RESUMO
Background: Dual stenting technique (DST) is still mandatory for some true bifurcation lesions (BLs), but drug-coated balloon (DCB) alone may offer a new optional treatment with the potential benefits of fewer implants. However, procedural safety presents a concern when using DCB-only to treat true BLs. This study sought to explore the safety and efficacy of the DCB-only strategy for the treatment of true BLs. Methods: Sixty patients with TBLs were randomly assigned to be treated by a DCB-based strategy or DST-based strategy. All patients received angiographic follow-up scheduled after one-year and staged clinical follow-up. The primary endpoint was the one-year late lumen loss (LLL) and cumulative major cardiac adverse events (MACEs) composed of cardiac death (CD), target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), target lesion thrombosis (TVT), or target vessel/lesion revascularization (TLR/TVR). The secondary endpoint was the one-year minimal lumen diameter (MLD), diameter stenosis percentage (DSP) or binary restenosis (BRS), and each MACE component. Results: The baseline clinical and lesioncharacteristics were comparable with similar proportions (20.0% vs. 23.3%, p = 1.000) of the complex BLs between the two groups. At the one-year follow-up, LLL was significantly lower in the DCB-based group (main-vessel: 0.05 ± 0.24 mm vs. 0.25 ± 0.35 mm, p = 0.013; side-branch: -0.02 ± 0.19 mm vs. 0.11 ± 0.15 mm, p = 0.005). MLD, DSP and TLR/TVR were comparable between the groups. The one-year cumulative MACE, all driven by TLR/TVR (6.7% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.667), was low and similar without CD, TVMI or TVT in both groups. Conclusions: Compared to the DST strategy, the DCB- based strategy may be safe and effective in treatment of the selected true BLs. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical registration number is ChiCTR1900024914.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We developed a new fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold covered with biodegradable poly-L-lactic acid film (Firesorb-C) for coronary artery perforation. Our vitro tests have demonstrated that Firesorb-C was technically feasible but its biosafety and efficacy warranted further validation in vivo. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biosafety and efficacy of Firesorb-C in rabbits. METHODS: Firesorb-C was deployed at the zone from the abdominal aorta to the right iliac artery in five rabbits. Angiography was conducted for evaluation of the immediate efficacy and 6-month biosafety and biodegradability of the Firesorb-C. Meanwhile, optical coherence tomography (OCT), histological light microscopy (HLM) and scan electron microscopy (SEM) were performed to evaluate the biosafety. RESULTS: All Firesorb-C applications were successfully implanted without procedure-related complications. In all treated rabbits, angiography showed that the Firesorb-C had completely sealed the opening of the left iliac artery without blood flow in its branches but with full patency of the right iliac artery immediately post-procedurally, while the covered membrane of Firesorb-C had been degraded and blood flow was restored in the left iliac artery and its branches at 6 months. OCT also found that the occluded left iliac artery had been reopened and the stented segment was almost fully endothelialized without in-stent restenosis at 6 months, meanwhile HLM and SEM confirmed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: Firesorb-C is associated with excellent efficacy, biosafety and biodegradability in rabbits. It shows promise as a replacement for conventional covered stents for treatment of coronary artery perforation or for use in other clinical situations.