(2): 370-382, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915080

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Cancer specific survival for men with early stage (I to IIB) testicular germ cell tumors is greater than 90% with any management strategy. The data regarding the comparative effectiveness of surveillance, primary chemotherapy, radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were synthesized with a focus on oncologic outcomes, patient reported outcomes, and short and long-term toxicities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed®, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1980 to 2018 for studies addressing the effectiveness of surveillance, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, according to pathology and clinical stage, for men with an early stage testicular germ cell tumor. RESULTS: Cancer specific survival ranged from 94% to 100% for patients with early stage testicular germ cell tumors regardless of tumor histology and initial management strategy. For men with seminoma the median cancer specific survival was 99.7% (range 97% to 100%), 99.5% (96.8% to 100%) and 100% (100% to 100%) among those managed by surveillance, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Median cancer specific survival for men with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors was 100% (range 98.6% to 100%), 100% (96.9% to 100%) and 100% (94% to 100%) when managed by surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence rates and toxicities varied by management strategy. For men with seminoma surveillance, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with median recurrence rates of 15%, 2% and 3.7%, respectively. For men with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors the median recurrence rates were 20.5%, 3.3% and 11.1% for surveillance, chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, respectively. Surveillance was associated with minimal toxicities compared to other approaches. Primary chemotherapy had the highest rate of short-term toxicities and was associated with long-term risks of metabolic syndrome, hypogonadism, renal impairment, neuropathy, infertility and secondary malignancies. Toxicities with radiotherapy included acute dermatitis and long-term gastrointestinal complications, infertility and high rates of secondary malignancies (2% to 3%). Patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection had significant risk of toxicity perioperatively and long-term infertility in men with anejaculation. Transient detriments in patient reported outcomes and quality of life were noted with all management options. CONCLUSIONS: Men with early stage testicular germ cell tumors experience excellent cancer specific survival regardless of management strategy. Management options, however, differ in terms of associated recurrence rates, short and long-term toxicities, and patient reported outcomes. The profile for each approach should be clearly communicated to patients and matched with patient preferences to offer the best individual outcome.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Espaço Retroperitoneal , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Conduta Expectante
6.
J Urol ; 205(5): 1286-1293, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356478

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A paradigm shift in the management of small renal masses has increased utilization of active surveillance. However, questions remain regarding safety and durability in younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 60 or younger at diagnosis were identified from the Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses registry. The active surveillance, primary intervention, and delayed intervention groups were evaluated using ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, χ2 and Fisher's exact tests, and Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 224 patients with median followup of 4.9 years 30.4% chose surveillance. There were 20 (29.4%) surveillance progression events, including 4 elective crossovers, and 13 (19.1%) patients underwent delayed intervention. Among patients with initial tumor size ≤2 cm, 15.1% crossed over, compared to 33.3% with initial tumor size 2-4 cm. Overall survival was similar in primary intervention and surveillance at 7 years (94.0% vs 90.8%, log-rank p=0.2). Cancer-specific survival remained at 100% for both groups. There were no significant differences between primary and delayed intervention with respect to minimally invasive or nephron-sparing interventions. Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 96.0% and 100% for primary and delayed intervention, respectively (log-rank p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance is a safe initial strategy in younger patients and can avoid unnecessary intervention in a subset for whom it is durable. Crucially, no patient developed metastatic disease on surveillance or recurrence after delayed intervention. This study confirms active surveillance principles can effectively be applied to younger patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Conduta Expectante , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem
7.
Lancet Oncol ; 21(5): e280-e291, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359503

RESUMO

Protracted conflicts in the Middle East have led to successive waves of refugees crossing borders. Chronic, non-communicable diseases are now recognised as diseases that need to be addressed in such crises. Cancer, in particular, with its costly, multidisciplinary care, poses considerable financial and ethical challenges for policy makers. In 2014 and with funding from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, we reported on cancer cases among Iraqi refugees in Jordan (2010-12) and Syria (2009-11). In this Policy Review, we provide data on 733 refugees referred to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Lebanon (2015-17) and Jordan (2016-17), analysed by cancer type, demographic risk factors, treatment coverage status, and cost. Results show the need for increased funding and evidence-based standard operating procedures across countries to ensure that patients have equitable access to care. We recommend a holistic response to humanitarian crises that includes education, screening, treatment, and palliative care for refugees and nationals and prioritises breast cancer and childhood cancers.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Política de Saúde , Oncologia/organização & administração , Neoplasias/terapia , Refugiados , Socorro em Desastres/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Jordânia/epidemiologia , Líbano/epidemiologia , Masculino , Oncologia/economia , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Formulação de Políticas , Refugiados/legislação & jurisprudência , Socorro em Desastres/economia , Socorro em Desastres/legislação & jurisprudência , Síria/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Urol ; 203(5): 894-901, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609176

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We synthesized evidence on the comparative performance characteristics, benefits and harms of diagnostic imaging modalities used in combination with serum tumor markers for clinical staging of testicular germ cell tumors. The diagnostic imaging modalities included computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired reviewers independently searched PubMed, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1980 to 2018 using title-abstract and full-text screening to identify original studies of the use of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, chest radiographs and serum tumor markers for the clinical staging of early stage testicular germ cell tumors. RESULTS: We found 21 studies of a total of 1,702 patients. With significant bias and limitations to the data, the performance characteristics of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography for staging of the retroperitoneum were similar, with median sensitivity ranging from 67% to 80% and median specificity ranging from 95% to 100%. Computerized tomography of the chest (median sensitivity 100%) was more sensitive than a chest radiograph (median sensitivity 76%), especially in men with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. The addition of serum tumor markers to diagnostic imaging improved staging sensitivity from 38% to 41% to 59% to 60%. No study specifically reported on harms of the imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of axial imaging with computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and serum tumor markers demonstrates optimal performance characteristics for staging early stage testicular germ cell tumors. There is little use for chest computerized tomography in men with seminoma, negative abdominal imaging and negative serum tumor markers.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
9.
J Urol ; 204(1): 33-41, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967523

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review of studies assessing the diagnosis and effectiveness of management strategies for germ cell neoplasia in situ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired investigators independently searched for studies on the diagnosis and management of testicular germ cell neoplasia in situ using PubMed®, Embase® and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1980 through August 2018. The reviewers then extracted data and assessed quality. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. Among patients with a testicular germ cell tumor the prevalence of contralateral germ cell neoplasia in situ was 4.0% to 8.1%. No significant difference in the risk of metachronous malignancy was identified between unscreened groups vs those with routine contralateral testicular screening (cumulative incidence 1.9% vs 3.1%, p=0.097, respectively). Patients who presented with a history of testicular atrophy, age less than 40 years or cryptorchidism had an elevated risk of germ cell neoplasia in situ. In patients with germ cell neoplasia in situ the use of 18 to 20 Gy radiation therapy demonstrated the lowest rate of disease on followup biopsies (0% to 2.5%), compared to a median of 30% on biopsies in patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy. Carboplatin based treatment regimens demonstrated positive disease in 66% to 75% on repeat biopsies. Rates of treatment related hypogonadism were 30.8% to 38.5% and 13% to 20% for patients treated with 18 to 20 Gy and cisplatin based chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a testicular germ cell tumor the risk of having contralateral germ cell neoplasia in situ is 4% to 8%, with a greater risk in patients with testicular atrophy, cryptorchidism or age less than 40 years. The risk is high enough to support use of contralateral testicular biopsy in patients with these risk factors for germ cell neoplasia in situ. However, routine screening is not advised. Radiation therapy with 18 to 20 Gy was associated with much better eradication of germ cell neoplasia in situ than chemotherapy. Chemotherapy may eradicate germ cell neoplasia in situ in up to two-thirds of patients undergoing chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for a primary germ cell tumor. Further research and data are needed to strengthen many aspects of the evidence base.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/terapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
10.
Cancer ; 125(22): 3947-3952, 2019 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31355922

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Using a large, nationally representative, population-based cancer registry, this study systematically evaluated the impact of the location and burden of extranodal testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) metastases on survival. METHODS: Men with stage III TGCTs captured by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry from 2010 to 2015 with distant extranodal metastases were identified. Clinicopathologic information was collected, and patients were subdivided according to the specific organ site or sites of metastatic involvement (lung, liver, bone, and/or brain). Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS), and model performance was assessed with Harrell's C statistic. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-nine patients with stage III TGCTs were included with predominantly nonseminomatous histology (84%). Most patients (91%) had pulmonary metastases, whereas 20%, 10%, and 10% had liver, bone, and brain metastases, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 21 months, 19% of these men died of TGCTs. When they were grouped by the primary site of metastasis, patients with more than 1 extrapulmonary metastasis exhibited the worst CSS (hazard ratio [HR] vs isolated pulmonary involvement, 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.60-7.00; P < .01). Among patients with isolated extrapulmonary involvement, those with brain metastases had the poorest survival (HR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.98-5.28; P < .01), and they were followed by patients with liver (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.56-3.35; P < .01) and bone metastases (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.11-3.50; P = .02). Harrell's C statistic (multivariable) was 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: The site of metastatic involvement affects survival outcomes for patients with TGCTs, and this may reflect both the aggressive biology and the challenging treatment of these tumors. Further incorporation of organotropism into current prognostic models for metastatic TGCTs warrants attention.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Adulto , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Programa de SEER , Adulto Jovem
14.
Urol Oncol ; 42(3): 71.e9-71.e18, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278631

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Lack of strict indications in current guidelines have led to significant variation in management patterns of small renal masses. The impact of the urologist on the management approach for patients with small renal masses has not been explored previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with small renal masses from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2013 were identified and assigned to primary urologists. Mixed-effects logistic models were used to evaluate factors associated with different management approaches, estimate urologist-level probabilities of each approach, assess management variation, and determine urologist impact on choice of approach. RESULTS: A total of 12,402 patients with 2,794 corresponding primary urologists were included in the study. At the individual urologist level, the estimated case-adjusted probability of different approaches varied markedly: nonsurgical management (mean, 12.8%; range, 4.9%-36.1%); thermal ablation (mean, 10.8%; range, 2.4%-66.3%); partial nephrectomy (mean, 30.1%; range, 10.1%-66.6%); and radical nephrectomy (mean, 40.4%; range, 17.7%-71.6%). Compared to patient and tumor characteristics, the primary urologist was a more influential measured factor, accounting for 13.6% (vs. 12.9%), 33.8% (vs. 2.1%), 15.1% (vs. 8.4%), and 13.5% (vs. 4.0%) of the variation in management choice for nonsurgical management, thermal ablation, partial nephrectomy, and radical nephrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists in the management of small renal masses and appears to be driven primarily by urologist preference and practice patterns. Our findings emphasize the need for unified guidance regarding management of these masses to reduce unwarranted variation in care.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Urologistas , Estudos de Coortes , Medicare , Nefrectomia
15.
Urol Oncol ; 42(8): 248.e11-248.e18, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Life expectancy models are useful tools to support clinical decision-making. Prior models have not been used widely in clinical practice for patients with renal masses. We sought to develop and validate a model to predict life expectancy following the detection of a localized renal mass suspicious for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using retrospective data from 2 large centers, we identified patients diagnosed with clinically localized renal parenchymal masses from 1998 to 2018. After 2:1 random sampling into a derivation and validation cohort stratified by site, we used age, sex, log-transformed tumor size, simplified cardiovascular index and planned treatment to fit a Cox regression model to predict all-cause mortality from the time of diagnosis. The model's discrimination was evaluated using a C-statistic, and calibration was evaluated visually at 1, 5, and 10 years. RESULTS: We identified 2,667 patients (1,386 at Corewell Health and 1,281 at Johns Hopkins) with renal masses. Of these, 420 (16%) died with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range 2.2-8.3). Statistically significant predictors in the multivariable Cox regression model were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.05); male sex (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.08-1.81); log-transformed tumor size (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.30-2.24); cardiovascular index (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.32-1.67), and planned treatment (HR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06-0.18 for kidney-sparing intervention and HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.35 for radical nephrectomy vs. no intervention). The model achieved a C-statistic of 0.74 in the derivation cohort and 0.73 in the validation cohort. The model was well-calibrated at 1, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with localized renal masses, accurate determination of life expectancy is essential for decision-making regarding intervention vs. active surveillance as a primary treatment modality. We have made available a simple tool for this purpose.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Causas de Morte , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia
16.
Urology ; 165: 89-97, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808140

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate racial, gender, and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and their impact on survival. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with mRCC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with systemic therapy and cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) utilization. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 31,989 patients with mRCC were identified with 30.2% receiving CN, 51.6% receiving systemic therapy, and 25.8% receiving no treatment. Females were at lower odds of receiving systemic therapy (OR 0.91, P <.01) and increased odds of no treatment (OR 1.14, P <.01). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients were at decreased odds of receiving CN (OR 0.75, P <.01 and OR 0.86, P = .01, respectively). Black patients were at decreased odds of receiving systemic therapy (OR 0.85, P <.01) and increased odds of no treatment (OR 1.41, P <.01). Adjusting for demographic and disease variables, Black patients were at increased risk of death (HR 1.06, P = .03), largely due to less use of systemic therapy and CN; survival differences disappeared after accounting for receipt of therapy (HR 0.99, P = .66). CONCLUSION: There are racial, gender, and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of mRCC which are associated with a disparity in overall survival. Dismantling systemic barriers and improving access to care may lead to reduced disparities and improved outcomes for mRCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Adolescente , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Urology ; 147: 192-198, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33137349

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of testis-sparing surgery (TSS) in 2 specific circumstances: small, nonpalpable masses suspected to be benign and masses suspicious for germ cell tumor in a solitary or functionally solitary testicle or bilateral disease. METHODS: Our institutional review board-approved testicular cancer registry was reviewed for men who underwent inguinal exploration with intent for TSS (2013-2020). The attempted TSS and completed TSS groups were evaluated for differences using Student's t test for normally-distributed variables, chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests for proportions, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for nonparametric variables. RESULTS: TSS was attempted in 28 patients and completed in 14. TSS was completed only if intraoperative frozen section demonstrated benign disease, except for 1 patient with stage I seminoma and solitary testicle. Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section analysis was 100% and 93%, respectively. There were no significant differences in demographics between attempted vs completed TSS cohorts. Median tumor size was significantly smaller in the completed TSS cohort (1.0 cm vs 1.7 cm, P = .03). In patients with unilateral masses without history of testis cancer, the testis was successfully spared in 9 of 22 cases (41%). In patients with bilateral disease or germ cell tumor in solitary testis, the testis was spared in 5 of 6 cases (83%). At a median follow up of 12.2 months, all patients were alive, and 27 of 28 had no evidence of disease (96%). CONCLUSION: TSS is safe and effective for small, benign masses and in the setting of bilateral disease or tumor in a solitary testis.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Orquiectomia/métodos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Adulto , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Orquiectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Testículo/patologia , Testículo/cirurgia , Carga Tumoral
18.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(6): 1409-1417, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32646809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer-specific survival for men with clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma approaches 100%, regardless of the management approach chosen after orchiectomy. Given the young age and high survival rate of these patients, there has been a shift toward minimizing treatment-related morbidity and cost. In this context, non-risk-adapted active surveillance (NRAS) has emerged as a desirable management strategy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, quality of life, and economic values of postorchiectomy NRAS for CSI seminoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We developed a decision analytic Markov model to estimate the costs and health outcomes of competing postorchiectomy management strategies for otherwise healthy 30-yr-old men with CSI seminoma. INTERVENTION: Real-world current practice, comprising active surveillance and adjuvant therapies (reference arm), was compared with empiric adjuvant radiotherapy (option 1), empiric adjuvant chemotherapy (option 2), risk-adapted active surveillance (RAAS; option 3), and NRAS (option 4). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), medical costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, mortality, and unnecessary treatment avoidance were estimated over a 10-yr period. Uncertainties in model input values were accounted for using univariate, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: NRAS dominated all other management options, offering the lowest per-patient health care cost ($3839) and the highest QALYs gained (7.74) over 10 yr. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, NRAS had the highest chance of being most cost effective. Although NRAS resulted in the highest rate of salvage chemotherapy (20% vs 6% radiotherapy, 6% chemotherapy, 15% current practice, and 16% RAAS), it had the same mortality rate compared to current practice (2.5%). NRAS also allowed 80% of patients to avoid unnecessary treatment compared with 46% for current practice and 52% for RAAS. Study limitations included model simplifications, model parameter assumptions, as well as the absence of patient preference as a decision factor. CONCLUSIONS: NRAS maintains high cure rates for CSI seminoma, minimizes unnecessary treatment, and is cost effective compared with other management strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma is one of the most common forms of testicular cancer. Surgery is the first step in the treatment of men with this disease, and some men may receive additional treatment with radiation or chemotherapy afterward. As most men are cured with surgery alone, non-risk-adapted active surveillance (NRAS), which involves routine monitoring with imaging and blood tests for disease recurrence after surgery, has become a desirable treatment option. Our study shows that in addition to maintaining high survival rates and avoiding unnecessary radiation and chemotherapy, NRAS is cost effective for the health care system.


Assuntos
Seminoma , Neoplasias Testiculares , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Seminoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Conduta Expectante
19.
J Robot Surg ; 15(2): 309-313, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32572754

RESUMO

The objectives were to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node (R-RPLND) dissection for testicular germ cell tumors. A retrospective analysis was performed on all primary R-RPLND cases performed by a single surgeon, who performs both open and R-RPLND at a high-volume academic institution, between August 2013 and August 2019. Data on patient demographics, operative techniques, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were obtained. 28 men were identified who underwent primary R-RPLND. The majority of patients (N = 21, 75%) had clinical stage I disease, and a bilateral template was more commonly performed than either single side alone (N = 13, 46%). Of note, two cases involving clinical stage II disease were converted electively from robotic to open procedures at the discretion of the surgeon. R-RPLND patients experienced no intraoperative complications. The median follow-up time was 8 months (interquartile range 4-29 months). One (4%) patient developed a disease recurrence at 10 months after R-RPLND. Conclusion: primary R-RPLND is a safe and efficacious procedure for carefully selected men with stage I and II non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis. Long-term data are needed to evaluate the comparative oncologic efficacy with open surgery and the notably high rate of chylous ascites.


Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Orquiectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Segurança , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Urology ; 151: 129-137, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890618

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gender differences in the management of clinical T1a (cT1a) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) before and after release of the AUA guidelines for management in 2009, which prioritized nephron-sparing approaches. METHODS: Patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with cT1a RCC from 2004 to 2013 in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare were analyzed. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with radical nephrectomy (RN) for cT1a RCC before (2004 to 2009) and after (2010 to 2013) guidelines release. Predictors of pathologic T3 upstaging and high grade pathology in the postguidelines period were examined using multivariable logistic regression among patients who underwent RN or partial nephrectomy. RESULTS: Twelve thousand four hundred and two patients with cT1a RCC were identified, 42% of whom were women. Overall, the likelihood of RN decreased postguidelines (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44, P <.001), but women were at increased odds of undergoing RN both before and after guideline release (OR = 1.27, P <.001 and OR = 1.37, P <.001, respectively) upon multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. Tumor size >2 cm was also associated with increased likelihood of RN before and after guidelines (OR = 2.61, P <.001 and OR = 2.51, P <.001, respectively). In the postguidelines period, women had significantly lower odds of pathologic upstaging (OR = 0.75, P = .024) and harboring high grade pathology (OR = 0.71, P <.001) compared to men. CONCLUSION: Gender differences persist in the management of cT1a RCC, with women having higher odds of undergoing RN, even after release of AUA guidelines and despite having lower odds of pathologic upstaging and high-grade disease.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Programa de SEER , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA